Live Breaking News & Updates on Argument

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from Argument on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in Argument and stay connected to the pulse of your community

FR application by retired HC judge against PCoI fixed for argument - Breaking News

Dailymirror.lk – Sri Lanka 24 Hours Online Breaking News : News, Politics, Video, Finance, Business, Sports, Entertainment, Travel, sri lanka news,sri lanka latest news, latest breaking news, latest political news, covid-19 news,covid-19 news sri lanka, Sri Lanka Coronavirus updates, sl news, sl covid-19 news, SL breaking news, daily news, breaking news in sri lanka

Colombo , Western , Sri-lanka , Vijith-malalgoda , Bharatha-lakshman-premachandra , Nilshantha-sirimanne , Deshara-goonetilleke , Achala-wengappuli , Upali-abeyrathne , Ranjan-ramanayake , Padmini-ranawaka , Duminda-silva

Arrest, detention of writer Shakthika: FR petition fixed for argument - Breaking News

Dailymirror.lk – Sri Lanka 24 Hours Online Breaking News : News, Politics, Video, Finance, Business, Sports, Entertainment, Travel, sri lanka news,sri lanka latest news, latest breaking news, latest political news, covid-19 news,covid-19 news sri lanka, Sri Lanka Coronavirus updates, sl news, sl covid-19 news, SL breaking news, daily news, breaking news in sri lanka

Polgahawela , North-western , Sri-lanka , Padman-surasena , Lakmali-karunanayke , Lakmal-sooriyagoda , Niluka-dissanayake , Saliya-pieris , Harini-jayawardhana , Shakthika-sathkumara , Pulasthi-hewamanna , Yasantha-kodagoda

The Context

potential good argument _ actually think mark meadows has a potential good argument there - actually think mark meadows has a potential good argument there onl actually think mark meadows has a i potential good argument there on the sunremacy_ potential good argument there on the sunremacy clause _ potential good argument there on the supremacy clause of _ potential good argument there on the supremacy clause of the _ supremacy clause of the constitution. _ supremacy clause of the constitution. he - supremacy clause of the constitution. he was - supremacy clause of the i constitution. he was acting supremacy clause of the - constitution. he was acting as an officer— constitution. he was acting as an officer of— constitution. he was acting as an officer of the _ constitution. he was acting as an officer of the united _ constitution. he was acting as an officer of the united states, - constitution. he was acting as an officer of the united states, thel officer of the united states, the function — officer of the united states, the function and _ officer of the united states, the function and now— officer of the united states, the function and now he _ officer of the united states, the function and now he is- officer of the united states, the function and now he is being - function and now he is being prosecuted. _ function and now he is being prosecuted, so— function and now he is being prosecuted, so i— function and now he is being prosecuted, so i think- function and now he is beingl prosecuted, so i think there's function and now he is being i prosecuted, so i think there's a chance — prosecuted, so i think there's a chance we _ prosecuted, so i think there's a chance we might _ prosecuted, so i think there's a chance we might see _ prosecuted, so i think there's a chance we might see this - prosecuted, so i think there's a chance we might see this case i prosecuted, so i think there's a - chance we might see this case lifted out of— chance we might see this case lifted out of state — chance we might see this case lifted out of state court _ chance we might see this case lifted out of state court in _ chance we might see this case lifted out of state court in georgia - chance we might see this case lifted out of state court in georgia in- out of state court in georgia in which — out of state court in georgia in which case _ out of state court in georgia in which case it— out of state court in georgia in which case it would _ out of state court in georgia in which case it would go - out of state court in georgia in which case it would go to - out of state court in georgia in. which case it would go to federal district _ which case it would go to federal district court _ which case it would go to federal district court in _ which case it would go to federal district court in georgia. - which case it would go to federal district court in georgia. so - which case it would go to federal district court in georgia. so it. district court in georgia. so it would — district court in georgia. so it would leave _ district court in georgia. so it would leave the _ district court in georgia. so it would leave the state, - district court in georgia. so it would leave the state, but. district court in georgia. so it would leave the state, but iti district court in georgia. so it- would leave the state, but it would leave _ would leave the state, but it would leave the _ would leave the state, but it would leave the state's _ would leave the state, but it would leave the state's jurisdiction. - leave the state'sjurisdiction. fani wiiiis _ leave the state'sjurisdiction. fani wiiiis wouid — leave the state'sjurisdiction. fani willis would have _ leave the state'sjurisdiction. fani willis would have to _ leave the state'sjurisdiction. fani willis would have to decide - leave the state'sjurisdiction. fani willis would have to decide that l leave the state'sjurisdiction. fani . willis would have to decide that she sever— willis would have to decide that she sever the _ willis would have to decide that she sever the defendants _ willis would have to decide that she sever the defendants and _ willis would have to decide that she sever the defendants and try to - willis would have to decide that she sever the defendants and try to pull some _ sever the defendants and try to pull some of— sever the defendants and try to pull some of them — sever the defendants and try to pull some of them back _ sever the defendants and try to pull some of them back to _ sever the defendants and try to pull some of them back to state - sever the defendants and try to pull some of them back to state court i some of them back to state court or mum _ some of them back to state court or mum iet _ some of them back to state court or mum let the — some of them back to state court or mum let the entire _ some of them back to state court or mum let the entire case _ some of them back to state court or mum let the entire case move - some of them back to state court or mum let the entire case move up. mum let the entire case move up to federal— mum let the entire case move up to federal court — mum let the entire case move up to federal court. so— mum let the entire case move up to federal court. so it's _ mum let the entire case move up to federal court. so it's the _ mum let the entire case move up to federal court. so it's the number of| federal court. so it's the number of issues _ federal court. so it's the number of issues surrounding _ federal court. so it's the number of issues surrounding these _ federal court. so it's the number of issues surrounding these cases - federal court. so it's the number of. issues surrounding these cases which again— issues surrounding these cases which again is— issues surrounding these cases which again is why— issues surrounding these cases which again is why i — issues surrounding these cases which again is why i am _ issues surrounding these cases which again is why i am so— issues surrounding these cases which again is why i am so sceptical- issues surrounding these cases which again is why i am so sceptical when l again is why i am so sceptical when i again is why i am so sceptical when i hear— again is why i am so sceptical when i hear it— again is why i am so sceptical when i hear it very— again is why i am so sceptical when i hear it very aggressive _ i hear it very aggressive trial dates— i hear it very aggressive trial dates because _ i hear it very aggressive trial dates because there - i hear it very aggressive trial dates because there are - i hear it very aggressive trial dates because there are real i hear it very aggressive trial- dates because there are real legal issues _ dates because there are real legal issues that— dates because there are real legal issues that have _ dates because there are real legal issues that have to _ dates because there are real legal issues that have to be _ dates because there are real legal issues that have to be ironed - dates because there are real legal issues that have to be ironed outl issues that have to be ironed out and mark— issues that have to be ironed out and mark meadows _ issues that have to be ironed out and mark meadows was - issues that have to be ironed out and mark meadows was the - issues that have to be ironed outj and mark meadows was the head issues that have to be ironed out i and mark meadows was the head of issues that have to be ironed out - and mark meadows was the head of the pack and _ and mark meadows was the head of the pack and raising — and mark meadows was the head of the pack and raising that _ and mark meadows was the head of the pack and raising that argument. - and mark meadows was the head of the pack and raising that argument. i - pack and raising that argument. i think— pack and raising that argument. i think there's _ pack and raising that argument. i think there's going _ pack and raising that argument. i think there's going to _ pack and raising that argument. i think there's going to be - pack and raising that argument. i think there's going to be a - pack and raising that argument. i i think there's going to be a hearing as soon— think there's going to be a hearing as soon as — think there's going to be a hearing as soon as possible _ think there's going to be a hearing as soon as possible monday - think there's going to be a hearing as soon as possible monday on - think there's going to be a hearing as soon as possible monday on his motion _ as soon as possible monday on his motion so — as soon as possible monday on his motion so it— as soon as possible monday on his motion so it will— as soon as possible monday on his motion so it will be _ as soon as possible monday on his motion so it will be really- motion so it will be really interesting _ motion so it will be really interesting to— motion so it will be really interesting to see - motion so it will be really interesting to see if - motion so it will be really interesting to see if he i motion so it will be really- interesting to see if he successful there _ interesting to see if he successful there. . �* . interesting to see if he successful there. , �* . �* there. chris bruce, you've come across fani _ there. chris bruce, you've come across fani willis _ there. chris bruce, you've come across fani willis in _ there. chris bruce, you've come across fani willis in georgia, . there. chris bruce, you've come i across fani willis in georgia, she's under a lot of pressure right now

Argument- , Public-school-case , Mark-meadows , Fani-willis-in-georgia , State-court , Case , Function , Officer , Chance , Constitution , American , Supremacy-clause

The Context

it's the advice of counsel. where are the lines? because this is what the case will ultimately come down to, the advice that people likejohn eastman and some of the others were giving him, regarding the election. if they were giving him knowingly false advice, was that covered by the first amendment? so false advice, was that covered by the first amendment?— the first amendment? so the strongest _ the first amendment? so the strongest case _ the first amendment? so the strongest case here - the first amendment? so the strongest case here would i the first amendment? so the i strongest case here would have the first amendment? so the - strongest case here would have been if prosecutors could have brought the argument that donald trump willfully— the argument that donald trump willfully incited violence on january— willfully incited violence on january six, because there was no first oer— january six, because there was no first peramendment january six, because there was no first per amendment production, no free—speech protection if you incite violence _ free—speech protection if you incite violence. but they didn't do that, which _ violence. but they didn't do that, which means i have to think they don't _ which means i have to think they don't have — which means i have to think they don't have the evidence. i think it would _ don't have the evidence. i think it would have — don't have the evidence. i think it would have liked to do that, but he was not _ would have liked to do that, but he was not charged with inciting violence. _ was not charged with inciting violence, norwas was not charged with inciting violence, nor was he linked to any of the _ violence, nor was he linked to any of the hundreds of cases that were prosecuted up here in washington, dc regarding _ prosecuted up here in washington, dc

Public-school-case , Some , Advice , Likejohn-eastman , Counsel , Others , Lines , Election , Amendment , Say-donald-trump , Argument- , Young-thug-case

Gutfeld

. oh, let's just forget that wepon have said anything. but i think the point is st iso spot on that calling of the names saying that people are going to dieg to d. that's there. go to now.ll die people will di ie if they don't get vaccinated, people will die. you la you pass that p lawas,s you're all goingw! to die. and it's like, no, they say banning books aboute holo the holocaust and about slavery. i meanslavery? , for god's sakes, i don't know wherehe they're getting this stuff, but what they're trying to dout dow is shout down everybody elsen li because like you said ,ke they don't have an argument like this is what i've done lately. i have this little podcast. you can download i this ol t whereverwherever you get your podcast back . and people, if they disagree with something, i tweet it, they say, fine groomer. yeah.atnsul now, nowt., that's the new thats the new insult. they'll call you groomer. so what i do. you look great.k gr i think it is a compliment, not that kind of grooming, grooming . that's what i said to the authorities. the final thing is then i'll mic tweehele: t them back and i'll n

Anything , People , Names , The-point-is-st-iso-spot , Calling , Goingw , Let , You-la , P-lawas , Wepon , Dieg-to-d- , Now-ll-die-people-will-di-ie

Gutfeld

but they really are teachingat. that i like you, but you can opt or opt in. o yeah, i did opt in. you know, i asked my son, so"wha what what's what do i win today. work. yeah. because you've got to keepdo wo? >>u've got to keep on top that tyra said go ahead. t got you in trouble the first place you got kids. yeah. yeah. yeah. >> i got half of them aref homeschooled because of the . yeah. thparents are terrorists because they want to know what's going g on with their school. that used to be called good parenting. yeah. dbut what's funny is when you tae the democrats talk, when i feel passionate about something, i don't need notes.ng yeah. you know, i'm saying whe?n you i have your wholnge talking point of parents are like, we wannawen know what's going on , the curriculum. and your answe r is , i don't deal in fascism. neither do," w and ye. the point is , f i wanna know te what's going on . oh, you're racist. like they just spewed talking points out, like they just spews talking points out becausepe they have no argument.te yeah. so obviously, whoevever rsc whatever school board is cuttingor a check for their fundraisers and their

Work , Kids , Top , O-yeah , Opt , Wha , Trouble , My-son , Opt-in , Keepdo , Place , Tyra

Gutfeld

and their campaigns likeheir they should get their money back . yeah. t fascisfascm. tha for that's what you came up with . like they need these these oppositional democratsoppositi r trying to make a legitimate argument, get on e that will be great because we're no longer fighting for i'll be a domestict terroris.t, if that's what it [ is .bl so be it. where that is a badge of pride.a i'll get a new tattoo. proud father and domestic terrorists are that is this i mean, we we we always end upir in this cul de sac. it's really about school choice. it's really about havingg the the option to get out of thisd get away from these people. >> and i mean that these administrators. our >> yeah. and it should be your choice.. and let's be real that only the fbi is shocked that they didn'ti find that justdn because't a pen criticized the school board that they were actually plottinere actug to blp a teacher's house or something. they never thought that wouldd be the case. h is thewhich is the scariest tg

Money , Argument- , Oppositional-democratsoppositi , E , Tha , T-fascisfascm , Campaigns , Terrorists , Fighting , Domestict-terroris-t , Tattoo , Badge

BBC News

would face tougher scrutiny, they tried to and were successful in raising that so that banks at the 5200 $250 billion level did not face those tougher restrictions. and look, the banks argued that they didn't want to face the paperwork, they didn't want to face the restrictions, that the restrictions would restrict them from lending money which would hurt the economy. that was their argument. hour money which would hurt the economy. that was their argument.— that was their argument. how is it that silicon — that was their argument. how is it that silicon valley bank— that was their argument. how is it that silicon valley bank and - that silicon valley bank and announced that business is conducting business at usual in the us in the moment's one are the repercussions going to be for quest marki repercussions going to be for quest mar r ~' ., mark i think the ferc and the regulatory — mark i think the ferc and the regulatory system _ mark i think the ferc and the regulatory system in - mark i think the ferc and the regulatory system in general| mark | think the ferc and the | regulatory system in general is designed to create continuity. and by that i mean if the bank fails, that the depositors and the like, but there to keep, to prevent a bank panic from happening all throughout the country. how this particular bank is still operating, that's a great question. but i think from the

Level , Banks , Restrictions , Scrutiny , 5200 , 50-billion , 250-billion , Thank-ou-so-banks , Lending-money , Argument- , Economy , Look

The Ingraham Angle

i don't just want her off of the foreign relations committee. i want her out of congress.congs and but we unfortunately, republicans fail to go and make that argument.fail to go but as is becaus make she gets elected, she represents seven hundred and fifty thousand,000 americans. and we have to deal with that. - but then hopefully next timeopey they'll go after her at homed and we went to minneapolis and we couldn't believe whatr what we saw. i mean, it's it's a disaster there. and she she's rarely ine di the district. we people like i and we never see or heastrict nevr ned. she aoc ran over to cnn tonight to deliver what we've come comme to expect about these committee expulsions. >> in the case of all three of these expulsions, therereveng is either political revenge or there is the absolute ie agendf a racist, misogynist and xenophobic targeting racis. and those three , those are those three points, in additiono

Trump-hatingepublica-republicans , Relations-committee , Congress-congs , Argument- , Muslim-americans , Timeopey , Whatr , We-saw , Seven-hundred-and-fifty-thousand , 000 , People , Cnn

Confrontation at Sheboygan school parking lot leads to arrest, gun seized

A woman is accused of pointing a gun at a man while in a school parking lot during a confrontation that began off school grounds, police said.

Firearm-on-school-property , Etude-elementary-school , Sheboygan-police , Sheboygan-police-department , Pigeon-river , School-property , Concealed-weapon , Sheboygan- , Argument- , Arrest- , Confrontation-