Stay updated with breaking news from Bill say. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
number one issue. it has been the number one issue. we have got small businesses. medium size businesses and large businesses that have labor shortages. imagine if you could have people that were vetted, you knew they were coming, they were coming in an orderly process and coming only to work. >> ainsley: i know you have been working hard. in the works for two years. bipartisan visa reform bill. we know seasonal workers if you go to some islands here locally nantucket and martha's vineyard seasonal co-workers come up and send money back to their family. i know it's legal. what does your bill say. >> through the lensdz of what the politics can handle in the 118th congress. work visas have one year to three years. streamlines some of the bureaucratic crazy. there is all this red tape that makes it harder for people to get work visas. it's meant to essentially decrease the amount of people coming over illegally and increase those that are coming over to work. not pathway to citizenship. not access to voting.
he had lost and yet he perpetuated the life. ., , . . the life. i would say this. we're talkin: the life. i would say this. we're talking about _ the life. i would say this. we're talking about this _ the life. i would say this. we're talking about this as _ the life. i would say this. we're talking about this as a - the life. i would say this. we're talking about this as a criminal| talking about this as a criminal hearing — talking about this as a criminal hearing. that's— talking about this as a criminal hearing. that's hearsay- talking about this as a criminal hearing. that's hearsay what l talking about this as a criminal. hearing. that's hearsay what you talking about this as a criminal- hearing. that's hearsay what you are saying _ hearing. that's hearsay what you are saying that _ hearing. that's hearsay what you are saying that people _ hearing. that's hearsay what you are saying that people say— hearing. that's hearsay what you are saying that people say to _ hearing. that's hearsay what you are saying that people say to him - hearing. that's hearsay what you are saying that people say to him that i saying that people say to him that he had _ saying that people say to him that he had lost — saying that people say to him that he had lost. we _ saying that people say to him that he had lost. we are _ saying that people say to him that he had lost. we are trying - he had lost. we are trying to discern _ he had lost. we are trying to discern is— he had lost. we are trying to discern- - -— he had lost. we are trying to discern... , , ., discern... is it? they have given evidence under _ discern... is it? they have given evidence under oath. _ discern... is it? they have given evidence under oath. sure - discern... is it? they have given evidence under oath. sure but. evidence under oath. sure but understand — evidence under oath. sure but understand this _ evidence under oath. sure but understand this is _ evidence under oath. sure but understand this is not - evidence under oath. sure but understand this is not a - evidence under oath. sure but. understand this is not a criminal proceeding _ understand this is not a criminal proceeding in— understand this is not a criminal proceeding ina— understand this is not a criminal proceeding. in a criminal- understand this is not a criminal- proceeding. in a criminal proceeding that evidence — proceeding. in a criminal proceeding that evidence would _ proceeding. in a criminal proceeding that evidence would not _ proceeding. in a criminal proceeding that evidence would not exist - proceeding. in a criminal proceeding that evidence would not exist as - proceeding. in a criminal proceeding that evidence would not exist as it . that evidence would not exist as it is considered _ that evidence would not exist as it is considered hearsay. _ that evidence would not exist as it is considered hearsay. we - that evidence would not exist as it is considered hearsay. we are - that evidence would not exist as it i is considered hearsay. we are going through— is considered hearsay. we are going through a _ is considered hearsay. we are going through a congressional _ is considered hearsay. we are going through a congressional hearing - is considered hearsay. we are going through a congressional hearing to. through a congressional hearing to make _ through a congressional hearing to make sure — through a congressional hearing to make sure this— through a congressional hearing to make sure this does— through a congressional hearing to make sure this does not— through a congressional hearing to make sure this does not happen i through a congressional hearing to i make sure this does not happen again for the _ make sure this does not happen again for the operatives— make sure this does not happen again for the operatives are _ make sure this does not happen again for the operatives are using _ make sure this does not happen again for the operatives are using things - for the operatives are using things to convolute — for the operatives are using things to convolute the _ for the operatives are using things to convolute the lines _ for the operatives are using things to convolute the lines but - for the operatives are using things to convolute the lines but the - to convolute the lines but the hearing — to convolute the lines but the hearing is _ to convolute the lines but the hearing is one _ to convolute the lines but the hearing is one thing - to convolute the lines but the hearing is one thing in - to convolute the lines but the. hearing is one thing in criminal intent — hearing is one thing in criminal intent is — hearing is one thing in criminal intent is a _ hearing is one thing in criminal intent is a different— hearing is one thing in criminal intent is a different thing - hearing is one thing in criminal intent is a different thing and i hearing is one thing in criminall intent is a different thing and in hearing is one thing in criminal. intent is a different thing and in a criminal— intent is a different thing and in a criminal prosecution, _ intent is a different thing and in a criminal prosecution, these - intent is a different thing and in a. criminal prosecution, these people testifying _ criminal prosecution, these people testifying about _ criminal prosecution, these people testifying about what _ criminal prosecution, these people testifying about what they - criminal prosecution, these people testifying about what they told - criminal prosecution, these peoplei testifying about what they told him in trouble — testifying about what they told him in trouble if— testifying about what they told him in trouble if they— testifying about what they told him in trouble if they did _ testifying about what they told him in trouble if they did not _ testifying about what they told him in trouble if they did not and - testifying about what they told him in trouble if they did not and will i in trouble if they did not and will he believed _ in trouble if they did not and will he believed what he _ in trouble if they did not and will he believed what he did - in trouble if they did not and will he believed what he did not - in trouble if they did not and will i he believed what he did not believe him of— he believed what he did not believe him of those — he believed what he did not believe him of those things _ he believed what he did not believe him of those things become - he believed what he did not believel him of those things become hearsay and become — him of those things become hearsay and become inadmissible. _ him of those things become hearsay and become inadmissible. and - him of those things become hearsay and become inadmissible. and i- him of those things become hearsay. and become inadmissible. and i think that's— and become inadmissible. and i think that's the _ and become inadmissible. and i think that's the ultimate thing _ and become inadmissible. and i think that's the ultimate thing people - and become inadmissible. and i think that's the ultimate thing people are l that's the ultimate thing people are trying _ that's the ultimate thing people are trying to— that's the ultimate thing people are trying to do— that's the ultimate thing people are trying to do with _ that's the ultimate thing people are trying to do with the _ that's the ultimate thing people are trying to do with the series - that's the ultimate thing people are trying to do with the series is - that's the ultimate thing people are trying to do with the series is try i trying to do with the series is try to get— trying to do with the series is try to get a — trying to do with the series is try to get a criminal— trying to do with the series is try to get a criminal referral- trying to do with the series is try to get a criminal referral out - trying to do with the series is try to get a criminal referral out of. to get a criminal referral out of donald — to get a criminal referral out of donald trump _ to get a criminal referral out of donald trump to _ to get a criminal referral out of donald trump to say— to get a criminal referral out of- donald trump to say he committed a crime _ donald trump to say he committed a crime and _ donald trump to say he committed a crime and i_ donald trump to say he committed a crime and i think— donald trump to say he committed a crime and i think together— donald trump to say he committed a crime and i think together for- donald trump to say he committed a crime and i think together for me - crime and i think together for me has of the — crime and i think together for me has of the dummy— crime and i think together for me has of the dummy but _ crime and i think together for me has of the dummy but nothing. crime and i think together for me has of the dummy but nothing in| crime and i think together for me - has of the dummy but nothing in this has of the dummy but nothing in this has a _ has of the dummy but nothing in this has a direct— has of the dummy but nothing in this has a direct link— has of the dummy but nothing in this has a direct link that _ has of the dummy but nothing in this has a direct link that he _ has a direct link that he committed a crime _ has a direct link that he committed a crime was — has a direct link that he committed a crime was a — has a direct link that he committed a crime was a bill— has a direct link that he committed a crime was a bill say— has a direct link that he committed a crime was a bill say i _ has a direct link that he committed
were uncomfortable because their children were stripped from them, or their father or mother being hung from a tree. let's make it clear that our children, if we think that our children are not asking about race, we think that your children are not concerned about what's happening across this country, our children see exactly through what the republicans are doing across the state of florida and across this country. >> now, supporters of bill say to that, well, what it means is that a white kid in school shouldn't be made to feel bad for what happened three generations ago. >> john, i went to school with a lot of white boys and girls. during black history month, they actually enjoyed learning more about black history. i talked in a predominantly white school. and at no time did a parent or a child come up and say during black history month or any other time that they were
and i certainly appreciated having teachers that made me feel that way when i was younger. >> i want to pick up on the last point there because the supporters of this bill say, it's about parental rights. one of the provisions is somehow making the school legally liable. they can be sued, i think, if a teacher or a school administrator doesn't tell a parent if it learns that a student is gay. what's the impact there? >> yeah. i'm a little confused by the bill, too. i don't know if you looked at it. but i think the language is a bit broad. sounds like you might be responsible for outing kids if they're straight, too. i just want to focus on teaching as a teacher. i don't want to be calling out my parns every night saying, hey, i wonder if you knew your kid was straight. schools should be a place where definitely kids feel they can be themselves and feel safe enough to be themselves. but i don't think this is about parent's rights. parent's rights to do what? tell lgbtq kids they don't belong? push lgbtq families away and into the closet? hypothetically having a bake sale on friday, would my husband
>> reporter: now, look, the republican sponsors of this bill say that it is about security, rooting out fraud, and also having uniformity across the state but, of course, jessica, we need to make it very clear that there was no demonstrable fraud in texas, or in the 2020 election here in the united states. the governor himself even said that they had not found any but that doesn't mean, in his words, that there wasn't any. so we will see what happens tonight. it will likely be a very late night here in austin. >> all right, no evidence of fraud in texas. massive fraud in texas, or anywhere else across the country in a year where we saw record voting in 2020. dianne gallagher, it's so important, thank you for that update, we appreciate it. and joining me now is congressman ted lieu, a democratic representative from california, and a member of the judiciary and foreign affairs committee. he also served as an impeachment manager. congressman, it's great to have you, thanks for making time for us today. i just want to talk a little bit
and we're going to offer them work visas in mexico if they want to stay in mexico. but as bill was saying, these are images that play very well for trump, a rushing mob trying to cross the border illegally as they're being tear gassed by police. voters, he wants them to recall this as they go to the voting booth. but it's also useful to understand that these are not new caravans. these happen quite often. they've been happening for years and we have never seen a situation where anyone has tried to rush the border. >> i did think it was interesting to hear bill say that a lot of these people that he's talking to at least weren't even trying to get to the united states. that was the impression that the president here gave us, was that he believed these people were trying to cross into the u.s. but according to bill, maybe they aren't. maybe they're just trying to get to mexico, where, as you point
taxpayer annual increase the budget by at least 1.5 trillion. that's the supporters of the bill say. it will probably increase by much more than that. trying to see its cover suddenly concerned about the deficit. the bill is 1100 pages. obama carries 2300 going on 23,000 pages. would you say to that. >> psinet interesting and they suddenly found religion on running up the debt even know the obama administration ran up more than any other combine. with 20 trillion in debt. the only way we get out of that is by growth because we are unwilling as a country to address entitlements. the only way to fix the debt situation is faster growth. the city by reducing regulation. now we finish the job with tax cuts. to your point about democrats, they've become the party of no. it might've been a very good on movie, but not a good strategy for a party. they offer obstruction may have
more planes and drones. but isis is holding hostages here and holding out a dark warning to the world. >> and that was bill neely reporting from the southern philippines. joining us doug alavant and former director of iraq at the national security counsel. thank you for being here. you watched that report from bill neely and read the report of the potential for more military action there. as you heard bill say, the question now is whether isis is using the philippines as a spring board essentially to the rest of asia as they lose ground in the middle east. pentagon spokesperson reminds nbc news that we had a military presence there for more than a decade. why now? why the escalation now? >> well, two reasons. look, they have been there a long time. abu saffaf has been there since 2001. they pledge loyalty to isis in
brought costs down as you begin to look at it. if you want to do that there are other mechanisms to bring costs down i think we should more seriously consider. if you're not going to repeal it you need to be making strides towards bringing premiums down as quickly as possible. >> first of all, thank you, congressman. you're the first guest ever to bring a choir to our show. here's what i don't get. i think it's phony. i think the whole thing that's phony is to have this bill say, this repeal bill, whatever it's called, say that we're going to preserve preexisting conditions so that if you're sick you can still get health care insurance, yet they're going to let states change the prices so they can, let's say that i'm sick. they could charge me a huge premium so i can't even buy insurance because they don't have to charge me what they charge anybody else. so, it's phony to say it covers preexisting conditions. at least i think so. >> you're right on that. it's phony -- by the way i love the choir behind us. i think it's a good omen.