Stay updated with breaking news from Prier. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
with prier publication and we found it -- found about a third of the virus in a vector as it is called which is a tool that scientists use in laboratory to make large copies of something as if they make a vaccine or make something else. and this is pretty unmistakable. this is a smoking gun for the nipa virus this is what you expect to see at say two years ago for sars-cov 2. >> so doctor, actually it must concern you that this lab has a history of safety violations especially given the now relatively sure that coronavirus covid leak there and working with a virus 80, clear up to 80% not 8 but 80% and possibly working on making this virus more powerful and -- you know, is this the kind of lab that has security profile to
with prier publication and we found it -- found about a third of the virus in a vector as it is called which is a tool that scientists use in laboratory to make large copies of something as if they make a vaccine or make something else. and this is pretty unmistakable. this is a smoking gun for the nipa virus this is what you expect to see at say two years ago for sars-cov 2. >> so doctor, actually it must concern you that this lab has a history of safety violations especially given the now relatively sure that coronavirus covid leak there and working with a virus 80, clear up to 80% not 8 but 80% and possibly working on making this virus more powerful and -- you know, is this the kind of lab that has security profile to
20 samples soarnghted associated with prier publication and we found it -- found about a third of the virus in a vector as it is called which is a tool that scientists use in laboratory to make large copies of something as if they make a vaccine or make something else. and this is pretty unmistakable. this is a smoking gun for the nipa virus this is what you expect to see at say two years ago for sars-cov 2. >> so doctor, actually it must concern you that this lab has a history of safety violations especially given the now relatively sure that coronavirus covid leak there and working with a virus 80, clear up to 80% not 8 but 80% and possibly working on making this virus more powerful and -- you know, is this the kind of lab that has security profile to
on fighting corruption domestically that is helpful in ukrainian colleague, andriy order to convince president trump ultimately that this is -- yermak, as well as from a u.s. person, i don't now remember >> with all due respect, whether it was my staffer or someone from the embassy, and the readout was that it was a ambassador volker, we heard from two witnesses this morning that good phone call, that it was a those investigations were not official u.s. policy. ambassador volker, i don't know congratulatory phone call for the president's win in the if you understand what you were parliamentary election, that getting yourself into. but sitting here today i trust president zelensky did reiterate you understand that pressuring ukraine to involve itself in his commitment to fighting corruption and advancing reform u.s. domestic policy is just in the ukraine, and that president renewed his invitation simply wrong. i yield back the allowance of my for president zelensky to come to the white house. >> and i believe you said that time. that readout was exactly as you >> mr. turner. expected the call to go, is that >> i yield my time to jim right? >> that's what we were trying to jordan. >> i thank the gentleman. tee up. ambassador volker, you were the >> i just want to show you once again the july 25th text that special representative to ukraine, is that right? you wrote to andriy yermak which >> that is correct. >> and prier to that in your was the message that you were diplomatic service you were relaying to him so that he could ambassador to nato, senate prepare president zelensky. confirmed ambassador to nato in your distinguished diplomatic and you'll recall this, right, career. so it may not bother you when where you said that this was the you're referred to as irregular message, good lunch, thanks, heard from white house, assuming channel, but it bothers
and it ought to be the same when it comes to impeachment. somebody is not a whistle-blower he's not whistle-blowerring on anything we don't already know. he's using newspaper articles he's making conclusion statements it is really, really complete farce that's why democrats need this guy. and yet the whistle-blower had a professional tie to 2020 democratic candidate this was in washington examiner by new york, quote, the ig said whistle-blower worked or had had a relationship with one of the democratic candidates. the i.t. said whistle-blower had a professional relationship on the 20 20 candidates than another person. what atkin ton inspector general said that whistle-blower was a registered democrat prier working relationship with the current 2020 democratic presidential candidate in the third person what kind of inspector general is this? that comes to you. he has secondhand information none of it is first hand he said look i'm a democrat i have a connection with -- with one or more of the in thes
who asked him to be helpful in a situation initially that had to do with with hillary clinton. that they were doing the investigation which he thought was a law enforcement investigation. he's essentially claim that he was an asset in two prier investigations one dealing with a murder of his freaked friend and other with wall street issues saying help with something else and he said oaks. this is his story. he says eventually, and he claims that it had to do with clinton foundation, and they were asking him to help them with more regard to that that's all he said about that. >> okay and he all had had affair allegedly with -- christina or whatever -- this russian is she a entia? >> this is where it gets interesting she enters the country and he said he met her by chance at a meeting conference and she knows what about he did all of this okay. they have developed a friendship.
situation initially that had to do with with hillary clinton. that they were doing the investigation which he thought was a law enforcement investigation. he's essentially claim that he was an asset in two prier investigations one dealing with a murder of his freaked friend and other with wall street issues saying help with something else and he said oaks. this is his story. he says eventually, and he claims that it had to do with clinton foundation, and they were asking him to help them with more regard to that that's all he said about that. >> okay and he all had had affair allegedly with -- christina or whatever -- this russian is she a entia? >> this is where it gets interesting she enters the country and he said he met her by chance at a meeting conference and she knows what about he did all of this okay. they have developed a friendship. this becomes entwined with
Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20190605:22:48:00 vimarsana.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from vimarsana.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
certainly be willing to share it. i don't know. it's very easy for democrats to remain galvanized and to remain loyal and remain together right now when their opposition is someone as polarizing -- leland: hold on, we even i saw that from nancy pelosi in 2009-2010 when you had president obama in the white house. there was really no opposition, and she still was able to whip votes in a pretty prier the natural way. >> yeah. she's, you know, you gotta give nancy pelosi credit, she is a powerful player in washington, and she is able to keep her caucus in line. she does a fantastic job, and she has common freighted that -- demonstrated that since she assumed the speakership this time around. leland: you have the scoreboard at 2-0, nancy pelosi. we'll see if that changes in 21 days. meantime, i hear it's going to get kind of chilly in minneapolis. stay warm for us, all right? >> i'll do my best.
significant in the sense of what that could mean long term in terms of impact. >> so, did company representatives ever directly answer questions about their prier record? >> reporter: we asked three or four different times. they never really answered the question. and kept coming back to that same nonanswer. i just want to let you know right now, you can really smell this. it's giving me a little bit of a head ache. and you can see it. it's very clearly, still on the beach. that caution tape keeping people from going to the beach. this beach is going to be closed for seven days. a beautiful slice of life here in santa barbara. it's a lovely place people like to visit but they won't be anytime this week. >> when they have nonanswers it makes it seem like everybody else thinks they're stupid.