we're tracking lee as it moves across the atlantic and closer to the east coast. rescuers scramble to reach a cave explorer more than 3,000 feet under the surface. new footage just released showing his condition. i'm john berman with sara sidner and kate bolduan and this is "cnn news central." some big questions lingering about the investigation in fulton county, georgia, over the 2020 election. they are about to be answered. next hour we expect to see the full and final unredacted report from the fulton county special grand jury. now, this was the grand jury that was brought together for the initial investigation that ultimately led to then the separate grand jury handing up indictments against form trump and 18 other co-defendants. back in february nine pages of this report were released to the public, you probably remember this, but a lot was missing, including who the jury thought should be charged with crimes. the judge overseeing that case held back portions the report over due process concerns. now obviously that charges have been filed those concerns are no longer, and this full report can definitely give a fuller picture of everything that jury saw in the seven months of investigating what happened in georgia. did they recommend more people should have been charged? we will soon see. cnn's nick valencia outside the court in atlanta, paula reid and evan perez also standing by. nick, let's start with you, how is this expected to play out today? >> reporter: big question is expected to be answered today. the public will be given insight for the first time into how closely the indictments issued by fulton county district attorney track with the panel's recommendations that were issued back in december. we've been waiting for this report as you mention in part since february. it was then that judge mcburney who has been presiding or who presided over the special purpose grand jury process, he had released parts this have report but now we're expected to get the full report. he had not issued or not released the panel's recommendations on who to charge because he said he wanted to proekt it the rights of due process, but with these charges now filed in a ruling that he issued just about -- over a week ago he had said that the due process concerns are now a moot point. now we wait to the full report. the special purpose grand jury worked for about seven months and heard from 75 witnesses and unlike a regular grand jury they were singularly focus and had subpoena power which fani willis needed to compel some witnesses to testify. today will be the final word from the grand jury and we expect to see how closely their recommendations tracked with ultimately the decision that was made by fani willis and potentially there could be some big surprises in this report which is expected to be released in just under an hour. kate? >> nick, standing by for that. paula, let me bring you in on this. we talked about 75 witnesses, at least 75 witnesses came before this special grand jury. who all did the grand jury speak to that we know of? >> reporter: yeah, there was an extensive list of people they spoke with. in addition to some people that have been charmed, with he spoke to senator lindsey graham, georgia governor brian kemp. they spoke to so many different witnesses over the course of seven months. what i'm looking for today is was there any differentiation between what fani willis eventually did, who she listed as co-conspirators and what was recommended by the grand jury. if you look at the list of unindicted co-conspirators, particularly people like boris epshteyn, thomas bitten of judicial watch, phil waldron, i'm going to be looking to see what the grand jury recommended about these people, were any recommended to be charged and they decided to do them as an unindeed co-conspirators. that's one of the things i'm looking for today. >> and how it all is described in these pages is going to be important historical record as we watch this unprecedented case unfold. and for the state of things let me get over to evan perez. evan, we're going to learn more today, but when you look at the current state of the case that da fani willis is bringing and preparing as we now have all of the people charged, pleading not guilty, there's still a lot still up in the air with regard to this georgia prosecution. >> reporter: that's right. and, look, some of what this special grand jury found is going to find its way, perhaps, into some of the arguments you see from the district attorney as she tries to try to make sure this case stays on the rails, stays on course to be tried in state court. that's one of the things she's trying to do. she's also asked for all 19 defendants to be brought to trial as soon as october, which is something that the judge overseeing this, scott mcafee has already thrown a lot of doubt over, but then of course the other part of this, kate, is that you have mark meadows who has asked a federal judge to move the entire case or at least his case to federal court and what that mulg -- how that ruling comes down really has an impact -- will have an impact on the other defendants. it is possible that they decide -- the judge decides to move all of the defendants to federal court and of course the former president has already said in his court filing this week that he may be filing his own requests to move the case to federal court which of course is a precursor to another request which is to dismiss all of it because he believes he is immune. what we see in this special grand jury report all of the things that this grand jury found i think will be an interesting look -- a window into how the da approaches some of these questions offer the next couple of months of litigation. >> that's a great point. evan, thank you so much. evan will be standing by, paula will be standing by, nick will be standing by, much more to some. thanks, guys. >> with us now former federal prosecutor gene rossi, former u.s. district attorney for the eastern district of virginia. if there are people listed in this special door report that the special grand jury wanted to indict but were not ultimately indicted, what's the major take away there? >> major take away is this, fani willis exercised proper prosecutorial discretion in not throwing spaghetti at the wall and creating a spaghetti indictment. you have 30 defendants, you throw it at the wall and hope one of them sticks including trump. so that's a positive sign if the number in the report is greater than the number in the indictment. and the other thing that's important here is for evidentiary purposes if they gave immunity to people, that will probably come out of the report, but also the defense is take advantage of that because con spear testify statements even if they are not in the indictment their statements come in and that's an evidentiary hurdle that the defense could fight. the last point i want to make on this is you're going to see if there are transcripts in that report and transcripts for a defense attorney, i was a prosecutor for 30 years and a defense attorney for seven, transcripts are golden for cross-examination. >> i'm curious, you know, if there was no one else that was indicted but if there was someone that the grand jury thought should be indicted, can we make the assumption that some of them have flipped, some have decided to cooperate? >> share ration you asked a great question. when i did grand jury work my goal was to flip people like pancakes, okay? i used to use that analogy all the time. even if you indict 19 some are going to flip like pancakes, the prisoners that i talked with john a couple days ago, sara, you're absolutely right, if they have people that testified in the grand jury, referenced in the grand jury, did or did not get immunity, they probably likely flipped for or are about ready to flip and that's not good for the 19 defendants in that indictment. >> help me ask better questions, then. >> i just want to know -- >> this report is going to be released -- >> you ask good questions. >> in the next hour or so we're going to get this report. give us the guide. how should we look at this? what's the how-to guide to reading this special grand jury report? >> well, first off, it's very unusual for me. grand jury reports, transcripts, should be secret. i'm a fed guy so they're secret until a court order or some statute says you have to disclose it had so this is all foreign to me. so that report if it's full some, if it's fulsome will have a summary of what each witness said and that is incredibly important for mark meadows. maybe it could embolden him or buttress his motion for removal. maybe it could help powell and chesebro in their motion for severance, it could draw in other defendants to join the removal or the severance. knowledge is power. knowledge about the witness is power. the more knowledge you have about the witness is helpful for the defendant. if they have transcripts they have to call some of those witnesses, they announced 150, i'm sure some will be in the report. i would ask how many in the 150 are in the report. they will probably have transcripts which prosecutors dread. >> gene rossi -- >> i mean, you are -- have you had a lot of coffee this morning because i love your energy and i want to know where you got it from. >> i'm 67, i know i look like i'm 39, but i've got to say this, phil mattingly, you had that little coffee incident, i do want to know what his -- critiqued him on because i have a dpaur, she doesn't talk to me anymore. i exaggerate. happy birthday, brooke. >> gene rossi, great to see you, thank you very much. an education and so much more this morning. appreciate it. kate? >> and so much more. what else could come? we're also watching this, we're watching and waiting for president biden. he will soon be touching down in new delhi, india, for the big g20 gathering of leaders. biden is set to meet with the indian prime minister modi this morning, we're tracking that. big issues on the agenda of course like climate change and debt relief among them and also the war in ukraine. notably two people not attending the summit this year, china's xi jinping and russia's vladimir putin. jeremy diamond is following the president in new delhi, joining us now. what is the white house saying about the an sense of xi jinping and vladimir putin this time? >> reporter: president biden himself said that he is disappointed that xi jinping will not be at this g20 summit. the two leaders last met at the g20 summit last year in indonesia but u.s. officials say that xi's absence does provide an opening for president biden to make the pitch that he came here to make and that is to try to prove to the developing world that the united states is here for them and that the united states is the most reliable partner for them in the future. the president is coming here not just with empty words but with direct commitments, commitments to reforming the multilateral banks including the world bank and to try to boost funding for the world bank by tens of billions of dollars. those are some things that those developing countries have been looking for and the g20 unlike the g7 does include many of those developing countries such as india, for example, which is why we're seeing such a big focus here on those issues. but there's no question that regardless of whether xi jinping and vladimir putin are here, we will nonetheless see a fractured, a very divided g20 on some of the core issues to be discussed here including climate change but perhaps most notably on russia's invasion of ukraine. it was that issue that prevented a joint communiqué from being issued last year from all of the leaders of the g20 in part because russia is part of it, because china which refused to condemn russia's invasion of ukraine is part of the g20 but also india has refused to sign on so some of the western-lead sanctions. there is no question that president biden will have a packed g20 summit. the question is whether or not at the end of it there will be some joint communiqué or if they have to once again resort to a leaders statement which will note the major differences among those countries. >> what, if any, progress is made in terms of the western alliance, especially when talking about the host country india with regard to support for ukraine against russia's invasion. thanks for being there, jeremy. hurricane lee is now a monstrous category 5 storm in the atlantic. when people can feel some of the effects of this extremely dangerous storm and what its track is going to be. plus police are expected to give an update on that manhunt for a convicted killer. we will bring you the very latest out of pennsylvania. also rescuers are waiting for an american caver's help to improve before they can pull him out of a turkish cave 3,000 feet below the ground. we have new recorded video from mark dickey. i look forward to working with everyone to safely get myself out with their assistance. as you can see i'm up, i'm alert, i'm talking, but i'm not healed on the inside yet, so i will need a lot of help to get out of here. it followed me everywhere. so i consolidated it into a low-rate personal loan from sofi. geget a personal loan with low fixed rates. borrow up to $100k. and no fees required. sofi. get your money right. shingles. some describe it as an intense burning sensation or an unbearable itch. this painful, blistering rash can disrupt your life for weeks. it could make your workday feel impossible. the virus that causes shingles is likely already inside of you. if you're 50 years or older, ask your doctor or pharmacist about shingles. purple mattresses exclusive gel flex grid draws away heat relieves pressure and instantly adapts. sleep better. live purple. right now save up to $900 off mattress sets during purple's labor day sale. visit purple.com or a store near you. we, the moms who have lost our children to social media harms. we, we, we have had... enough. our politicians have failed. working for lobbyists, not us. we need your voice to pass the kids online safety act this fall. join us. join us. join us. join us. ♪ let's lead the way. (psst psst) ahhhh... with flonase, allergies don't have to be scary spraying flonase daily gives you long-lasting, non-drowsy relief. (psst psst) flonase. all good. release of the unredacted full report from the special grand jury in the georgia 2020 election subversion case. a big question is did that grand jury recommend that more people be charged than the da ultimately decided on. that da fani willis is taking on republicans in congress sending a blunt response to the republican chair of the house judiciary committee jim jordan. house republicans led by jordan launched an investigation into how willis has handled that investigation accusing her of being politically motivated by issuing indictments of donald trump and others and in her response she did not hold back saying in the letter that jordan was trying to obstruct criminal proceedings in her state and also saying this, your attempts to invoke congressional authority to intrude upon and interfere with an active criminal case in georgia is flagrantly at odds with the constitution, going on to write, the defendants in this case have been charged under state law with committing state crimes. there is absolutely no support for congress purporting to second-guess or somehow supervise an ongoing criminal investigation and prosecution. joining us right now is democratic congresswoman from pennsylvania mad lean dean, an impeachment manager during donald trump's second impeachment, also sits on the judiciary committee. thank you so much for coming in, i always appreciate your time. the judiciary is investigating the da, republicans say at least that they are -- the da also said in her response to jim jordan, and i wanted to gt to your take on, she writes, your letter makes clear that you lack a basic understanding of the law, its practice and the ethical obligations of attorneys generally and prosecutors specifically. i will take moments to respond. it gives me the right to ignore your investigative efforts, do you think the da should ignore the investigative efforts by the judiciary committee? >> well, i think she was smart to speak to it and to say very, very clearly that we have no role interfering with a state prosecution. we have separate institutions in this government, but you can see what mr. jordan is trying to do, he's trying to carry the caustic party of the former president and trying to interfere in this one avenue to justice, the georgia case. i think she was wise to actually speak to it and to underline that there is no constitutional bases and there is a very negative impact to this. if we were able to subpoena and interfere with ongoing prosecution and investigation our institutions break down. >> that does lead to a question. would you recommend that this district attorney ignore a subpoena coming from the committee? >> i don't want to get into that kind of a hypothetical. we take a look at what we just saw this week in terms of mr. navarro. everyone is accountable to the rule of law. the prosecutor in georgia is accountable to the rule of law and so far she is walking that line very smartly, very wisely and has charged this former president with very, very serious crimes, but let's take a look at the people that mr. trump is surrounded by and has been surrounded by. they flout the rule of law. mr. jordan himself is in violation of a subpoena. so mr. jordan is just talking out of both sides of his mouth in a desperate attempt to try to help the former president not be prosecuted. but, do you know what, he will be prosecuted. and that's what i take from the four prosecutions so far, four pathways to justice and i bet there will be more. >> you also -- you wear several hats as every member of congress does and i will say as every woman does as well, you have many roles. you also sit on foreign affairs. i was just speaking with jeremy diamond as he's landing in india for the g20 with the large focus going to have to be on the war in ukraine and there are questions about the amount of support that the congress and the american people will continue to have for the war in ukraine. you just returned from a trip overseas. are leaders overseas worried about america's continued support for ukraine? >> i will say, kate, i was on a bipartisan delegation with the foreign affairs committee, very bipartisan, with both the chair and the ranking member and in country after country, whether we were meeting with presidents or members of parliament, prime ministers, every single one started by saying america's role in the war against ukraine, the aggression against ukraine, has been indispensable and we want to be able to count on it. in a bipartisan way we said you can count on us because the majority of the majority in congress knows that as we support ukraine we are supporting democracies around the world. we will be at peril if we cut off support. when i landed on the ground and i read that mr. mccarthy might try to take support for ukraine out of a supplemental he think that is extraordinary dangerous, sends the absolute wrong message to the aggressors like mr. putin or chairman xi. >> i want to turn to the election, congresswoman. you have been a vice chair for the d trip working to get more democrats elected to congress, you know how important it is who is at the top of the ticket in order to do so. two things i want to bring up to you from the new cnn poll that we have just put out this week. voter enthusiasm which we know is so important as we head into election, voter enthusiasm among democrats it is trending down, while enthusiasm, those most enthusiastic amongst republicans trending up, it's up like six points, and a majority, 67%, say -- of de