Dust from the Sahara blankets the Greek capital while parts of Finland experience unusual amounts of snow in what public broadcaster labels ‘freak April weather.’
An element of his obituary. le. an element of his obituary. sound like you? nah.not me. in a relationship. if you re sexually active and unvaccinated, it could still be you. i m too old if you re under 45, you re not. for most people, hpv clears on its own. but for those who don t clear the virus, it can cause certain cancers. wow. gardasil 9 is a vaccine given to adults through age 45 that can help protect against certain hpv-related cervical, vaginal, vulvar, anal, and certain head and neck cancers, such as throat and back of mouth cancers, and genital warts. gardasil 9 doesn t protect everyone and doesn t treat cancer or hpv infection. these diseases may have many causes. your doctor may recommend screening for certain hpv-related cancers. routine cervical cancer screenings are still needed. you shouldn t get gardasil 9 if you re allergic to the vaccine, its ingredients, or yeast. tell your doctor if you have a weakened immune system, are pregnant, or plan to be.
Happened. is it a good idea? we re going to ask le about that, plus one hardline republican governor is trying to show her loyalty to donald trump, or is she and sharing a wave, the special visitors, one surfer had on her champion in ship winning rod the sinking of the titanic. how would really happen, especially to our premier sunday at nar on see our biggest challenge, uncertainty hidden fees, surcharges. who knows what texpect, turn shipping to your advange, keep it simple with clea upfront pricing with usps ground advantage when you re the leader is that s the clean up on respirion. how do you make like it never even happened happened brand
Many not all, but many of which donald trump himself signed. i would want to put those documents in front of the jury as early as possible. you say this is rock solid evidence here. this is documentary evidence is donald trump s name literally signed on the line. so that s what i would do in this situation. but you want to be safe and solid le on that point though trump s attorney, susan necklace, asked the judge if they could have the witness name, and by the way, this was a really interesting part. be ordered not to share it with their client what does that tell you about the relationship perhaps between trump and his attorneys? well it tells us that there s minimal trust, certainly from the judge over to donald trump and his team. i think the reason donald trump s attorneys suggested that was to try to get the judge to order the prosecutor to tell him who the witnesses is going to be. the law, you know, what a narrowly judges will make prosecutors turnover the names of their witnesses, sometimes on a friday, they ll say okay, who you call next week at a minimum, they ll say, okay, who you call in tomorrow
Or next business day. and defense lawyers need to know that because they have a witness list with dozens and dozens of names, but they need to know who they re prepping to cross-examine on monday and because the judge doesn t trust donald trump and because maybe to some extent his lawyers are wary of what he ll do the lawyers now don t have that ability to fully prepare in advance in a very cheered on that 0.2. and i think about that as perhaps necklace was saying, look, if you tell me i can t tell my client, then it s easier for me when i tell my client i m not going to tell you because i m not sure what you re going to do with the information. richard, judge merchan is deciding which prior trump the court cases or what they call a category of like bad acts can be used as evidence at the trial. so how could evidence like this effect a jury? it s obviously not intended to prove this particular case, but it s useful nonetheless well, lauren and le, been one of the main key issues is going to be in this case, has to do with his
Got to make sure that they are dotting all those eyes, are putting all those pieces together so that in the final closing argument, his lawyer can stand up and draw on that. i m saying that in the absence of any of that kind of testimony, i think it puts pressure on donald trump. quick response from you on that le you re right though, defense lawyers are allowed to argue inferences, so we re prosecutors and i think that s a much safer way for them to do that. you go folks, you know, this man has a family, any normal common sense human being would be embarrassed about these allegations. that s what happened here. that s enough for you to argue alan turkheimer, if you had participating in selecting this jury for the defense for donald trump, how would you be feeling right now? you feeling good the anti-trump sentiment is so prevalent in the county and during the process, it came to the surface. so all the jurors who expressed that they have been like donald trump, they didn t like what he stood for. he said bad things about him.
Issue with being away from their family in a greater way than they currently are. so i would be concerned that some of them would have to go joe jones, the former president, said again today that he intends to testify. do you think that could change? ange once the judge actually rules and which of his past legal run-ins can be introduced as evidenced, are or do you think it s him just talking that no defense attorney would allow his client in this case to testify well, here s a scenario, anderson i think could happen, and ellie mae agree with me on this that, you know, he s saying he s going to testify. and then judge merchan and i agree fully with the le that although the prosecution has loaded the wagon with a number of things that they d like to introduce a go-to his credibility so now, merchan will give them some things and you could imagine that former president trump would say, well, you know, i was going to testify, but this corrupt judge is letting all this evidence and that s irrelevant cases that i have on
On tuesday, we still are not sure when the final passage of this package would come together, but it does say a lot because the senate and it was supposed to be in recess next week, they re returning to washington because they view this as so needed. so immediate le, important that they want to take action as soon as possible. alex. yeah, the senate very eager to pass this. lauren before i let you go speaking of the senate, they passed a bill late on friday to reauthorize the fisa warrantless surveillance program. that s despite bipartisan concern and after hours of intense in an acrimonious debate. so what helped push it through yeah, i think there was just a resounding view from so many folks that this needed to pass before the deadline which happened last night at midnight. so there was this last minute ditch effort where they were able to put together a package, passed acid on the floor, gives some votes, gives some amendment votes to those who wanted them and move this forward. but we should just note this is another moment where speaker mike johnson and