He and his allies are trying to come up with rationals. it s really important when we talk about his attorney, when you welcome at his interviews, the first words were to compare it to the january 6th committee. you do that because you re making a a political argument. when the rest of the trump attorneys are thinking about this case, what they are thinking about is getting it past november 2024. it s very explicit. now they are saying we want to keep this out until after the election. donald trump s strategy has been basically from the beginning the political strategy. i get elected president, this all goes away. frnkly, when we speak to legal experts, that s probably his best bet. he and his allies, they are doing whatever ta can to come up with some excuse, not to convince the judge or the jury, but they are going to convince his base. all this is unfounded and he s under attack. what the bidens are doing is worse. that s why we hear the arguments and why we hear kevin mccarthy
To welcome him that didn t materialize. but i don t think we re going to fully understand yesterday s events for some days or maybe even weeks. marsha, do you have a sense about the whole issue of the people on the the streets in rostov, for example, seemed to be cheering him on. that would seem kind of dangerous? what conclusion do you draw from that? so, you know, his main audience is the military and the people who adjacent to the military. and that is exactly who was in rostov, in the streets of rostov. i wouldn t put too much stock into his undermining the rational for the war narrative. there are many rationals for the war, it works by creating a caulko phony and what he has done is he s tapped into a deal
Saying, quote, bragg should come and explain to us exactly what he s investigating do those tweets, those explicit statements we re going to come get you alvin bragg, does that matter in the context of the judge going to be handling this complaint from the d.a.? i think they will matter to the judge. first of all it s going to have to be more than this for jordan to go forward with this, but he will be allowing jordan to come up with completely new rationals that are nowhere cited in his prior statements, and the bay courts look at this they let legislators essentially have a do over. to be sure if all they can come up with is what you ve just read, that isn t enough, but it won t be essentially up to the subjective statements by jordan. the lawyers can now come in and offer some completely new super financial pretextual explanation for what they re doing, and that will be the clash in court i mean i have to say when you look at this from the long lens
China foreign minister before. i think two things are at play here. i think both xi and his team are under consideration for an opportunity for xi saying he know you re going through a hard time and prices are a problem, and in certain areas, but the united states and its allies have been making life impossible for us by the pressure they ve brought to bear on us domestically. so i think that is one of the rationals. but when a chinese president said something as definitive of this it has its policy significance and i do believe it further accelerates china s preparedness militarily for a future action over taiwan if and when xi jinping so chooses. so how did we get here?
The stew of lies, and people are, you know, more accepted these lies over two years. too many people have accepted these lies. too many politicians have run on these lice and have not committed to respecting the results of the election. in fact, have said very clearly in some cases that they won t accept the results and they will litigate. and litigation before back in 2020 was one of the justifications and rationals of people turning to violence. i don t want to be too overblown here, because, you know, i m very hopeful that there s better preparation this time around from the last time around from our law enforcement, from our state and local officials, our federal officials. and hopefully even from, you know, human beings themselves. election officials and voters who want to see a safe and fair election and tay want to see the real results. we hope those people will be very steely in their response to