Stay updated with breaking news from Which sex. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
intelligence analyst. thank you for joining us. let's get your analysis on the official who says the president doesn't have the details correct on the proposal, particularly on moving troops out of gaza. do you think, from what we know of this deal, do we think that both sides will eventually take it? >> jonathan, good morning. i think, you know, president biden, that was a masterful play on a friday night speech, particularly the sabbath in israel, when some of the hard line members of the coalition do not have access to media. he put forth a plan which, in essence, was the israeli plan. now, there's going to be some back and forth on this. you have to remember, henry kissinger once said, israel has no foreign policy, just domestic politics. in some sense, biden's move was a reflection of that. but at the end, you know, there might be some back and forth. you also have some israeli officials over the last several days saying, no, actually, this is what the israeli negotiating team did put forth.
scientific administrator for 54 years, more than a half century and you were director of the national institute of allergies and infectious diseases for more than three decades, is that right? >> 38 plus years. >> okay. i assume that you've never been accused of trying to start a disease before, is that right? >> that is correct. >> you have devoted your life to fighting infectious diseases for the american people, is that right? >> that is correct. >> i want to go back to this email that you cited in your opening because i think it goes right to the heart of this campaign of character assassination against you. the claim was essentially that you tried to cover up the possibility of there having been a laboratory leak, which, of course, is perfectly possible and if committee were doing its
apart legislation that reflects the hard—fought and hard—won protections given to women, who trans women and all sorts of people with protected characteristics. the all sorts of people with protected characteristics.— characteristics. the equality act which they _ characteristics. the equality act which they were _ characteristics. the equality act which they were put _ characteristics. the equality act which they were put in - characteristics. the equality act which they were put in in - characteristics. the equality act which they were put in in 2010 i characteristics. the equality act i which they were put in in 2010 and the tories — which they were put in in 2010 and the tories opposed already protects single _ the tories opposed already protects single sex— the tories opposed already protects single sex pieces for biological women — single sex pieces for biological women. it already defines what a woman— women. it already defines what a woman is— women. it already defines what a woman is stop what is certainly needed — woman is stop what is certainly needed is — woman is stop what is certainly needed is clearer guidance and for service _ needed is clearer guidance and for service providers about how to safeguard those women only spaces. the conservatives also said they would remove the powers of the devolved scottish, welsh and northern irish governments over gender policy. it comes after the uk government intervened last year to stop scotland making it easier for people to change their legal gender. what has been suggested by the conservatives today is just another example of undermining the powers of the scottish parliament. obviously i do not want to see that because i believe we should have a parliament with a full range of powers to tackle all of the issues affecting the people of scotland, but people
what is _ struggled to answer the question of what is a _ struggled to answer the question of what is a woman. —— keir starmer. i think— what is a woman. —— keir starmer. i think the _ what is a woman. —— keir starmer. i think the conversation we just witnessed between the two of them for about _ witnessed between the two of them for about ten minutes was one of the most _ for about ten minutes was one of the most intimate ones i've seen in this general— most intimate ones i've seen in this general election debate so far. we have seen— general election debate so far. we have seen a very good reason to say this should — have seen a very good reason to say this should be part of the election. i agree _ this should be part of the election. i agree with kemi that this is a relatively— i agree with kemi that this is a relatively new issue when it comes toiust _ relatively new issue when it comes toiust how— relatively new issue when it comes tojust how contentious relatively new issue when it comes to just how contentious and how political— to just how contentious and how political it — to just how contentious and how political it has become. it makes sense _ political it has become. it makes sense to — political it has become. it makes sense to me that it would be discussed. twitter is not the place to discuss— discussed. twitter is not the place to discuss anything. what we just witnessed, to me, is the perfect example — witnessed, to me, is the perfect example of why it is ok to bring up this topic— example of why it is ok to bring up this topic in — example of why it is ok to bring up this topic in conversation, and especially— this topic in conversation, and especially around the general election— especially around the general election where we are talking about something deeply serious, which, as wes streeting said, that conflict of opinion— wes streeting said, that conflict of opinion you sometimes get on minority— opinion you sometimes get on minority rights, it's hard to talk about, — minority rights, it's hard to talk about, politicians have to talk about, — about, politicians have to talk about, and you are a perfect example of how _ about, and you are a perfect example of how you _ about, and you are a perfect example of how you can do this in a general election _ of how you can do this in a general election. ., ., , , election. one thing that has been missin: election. one thing that has been missing is. _ election. one thing that has been missing is. a _ election. one thing that has been missing is, a lot _ election. one thing that has been missing is, a lot of— election. one thing that has been missing is, a lot of the _ election. one thing that has been missing is, a lot of the toxicity i missing is, a lot of the toxicity of this debate has created real and
the equalities act _ single sex spaces. you will reopen the equalities act of— single sex spaces. you will reopen the equalities act of 2010. - single sex spaces. you will reopen the equalities act of 2010. so i the equalities act of 2010. so anybody could put down their own amendments, they could chew over this major piece of legislation. that is not the way we are planning to do it. i have been working on this for quite a while, it was interrupted by the snp gender recognition bill. if we go back to why the confusion has become more apparent, there has been a court case, with which said legal sex is what the language and the equality act means and so we need to bring that clarification in. it is very arcane, very technical, a lot of people don't understand and that is why we have so many of these very divisive debates, lots of people making all sorts of accusations. we want to bring more light into the issue. do want to bring more light into the issue. ,, . want to bring more light into the issue. , ., . . want to bring more light into the issue. i. ., ., , issue. do you agree with what is bein: issue. do you agree with what is being proposed _ issue. do you agree with what is being proposed here? _ issue. do you agree with what is being proposed here? when i issue. do you agree with what is being proposed here? when thej issue. do you agree with what is i being proposed here? when the last labour government _ being proposed here? when the last labour government introduced i being proposed here? when the last labour government introduced the l labour government introduced the equality— labour government introduced the equality act, the intention was for
general election campaign as a wedge issue. do you stand by that _ general election campaign as a wedge issue. do you stand by that advert? i issue. do you stand by that advert? please _ issue. do you stand by that advert? ptease don't— issue. do you stand by that advert? please don't point— issue. do you stand by that advert? please don't point at _ issue. do you stand by that advert? please don't point at me _ issue. do you stand by that advert? please don't point at me like - issue. do you stand by that advert? please don't point at me like that. i please don't point at me like that. it is unnecessarily aggressive. hate it is unnecessarily aggressive. we are having a conversation here. but there _ are having a conversation here. but there are _ are having a conversation here. but there are strong _ are having a conversation here. but there are strong feelings _ are having a conversation here. but there are strong feelings about - there are strong feelings about this _ there are strong feelings about this. . . there are strong feelings about this. ., ., ., ., . this. there are, and i have watched so many women — this. there are, and i have watched so many women vilified. _ this. there are, and i have watched so many women vilified. people - so many women vilified. people standing with signs... i5 so many women vilified. people standing with signs... is it responsible _ standing with signs... is it responsible to _ standing with signs... is it responsible to insert - standing with signs... is it responsible to insert this issue in the white heat of an election? it is the white heat of an election? it is the time to — the white heat of an election? it is the time to do _ the white heat of an election? it is the time to do so _ the white heat of an election? if 3 the time to do so because then you get a mandate to do it. to not do it in an election, you go back into power and people say, why didn't you put it in the manifesto? this is absolutely the time to talk about things. absolutely the time to talk about thins. ~ ., . , absolutely the time to talk about thins. ~ ., ., , ., things. without anything of 'abbing at all, ou things. without anything of 'abbing at an. you have i things. without anything of 'abbing at all, you have had * things. without anything of 'abbing at all, you have had 14 h things. without anything of jabbing at all, you have had 14 years - things. without anything of jabbing at all, you have had 14 years to - at all, you have had 14 years to amend — at all, you have had 14 years to amend its— at all, you have had 14 years to amend its legislation. - at all, you have had 14 years to amend its legislation. it- at all, you have had 14 years to amend its legislation. it is- at all, you have had 14 years to amend its legislation. it is a i amend its legislation. it is a 14-year-old _ amend its legislation. it is a 14—year—old piece _ amend its legislation. it is a 14—year—old piece of- amend its legislation. it is a - 14—year—old piece of legislation. in an election — 14—year—old piece of legislation. in an election campaign, _ 14—year—old piece of legislation. in an election campaign, which - an election campaign, which according _ an election campaign, which according to _ an election campaign, which according to the _ an election campaign, which according to the polls - an election campaign, which according to the polls you i an election campaign, whichl according to the polls you are losing. — according to the polls you are losing. you _ according to the polls you are losing. you are _ according to the polls you are losing, you are choosing - according to the polls you are losing, you are choosing to l according to the polls you are - losing, you are choosing to insert this issue — losing, you are choosing to insert this issue into— losing, you are choosing to insert this issue into it, _ losing, you are choosing to insert this issue into it, with— losing, you are choosing to insert this issue into it, with these - losing, you are choosing to insert this issue into it, with these very| this issue into it, with these very divisive _ this issue into it, with these very divisive adverts _ this issue into it, with these very divisive adverts which _ this issue into it, with these very divisive adverts which i _ this issue into it, with these very divisive adverts which i haven't i this issue into it, with these very. divisive adverts which i haven't yet heard _ divisive adverts which i haven't yet heard whether _ divisive adverts which i haven't yet heard whether you _ divisive adverts which i haven't yet heard whether you agree - divisive adverts which i haven't yet heard whether you agree with - divisive adverts which i haven't yet heard whether you agree with him| divisive adverts which i haven't yet i heard whether you agree with him or not. heard whether you agree with him or not i_ heard whether you agree with him or not i wonder— heard whether you agree with him or not. i wonder whether— heard whether you agree with him or not. i wonder whether you _ heard whether you agree with him or not. i wonder whether you agree -
the fusilier museum, in bury, in greater manchester is a shrine to military service. today, the man who wants to be prime minister wants to convince you the country would be safe in his hands. look at those around him — they have each served in the forces. they are now labour candidates. national security is the most important issue of our times. something which, of course, is always true. and which, for us, if we are privileged to serve our country, will become our solemn responsibility. and labour is promising to keep the uk's nuclear weapons if it wins. keir starmer, you could be prime minister next month. if circumstances necessitated it, would you authorise the firing of nuclear weapons, yes or no? it's a vital part of our defence, and of course, that means we have to be prepared to use it. how things have changed.
imprisonment of his political opponent. >> i guess he agrees with -- >> by his attorney general. he kept saying, despite the lies to "fox and friends" weekend crew, which, of course, they didn't challenge him after he said that, he said, "lock her up" repeatedly, joined in, agreed with the crowd, repeatedly. the guy completely -- and this idea, jonathan lemire, that he didn't push after he was president of the united states to investigate hillary. he did time and again, and time and again, his attorney generals came back and said, "there is nothing to indict her on." >> i was struck by how many of the rallies, both in 2016 and 2020, i attended. this was one of the signature pieces of his act, was the "lock her up" chants from the crowd. he would egg it on and
were to win again, his department of justice would go after his political foes. he thinks that'd be fair play because of this case in manhattan which, of course, we know that joe biden, president biden, had nothing to do with. if there is better evidence of president biden not being involved with the intricaies of the doj, his beloved son, hunter biden, his own trial starts in a couple hours in delaware. joining the conversation, we have the president of the national action network and host of msnbc's "politics nation," reverend al sharpton. nbc news and msnbc political analyst, former u.s. senator, claire mccaskill. she and jen palmieri hosts of the podcast "how to win 2024." good to have you. >> senator claire mccaskill -- >> former prosecutor. >> -- former prosecutor, talk about donald trump's lies over the weekend, saying he never
a prominent issue in this election, as chris mason reports. the fusilier museum in bury in greater manchester is a shrine to military service. today, the man who wants to be prime minister wants to convince you the country would be safe in his hands. look at those around him. they have each served in the forces. they are now labour candidates. national security is the most important issue of our times. something which, of course, is always true. and which for us, if we are privileged to serve our country, will become our solemn responsibility. and labour is promising to keep the uk's nuclear weapons if it winds. keir starmer, you could be prime minister next month. if circumstances necessitated it, would you authorise the firing of