First of all, i don t believe that any military action can bring us closer to solve the problem in any way, or to hold anybody accountable. really? you don t believe that having murdered all these people in your country, you don t believe that israel has a right to seek to destroy those who committed this act? stephen, there s an attempt always to talk about october 7th as if it is the beginning of everything. it was horrible, it was painful, and we feel sorry for it, but it is not the beginning. it didn t happen in a vacuum. it didn t happen just because bunch of crazy people just wanted to slaughter other people. we have. although i do not feel in any way that i can legitimise the killing of children and women and civilians i was always against that
First of all, i don t believe that any military action can bring us closer to solve the problem in any way, or to hold anybody accountable. really? you don t believe that having murdered all these people in your country, you don t believe that israel has a right to seek to destroy those who committed this act? stephen, there s an attempt always to talk about october 7th as if it is the beginning of everything. it was horrible, it was painful, and we feel sorry for it, but it is not the beginning. it didn t happen in a vacuum. it didn t happen just because a bunch of crazy people just wanted to slaughter other people. we have. although i do not feel in any way that i can legitimise the killing of children and women and civilians i was always against that but i am against killing civilians
Anybody accountable that may have violated the law within her jurisdiction. how would you describe her as a litigator, as a trial lawyer? how would you describe her as cross-examining witnesses, for example? she s very tough. it s mastery of the courtroom if i could be so i guess hyperbolic. but she s one, again, she studies hard. she studies well. she knows the law. she knows her case so she is able to easily cross-examine witnesses, lure them down various paths, get them to commit to things that help her case or demonstrate their lack of credibility. i think one of the things, too, is she s very familiar with the bench in fulton county. she has practiced there as an tant d.a. for years. so she knows each judge s personality and how to be successful in that particular courtroom.
Jail but with this now is a jon he is at the chicago fraternal order of police. no cash bail what does this mean for law and safety in the protection of the people of chicago? good afternoon eric, thanks for having me for the reality is even prior to this law being pushed through in in january of 21, even members should say offenders who are out on electronic monitoring their story after story they are committing crimes because unfortunately county does not hold anybody accountable. the supreme court again along party lines decided th there s nothing wrong with this legislation would could not be further from the truth. it is going to lead to more crime for there s no way to look at it any other way. the one provision that does not get addressed enough is the obligation for the judges now have the ability to waive cash
I mean, look, jesse. the #th floor, someone needs to go up to the seventh floor of the fbi headquarters and they need to padlock the seventh floor. they need to completely remove all of those executive staff members from the director down and he made it very clear, his buzz words were sobering. sobering is another way to say shocking and then he said hold anybody accountable. so he made it very clear no training, no revised policy, no implementation of new procedures. that s not what he clued us into. he said our lack of holding people accountable is not going to change the fbi as it exists today. that tells us unless we are prepared to completely overhaul the fbi from the top down, we are going to live with the existing state of affairs as basically the fbi is going to be able to snub their nose at the general public just get away
Disturbing new legislation, listen to this. it would now allow courts in the state of california to consider whether or not a parent acknowledges their child s, quote, preferred gender identity during custody cases. translation, if the state thinks you re not woke enough or you don t take their position or agree with them, you will be at risk of losing your child to another parent that would validate whatever the child identifies with, or, at a minimum, you will be at a distinct disadvantage for thinking differently than what the state is demanding. wow. here with reaction, she is the host of outnumbered, cohost emily compagno, fox news contributor tammy bruce. let me get this straight. you know, we have a lot of states no-fault divorce, you don t hold anybody accountable. so if you have a young child and says i want to identify as this sex or this sex, and if you re a
The california craziness that continues, we have disturbing new legislatiodisturislationn. listen to this. it would now allow courts in the state of californi e a to tor or n consider whether or notot a parent acknowledges, their child s, quote, preferred gender identity during custody cases. translatio casesn, if the state thinks you re not woke enough or you don t taku e position or agree with them, you will be at risk of losing your child to another parent. that would validate whatever the child identifies wl with or at a minimum you will be at a distinct disadvantage for thinking differently than what the state is demandin g. wow. here with reaction, she is the host of outnumbered host, emilys campana, fox news contributor tammy bruccontrie. u let me get this straight. you know, we have a lot of state, no fault divorce. you don t hold anybody accountable. sodontable. if you have a young childhi and says, i want to identifykay,
Against this guy to me, this is all it all is integrated this is another attack on our democracy, and i don t think people fully understand what that means they think attacks on our democracy is only like taking away somebody s vote or what happened on january 6th. this is an attack of a jury, which is in our constitution in the seventh amendment, the right to jury trial, that basically takes the power of citizens away to hold anybody accountable. that s what a jury is. it s an integral part of our democracy. the founders put it in our constitution, and the governor of texas instigated, as you know, by tucker carlson and kyle rittenhouse, who weighed in on this as well, decided he knows better than 12 average folks sitting in austin, texas, to make this decision again, it s another attack on our democracy. you know, and right, and fascism has many features. and one of them is this sort of lust to be able to harm or kill
Line and all of this is that we can have hearings until we are in blue of the face. the hearings are not holding anybody accountable. the way we hold everybody accountable is to cut funding. that is what he wants. we need more ability to be able to cut some funding from these people because that is the way they are held accountable. so people like chip freud do believe they have been given assurances that some of this will happen going forward. we will see. it really does come down to the battle on monday. that is a different battle. this is the specific set up and negotiated behind closed doors. these are the specifics that they re going to put on paper and vote on them. and they have to be approved by a majority of congress, setting the rules. the power up the rules committee . essentially they say what anything is. they say how long it ibase. they change but it could be 90
Saying silent on a guy who s been revealed to be have lied repeatedly about his own background. sitting silent on all of this. in the hopes of securing the magical to 18. well, i think that what we have seen in everybody on this panel has watched is that they don t hold anybody accountable. the republican party establishment and republican party leadership hold no one. they watched donald trump according to the washington post lie some 30,000 times. never held him accountable. in the course of the. and i mean in the end it is all about power in this and i think that kevin mccarthy recognizes that lauren boebert and marjorie taylor greene are probably much closer to the center of where the republican voters in this country are and any sort of mainstream republicans that are left in leadership or left in as elected officials just keep winning mind jonathan that if you look at almost every single