In a precedential opinion issued last month, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) held that when the single issue presented on appeal is whether a prior art.
Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act is one of the most-litigated privacy statutes, but aspects of the law remain unsettled. Two appeals, Cothron v. White Castle System, Inc. and Tims v. Black Horse Carriers, Inc., will clarify BIPA claims statute of limitations.
BIPA Case Paused Until Courts Clarify Statute of Limitations natlawreview.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from natlawreview.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
The USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has increasingly used its discretionary denial authority in recent years. Although the PTAB’s discretion under 35 U.S.C. § 314(a) and.
The Federal Circuit's recent precedential decision in SRI Int'l., Inc. v. Cisco Sys., Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2021) clarified the test for willful infringement.
Overlooked Patent Cases: Indirect Infringement Developments - Intellectual Property mondaq.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from mondaq.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Wednesday, July 07, 2021 Gabara v. Facebook, Inc., No. 2020-2333 Gabara sued Facebook Inc. in the Southern District of New York asserting infringement of several patents relating to imaging technology. Facebook moved to dismiss, arguing the claims of the asserted patents were invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The district court granted Facebook s motion. It found at Alice Step One that the claims were directed to the abstract idea of [m]oving the device to change one s view of the image. At Alice Step Two, the district court found no inventive concept, finding the patents employ conventional computer hardware and processes, in an ordinary
This installment of our monthly Law360 bid protest spotlight examines three protest decisions from three different forums: one from the Government Accountability Office (GAO), one from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and one from U.S. Court of Federal Claims (COFC). In Mayatech Corp., the GAO addressed its jurisdiction to hear bid protests of task orders valued at less than $10 million in limited circumstances. The Federal Circuit also addressed a jurisdictional question this month in LAX Electronics, Inc., where it interpreted the meaning of the requirement that a bid protest must be “in connection with a procurement or proposed procurement” to invoke the COFC’s bid protest jurisdiction. Finally, in