Stay updated with breaking news from Wars e haven t. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
other countries, then they then those countries are going to have to agree on the use of those weapons and the supply of humanitarian aid into those areas where the weapons are being used. and that clearly has implicit i will have an implicit effect on israel going forward. it appears but the economy is hurting because of the defense spend at the moment. so making sure this aid continues to come the country's credit rating has gone down, its spending hundreds of millions of dollars a day, literally to fight its wars with iran, with hezbollah in gaza so knowing that the aid continues and that it will be incoming and the things like the iron dome missiles which get about $500 million of those funds the fact that that will come, that there will be these protective iron dome rockets supplied and the advanced
politics. try as i might to get him to try to talk politics, he never does. i gave up on that. and thank you general very much. you wrote an eloquent piece saying this is what's important and why it's important in the aid to the country. as you can see as it's playing out on capitol hill, not everyone agrees with you. why is it so important? >> well, neil, first of all, i think it's important to recognize that israel and ukraine are both engaged in fights that are directly tied to core u.s. interests and frankly, we need to do all we can to see that they prevail on those wars, if we don't, that will embolden our adversaries and dramatically increase the odds that america's sons and daughters will ultimately have to spill their blood. there comes a point where evil must be checke is that unfortunately, too many
agreement. then explain to us, how has ai arms to change the game if it is not contained what is the future of kinetic wars as well as cyber warfare? >> the future of warfare in a lot of ways is going be on demand the actual physical soldier is still the crux of the fighting force. with artificial intelligence and drone technology the united states and china are working on this concept called swarming. you get a large number of drones to work in concert together on a mission. at least on the american side we have drones that can maneuver about 40 miles an hour that are caring like 1000-pound payload and on the chinese side they conducted an interesting experiment they cut off their drones from gps. the drones is self healed and
johnson. they don't want them there any longer. you also caught up with georgia republican representative and marjorie taylor greene, who underscored the same kind of messaging. so while they're not going to move to vacate now, they're hoping either he will resign on his own or they might revisit it in some other fashion later this after a day of passages of four foreign aid bills yeah this is significant moment for the republican party, for the wars abroad as the american allies who have been clamoring for that, as well as for the institution of the house which has descended into absolute chaos in the aftermath of the ouster of kevin mccarthy. >> this is the republican party so still bitterly divided over how to proceed that a lead their lip. what america's places in the world, how to spend us taxpayer dollars. their agenda as they head into the majority of this infighting has played out. and because of
for him to be removed from the speakership, i believe that now we can restore our national security, our global reputation, but this was all unnecessary, political posturing by the far right american politicians, which is in the minority. it is worth mentioning very clearly that the rule for the overall package got nearly three quarters on the house floor, meaning that the minorities are dominating the delay game but the majority is overwhelmingly for this type of support for ukraine. i’m overwhelmingly for this type of support for ukraine.— overwhelmingly for this type of support for ukraine. i'm 'ust can ut one support for ukraine. i'm 'ust can put fl support for ukraine. i'm 'ust can put of h support for ukraine. i'm 'ust can put one one of the h support for ukraine. i'm just can put one one of the republican i support for ukraine. i'm just can i put one one of the republican said, he said he was concerned with finding foreign wars rather than secure the border. does that kind of rhetoric cut through?— rhetoric cut through? imagine that, that the speakers _ rhetoric cut through? imagine that, that the speakers are _ rhetoric cut through? imagine that, that the speakers are trying - rhetoric cut through? imagine that, that the speakers are trying to - that the speakers are trying to protect american national security. this is not how it is supposed to work. we are supposed to have bipartisan security and by parties and national security, and support
been to obsess with voting for foreign wars and the murder industry here in america, it actually understand how angry americans are when you have the strongest loudest it's voices. >> and republican, and the republican movement and grassroots furious calling for mike johnson to be vacated. the people here my colleagues have not heard the message, so i'm looking forward for them to go home on hearing hearing from the folks back at home a kentucky republican, thomas massie, also expressed his disappointment in how speaker johnson, what do you think is demise is at this point? >> well, marjorie taylor greene's comments, there are coded language four. i got whipped and i know i'm beat, right? she's not going to make the motion to vacate because i don't think the american people are going to stand behind that at this period of time. i don't think republican districts are going to stand behind that at this point. these, these issues are coming at us so fast and furious, furious from around the world that we need real problem-solvers to stand up and stricter. stick their chin up and be ready to walk through.
be spent at home here in america and things like border security. they don't think that billions of dollars should be sent overseas to fight wars in foreign countries. but many democrats and the other part of the republican party, which we sometimes call the national security part or the reagan list part of the republicans, they very much support this bill. they say this is a vital moment that america needs a standby ukraine, that two years on, it is important, not only to ensure that the ukrainians had the weapons and the ukrainians had the weapons and the ammunition they need, but also for morale and ukraine. it is important that america stands by its partners. so this is really a crucial moment. so we will have to see what happened in that vote in an hour but as i say, that bill is expected to pass.— hour but as i say, that bill is expected to pass. thank you very much indeed. _ expected to pass. thank you very much indeed. as _ expected to pass. thank you very much indeed. as we _ expected to pass. thank you very much indeed. as we have - expected to pass. thank you very much indeed. as we have been . much indeed. as we have been hearing, the package includes munitions and air defence missiles desperately needed by ukraine. the
is like an island in the middle east and there's nowhere to turn. if there is a broader conflict so at what point does this need to turn to a conversation about out what's, what is it going to take to move toward peace in gaza and to de-escalate the tensions were not just with iran, but with its proxy. >> well, i think that's something israel needs to think about very hard because right now they're involved in a two front war right now, at least two friends may be three depending on how you count because they have the war in gaza, they have a war against has belie& lebanon. and now they're starting a direct war with iran that's a lot. i mean, israel is very powerful military, but that's a lot of wars at once for one little country and it also suggests that perhaps the united states almost might notably be dragged into whatever happens there. oh, absolutely. i mean, you saw last week. i mean, us forces were defending israel since october 7. there have been many uranian sponsored attacks on us bases in the region, some of which have killed or wounded us troops. so, yeah, absolutely. the united states is in the middle of it because israel's
a long serving financial problems because of the united states tried land, it's one of the reasons why the sioux industry was so badly and degraded in the united states, and i hit pennsylvania as hard as it had any place. fortunately still hanging in there. a lot of this can send out there. it's essence is economic what is also fueled by the border and by billions of dollars being consent -- spider for foreign wars! is discontent. but a bottom-line people are worried about prices. >> jesse: and joe biden is letting the japanese by u.s. steel american steel companies, it's obsolete insane. do you believe that people is in the seven r. flipping joe biden the brute? >> ediger have to respect the president and the presidency, a thing it's a really important. you have to establish that if it does not exist now. children in particular should be
for those who never fought or or not military generals like me and much of our audience when you say a low burn what's the difference between a low burn war and an all-out war that involves other nations potentially? >> good question low intensity conflict is kind of the general way of looking at a counterterrorism it's very similar to vietnam gorilla style small unit tactics high intensity conflict would be what we saw in iraq operation first iraq war or deploying to afghanistan we start moving in thousands of troops, operation enduring freedom those are high intensity conflicts actual wars were taking large bodies of troops and tanks and helicopters and airplanes and we are going in there i thank to a theatre for the purpose of being able to either topple a regime and take out a saddam hussein or in this case i think we are still at the low intensity conflict but we