Live Breaking News & Updates on Justices sahidullah munshi

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from Justices sahidullah munshi on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in Justices sahidullah munshi and stay connected to the pulse of your community

Ayman

provide oversight and accountability, to restore faith and truth to the court so that the public can understand what is actually happening in the court and police what is happening inside of the court and how the justices conduct themselves. >> give us a sense of how that's being received. it will require bipartisan support. do you have republican colleagues who share your concerns in a meaningful way, and how do you think this is been received by the courts, whose argument has been that congress does not have an oversight role to play over the supreme court behavior? >> well, the founding fathers, when they set up three branches of government, intended for there to be checks and balances. the role of congress is to write the laws, ensure that we are doing appropriate policing of our agencies, and the judiciary is supposed to police at golf. court, up and down, from the

Supreme-court , Justices , Public , Oversight , Truth , Accountability , Faith , Police , Way , Support , U-s- , Colleagues

Ayman

6th, was really acting in presidential capacity, whether he was exercising presidential duties or whether the even enter the outer perimeter of his wrath -- of his presidential duties. if the answer is yes, the supreme court has to decide, and does immunity apply, does it apply to the so-called presidential ask? in particular, do they apply when the president is no longer the president and is a former president? even in those issues, there really five or six issues. it will probably take the court some time to resolve it and they probably won't come out with a decision until late june. on the question of, is it troubling it took so long? yes. i don't think it had to take so long. i think this was a compromise and it's my speculation there were certain justices who said, i don't see why we should expedite this at all and there were other justices who said, let's get this show on the

Duties , Answer , Perimeter , Wrath , Capacity , 6 , President , Supreme-court , Issues , Immunity , Particular , Decision

Ayman

the judicial ethics enforcement act of 2024. this bill has gained support from congressman adam schiff and would create an office of the inspector general to ensure accountability for justices sitting on the supreme court. congresswoman stansbury joins me now. great to have you back on the show. very important piece of legislation that you and others have introduced. we know the court released its first formal code of ethics in november and it was criticized for lacking enforcement mechanisms, it didn't really include any new roles that would address the lapses that we've seen from some of the justices recently. how did that play into your decision to introduce the bill, and why now? >> thank you for having me. it's very clear that this is one of the most captured courts, probably ever in american history and if we need any evidence of that, besides the enormous gifts, the travel. we

Bill , Supreme-court , Support , Justices , Congresswoman-stansbury , Accountability , Adam-schiff , Judicial-ethics-enforcement-act , Office-of-the-inspector-general , 2024 , On-the-road , Piece

The Source With Kaitlan Collins

you can in a case like this, with passion and reason, you could say they prove their case. what came out of here, you determine what justices. >> and so then helped me with the second level. he's helped making the opening argument for the defense. he did the prosecution. you're the lawyer at the table? what are you doing? you watch him, you watching the jury trying to figure out who's doing what i'm watching both, but i'm not a big believer in watching body language or facial expressions because we've all had the experience, a jordan nods at you throughout the entire island, you lose. so it's something that doesn't really work. >> you know, it's funny because you'll sometime be watching majority of the whole trial it could be months long and you think i got this juror at the end of the day that's the one you did everybody hear not that i think they keep it thematic. right. i think that's how you captivate your audience. you keep it really generic, just giving them a sense of what you'll do. but i'm looking for what the defense will do at the end of the day quickly you can talk about michael cohen being a perjurer. you can talk about stormy daniels being unsavory.

His-civil-fraud-verdict , Defense , Case , Reason , Justices , Argument , Passion , Level , Prosecution , Jury , Experience , Lawyer

FOX and Friends Saturday

their supreme court because of politics. so it really wouldn't reach a resolution of true justice until it met the united states supreme court. pete: and that could take who knows how long. nicole: similar to when the states were trying to remove donald trump from the state ballot, it had to get to the supreme court for them to unanimously vote -- pete: because trump appointed a bunch of the justices. will: meanwhile, congratulations to pete and tennessee. pete: you seemed to think this was not a big win for me, you seemed to think it was not -- she could is chosen any number of states including texas -- will: a "sports illustrated" model chose nashville, tennessee, to relocate after of the declining state of california. here she is last night on jesse watters. >> you know, you come to california to, it's the city of dreams, the state of dreams, right? you think this is where i can accomplish anything. but it does not feel safe anymore. i don't feel safe going to the grocery store. i don't go anywhere outside without my if husband with me, and i certainly don't take my

Pete , Nicole-saphier , Donald-trump , It , States , Politics , Court , Justice , United-states-supreme-court , State-ballot , Wouldn-t-reach-a-resolution , To-a-w-will

The Chris Wallace Show

very careful about. and that's not coming from donald trump's lawyers. that's coming from walter dellinger, who was president clinton's a solicitor general he made that case way back in 1995. you gotta be really careful when you're risking having criminal laws interfere with the president's official duties. trying to overturn an election that was about to say, then you make a determination based on the specific facts of the case. but i think that there are some cases like going to the justice department and saying, hey baby, we need to investigate something. you might not like it, but that could be within the scope of a president's official duties. >> lulu correctly, how many justices will sayyed with trump that when it comes to officially always know, we always know the same three are always going to take aside and there are neil gorsuch, they are samuel alito and they are his good, good, good powell lauren strong, clarence, thomas owe you all know already i was i was ridiculous. gorsuch is the most pro criminal defendant justice on the court, regardless of the politics of

Donald-trump , Case , Laws , Lawyers , Walter-dellinger , Clinton , Solicitor-general , 1995 , Something , President , Saying , Election

The Chris Wallace Show

is actually using this as an opportunity, whether you like it or not, visited nypd cop who was killed on the job and go to this let me just say from the front page of the new york post getting them in court room. >> anyway, i want to pick up on yet another legal case that donald trump's involved in. this thursday, the supreme court is going to hear donald trump's case for total immunity for a president in involving official akre rayyan how many justices do you think we'll sayyed with trump either for complete immunity or partial immunity. >> it's hard for me to say. i will say that i think that chief justice roberts is going to be open to the argument that the dc circuit used very loose reasoning when issuing there decision here, you could say that no, he is not immune to all criminal prosecutions. but when you're looking at criminal laws that have some bearing on a president's official duties. that's something that you want to be

Case , Opportunity , Job , Cop , New-york-post , Court-room , Page , Nypd , Donald-trump , President , Immunity , Justices

The Journal Editorial Report

paul: with a full jury of 12 people and six alternates now seated opening statements set for monday in the hush money trial in manhattan. the former president facing a gag order, prosecutors say he has already violated as the supreme court is set to hear oral arguments in his bid to claim immunity from criminal prosecution with a decision expected from the justices. by late june. it is shaping up to be a busy week for the former president and his legal team. what is the most significant news we learned from the trial? >> the biggest thing is a little about about these 12 people and a slice of new york who will be rendering a verdict in this case. that was expectation that jury selection might take a couple weeks. the judge and lawyers blazed through that. these 12 anonymous people on investment banker, educator,

Paul , People , President , Statements , Jury , Alternates , Hush-money-trial-in-manhattan , 12 , Six , Immunity , Prosecution , Arguments

All In With Chris Hayes

on tuesday, the supreme court heard oral arguments in an appeal from a former pennsylvania police officer named joseph fisher who face multiple crimes for shoving his way into the capitol on january 6th. he was charged with obstruction of an official proceeding. which in this case of course, the congressional certification of the 2020 election. hundreds of others have been charged or convicted of that as well. he wants that felony charge dismissed and the majority conservatives of justices sounded sympathetic to his argument that the obstruction law should only apply to evidence tampering and not say a congressional proceeding. hundreds have been charged with

Supreme-court , On-tuesday , Way , Police-officer , Crimes , Appeal , Pennsylvania , Joseph-fisher , Arguments , Obstruction , Capitol-on-january-6th , 6

All In With Chris Hayes

felony charge dismissed. and the conservative majority of justices sounded skeptical of the charge and sympathetic to fisher's argument that that obstruction law should only apply to evidence tampering, and not, say, a congressional proceeding to serve a final action. here's the thing. hundreds of accused and convicted of insurrections have been charged with this particular obstruction charge, and so is donald trump. when the court appeared to hold in oral arguments yesterday a sudden concern about the first amendment right to peaceably assemble, the possible use of this statutory charge by the government to overreach and criminalize it, which itself would be a perfectly legitimate concern if it weren't for the fact that on monday, the day before those very same oral arguments, the same supreme court once again acted by not acting, and allowed a lower court ruling to stand that would effectively make it legally impossible to organize protests in three states, particularly black lives matter protests. in that case, a louisiana police officer was injured by a protester, and he sued the man

Thing , Action , Majority , Proceeding , Argument , Charge , Joseph-fisher , Felony-charge , Justices , Obstruction-law , Evidence-tampering , Hundreds-of-accused