TIME flies, 2,555 days have gone by. Today, March 8, marks the seventh anniversary of Malaysia Airlines flight MH370’s disappearance. It was supposed .
MH370 investigators find no proof of ‘rogue pilot’ theory – Telegraph.co.ukby wpjljron Sunday, March 8th, 2015.MH370 investigators find no proof of ‘rogue pilot’ theory – Telegraph.co.uk“There was no known history of apathy, anxiety, or irritability. There were no significant changes in his lifestyle, interpersonal conflict or family stresses.” Some have floated the idea that the pilot might have decided to commit suicide or deliberately crash the plane as part of a complex insurance scam. But the report said, “there is […] “There was no known history of apathy, anxiety, or irritability. There were no significant changes in his lifestyle, interpersonal conflict or family stresses.”
Pix for representational purpose only. I REFER to the Sarawak Report published on Jan 30, on “Jumbo Jets Don’t Just Vanish – At Last Some Answers To The World’s Biggest Aviation Mystery”, based on the book The Disappearing Act written by a French author Florence de Changy. I fully agree with Florence’s assertion that such a big jetliner cannot just simply disappear into the thin air and her take that “the US military shot down MH370” was very interesting. If so, that is considered murder and the perpetrators have to be brought to the International Court of Justice, like those believed to be responsible for the shooting down of MH17.
Happened. caveat for everybody watching. but what we know right now, who could be responsible for this at this point besides one of the pilots? well, the way that that plane was taken off course and the way that it was subsequently flown way point to way point, apparently deviating in such a way that it would avoid radar seems to have been very clever, very purposely flown with a lot of savvy and sophistication with the way planes are flown and the way airline operations are conducted. perhaps there was someone else on board who was able to fly a plane in that kind of way. we don t know. apparently all these passengers have been cleared. so suspicion, again, falls on the pilot. two completely opposing things from the malaysian government. i want to bring in the president of malaysia s national union of flight attendants. he worked with captain zaharie ahmad shah and the crew.
This point indicating he was involved. you know him. what would you say? captain zaharie as i know and the rest of our crewmembers, we used to work together. and i believe that captain zaharie is a very simple guy. he is very professional during his work. and being a commander, he always takes charge of his flight. i don t see any problems working with him, neither any one of our crewmembers. we ve never had any problems working with anybody so far. and last couple of years that i flew with him and, you know, we ve spoken a few things. but it s kind of that we see each other and we talk about normal things. and that s about it, you know. nothing strange about anything. interesting you say he is a simple guy. what do you think about the new rules that have been imposed? because there was a report that there are new rules after that incident that would not allow anybody to be alone in the cockpit. and that was a change in rules. some people said well, is that
Good to have you with us. i appreciate you take:00 the time. what can you tell us in terms of anyone you knew and the pilots on this plane, and what they were like as the investigation still seems to focus on those individual. yeah, hi, erin. basically, i think we are currently right now looking at some family members and also the crew who we have spoken to. and the last time that i spoke to them was about a couple of days ago. and basically, i ve worked with some of the crewmembers before. so i know captain zaharie also, because we were flying colleagues before. and we did a couple of flights. and basically, also some of the flight attendants who naturally work with us together on several flights. do you think, ismail, that any of these people could have been responsible? obviously people are talking about the captain simply because he was the captain. and a lot of focus has gone there. there has been no evidence at
Is a simple man. it s what we ve heard all along that he was good man, he was a well liked man, he was a man who was respected enormously. yes. may i ask a quick question? yes. ismail, this is richard. hi, it s richard quest in new york. quick question. the morale now for your colleagues malaysia airlines, bearing in mind the enormous weight of this investigation and the stress of it all? yeah, i think everybody is, you know, a little bit edgy and also a little bit curious about what is going on. but people are talking about it. but that s kind of normal to me right now because we know that things not as what it s supposed to be. but we are just waiting and just hoping that things can come by and more answers will come in the next coming weeks. ismail, before you go, i know you said captain zaharie was a
Because there is speculation that somebody in the cockpit was responsible for what happened to this plane. what is your response to that? yeah, i think it s a natural thing. every airline has got security measures that is undertaken. and basically, what i see is that when the airline impose security measures where crewmembers are supposedly to become barriers to the cockpit. so, you know, anybody who wants to come in, they have got to go through the flight attendants. and the flight attendants will get the response from the pilots. and the pilots will give the go ahead. so that s about it. you know, basically, that s about what we see. and it s kind of natural right now that they heighten up the security. and what we are just saying is i think it s good for everybody to discuss more measures than just to come out with a simple policy, which we look at it in that way. and richard, what do you make about what ismail is just saying here, that captain zaharie shah
Indications they may have sabotaged or hijacked the plane, and so far, they ve all been cleared. as we said earlier, only the passengers have been cleared. the rest, no. now, the focus of the investigation is the cabin crew, which included captain zaharie ahmad shah and his co-pilot fariq hamid. the investigators assisted malaysian investigators with the flight same later the pilot had at his home. and up to this point, there have not been any red flags for the pilot or co-pilot. there hasn t been anything found. anywhere they look, they don t know where to look, they finally admitted to that. they don t know how fast it was flying, how high it was flying. they don t know why it was flying wherever it is, and they had an area for reasons they ve gone through they thought might be the right place, searched it all, and sort of moved it willy-nilly. what are they doing? you re right, shep. it s all over the place. a lot of the search is based on
Experts analyzing the data about the radars and data from satellites. that s a separate matter from the investigation into the people involved with this airplane. i know we just seem to be going in circles, right? there aren t any hard core answers right now. i mean, you look at the pilot. there s no hard core evidence against him at all. nothing on his flight simulator. fbi said there s no smoking gun, right? we can t find anything in his background remotely suspicious. i understand why captain shah s daughter is so angry. right. when the malaysian authorities say human hands turned that aircraft, they re not saying it had to be the pilot or co-pilot. they re not ruling out that someone else came in the cockpit and either made them turn or did the turn themselves. we ve heard so many reports the co-pilot wasn t capable of flying this aircraft and making it turn around.