don't think you've heard the last of it. >> reporter: he wants a longer, more-stringent deal and is trying to force the issue by accusing iran of not complying with the terms of the existing deal, even though all five other signatories, including russia and china, say otherwise. so does the secretary of state. >> iran is in technical compliance of the agreement. >> reporter: iranian president hassan rouhani said his country will not renegotiate, and warned a u.s. pullout would have broader implications. is there a diplomatic way out? "talking would be a waste of time," he said, "and in the future, no other government would be willing to negotiate with a country that tramples on les commitments." "alking away from the iran deal may also complicate u.s. attempts to get north korea to agree to give up its nuclear weapons. senior national security iontributor michael morrell: >> so if we back away in any way ayom our nuclear agreement with iran, we send a signal to north korea that a future president might unravel their deal, too.