People in the audience there, what they were feeling and thinking, when there was actually no discussion about real jobs or how to put people back to work. but it was one of those debates where i ve enjoyed watching all these republican party debates, and it just, you know, tonight we learned from michele bachmann that $10 for people who didn t know what $10 was, it s two happy meals. huntsman, who was really like the only sane person there, you know. it s like he s the it s like he s taken defiantly sane, jon huntsman. it s like he s taken the other seven out on a field trip. like they don t know they re at a debate. like he s the doctor and he s brought them around. but he said something and perry, over what he did there, where he was trying to remember the third department that he would get rid of. i thought the next question to him actually was going to be, name the three meals you ve had today. and he s going, breakfast,
Lunch and they were trying to help him out. they were shouting out departments. epa! close the epa! close this, close that! and to john harwood s credit oh, fantastic. i loved that he stayed with it. he stayed with it. he department allow it to be laughed off. i thought, boy, that was a great moment. but huntsman s ending moment, because i think he s, again, the sanest of the bunch, he said that he wants medical records computerized and streamlined so that patients will receive a more efficacious form of treatment. i think using the word efficacious at a republican debate, you re over! you re just over! that s the end of you. sadly. yeah. and it is over. they talked a little bit about the foreclosure crisis, the housing crisis in this country. the republican plan is, of course, both from ron paul and mitt romney, each end of that very narrow conservative spectrum that s out there. each end says, oh, you know,
Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20111110:03:00:00 vimarsana.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from vimarsana.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Unimpeachable integrity who will top to bottom review what happened. what were the systems failures that took place here? why did this happen? why was it covered up? who was involved? and they need to issue a report that is completely transparent and completely honest. and whether, you know, it is a former governor of impeccable credentials like tom ridge, you know, some democratic counterparts, but people of impeccable integrity need to cam forward, i think, be called forward, to evaluate this and to report on it with total transparency and get all the facts out there, after a thorough investigation. steve schmidt, thank you again for joining me. we ll be back with more, with michael moore. we ll get to talking about the debate. and later, my interview with jack abramoff. we know a place where tossing and turning
A conspiracy between rick perry, the democrats, and the media. i think these are extreme charges, and it was a extraordinary moment, when someone who is accused by four women of sexual harassment, when he refers to speaker pelosi as princess pelosi. i just thought it was an extraordinary moment. i thought in a poker game, i thought it was a big tell. and i disagree with nancy pelosi on nearly everything, but she earned that title. and his contempt that he showed towards her, i just thought it was bad, thought it was a big tell, and i think herman cain is going to lose ground rapidly in this race, you know, in the next couple of weeks. alex, he referred to nancy pelosi as princess pelosi later in the debate on a health care question. but there was one more round where john harwood tried to reignite this question of the
To be rebuilt, no doubt about that. but you can t name the third one? the third agency of government? i would do away with education, the commerce. commerce. and let s see i can t. the third one i can t. sorry. oops. i said at the end of rick perry s first debate that he had destroyed his candidacy by attacking social security. he could not possibly beat president obama by attacking social security if he ever got to be the nominee and he probably couldn t win the republican nomination with that attack on social security. tonight, he just lost all hope of even being considered for the vice presidential nomination. the party cannot afford to send that man into a debate with joe biden. joining me now is msnbc analyst steve schmidt. he is the former senior adviser to the mccain/palin campaign, and a senior strategist in the
And on this, he just wasn t so sure exactly what to make of it, when he first heard about it. i mean, such are the political pressures of such a thing in pennsylvania. well, and plus, you know, these politicians like santorum and the people we saw in the debate tonight, i don t know what planet they re on. i don t know what world they live in, but this issue of sexual abuse, of rape, whether it s of children or whether it s of i forgot what the statistic was of how many, you know, women are raped every few minutes there s at least one woman raped every few minutes in this country. it s a huge, huge problem. it really doesn t get discussed very much. and you saw tonight in the debate when maria bartiromo attempted to ask cain the question, she got booed, and then after his answer, you had one of the loudest applauses of the night. the applause said very clearly, shut up, woman, don t ask questions like that. and, obviously, we still have a long way to go.
Freddie mac in 2006. what did you do for that money? are you asking me? i have never done any lobbying. every contract that was written during the period when i was out of the office specifically said i would do no lobbying and i offered advice. it s sad that the news media doesn t report accurately how the economy works. what is the media reporting inaccurately about the economy? what? the cnbc republican presidential debate tonight included a meltdown moment, the likes of which we have never seen in a presidential debate. it s three agencies of government when i get there that are gone. commerce, education, and the what s the third one there? let s see. you mean five? oh, five, okay. so commerce, education and the um? epa? epa, there you go. seriously? is epa the one you were talking about? no, sir. no, sir. we re talking about the agencies of government the epa needs
Sure exactly what to make of it, when he first heard about it. i mean, such are the political pressures of such a thing in pennsylvania. well, and plus, you know, these politicians like santorum and the people we saw in the debate tonight, i don t know what planet they re on. i don t know what world they live in, but this issue of sexual abuse, of rape, whether it s of children or whether it s of i forgot what the statistic was of how many, you know, women are raped every few minutes there s at least one woman raped every few minutes in this country. it s a huge, huge problem. it really doesn t get discussed very much. and you saw tonight in the debate when maria bartiromo attempted to ask cain the question, she got booed, and then after his answer, you had one of the loudest applauses of the night. the applause said very clearly, shut up, woman, don t ask questions like that.
oh, fantastic. i loved that he stayed with it. he stayed with it. he department allow it to be laughed off. i thought, boy, that was a great moment. but huntsman s ending moment, because i think he s, again, the sanest of the bunch, he said that he wants medical records computerized and streamlined so that patients will receive a more efficacious form of treatment. i think using the word efficacious at a republican debate, you re over! you re just over! that s the end of you. sadly. yeah. and it is over. they talked a little bit about the foreclosure crisis, the housing crisis in this country. the republican plan is, of course, both from ron paul and mitt romney, each end of that very narrow conservative spectrum that s out there. each end says, oh, you know, tough. you know, don t do a thing. let the market completely bottom out. let everybody lose their hopeless who has to lose their