Live Breaking News & Updates on War on the supreme court

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from War on the supreme court on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in War on the supreme court and stay connected to the pulse of your community

Life Liberty Levin

country. there a war on the supreme court, led by the democracy, they want to pack and take it over, that is what they do in autocracies control the judiciary. they want you to police policebelieve that the majority vote would win, the cities would control federal government and tens of millions of americans who do not live in the cities in rural and suburban areas would be without representation. they want to nationalize the voting system, take much of what they did in california, which used to be a republican state, and destroy the nature of t the electoral system, and now they have super majorities in both houses in ronald reagan a home of california, where we can't win election, that i want to eliminate the filibuster. why? because if they win an election cycle they to be able to impr impose

Country , Judiciary , War-on-the-supreme-court , Policebelieve , Democracy , Autocracies , Government , Americans , Cities , Millions , Tens , Majority-vote

Life Liberty Levin

country. there a war on the supreme court, led by the democracy, they want to pack and take it over, that is what they do in autocracies control the judiciary. they want you to police officpolice officbelieve that the majority vote would win, the cities would control federal government and tens of millions of americans who do not live in the cities in rural and suburban areas would be without representation. they want to nationalize the voting system, take much of what they did in california, which used to be a republican state, and destroy the nature of th the electoral system, and now they have super majorities in both houses in ronald reagan a home of california, where we can't win election, that i want to eliminate the filibuster. why? because if they win an election cycle they to be able to impress impose

Country , Judiciary , War-on-the-supreme-court , Democracy , Officpolice-officbelieve , Autocracies , Government , Cities , Americans , Tens , Majority-vote , Representation

Life Liberty Levin

country. there a war on the supreme court, led by the democracy, they want to pack and take it over, that is what they do in autocracies control the judiciary. they want you to police officpolice officbelieve that the majority vote would win, the cities would control federal government and tens of millions of americans who do not live in the cities in rural and suburban areas would be without representation. they want to nationalize the voting system, take much of what they did in california, which used to be a republican state, and destroy the nature of th the electoral system, and now they have super majorities in both houses in ronald reagan a home of california, where we can't win election, that i want to eliminate the filibuster. why? because if they win an election cycle they to be able to impress impose

Country , Judiciary , War-on-the-supreme-court , Democracy , Autocracies , Government , Cities , Asian-americans , Officpolice-officbelieve , Tens , Majority-vote , Representation

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - FOXNEWS - 20120407:18:39:00

misinterpreting what judicial activism is. the president this is a narrative who he is. it's not the first time he's waged war on the supreme court and 2010 state of the union address we have an unreal spectacle the head of the executive branch egging on the legislative branch to diss the judicial branch as they sat there. the question should be after the decades of the left accusing republicans of imperial presidency, we have an actual imperial presidency let's see the press research that. >> jon: time for a break. up next, mitt romney sweeps three states and shows no signs of stopping and the media are right there with him. >> mitt romney racks up three more wins, riding a big wave of momentum with a positive push from the media toward the g.o.p. nomination. but should they dismiss rick santorum entirely? plus, sarah palin holds her own against the mainstream media on the today show, how did that go over with the

President , Executive-branch-egging , Narrative , Time , Judicial-activism , Head , Misinterpreting , Spectacle , State-of-the-union , War-on-the-supreme-court , 2010 , Question

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - FOXNEWS - 20120403:11:08:00

before the supreme court. yesterday, when he had the prime minister of canada and the president of mexico at his side in the rose garden, the president of the united states essentially took a shot at the supreme court. some depicted it as he declared war on the supreme court saying essentially that if they overturned his rule of law, that would be illegitimate. listen. >> remind conservative commentators that for years, what we've heard is the biggest problem on the bench was judicial activism or a lack of judicial restraint. that an unelected group of people would somehow overturn a duly constituted and passed law. well, there's a good example. >> it's interesting because he has also taken on the supreme court during the state of the union message in 2010 when they were sitting right in front of him. and some people would argue that

Us-supreme-court , Us- , Shot , Of-mexico , Some , Side , Rose-garden , Prime-minister , Canada , Commentators , War-on-the-supreme-court , Rule-of-law

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - FOXNEWS - 20120403:10:56:00

>> could he possibly have been saying look, if this is -- if this is not upheld, the ruling would be illegitimate and i'm really kind of talking to justice kennedy over there who is probably a swing vote. you have three months. i vote you say it's ok. >> that's why we have a life tenured independent judiciary so that it cannot be brought by politicians no matter how well they may be. if this is upheld, the president can say look, even a court appointed by a republican president upheld this but for him to question the power and ability and authority of the court to review it and to decide if it's unconstitutional is incomprehensible. >> kind of looks like he's declared war on the supreme court. >> kind of looks like he's desperate. >> ok. he's a judge. it's his opinion! judge, thank you very much for joining us live. >> thank you, steve. >> put down the candy, the sugar just like drugs?

Look , Swing-vote , Ruling , Justice-kennedy , Life , Judiciary , Three , President-obama , Court , Power , Matter , Politicians

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - FOXNEWS - 20100623:06:02:00

this has happened before. who was it? you thought i'd say woodrow wilson. no. next favorite, f.d.r. do you remember when the president said this at the "state of the union" address? >> with all due deference to separation of powers, last week, the supreme court reversed a century of law that i believe will open the flood gates for special interest. [bleep] including foreign corporations to spend without limit in our elections. [ applause ] i'd urge democrats and republicans to pass a bill that helps correct. >> glenn: okay. whatever. >> some of the problems. >> glenn: pipe down, please. when i heard that, i told you, i think it was the next day. so that sounds like f.d.r. he was throwing down the gauntlet. i said look out. look out. because he's going to declare war on the supreme court just like f.d.r. did. supreme court started striking down the new deal.

President , Fdr , Favorite , State-of-the-union , Woodrow-wilson , Law , Supreme-court , Corporations , Interest , Flood-gates , Deference , Separation-of-powers