Stay updated with breaking news from Ratliff. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
A Columbia civil rights leader reflected on her experiences of prejudice and segregation Monday as she celebrated the birthday of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. NA
A Columbia civil rights leader reflected on her experiences of prejudice and segregation Monday as she celebrated the birthday of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. NA
some adults in the room but one thing is the intelligence director, ratliff, that role during the election year it was used for trump's political advantage and was installed apparently for that exact purpose and there were other political appointees of donald trump inserted into the agencies to try to use the agencies for political purposes. so our institutions held and we talked about how the courts held during the frenetic months of november and december when we had all these crazy, unfounded, baseless claims that were just
FOX and Friends-20200930-10:51:15 archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
congressmen blatherring on about joe biden and conspiracy theories and quite another to have a professional attorney excuse trump's behavior under oath. speaking of gop congressman, axios says their plan is to gum up the works. doug collins is planning to engage chairman jerry nadler with a bunch of procedural maneuvers. it could get a lot messier in judiciary where jordan and ratliff are joined by matt gaetz and louis gohmert >> it should get pretty hot under the collar as we go along. today the house committee is circulating its report to its members. we're watching out for any
president trump and told him the republican, looked like he pictures, if they got busted about his meetings be the member was heading down rabbit holes, talk about boring -- i thought, after the airline reviewed of my staff could hear security footage. as a result, they terminated his president trump on the phone what is this guy doing? when jim jordan got in, he made asking ambassadors sondland frequent flyer program and about the investigations. >> the president was speaking the point that you just annulled his 400,000 miles. loud enough for your staff elucidated, which was, why do >> greg: that's like when you member to overhear this? you exactly think this is give other people's urine dear >> he was. evidence that deserves to be >> greg: this is third person impeached? the problem, of course, is the remove now from the staff member president said it was a perfect parole officer. >> juan: how do you find a cat at the airport? who overheard it. call. you can say, yeah, he made some >> dana: people only seized on it because taylor did not have small mistakes. >> jesse: quigley does. >> greg: all right. this in his original deposition. he said it was a perfect call. a staffer of his said, i need to nothing wrong, he'll do it >> katie: speaking of cats. again. this is a good reason why you tell you about this because i >> greg: it's getting to the should not be food in your car. take a look at these cats didn't tell you beforehand so point now where it's a little crawling through the window of much like abbasid or sondland, irritating. i get it. he said i need to amend and make a great resume, the experience is impressive. the window, having a party, sure i have everything, i do not but don't you think that was the crawling all over with their think it's fair to say that they point to begin with? paws in the leather seats. are no name. they have very sharp nails. they didn't want to do this. they weren't the whistle-blower. the experience, they really played that hard to be visiting her parents in the impressive because the testimony countryside of south carolina, was in. when she saw all of these cats i think when ratliff asked them at least we ask, why did you getting in a car, running lead with weak testimony so you around, jumping up the console, can say, there's going to be having an insane time. good stuff next week when people argue for impeachment click are really going to pay she says the cats were probably attracted by the popcorn, chips, click we didn't want to be here attention? you lead with your best punch. in the first place. ranch, and the ranch dressing. we were here as witnesses, they you start week and going to have a strong finish? >> greg: recognized one of those cats from the baseball were asked are you against no one is going to do that. game. wasn't that one of the cats? trump.
>> will have to wait and see what the polls say but anecdotally i will tell you i had a republican friend sent me a note saying wow, the republicans sliced and diced the democrats today. they are done. two seconds later, democratic friend sent me a note saying the democrats totally destroy the republicans today. it's over. opinions have been hardened. you could see what you wanted to see in today's hearing. we had not seen up to now is how this republican team would work together and i think what you saw today from the members is used on message cohesion, and ability to execute on the strategy. they had a strategy and they were working together and they yielded back to jim jordan and mr. ratliff over and over again. they brought more heat and passion the democrats did and i think at some ways that might be persuasive to some people and others it might be very grading. the point that they bring up, these two witnesses, as you see
the ukrainian establishments were not in favor of him and out to get him. >> i will allow the question but are you asking -- >> are you seriously interrupting our time here? >> i won't dock this into the time. i want to be clear, ambassador, if you are able to verify the things that counsel asked you is fine, otherwise, questions from the majority or minority that assumes facts before you, you should be caution about that. >> mr. chairman, point of order. the time is with the minority counsel. >> mr. ratliff. first 45 minutes and literally had an objection to almost the foundation of every question mr.
goldman asked regarding facts and not evidence leaving but house resolution 660 does not say we are under the federal rules of evidence. it is your position that i should be asserting objections to questions that violate the federal rules of evidence, let me know now because this hearing is going to change significantly. >> as i said mr. ratliff, i will answer the question. >> i think the gentleman has a different question about the rules. what are the rules that's going to govern this? >> i am asking and yielding you for a question to the question that i just asked. >> what purpose do you seek recognition? >> to answer mr. ratliff's question? >> i have answered it. >> you have not answered my question whether or not i should be asserting facts not in evidence or leading objections to questions that are oppoposedm