Transcripts For RT CrossTalk 20230318 : vimarsana.com

to a certain threshold and then both have kind of moved back. rachel, what do you think? now i think we re looking at a p. r. a battle for hearts and minds throughout this entire thing. and there s a lot of talk of potential false flag, false flags, could it escalate? could it deescalate conflict? i think ultimately it s just going to keep following its course and there s going to be these will incidents here and there, and nobody really, as you mentioned, peter has an interesting escalating any more. but it does allow for each party to jackie for position, and that s ultimately what we re seeing with this is an incident as well. i m a ryan, i m really glad that rachel, i mentioned the word propaganda cuz she is absolutely right because this is what it has been most of the time coming from the west. so we have this doubting of the drone, but the, even them, um, the least thoughtful people in the western or not many left with they didn t. no one has said it s been shot down. it was down to. okay. i think that shows a little equivocation, like we re seeing in the washington post, like we re seeing in the new york times. there s a equivocation going on right now. now i don t know if that is part of a false flag itself. we can t tell, but there s certainly a shift going on. ryan, i definitely share her concern regarding the false flags, the topic in general interest in this entire sphere. personally, i see this more as an agreeing with the general topic. this is kind of jockeying for position or really just playing the p r game. ultimately, i think that we play this game. we see this game back and forth where the u. s. government seems to feel that they can operate in any field anywhere. just, you know, and, and just claiming international waters discussion. but if russia does the same in any, even even remotely in the same way in reverse, in any kind of area close to the western hemisphere, it becomes some sort of act of war and framed that way. and so we just see this game, this pure game back and forth. and we know when we ve been reported or heard the reports about how this actually went down about dumping the fuel and how they responded. i, your point about downing, i think, is really important that ultimately they want people to misinterpret how this went down, because then they can play that better for ok. it s going to go to pepe, basically pepe the same question to you. because, you know what the russians are basically saying is that don t send anymore drugs over the black. see we, you know, what s going to happen here. and i think that, you know, there is going to be these, these elements in the us are going to say, yeah, if we send another one, it will probably get harassed as well. i mean, it s a very clear signal without creating a major incident. go ahead, pepe on this thing is going to go on forever. now. it s a false flag to the end of time. the key proposal it s provocation, of course, and publications in the black city and publications near crimea. v b m t 9 repo was go. we manger vocation and according to my best intel information, it was down by electronic war for the russians are masters of electronics warfare. not nobody s better than them in the world. so this, this is probably the real story and, but nobody is interested in spinning the real story and all the for the america in terms of loss of face. it s even worse than the $580.00. it s in a yeah. so with the shop explosives. ok, well of course he s making reference to the, the north stream disruption in the north stream pipelines here. but rachel, i mean, again you, you re the one that started out with the, this kind of the, this is more of a propaganda more than anything else. also that we keep hearing about talk of the new ukrainian offensive is do you think that this drone story plays into that is that to show you know, how aggressive the russians are and how much we have to help our ukranian friends? i mean, is there any connection here? because like i said, the pages are the mainstream media, they re beginning to doubt the administration. go ahead. rachel. i don t know if these people are that intelligent or sophisticated to tell you the truth. i mean, the best they could come up with was this, with this drawn story was that, you know, there is a russian jack involved and it basically with the fuel on this american drone and thereby harassing edge. it s just, it s just kind of ridiculous. and the fact that we re even talking about this when, you know, every single time there s an incident involving international aerospace and a russian jet that gets a little too close to alaska when you know, rushes right there or anything like that. you know, russian jazz ends up close to europe in international airspace. somehow it becomes a topic and it kind of have to wonder why it is you re absolutely right. because in a ryan big, it s interesting that we have this incident here which plays to the advantage of all parties involved because of its interpretation. but we have inside the united states with the presidential election coming up. and we had carl tucker carlson over at fox news. do a kind of a straw poll of republicans that are running or may potentially run. and the verdict is, in a most republican voters, and most of the candidates that are in are, couldn t run our, our, against this war. it s, it s biden s war. and, you know, you can, you can show the other russians is there as aggressive as you may be. but at the same time, there is no appetite because this is an elite war, and that s what the has been packaged as, as it is a process, a package of propaganda. people are not interested in this conflict. ryan, i wholeheartedly agree. and i think that s been something we can see in the united states long before this war. i think this is an especially propagandized war, and i think it s, it s, it s been politicized to would agree that the, that we haven t seen in a while. but ultimately, you look before this, you can see any pull from either left or right and seeing that most americans don t want more war of any kind. and it s always, that s why they have to package it politically and sell it to people. and that s why it ultimately became this larger concept about, do it for the world, or do it for freedom and take it on the chin because putin s causing everything. and it s, it s just a rational and i think, you know, understanding americans don t want this. it paints the picture that we re not really represented by our government today. yeah, i absolutely agree. you know, in pepe, you re the one in the program that s already mentioned, crimea. and if we go back to the, the illegal transfer power in the coo and 2014, that s what victoria knew and wanted. she wasn t interested in kim, she was interested in crimea. and this is why we get all of this talk from the administration and nato, that it, the, at the very least crimea has to be demilitarized. so it s very interesting that has nothing to do with a political settlement. that s talking about a geopolitical a settlement that the west is interested in. i thought it was very interesting. it has to be demilitarize. they already see what they want to accomplish, which they won t go ahead, pepe peter effect is much more serious because the sick counselor, ukraine, encounter of offensive. if it happens, let s say around the end of april may or june d objective is to cut off crimea from applied strong, very few telegram military channels. russian specialists and some of them are really, really alarmed that this is a strong possibly gonna throw every sink that they ve ever seen, that nato hass against the russian forces to cut off crimea from, from russia. so if this happens in terms of once again, p r, o, peroration and propaganda war, it would be a massive win for the nato stun space. so i hope the ministry of defense is seriously pay attention to it. and according to some very, very good military analysts than reports us on the ground. they are not so sure. well, rachel, that s exactly the point. you know, you can get when you get reporting from the ground is very, very much in a divergence, away from what we keep hearing from the zalinski people from nato itself. i mean, even stilton berg says, you know, the russians are winning on the, in logistics. well, that s what war is his logistics. go ahead. rachel? yeah, well i mean, i ve been spending some time recently, obviously in europe in paris here and in germany recently i covered some protests at the ramstein nato and us air base where they launched operation drone operations, notably into africa for example, and protests as there were saying look, i mean, what s going on in ukraine is just light years away from the problems that we have at home. and yes, they feel badly for everybody involved in, in both countries who are impacted by all of this. but, you know, who s actually thinking about the interests of germans, the interests of french people. i mean, we have mack whole right now. who according to the telegraph today or yesterday, was saying that, you know, there s an issue with you wanting to band together and by ammunition altogether and finance it. and there s a big fight right now because at, in the you, because france and michael want to have that production in france. so in other words, they want to kind of use it to bolster, use this conflict and the proper propagation of the conflict to bolster their military industrial complex like the u s s, which doesn t really give them very much incentive to tamp things down or to head to the negotiating table when they re still kind of jockeying for position in order to get to, to get some kind of benefit out of all this. meanwhile, you know, they re talking about increasing french defense production as a result of all this and having it funded by u tax money essentially. meanwhile, french bakeries are struggling to keep the bag yet alive. so there s like years away from the everyday concerns of the average european at this point. yeah. well it s all about priorities and the average citizen, they re the lowest found the totem pole here, or i m gonna jump in here. we re going to go to a short break, and after that short break, we ll continue our discussion on ukraine and propaganda state with hardly ah, ah, in the least of canter. russians state little, never, i ve stayed as i m phoning most landscape diva. mm hm. and i m not getting all something up with it within the 50 babel disability on i need to find i m speaking with, we will van in the european union, the kremlin. yup. machines. the state on russia today and split ortiz spoke neck, given our video agency, roughly all band on youtube with me some time. i m rick sanchez, and i m here to play with you. whatever you do, you do not watch my, your show seriously. why watch something that so different my little opinions that you won t get anywhere else work of it please. if you have the state department, the cia weapons makers, multi $1000000000.00 corporations, choose your facts for you. go ahead. i change and whatever you do. don t watch my show, stay mainstreet, because i m probably going to make you uncomfortable. my show is called direct impact, but again, you probably don t want to watch it because it might just chain she dwayne thing operation. the aerodynamic began shortly after world war 2 and lasted almost 3 decades. it wasn t a major effort to try and split the ukraine off from the soviet union, u. s. intelligence together with hypnos, executioners drained hundreds of saboteurs to be deployed in the soviet union, just focused on the east of alberto. so we ll have started with service unions. more yes, today is security service of ukraine use is not only the statistic methods, but also the ideology of the nationalist. a welcome back to cross top where all things are considered on peter labelle. to remind you we re discussing ukraine and propaganda. ah. okay, let s go back to ryan and franklin, you know, in, in the larger picture of what s going on here. we were getting the outlines of what the west is trying to, jackie ford, leased, push a zalinski and his people to do and basically have an offensive get it tried to reach out to retrieve as much reoccupied as much land as you can. and then we ll sit down and talk, you know, what the biggest problem with that, ryan is. what if the russians don t want to talk? well, there s a lot of dynamics to that that, that, that point it really, it, it, the, as people often discuss and nobody wants to negotiate the barrel of a gun. and that s how the u. s. very, as far as i can tell, kind of ubiquitously and everything they do foreign policy operate where it s ultimately we demand something and if you don t comply with that, nothing else is going to be discussed. we see that going on with syria right now in regards to just rebuilding syria. no, we won t even allow them to get their lives back until we get a saw that a power. that s how this tends to go. so i don t, i mean, nobody would expect russia from this position to actually engage with a negotiation with somebody is not negotiating honestly. but i do think that this is about driving this to a position that benefits the west of the, at specifically the united states at the expense of ukraine. i think everybody who s looking at this honestly, can see that. and, and speaking of the people in regard to france or, you know, any well where else were discussing this dynamic thinking, premier like, think about the hypocrisy of argue when you re doing this for the people and then taking back of territory that, that voted to not be part of who grant it, very obvious reasons. it s incredible. it s, it s really amazing that you bring that up because you know, and they, and they had referenda before 2014 people should be knowledgeable about that. that mean for ever since ukraine became independent, they ve been wanting to leave ukraine and they finally got their opportunity when there was a cool. let me go back to rachel, who, you know, rachel, you know, one of the fundamental themes that i ve been pushing on this program ever since the conflict started, is that we already know what the russian position is on and ending to the conflict they told the world on december 17th, 2021 about their security demands. okay. those security demands have not changed. okay. so there s no reason to wonder what the russian position in the russian position came before the conflict even started. go ahead, rachel. yeah, i think the big question is, what is the western position? because, for example, here in france, present a menu and my co initially wanted negotiations and now it s ukraine has to win on the battlefield. that seems to be v line seems like all these western countries are fighting with each other to see who can get closest to zalinski. it s like they re playing a game of musical chairs and they don t want the music stopped to stop right now. but when it eventually does, and all this is over, they re all going to fight to be the guy who s not on a chair, but is on zalinski lap as he sits in the chair, they want to be that guy. so they, they re buying time so that they can all jockey with one another until to see who can get the best outcome when all this is over. that seems to be what it s about. but what s really interesting, as well as in terms of being able to trust the west when it comes to negotiations, that s pretty complicated. i mean, just look recently at the black sea grain deal, which was everybody was up in arms about the fact that grain can get out of ukraine to poor countries. well, look what s happening to it. i mean, i m a turkish president, an early one. he said that 44 percent of that green right now is going to europe. the top 3 countries that are getting it in. but 46 percent of it is going to china . turkey which are obviously. busy portals to africa and asia, but it s also going to spain and it s being used to feed livestock. i mean spin, makes enough grain or has enough grain for itself more than enough grain for itself . so it doesn t need it to feed its people, but it s being used to fatten up pigs so that europe can benefit from that commercially. so i mean, all this talk about, oh, we need to get food out of the region and poor russia are rushes blocking. this effort, i mean, ultimately at this point it s, it has nothing to do with what they initially said. i mean, it is like making up a food bank and ultimately going home and shoving it all in your fridge. but say, rachel is absolutely a 100 percent right. here, okay, and you know, in the, in the way that i go back to right here, ryan, they, they never anticipated any of these things here. oh, the sanctions. russia will be crushed. the war will be over. there will be regime change in russia. they have such a simplistic view of it all, but when it started getting tough sanctioned boomerang on europe and on the world when we were talking about food security and whatnot. and then on the military front, millet, the nato is never designed to fight a war like this not to appear. ok, not appear conventional power like russia. i mean i, on every single stage, every single step. nobody in the west thought this through clearly go ahead. ryan, i would agree that it s clumsy and i think that s just for kind of a common theme with a lot of the foreign policy today. but i would at least put forward the kind of the possibility that they did think this would happen. that the argument, i mean really taking a step back to understand what sanctions are even written down in their own documentation. what they re intended to do is drive people to a point of desperation to where they accept whatever the solution is. we see this with foreign policy all over the place right now. argue americans are under the same focus of u. s. foreign policy kind of concept we re, we re being driven to a point of desperation. but so the idea being that, that they expected europe to be in this position because ultimately we see this being a, this isn t just a, i mean, you could even try overlap to the great reset kind of direction for a lot of things. but that s a different conversation. the point is, i think they knew, ignored stream attack and so on, would put europe in his point of desperation to make them more rely on the united states when you see this good. aren t rachel? you know, right? just came up with an interesting theory and i think it can work with mine as well as the day that there was a plan, a russia would, sanctions would destroy the country, all the arms that nato would give. ukraine would solve their problem, but it didn t work now the plan bent plan b, because you brought it up, is that, you know, let the will, will it take european markets, i will make sure get more arms sales because all these countries with this spending more money on arms and you know, we kind of walk away, we didn t get everything we wanted, but we did get a strategic advantage of having europe completely under the thumb of the united states. lot of people in the us will be happy with that outcome. rachel? well, german business associations are rein the alarm right now over the fact that businesses are moving like industrial businesses in notably in germany, but also from other european countries are moving to the united states. why? because biden s inflation reduction act, which is supposed to be a climate change act, but it s really just disguised protectionism. it basically gives brakes to green companies, of which germany has many because it kind of bank that whole economy on all the, on all that before it decided to, you know, cut itself off from gas and, and ultimately realized it didn t work. but i mean, the germany has a lot of green businesses and what they don t have right now. it s very much energy . i mean, like i said, i was in germany recently, and i decided to go for a swim at a private pool. and good luck trying to find a public pool near the french border that was even open because energy costs are so high. but um, i mean i had to swim in a freezing cold pool because even private business that charges 23 arrows for an entry didn t really want to heat the pool that much. so i mean, that gives you a just a taste. i wasn t even there for very long, but already i had a taste for how bad things are now. imagine if you re german industry and you re having to use just a massive amount of energy to produce things or what are you going to do when you re strapped for energy because your country basically come off its own energy supplied? are you going to stay stick around to see how bad things get or are you going to be seduced by this offer of, you know, lots of energy and tax breaks over in the us? well, guess what? they re choosing. rachel, you re absolutely right. i mean, this is a, you know, it s really amazing them. this is what america does to its friends. okay. what do you think it does to its enemies? is extraordinary there. you know, betsy ryan with the, the, the, the amazing outcome about this is that this really is a, it seems to me that, that we have de facto now to globalization is going on right now. the united states as it s al, lies in europe. he has japan, australia, and then the rest is going to go to russia in china, and there s no going back here now. i mean, the russians, i don t see why they would rebuild that pipeline so the americans can blow it up again. know there s plenty of countries and asia that want this energy, you know, why? because germany became a very prosperous country off of cheap energy. everybody else wants to do the same thing. the, the west can go its own way. and good riddance, okay, if you re blowing up pipelines like this, go ahead. ryan. i completely agree. i think that the policies were seeing it really in a global way, but you could spearheaded by few what u. s. government being one of them is this, you know, e s g mindset of doing things for this kind of work. green, you know, sustainable development, goal direction. but the, in the inherit hypocrisy on it shows that they don t even care about these things. at the core, i mean, you have the u. k and the united states arguing that nuclear weapons, gas, all these things that are like the core, the crux of what environmental us. think of the problem there. labeling as e s g compliant because well they use them to fight for freedom which allows them to fight for, you know, a bottle of law like you can see how they can abstractly argue that the biggest polluters in the planet are allowed to keep doing these things, and you can see the same gang played with, you know, it s the same concept. we re ultimately germany should be accepting this reality because it s better for the world standing. and that s not even the truth. right? and so, and in the point about germany and, and the, or rather the company is going over the united states. that i think again, the point about the foreknowledge, or rather the doing this for that exact purpose is driving these companies. there is a byproduct, but i argue it was something that they foresaw, right? so that there, abusing their own allies and to your point, you know, think about it, what they re doing, their enemies, it s obvious. they don t care about anybody. nothing is sacred to the u. s. government, as far as i m concerned in the hours they work with you here. rachel, what i mean? yeah. the i have as i would ask you a question, but it s a question i ve been asking for almost a year and a half. why does your go along with a game impoverishment? okay. i mean europe was about security and prosperity. it s about neither now. yeah, because everything s ideological. i mean, the wine big question is why in february of last year 2022 was german chance are all i shall standing in the podium right beside joe biden. yeah. when and this is prior to the conflict in ukraine, really going hot and popping off, but why didn t he just stand there? when somebody in the press corps asked, you know, what would you do? what s gonna happen with nord string to if russia goes into ukraine and biden said, there will be ignored stream to on will make sure that and all i ve shown just stood there just there. then again, why? i mean, right? you just stood there like he had nothing to say, didn t interject, excuse me. what? right. like you think that a european leader be like, pardon me, and french president a man when michael went to bob went over to the. busy white house last december to try to bag, which is never good position to be in bag. the democrats and republicans and the white house to please please, please don t move forward with your climate act and your protectionist act. which risks cutting off? you know, european products from your market, and basically he was told, well, we ll see what we can do, but other things, but sorry, that s just the way it s going to be. that s the way until we what came home. and he said big victory. yeah. and he and he said big victory were gonna, they promised to keep talking. okay, well that s value repeated again. that s why in this program we were referred to him is sergeant schultz, law chancellor, filled. and i d like to tell everybody we lost peppy, technical problems. i will have him back soon. i want to thank my guess i m in franklin, paris, and in moscow. and i want to thank our viewers for watching the fear r t. c and exam. remember process rules ah ah, ah one second 2nd to demo you then i m guessing is ebony can i ve done the additional i ve been to mary, mary van does. all is you get me that sound under when it s once i got you. great. thank you. i m a fan lilies assistant even you are pretty. she said she did you so she didn t she actually oh for the mountains banal. yes it soft to ice could shun number? no, i mean she eat equal full resources. hint that neil on p facility. but that meant, can you, ma am? it s up to their go eat, would you be not only can extend to people i had those on the come i passed this one. it is what was your best care? cisco s were shabby. i won t care, vetted as one of his one is for oscillation, a thick one mean call naval. can you call navy? don t exist a new meal each it she never sure to dead yet because city dig through full lead to another bad enough to hope. what am sick i felt about was the thought said, you know when it sa says, well, you didn t bout he vick hello to alicia with ah ah, ah ah! [000:00:00;00] a march 20th 2003, the u. s. army and its allies invaded iraq by noah. shaheen the faded today, the let me know kind of set up. wizard, anybody else ever? yvonne? 07. how. how does the lean guys in the hobby may the 1st 2003 us president george bush, declare victory in the iraq war. how the different are you know, up i would put up for july and i found it, but went through hired to december. the 30th 2006 said, am hussain. was executed at ottoman some will shut down them from december. the 15th 2011. a ceremony was held in baghdad to mark the end of the u. s . military mission. in reality, the u. s. army is still in iraq, a globe. he had a village and still a couple people, but ah products, sanchez, i ve been doing news for 30 years to languages all over the world here at the united states. i ve interviewed for presidents. i ve been fired by some of the largest television networks in the world as well. and i co founded a publicly traded company and from all that, you know what i ve learned. i learned that news should be honest. it should be direct. and by golly, it should be impactful, this direct impact. ah