Stay updated with breaking news from Aversion. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
in 2006 he republican voters made a very bold and strong decision to move away from the older republican party to the new approaches caring about the border, caring about china. having a born policy and the natural interest. they sought desantis was in the mold but maybe without some of the drama or problems associate with trump. his campaign team to have been more of an aversion to the older republican party that republican voters are not as excited about my advice would be if he wants to hang in there and he is definitely the solid number two is to remember why people like him and a focus on taking on the old establishment d.c. but republican voters are trying to move away from. >> fund raising his team is pointing to this massive number, never back down is the impact supporting him. they say this in newsweek as well. the desantis campaign had a massive what her 50 million-dollar hall between his campaign and his affiliated never back down impact far exceed the 35 million those reported by the trump campaign
summers going forward because of the effects of climate change, the greater frequency of these wildfires and so on. so how can we as a country prepare to adjust to do this? what can we do in the short term to take better care of ourselves, to protect our lungs, but what are some things we need to do longer range, for people with vulnerabilities in particular, that this is the new reality? >> jonathan, i'm so glad you asked that. i think we have a graphic here for the viewers to look, to take them through. there are things you can do to keep yourself safe. first of all, go to airnow.gov. air now.g-o-v to check your report. it may seem hazy. the fact is you spend most of your life indoors. if it is hazy outside, make sure your indoor air quality is as clean as possible, so stay informed. if it is bad outside, it is risky to be bad inside. avoid physical aversion.
what does it all mean? i'm telling you nobody knows. when you don't know we should not be something stupid. when you don't know you have to watch and monitor carefully and make sure we are protecting our country. that is the most important part. the very beginning was nerve-racking because of the nuclear arsenal. and as you know it's the largest in the world. it is frightening to think because prigozhin is not a good man. he may very well be worth. it is not fairly so. jon: it is fascinating. he reports dark nobody was killed in all of this. but the russian government and few have an aversion to telling the truth. so maybe there are deaths we do not know about. >> you very well could be right. there's so much we do not know about this. i will tell you this at their deaths we do not know about it
of liability? >> not always. there's an assumption of the risk, which is an old common law term which does believe people even if they are negligent from liability because someone assumed the risk. you have to know the risk and you have to voluntarily assume it. however, if there's operational negligence, if the company was cutting corners, if they had an aversion to safety protocols, then that was not covered in the waiver. and therefore, they would be vulnerable to a lawsuit. >> trace: interesting because cbs reports the following. lawsuits and industry experts had raised serious safety concerns about the project years before the sub's disappearance. in 2018, a professional trade group warned that oceangate's experimental approach to the design of the titans could lead potentially catastrophic outcomes which brings up the next question which is, if they want the company, i don't care how many waivers you signed, if they want this company that they were facing some kind of danger
>> when we looked out here at the whole wall, it was covered. that really, really, really freaked me out. depression, anxiety, you feel violated. when you are inside the house it sounds like it's raining because they randomly let go where they are hanging and drop. >> that's fun. they just jump off the wall. the crickets don't bite. they don't sting. they do destroy crops and other vegetation. they also create a driving hazard because here is the detail you want with your cereal, as their bodies are crushed by car tires, they make the road slippery. a state and -- >> yeah. >> ew from the other side of the studio. the state says they won't be going away soon as they seem to be adapting to elko's natural habitat. friends for life. they have also been reported in idaho and oregon. so y'all get ready. >> do you have a particular aversion to crickets?
>> no, i don't have an aversion to crickets. i don't like the things that -- i get flying. i get that. but if they just jump off the wall? that's a problem. >> i do not blame you. also, the big fish didn't get away but the prize did. the crew of the boat sensation pulled in a 619-pound blue marlin at a tournament off the coast of north carolina. it took more than six hours to reel it in and they thought they'd reeled in a more than $3 million prize, but tournament officials disqualified this whopper because a shark had chomped part of its underside, you know, the tail apparently your marlin can't be maimed or m mutilated the winning catch went to a boat crew with their marlin weighing 484 pounds. i lose points because i don't have all of the 619-pound marlin? >> i don't understand it. environmental lawyer and anti-vaccine activist robert f.
obtained during the trial's discovery process. now, the filing states that the evidence includes quote, information pertaining to ongoing investigations and warns that its disclosure could quote, compromise those investigations and identify uncharged individuals. smith's request for trump silence comes as no surprise, considering the fact that the ex president hasn't exactly kept a low profile post arraignment. just hours after he left the courthouse on tuesday, trump blasted the indictment as corrupt and cassatt as a part of a political pursuit designed to destroy him. -- really stands in stark contrast to what went down inside the courtroom that day. according to reporters, trump said nothing during tuesday's proceedings. instead, he sat silently with his arms crossed, while his lawyer entered his plea of not guilty. it seems donald trump, a man who has built an entire political career out of an aversion to silence, and a shameless ability to lie, for
proceedings. instead, he sat silently with his arms crossed, while his lawyer entered his plea of not guilty. it seems donald trump, a man who has built an entire political career out of an aversion to silence, and a shameless ability to lie, for now at least, has finally met his match. see, in a courtroom lawyers can't simply make assertions without facts. nor can they actually just talk whenever they want. unlike trump, they can't insist that something is correct, just because they say so. as the atlantic has noted, it is hard to think of something less trumpian than a courtroom. during this trial, trump will be forced to do something he has been avoiding for years, and that is confront reality. the ex president wants you to believe that his political enemies have all gotten off -- for the very same crimes he has been accused of. that is not true. those comparisons won't stand up in court. for starters, trump's repeated
kept a low profile post arraignment. just hours after he left the courthouse on tuesday, trump blasted the indictment as corrupt and cassatt as a part of a political pursuit designed to destroy him. -- really stands in stark contrast to what went down inside the courtroom that day. according to reporters, trump said nothing during tuesday's proceedings. instead, he sat silently with his arms crossed, while his lawyer entered his plea of not guilty. it seems donald trump, a man who has built an entire political career out of an aversion to silence, and a shameless ability to lie, for now at least, has finally met his match. see, in a courtroom lawyers can't make assertions about facts. nor can they actually just talk whenever they want. unlike trump, they can't insist that something is correct, just because they say so. the atlantic has noted, it is hard to think of something less trumpian then a courtroom. during this trial, trump will