Stay updated with breaking news from Potentialities. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
matthew mcconaughey. >> dana: their chances? >> i think they get beat. texas is a red state. they threw so much money and effort last time expecting to carry it for biden, defeat senator john cornyn and take the texas house of representatives and pick up at least three republican seats and they didn't win any and they spent an ungodly amount of money doing it. robert francis o'rourke will enter the race for the third election in the row and i suspect the outcome will be the same. defeat, defeat. >> bill: it was nebraska last time, iowa. he ran and blogged about it and he was doing the running thing. it went on for weeks. >> are you talking about the drive across america to find his soul and understand america and think about the potentialities. he was born to do this and i
in fact, on the contrary, there was probably more police in central london yesterday because it was black friday. it was a busy shopping day. so the police were vigilant and already prepared for potentialities. >> yeah. they do have quick response units placed all around the place. as you point out, that is a heavily policed part of london. we have to leave it there. thank you so many. always appreciate it. >> pleasure. dutch suspects aofficials ae looking for a suspect who shot and stand three minors in the hague. police say the situation is complex and they have not named a suspect, nor a possible motive as of yet. the dutch national broadcaster, nos, reports no indication at the moment that this was a terror incident.
young women for sex or those who participated in sex acts with him, knowing the girls were under age and paying for this, they can be charged with sex trafficking. i thought that was reassuring that the investigation will continue into other wrongdoers. i also note that william barr said that the inspector general is investigating this. they would be looking to see whether the bureau of prisons failed to follow protocols or whether the protocols are inadequate and needs to be changed. they also said the fbi is investigating. they would be looking for crimes. is there a murder that occurred here by an inmate or prison guard? were his civil rights violated through some sort of abuse? that's the only reason why the fbi would be investigating. >> wide reaction here. what might they be looking into at this moment? barbara brought up some potentialities there. >> i think they'll look into what were the prison guards
washington correspondent charlie savidge, known as nbc contributor and white house reporter jonathan la mere, also an msnbc political analyst. charlie, you talk about a lot of potentialities and ways don jr. could run afoul of the law. depending on how the grand jury interprets the facts for the special count, robert s. mueller iii gathered about the two trump towers meeting it could find the foreigners elected the federal complain election act and don jr. conspired in that offense. what do you think he's most at risk for, charlie? >> well, there's a variety of different laws that ban foreign assistance to campaigns. not just the provision of that assistance but even promises to provide such assistance or requests to provide such assistance even if it never actually materialized. some of those laws under the federal election campaign act have never actually been used to
but they were trying to get that information out to the public as soon as possible so that it did not create panic. i do want to mention that we were there last year not too long ago inside that very building which is located actually in diamondhead in a bunker, that is where the emergency management operations that are there 24 hours a day monitoring everything from whether there are hurricanes coming, whether there is an earthquake, whether there is any kind of a missile or some sort of attack, they are constantly 24 hours monitoring to find out, you know, what they need to do for the population there. so inside this bunker which is inside of a crater basically, inside of a hillside, they are looking at all the potentialities that could happen to the folks in hawaii. and they showed us exactly what the procedure would be if there was an incoming ballistic missile or any kind of nuclear attack on hawaii from north
>> let me just ask you before the skype goes out, in 2013, a thaad missile defense system was deployed to guam. do you have any idea when it was last tested, and are you confident that it will be operational to protect your citizens if need be, god forbid? >> there was a test, i would say, a month or so ago. there has been this constant testing. i'm not seeing a shooting of any type of missile for defense purposes, but a testing of the system. and again, there have been -- because we're in american territory and seem to be in the middle of a lot of things, there is a lot of dialogue communication correlation between our administration, the civil government and the local military command in the marianas, so there is an exchange of information and looking at potentialities of worst-case scenarios, there is a coordinated effort. i feel very confident not only
this was an elaborately coriaographed gag order on sally yates. >> this headline from the washington post says the trump administration sought to block sally yates from testifying on behalf of russia. in addition to his work, remembered his former kouns thool house intelligence committee. so i guess the way to get at this again is how, by the treatment of yates, can you discern perhaps what yates has to say or had to say in past tense. >> well, let's break it down. my understanding is that yates' testimony would have differed from the official white house accounts. now we don't know exactly in what way her testimony would have differed from the official white house accounts but we can think about two potentialities. what she told to white house
yates. >> this headline from the washington post says the trump administration sought to block sally yates from testifying on behalf of russia. in addition to his work, remembered his former kouns thool house intelligence committee. so i guess the way to get at this again is how, by the treatment of yates, can you discern perhaps what yates has to say or had to say in past tense. >> well, let's break it down. my understanding is that yates' testimony would have differed from the official white house accounts. now we don't know exactly in what way her testimony would have differed from the official white house accounts but we can think about two potentialities. what she told to white house counsel and said hey, you've got a problem on your hand with your national security advisoadvisor. that's point one. the second thing she could have
up? trump has said explicitly in the last 24 hours, nothing is off the table when it comes to iran when asked the question. you asked the administration why they're using this threatening language. they told you they hope iran will heed the warning and change its behavior. the general just said, words will not yield anything. do they believe that? do they understand that? >> well, they said that they were reviewing different options, everything from economic, which we saw today, to they wouldn't say the word military, but they wouldn't take it off the table in our conversations. so you know that over at the pentagon, they have a stack of plans. that's their job. for potentialities. if iran launches a missile, then we could do this. if iran harasses ships in the gulf, then perhaps we could deploy our own ships and set up some sort of blockade. so, they could step up to these options. the thing is, iran understands what's going on here. it understands that it is being goaded into a response. i think that's why you saw the foreign minister today tweet
privileges and potentialities in a faith. but in a culture we're always like he's not what he seems or she seems. this man is what he seems to be. and one thing. he has really small writing. he said who am i have to big handwriting? >> so he didn't want to show arrogance through handwriting. >> this is a humility. there is a distraction of pomp within his practice of catholicism, which is new. >> the differences between pope john paul benedict and francis. and people never want to diss john paul but there is something about francis. and maybe part is he's argentinian and very effusive in