Live Breaking News & Updates on Case

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from Case on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in Case and stay connected to the pulse of your community

SD Supreme Court partially reverses ruling in truck ownership case

The South Dakota Supreme Court has partially reversed a lower court’s ruling in a case involving a ownership of a semi-truck.

Dakota-supreme-court , Supreme-court , South-dakota-supreme-court , Plains-towing , Case- , Crash , Lawsuit , Scottlyn , Semi , South-dakota , Sturgis

Trump Hush Money Trial

trump's, so to speak. and this is not a personal matter between a man trying to hide it from his wife. it was an intentional at trying to defraud people by having falsified business records that form these invoices and what not and prove it. there was actual criminal activity here. they cannot rely on a little bit of innuendo or suggestion, or maybe even a dislike for him and the political space they have to prove their case& they've got do it pretty quickly to head off or will be the opening from the fans which will surely try to show this as a political win. >> elie honig, what, what about the defense was expecting to hear from them? >> so first of all, they're going to argue they have to prove their case. the prosecution bears the burden of proof, not just probably not just more likely, but beyond a reasonable doubt. and the defense is going to argue they cannot do that the defense is going to argue this is an ancient decrepit sort of dragged up out of the depths paperwork case from eight years ago and they're going to say it's built on the back of a proven admitted liar, michael cohen. michael cohen will be a central focus of both oh,

People , Business-records , Matter , Man , Trump-s , Invoices , Activity , Wife , Opening , Ruling , Case- , Space

The Context

with me isjohn edward jones. with me isjohn edward jones iii. he is a former us federaljudge and president of the dickinson college in pennsylvania. the opening statements are something like an overture. they set out a road map. what did you make of the two sides and the way they set out their arguments? two sides and the way they set out theirarguments? tt two sides and the way they set out their arguments?— two sides and the way they set out their arguments? it was exactly as i thou . ht it their arguments? it was exactly as i thought it would _ their arguments? it was exactly as i thought it would be. _ their arguments? it was exactly as i thought it would be. it _ their arguments? it was exactly as i thought it would be. it is _ their arguments? it was exactly as i thought it would be. it is a - their arguments? it was exactly as i thought it would be. it is a road - thought it would be. it is a road map _ thought it would be. it is a road map from _ thought it would be. it is a road map. from the prosecution standpoint, what we know is that the linchpin _ standpoint, what we know is that the linchpin of— standpoint, what we know is that the linchpin of their case is probably michael— linchpin of their case is probably michael cohen. they admit that he is not the _ michael cohen. they admit that he is not the best witness in the world but it _ not the best witness in the world but it seems they have got other witnesses — but it seems they have got other witnesses who will buttress or corroborate his testimony. from the defence _ corroborate his testimony. from the defence perspective, what they did was trivialise the case and basically say this is a case that shouldn't— basically say this is a case that shouldn't have been brought. so what we don't _ shouldn't have been brought. so what we don't know about some of the other— we don't know about some of the other witness testimony, some folks who worked for the former president and what _ who worked for the former president and what they might say, and of

President , Something , Us , Edward-jones-iii , Overture , Statements , Me-isjohn , Federaljudge , Dickinson-college , Pennsylvania , Way , It

The Context

course _ and what they might say, and of course the — and what they might say, and of course the prosecution is playing it close _ course the prosecution is playing it close to _ course the prosecution is playing it close to the vest as far as that testimony. close to the vest as far as that testimony-— close to the vest as far as that testimon . , .,, . ., ., ., testimony. the prosecution have to rove testimony. the prosecution have to prove several _ testimony. the prosecution have to prove several players _ testimony. the prosecution have to prove several players of _ testimony. the prosecution have to prove several players of his - testimony. the prosecution have to prove several players of his intent. | prove several players of his intent. can you help us with the law as it pertains to the 2016 campaign? was it illegal in and of itself to pay stormy daniels? tt it illegal in and of itself to pay stormy daniels?— it illegal in and of itself to pay stormy daniels? it illegal in and of itself to pay storm daniels? ., , ., ~ ., stormy daniels? it was not. and that is really important. _ stormy daniels? it was not. and that is really important. you _ stormy daniels? it was not. and that is really important. you can - stormy daniels? it was not. and that is really important. you can pay - is really important. you can pay hush _ is really important. you can pay hush money, but what happened is they booked it as payments to michael— they booked it as payments to michael cohen for legal services, so there _ michael cohen for legal services, so there is— michael cohen for legal services, so there is a _ michael cohen for legal services, so there is a fraud thing. but that would — there is a fraud thing. but that would normally be what is called a misdemeanour, which is a mid—level offence _ misdemeanour, which is a mid—level offence. however, when you do it to cover— offence. however, when you do it to cover up _ offence. however, when you do it to cover up or— offence. however, when you do it to cover up or to— offence. however, when you do it to cover up orto aid offence. however, when you do it to cover up or to aid another crime, and that— cover up or to aid another crime, and that crime is election interference, it rises to the level of felony. — interference, it rises to the level of felony, which is the most serious offence _ of felony, which is the most serious offence they can be charged with. so they must— offence they can be charged with. so they must prove notjust the documents were fraudulent, that is the checks— documents were fraudulent, that is the checks that were paid as legal fees, _ the checks that were paid as legal fees. but — the checks that were paid as legal fees, but also a case that was not charged. — fees, but also a case that was not charged, election interference. in other— charged, election interference. in

Law , Course , Prosecution , Rove-testimony , Campaign , Intent , Vest , In , Players , Testimony , Testimon , 2016

The Context

end of— compromise. but we are right at the end of this _ compromise. but we are right at the end of this process. this is now the detail, _ end of this process. this is now the detail, the — end of this process. this is now the detail, the small print of a bill. it detail, the small print of a bill. it is _ detail, the small print of a bill. it is not — detail, the small print of a bill. it is not the broad principles and whether— it is not the broad principles and whether it — it is not the broad principles and whether it is right or wrong. i sopported _ whether it is right or wrong. i supported the bill at second reading principle _ supported the bill at second reading principle vote and we are now at the end stage _ principle vote and we are now at the end stage where we are just getting the detail— end stage where we are just getting the detail right. that is a moment where _ the detail right. that is a moment where the — the detail right. that is a moment where the government can, without compromising its principles, make the small— compromising its principles, make the small adjustments that will then allow the _ the small adjustments that will then allow the bill to become law, and it is in the _ allow the bill to become law, and it is in the government interests but that bill— is in the government interests but that bill to — is in the government interests but that bill to become an act of parliament as soon as possible. it parliament as soon as possible. sounds like parliament as soon as possible. tit sounds like the parliament as soon as possible. tt sounds like the government is saying that for those people who have potentially served alongside british forces, future ones that might not necessarily be the case. t5 forces, future ones that might not necessarily be the case.— necessarily be the case. is that enou:h necessarily be the case. is that enough for _ necessarily be the case. is that enough for you? _ necessarily be the case. is that enough for you? i _ necessarily be the case. is that enough for you? i think - necessarily be the case. is that enough for you? i think we - necessarily be the case. is that. enough for you? i think we need clarity— enough for you? i think we need clarity here. i understand the government point of view, that they do not _ government point of view, that they do not want — government point of view, that they do not want to vague or opaque a category, _ do not want to vague or opaque a category, but i think we all know then— category, but i think we all know then when— category, but i think we all know then when we see them. they are people _ then when we see them. they are people who are clearly in danger, their— people who are clearly in danger, their cases — people who are clearly in danger, their cases have not yet been resolved _ their cases have not yet been resolved. and i think that it is in

Bill , Process , Detail , Principles , Print , Whether , Stage , The-end , It , It-detail , Compromise , Principle-vote

The Ingraham Angle

now, let's look at it another way and i tweeted about thisd.a. earlier today, imagine if some conservativea ha d.a. and i dont know mobile, alabama, had decided to win type biden forta violating sometu corrupt businea statute for al al the shenanigas he and huntehr were involved in in china and so forth, and then the judge in the case was as g.o.p. appointee and the judgest daughter or son was a bigr fu consultant or fund-raiser for trump here then imagined that this judge issued a gag order prohibiting biden from speaking out about what is an obvious conflict or at least apparent conflict of interest. now what with the left there and say, oh, gee this is taking place in good faith and the justice system is working just fine.al certainly the times would not write that, no, they would and complain alabama is a deep redab state that doesn't respect women's rights and also saye biden can't get a fair trial there.

Way , Biden-forta , Sometu-corrupt-businea-statute , Mobile , Conservativea-ha-d-a- , Alabama , Thisd-a- , Case- , Judge , China-s , Daughter , Judgest

The Ingraham Angle

but certainly juan merchan is making it more difficult. you know, he wasn't chosen by. random selection, which i find shocking. he was picked as the chief administrative law judge theret supposedly because of his great judicial learning and temperament. but i understand that, in fact, he's not that good of a judge ani hed very thin-skinned and h temperament problems. i heard that from a great lawyer that i know in the name of david schoen. j >> laura: speaking of david schoen, david, judge merchan allowed one of the jurors to sit in the case despite obvious political by. watch this. >> they have things ons social media posts that donald trump and his lawyers found troubling. the juror number one had taken a video in the distance what looked like a celebration in the streets of new york for trump

Selection , Theret , Administrative-law-judge , He-wasn-t-chosen-by , Merchan , Whether-juan-merchan , Lawyer , Fact , Temperament-problems , Temperament , Learning , Ani-hed

The Ingraham Angle

in the case.we we know the doubter has a vested interest in the case and the judge tow make sure the casetro isn't dismissed and now to make sure trump will never leave the courtroom and since there everyday? we know the right to bee prespresentat thnee trial was ad transection 6 under the amendment. these arefene the right of the defendant. th waie court of appeals it cane waived. it is the defendant's right, but he wants to make sure he's outa. there campaigning. that is it. >> laura: whatever happens,ce don't go out and go to harlem and convince a lot of people that this is a total sham ande that thewoy should vote for youm because you will stand up for the working people. can have them dohtow that, speeh hear it i think what i wast saying in the "angle," everyone understands in our country it seems the democrats and liberals have more rights, more leeway,'s more freedom and a lot of

Whether-juan-merchan , Trump , Case- , Courtroom , Interest , Tow-make , Casetro-isn-t , Bee-prespresentat-thnee-trial , Doubter , Coming-up , Amendment , Defendant

The Ingraham Angle

the doj, as you said many times, not only did the department of justice under bill barr declined prosecute, but there is nothing that keptice merrick garland's justice department from still within the statute of limitations, and, and alvin bragg's predecessor declined to prosecute this case. and now alvin bragg originallyt. declined to prosecute it. >> laura: this is not be a fair trial and it never should have been brought in the first place. david, a question i have themt h both of you know the answer toet this but i don't think our viewer s do, they were lawyers seated in the jury. one is from a big corporate firm. thrpore other is a civil litigah i believe. now, that could play both ways, could it not -- mark i don't know much more about them, but to me it would seem that trump might want one of those on the jury.on it takes one t, only one persono hang thio kns jury.

Justice , Times , Nothing , Department , Doj , Merrick-garland , Keptice , Bill-barr , Laura-ingraham , Trial , Place , Case-

The Ingraham Angle

>> certainly, you have to know a lot more about the juror than we know. it is permitted to be known froh limited or deer that they are doing pure generally come i would say that. is not a juror and i'm not sure how a big firm. lawyer will take this kind of time from work. but the bottom line is jesse wegman issue quoted earlier certainly has it wrong. trump's fifth and sixthven amendment rights are clearlychar violated in this case and he doesn't know what is charged with. the target of felony and the judge prove that intervale of motion to dismiss when heur said the government has put forward four different theories and three are okayde.r how dohe you defend at the same time whether he doctored the businessecti records to commit x claim or election crime?t th it is absolutely absurd, but the judge tried to cover full circle. oui think we as lawyers have an obligation to speak out about this for this country and around the world. yoze u so this week maybe this l trust wrote a column in "the wall street journal" saying the deep state will arise again

Number-one , Lot , Lawyer , Kind , Firm , Deer , Froh , Donald-trump , Case- , Issue , Felony , Work