Stay updated with breaking news from B royce lewis. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
importance of the rule. i have talked to some democrats including pramila jayapal from yesterday who said i think it's important to talk not about saving the rule but on saving the speaker himself. "a," do you think it's going to come to that? and "b," what do democrats get out of this? >> yes, so next question what happens next based on the government funding fiasco and then there was fisa, this warrant list funding and then ukraine aid. i've talked to republicans who say that's potentially three strikes, and essentially you're out for mike johnson. potentially congresswoman marjory taylor greene dangling that to vacate. the big question is will congressman greene bring it to the floor to vote on this? i spoke to her yesterday and she said it's a matter of if or when. she didn't give a straightwer. i think the dynamics of washington changed when former president trump gave his
does. >> dr. sheffield? >> yes, it does. >> and professor schizer? >> yes, it does i guess they wanted their lesson our panel is here. >> margaret, do you think? those answers would have been so clear, quick, and definitive had they not been proceed by what happened? >> lab and for the questions that i knew that, you know, yeah. but if you fed her prepared testimony before she was there in front of the cameras and stuff. there was a passage that really stood out to me and it said something like, please remember university of presence are not politicians, which i knew was sort of wishful thinking like that, other people get to decide if you're a politician or not. but i think the reason that was sort of baked into the statement was that that has been the real problem you become a university president by virtue of a number of things may or b, or academic experience the work you've done for the university, but it's not usually because you have a decades-long record of political training and at least they have had sort of a crash
but republican leaders in the state house or maneuvering to keep the band in place, even though there has been some movement to repeal in the state senate with this now senior political correspondent for the wall street journal, molly ball, in what's so important about arizona at this very moment, molly is that advocates of reproductive rights say, look, there are those including donald trump who say leave decision on abortion up to the states. this is what happening in the state of arizona right now. what is b? being luck with that decision exactly. >> and of course, arizona is a major battleground state. in fact, this is the most severe abortion restriction of any battleground state. and you can see how it's dividing the republican party in these repeated scenes of chaos that we've seen in the arizona legislature where some republicans want to repeal the 18, 64 law which bans almost all abortions except those that threatened the life of the mother. >> and some republicans very
potential jurors about to walk again how are they going to narrow down this pool of prospective jurors to fill these last five spots. what do you think okay. >> here's here's how the process is going to go today. the judge's starting with a brand new panel of 96 potential jurors. and the first two questions he's going to ask are a do any of you have a hardship a job-related issue that prevents do from serving as a juror and b, are any of you so biased for or against either side in this case that you just don't think you could be fair and what the judge did the first time and he's going to do again is essentially anyone who raises their hand in response to either of those questions, you're out. no questions asked. and last time that cut the pool by more than half, they lost 50 people. whoever remains after that we'll then go through the questionnaire, the 42 questions that we see. we see some samples here up on the screen. >> after that, the judge will decide if they should if they can stay on the jury based on their impartiality. >> and then after that, the parties will get to exercise what we call their peremptory
caitlin clark is about to cut a huge deal with nike. the iowa superstar is in talks for an eight-figure endorsement to include her own signature shoe. nike's offer outsigns her contract with the indiana fever coming a few days later after she was selected as the number one draft pick. i wonder if the white house will tweet that b that. probably not. >> she will be okay. i believe she will be fine. >> dana: if it brings more eyeballs to the game, great. >> bill: you get the tv contract up and you make more money. >> dana: will they make the shoes in my size? i doubt it. >> bill: illegal immigration top political issue number one in america. the senate shrugged off the impeachment article against mayorkas yesterday with barely a glance and no debate. how does that play? bitter anti-israeli protests again at columbia university as the school's president is
all operating off the same sheet of talking points. in fact, if you lookheetf at soe of their tweets and social media posts, they're almost identical. quit and ia postse obviously being sent o by somebody and then they just put them b when they're suppose to to get whatever paycheck or revenue share that they're gettinsuppos g for these tweets. but young people are going to be leaving joe bide.n because quite honestly, this can't go on much longer. sean, you know that i don't believn muchgee he's going to bw the nominee. and i think with each passing day, it becomes more obvious the democrat s are scrambling. can't they can't send him out to places like pennsylvania, which is a need th outd to win e because he might go off script or atalk about cannibals oe becr shaving cream or anything else. so i think we're watching before our very eyesg him being thrown under the bus by his own team and his own party. by hisbut as for donald trump, i mean, even though he's having to be stuck in a courtroom, he still makes time to go and interact with the people. and he goes placespeople h evend york city where you'd think that people would hate him. cod we know that obviously york is far from a conservative place. >> but even in some of these places, he is belovelaces evende folks that you wouldn't expect. so i think the tide is reallfoly
got o it then. >> but they've got so manys problems on their hands right now. democratonheir s do in terms of theirent different factions breaking off and yofactu have black and hisp voters who are fleeing to donald trump noanerw. and then you have these wild divisions among jewish supporterswild d and then this bizarre pro-hamas wing of the democrat party that for some reason joe biden is like trying b to get those voterstho and trying to get the pro-hamas people back in lin- hae to suppt him, which is just the most appalling thing i've ever seen in politics. you know, he would be this could be a sister soldierldie moment where he goes to the hamas wing of the democrat part ho y and says, screw you, b i don't want your votes. but of course, he doesn't do it. >> just the opposite principles . >> and that is why he should be stuck a knife in israel's>> e back. that's why he's twisting it. that's why at the end of the day,twistingf he's emboldening s hamas and the iranians. >> all right. n th exit question.
what we are trying not to do. why do you want to make _ what we are trying not to do. why do you want to make it _ what we are trying not to do. why do you want to make it more _ what we are trying not to do. why do you want to make it more human i what we are trying not to do. why do | you want to make it more human and -ive you want to make it more human and give it— you want to make it more human and give it a _ you want to make it more human and give it a persona? _ you want to make it more human and give it a persona? will— you want to make it more human and give it a persona? will that— you want to make it more human and give it a persona? will that do- you want to make it more human and give it a persona? will that do not. give it a persona? will that do not consume — give it a persona? will that do not consume to — give it a persona? will that do not consume to confuse _ give it a persona? will that do not consume to confuse people? i give it a persona? will that do not. consume to confuse people? young people _ consume to confuse people? young people and — consume to confuse people? young people and children? _ consume to confuse people? young people and children? anyone - consume to confuse people? young people and children? anyone with. consume to confuse people? young. people and children? anyone with an anthropomorphised _ people and children? anyone with an anthropomorphised ink— people and children? anyone with an anthropomorphised ink relationship i anthropomorphised ink relationship with technology _ anthropomorphised ink relationship with technology. is _ anthropomorphised ink relationship with technology. is it _ anthropomorphised ink relationship with technology. is it dangerous? l anthropomorphised ink relationship with technology. is it dangerous? i| with technology. is it dangerous? i do with technology. is it dangerous? do not think so. this is built for creatives. each of our characters has certain characteristics. and so, they have certain things that they are interested in, and certain tastes, and that is what i think is currently missing if you look at chatgpt, for instance. as a creative, i don't want to interact with on it. i want to interact with... b, with on it. i want to interact with... �* ,,, with on it. i want to interact with...- not - with on it. i want to interact i with. . .- not necessarily. it with... a babe? not necessarily. it is not about _ with... a babe? not necessarily. it is not about that. _ with... a babe? not necessarily. it is not about that. it _ with... a babe? not necessarily. it is not about that. it is _ with... a babe? not necessarily. it is not about that. it is about i is not about that. it is about connecting, right? you know, iam a child of the 90s. so, yes, that was my first starting point.— my first starting point. shilo is aoian my first starting point. shilo is aoain to my first starting point. shilo is going to return _ my first starting point. shilo is going to return to _ my first starting point. shilo is going to return to the _ my first starting point. shilo is i going to return to the programme, we will develop her. we are also going
sites just criticizing and doing opinion. i thought this juxtaposition could work on a campaign trail but that's not how this is going to be decided inside that courtroom. >> these are all stories. this is over the last few days from legal experts. wall street journal but all of these are stories from legal experts saying how this is not a case. the case is ridiculous. this is another one, the case is a ridiculous trump indictment. take a look, all of these are stories, you see them here. >> well, that's trump, you know? every -- every corner that he's standing on is a stage, and he will use props. he will use whatever tool is available to him to create a narrative that he thinks best, a, positions him and, b, allows
assumption. we supported the senate bill. essentially the bills that are coming up, although they are separated, and will be voted on separately, the three bills in particular are essentially the senate bills. therefore, it would be reasonable to assume, a, we want to see them passed, and b, we will help achieve that objective. >> let's talk about how the speaker has completely changed his position now. he seems to be willing to ignore the motion to vacate and proceed with foreign aid, which is very unpopular with certain members of his party and with the former president with whom he just met last friday night. what do you think is going on there? >> he has made it clear for some months now that he believes confronting putin was important to do. he believed if putin went in and took ukraine, that he would not stop there, and he would pose a threat to nato nations, and then