Stay updated with breaking news from Laura flam. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
who we called laura. it wasn't her real name, and her words are spoken for her to protect her identity. her case was featured in today's report. here, she tells me how the abuse escalated. not only went from having money and phones, it was then having to then have sex with not one, not two, but more of their friends, and then it became like the vicious circle of the grooming. yeah, well, i got picked up, then, as what they call my friends, and as we drove up onto the top of the hills, it was like half one in the morning, pitch black, and they were making me do sexual, give, have sex with these other men, and as i refused and said no, then there was arguing and fighting, and i was having to fight them off me. and then they took my coat and my shoes off me, and theyjust threw me out of the car and i was left there on my own, and a passer—by walked past and picked me up and took me to police station.
arabia, you're now saying that you might not do that.— might not do that. i said we will review, might not do that. i said we will review. and _ might not do that. i said we will review, and we _ might not do that. i said we will review, and we will— might not do that. i said we will review, and we will review. i might not do that. i said we will i review, and we will review. people on the left. _ review, and we will review. people on the left, listening _ review, and we will review. people on the left, listening to _ review, and we will review. people on the left, listening to promises i on the left, listening to promises that you make to them in 2020, and even people who have got to know you as opposition leader, they might have heard quite a few times you shifting your position on things, there is nothing wrong with people changing their mind but do you accept that sometimes you give people that impression, there are contradictions between the keir starmer of 2024 and the keir starmer of 2020. ., ., ., ., of 2020. laura, we are in a different — of 2020. laura, we are in a different position _ of 2020. laura, we are in a different position when i of 2020. laura, we are in a different position when it i of 2020. laura, we are in a i different position when it comes to geopolitics and the conflicts that are going on and obviously we have to adapt to the situation in front of us, but let me push back on this wider point, because labour party members are predominantly, overwhelmingly, behind what we've done with the party, to change the party. fouryears done with the party, to change the party. four years ago we were picking ourselves up, bruised, from a terrible election result, and most people, the pessimists in the party, thought that the labour party will never, everwin
operation that took place just a few days ago was very clearly an operation to deal with the houthi attacks in the red sea, this is commercial shipping, these are civilians. in commercial shipping, these are civilians. . ., ., ., civilians. in much of the are world, as ou civilians. in much of the are world, as you know. _ civilians. in much of the are world, as you know, that _ civilians. in much of the are world, as you know, that is _ civilians. in much of the are world, as you know, that is not _ civilians. in much of the are world, as you know, that is not the i civilians. in much of the are world, | as you know, that is not the houthi view, or the view of much of the arab world, that actually this is about this wider pattern? well, i think that is _ about this wider pattern? well, i think that is hard _ about this wider pattern? well, i think that is hard to _ about this wider pattern? well, i think that is hard to sustain i about this wider pattern? well, i | think that is hard to sustain when you look at the targets of the attacks in the red sea, which looked to me to be pretty arbitrary. but in the end, laura, what you're putting to me is that somehow there should be no response to these attacks in the red sea. i don't think that that's appropriate. i haven't actually met or talked to anybody who says the right thing to do is simply to allow these attacks to happen, if they escalate, so be it. nobody thinks that. so, action had to be taken. i was pleased to be briefed about it, we supported that action, the prime minister needs to make a statement. if there is to be further action, and i don't know because i have not been briefed on that, i would expect that briefing,
minister, really established the convention, which is, if there is to be a sustained campaign, the deployment of troops on the ground... deployment of troops on the ground- - -— deployment of troops on the ground... deployment of troops on the round... , ., , , ground... so, the small print is about the _ ground... so, the small print is about the sustained _ ground... so, the small print is about the sustained campaign. | ground... so, the small print is i about the sustained campaign. hear me out, because _ about the sustained campaign. hear me out, because what _ about the sustained campaign. he: me out, because what david cameron down as prime minister did what i think right, which was to say, if we are going to deploy our troops, there has to be a viable case, and that should be put before parliament and the information made available as far as it can be, there has to be as far as it can be, there has to be a proper legal basis because we are deploying our troops, and there should be a vote.— deploying our troops, and there should be a vote. think our viewers would like to _ should be a vote. think our viewers would like to know, _ should be a vote. think our viewers would like to know, if _ should be a vote. think our viewers would like to know, if you - should be a vote. think our viewers would like to know, if you win i should be a vote. think our viewers would like to know, if you win the i would like to know, if you win the election, will you still introduce that lord? election, will you still introduce that lord?— election, will you still introduce that lord? ~ ., ., , that lord? well, i want to codify that, it that lord? well, i want to codify that. it could — that lord? well, i want to codify that, it could be _ that lord? well, i want to codify that, it could be by— that lord? well, i want to codify that, it could be by a _ that lord? well, i want to codify that, it could be by a law, i that lord? well, i want to codify that, it could be by a law, it- that lord? well, i want to codifyi that, it could be by a law, it could be by some other means, but i am absolutely clear that is a principle i want to see entrenched. you won't commit to passing _ i want to see entrenched. you won't commit to passing it _ i want to see entrenched. you won't commit to passing it as _ i want to see entrenched. you won't commit to passing it as a _ i want to see entrenched. you won't commit to passing it as a law? i'm i commit to passing it as a law? i'm not rulin: commit to passing it as a law? in not ruling out law. but laura of course there will be urgent situations, because when we are on joint operations, where it simply is not possible always, or even wise
situation, the review will _ to say in 2020? we will review the situation, the review will clear i situation, the review will clear what the position is. i situation, the review will clear what the position is.— situation, the review will clear what the position is. i think today ou are what the position is. i think today you are perhaps— what the position is. i think today you are perhaps slightly - what the position is. i think today you are perhaps slightly backing i you are perhaps slightly backing away from some of the things that you said a few years ago. so, you said when you make your prevention of military action promise, it wasn't there in the small print that you only meant boots on the ground. you've just you only meant boots on the ground. you'vejust said... i you only meant boots on the ground. you've just said. . ._ you've just said. .. i would challenge _ you've just said. .. i would challenge that, _ you've just said. .. i would challenge that, laura, i you've just said. .. i would i challenge that, laura, because i made it very clear when i was saying that that it was to codify the existing convention. it's absolutely clear from the cabinet manual, it's absolutely clear from what david cameron did as then prime minister that that was about a sustained campaign with troops on the ground. i'm not sure that our labour activists listening to you understood that complexity. laura, no labour activist _ understood that complexity. laura, no labour activist has _ understood that complexity. laura, no labour activist has ever - understood that complexity. laura, no labour activist has ever said i understood that complexity. laura, no labour activist has ever said to, | no labour activist has ever said to, if urgent action is needed, we should stop that in order for parliament to be convened. this isn't something that is put... fin isn't something that is put... on arms sales. _ isn't something that is put... 0n arms sales, you used to say that you would stop the sale of arms to saudi arabia, you're now saying that you might not do that. i
the federal government that bill trump is going to push back. bill: d, thank you for being here jeff a prediction for tomorrow night? >> i think trump overwhelmingly the marjoram have to look at. dana: you think a second? back in place? what second-place could be a tossup. because desantis has a bigger -- better ground game he might come in second period it would not surprise me if haley does a bit up ifdesantis does come in third place i do not know if the train looks good for him because new hampshire that's not is time to show big. bill: we will see. dana: please give our best your wife laura. thank you for being here. >> thank you so much. when show effects and across iowa. it's not stopping the candidates who are out there stumping for votes as temperatures dip well below freezing. here's the net forecast chief meteorologist. >> did you go outside today? >> yes, i did.
she said it in writing. she fund raised off it and she wasn't even specific. the day after she was elected and she said and i quote we are definitely going to sue his ass he will know my name. when you make statements like that, how can you say there is no political angle to this? >> laura: look at that other panelist just disturbed that he was actually saying something. can you take that back now? she did come out today and said this case has never been about politics, sol. >> it's an absolute joke. just an absolute joke. it's an ethics problem. she campaigned, everybody has said it a million times but it's true. she campaigned on throwing him in jail. it's unethical in my view. >> laura: is there an ethical move here, an ethics action that could be filed against her for this obviously blatantly political case that she brought? >> laura, laura, laura, they only do that against bill barr in new york. that's the only person they bring an ethical complaint against. >> laura: the judge would be part of this as well this should
the "boston globe" has still donald trump winning in new hampshire by 20 points. we can't forget the amount of money that she has spent. she has big dollar. of the old school republican donors that don't like trump that have given her money. now, money in politics does have impact. having ads on the air make a difference. it's not going to matter in iowa it. could close the gap in new hampshire if we're being honest. if she closes the gap and coming comes within 8, 9 points of trump does she have momentum moving forward, i think she does, does chris christie change that up? i don't think so. but, again. >> laura: hey, sean? >> yes. >> laura: you want to put some money on this right now on national tv? so you are saying that nikki haley is going to have momentum after new hampshire? is that what you are saying. >> i'm saying money matters and if she comes within 7 or 8 points of trump, do you get momentum out of that especially where trump is up by 20, to points, if can you close the gap, i don't like it. i have been a trump supporter. i'm a make america great again
hearts, there we are, sharing our hearts. >> laura: mayor adams putses on a good show. american kids come last, ask parents at james madison high school in brooklyn. yesterday they were told their sons and daughters had to return to remote learning because migrants living in tents were being moved to their gymnasium. >> speechless, shocked, i thought it was a joke. we expected everything, we have been through everything, covid and everything. this just beyond. no matter how hard teachers try, facetiming your friends does not constitute learning. we have to provide immunization papers otherwise they are not allowed into the school. those people were not checked at all. >> laura: they were checked on to see if they are comfortable
The Ingraham Angle vimarsana.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from vimarsana.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.