Stay updated with breaking news from Stiff arm. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
government. it shall. it does not say it may. it says it shall be somebody from outside the government. this guy is highly conflicted. then the more revelations about the proximity to the president in his past, why is he still allowed to do it? chairman jim jordan is right. this is the way our government is supposed to work. oversight committee, judiciary committee should have access and be able to interview the people there. d.o.j. should not be giving a stiff arm and thwarting the ability to do its job and interview these people. they cannot make these people unavailable. >> harris: david weiss isn't just somebody connected to government. he remains -- remains merrick garland said it -- the u.s. attorney of delaware. if that's not shady and cozy i don't know what is. how often is the president in that state? 40% of the time. we'll move.
foundation senior fellow for china straits author of the 100 year marathon. it seems invite administration a stiff arm. what does this action what does this confrontation mean? >> well, from the buy demonstration point of view i think they are embarrassed. they thought they were extending the hand of friendship and the chinese refuse to talk to them. you know in the pentagon they asked for military pin channels to pre-reopen and have talks with german millie and his secretary of defense. china refuses to do that. china has really started a worldwide campaign recently to mock america it's in the front page of the "new york times" story yesterday, eric. she's thinking as mocking the invite administration. i think that is a correct interpretation. they have had a number of articles and. neil: recently.
>> yeah, and getting hit from the right and left on this issue. listen, the biden administration made a conscious effort to try to give the heisman award, the stiff arm to all the trump-era policies they could, especially when it came to border policy, they thought it was bad. now they get into this and the surge increased and fentanyl is coming over in major numbers, they are going to have to shift in some way and have to embrace perhaps some trump-era policy despite the fact the left doesn't want them to. >> dana: i even knew what the heisman meant. >> bill: she's getting better. >> bret: that was for you, dana. >> bill: i've been counseling her, she's coming along. updates and headlines from the intelligence hearing today. >> dana: an awful lot of no
cloud over ohio? rachel: the first time i agree with the communist spokesman. pete: it has been very interesting to watch just as a separate story, to watch the way in which the media has systematically ignored the disruption of a town in middle america. horrible decision-making, it appears. just basically the heisman stiff arm to it, i don't want to talk about it. rachel: from the people who claim to be the stewards of the environment, who are dumping millions of dollars that are going to bankrupt our children into green new deal policies that are doing nothing to deal with real environmental problems like this. it is absolutely embarrassing. it is not just embarrassing and horrible domestically, but it projects weakness and apathy are brought. who has respect for this
i think we deserve better than that even "i don't know" "we don't know yet," steve would be better than a stiff arm. unless i get the question i will not tell you. unless you ask me specifically you are not going to hear about it. unless you look up and see something i won't comment on it. this is a missed opportunity because we are united, ainsley against china. >> ainsley: those reporter questions, maybe we can get that video during the show. they were screaming. you could hear what the reporters were asking him as he is getting in that suv. normally it's just a bunch of mumbling. >> brian: embarrassing. >> ainsley: because so many reporters at once. they didn't answer. >> steve: if any of the devices destroyed over the last three days were from china, that would be a major provoking of the united states. and that could be one reason why the officials are reluctant to say well we think it came from china suddenly, wait a minute, china is provoking us.
ukraine. it would make the munich security conference a joke. rides rise to the occasion my german friends. >> brian: let's talk about the other issue domestically. turns out a guy you worked with for decades was hoarding documents. they found six in wilmington. they found at least six to ten in his office in washington. they found more in his garage and they date back to his days in the senate. what are you calling on the g.o.p. to do about this because so far getting a big stiff arm from the white house. >> number one, you have got a special counsel, that's a good thing. but let's talk to the archives about what's missing and i want to know why the press wasn't stoled about this event days before the 2022 election. they have found out there was classified information in biden's home days before the 2022 election and they set on it. that's what i want to understand. and if you come to my house, you will find chick fillet bags all over the floor but you are not
and specializing this kind of partisan investigations and they recognize that they are going to make a decision, whether or not to follow the precedent that president trump did when he was in office. there are some really interesting choice for this white house, it says it wants to get back to normal, wants to get back to our respect for the prerogatives of the congressional branch of government which does enjoy the power of subpoena and does enjoy, has the responsibility for oversights scrutiny, but when that is partisan when your president of the united states you say why do i have to get along with us? president trump stiff arm the democratic congress and said i'm not gonna do the, i'm not gonna respond to your subpoenas, i'm not gonna give you the documents not gonna give you the witnesses you're asking for what the biden administration has to do is if they do that do they create a bipartisan precedent -- not just illegitimate forms of scrutiny. how do you make a decision between what you think is
point here about how the justice department may approach this and sort of do the -- keeping a little distance. what do you make of this move by the committee, and how do you see trump responding to all of this? >> well, i think you're right. it's obviously a little bit of a stiff arm. when i've heard from -- they've always been approaching this investigation in a very traditional criminal prosecution, where they sort of take a pyramid structure and go from the bottom up. you know, i think the appointment of jack smith -- looking at the higher levels of this. so it's clear that they've been proceeding independently without the committee. i think this is more about the committee sort of trying to show something for all of these massive public hearings, these millions of lines of data that they've gone through, and you know, as everyone pointed out, this is a little toothless, but it's also about taking some