Group. she s going to squeeze the big group. the best way to do that is the indictment. after this motion came down from the meadows camp, i think they re starting to see a lot of other folks wrapped up in this letter thinking but this is the, move try to move it to federal court. the argument is simply going to be whether it is the documents case in miami or, this in georgia. there are things that affect the presidency that haven t been tested in these state courts the way that in a federal court they are prepared to handle. somebody like a meadows, he deserves to be charged, but he has the best case that you re going to have about executive privilege, and about conversations that he s having in the advising role as the president. that s something a federal court is prepared to handle in a way that this could be very complicated in georgia. everyone stay with, us a lot more to discuss, including what is an over act, leading to a conspiracy indictment. plus, hunter biden is down a lawyer. we ll explain what happened, plus other new developments in his legal troubles, ahead. carvana has hundreds of thousands of five star reviews and counting. the whole process was really simple and easy, and this is my third time selling to carvana.
President. that s something a federal court is prepared to handle in a way that i think this could be very complicated in georgia. everyone stay with us. a lot more to discuss including what is an overt act and when texting someone for a phone number lead to a conspiracy indictment, plus, hunter biden is down a lawyer. we ll explain what happened plus other new developments in his legal troubles ahead. drumroll by lónis, little league this just in got the keys to what you want and what you need something new somet moving to a differenteat okay now (what?) can i get a (get a) drumroll? (what?) can i get a drumroll drumroll? (what?) can i get a can i get a drumroll please (oohh) that s nice (yahh) ya, can i get a drumroll, can i get a drum- that s nice
Article: Donald Trump s Conspiracy Indictment, It s Not That Complicated; Really. - A basic breakdown off the important law regarding the Donald Trump indictment for conspiracy to defraud the U.S.
Article: Donald Trump s Conspiracy Indictment, It s Not That Complicated; Really. - A basic breakdown off the important law regarding the Donald Trump indictment for conspiracy to defraud the U.S.
News. we are half an hour in roughly since jack smith spoke, and we have been all been making our way through the indictment. big picture, what do you see as the significance of this conspiracy indictment against donald trump for trying to steal the election? what does tonight mean for america? , so we ll all be reading this indictment and studying it for days. i think that s something we should acknowledge as we begin to look at it. unlike the rest of you all who are diligent, and i have been listening to you make your way through it i of course skipped to the end, which i m bad to do, and focused on the fourth charge in this indictment, which is the 18 u.s.a 241 charge, the civil rights conspiracy charge, and to me that speaks the most starkly. we re happy to reach this moment where justice begins to look like it s being done, but it s also a somber moment. it s a difficult moment for our
Things about this case is the rhetoric keeps escalating, despite evidence going in the opposite directions after repeated investigations that find nothing, that do not support this statements. the statements continue to be made up to and including at the ellipse on january 6th. that strikes me as evidence of intent to obstruct the official proceeding, specific knowledge that those allegations were false. that, i think, is the fascinating development that jack smith, and potentially, conspiracy indictment is going to lay out. neal katyal, i have to say, in all my readings of lol, thousands and thousands that i have read, it never occurred to me, never occurred to me, that lol would end up being an evidentiary smoking gun. yeah, so, look, i think the bottom line here is that the prosecutor, jack smith, has to prove that donald trump thought that he had lost the election, and still conducted all these things, whether it s fake electors, disrupting january
Intent to obstruct the official proceeding, specific knowledge that those allegations were false. that, i think, is the fascinating development that jack smith, and potentially, conspiracy indictment is going to lay out. neal katyal, i have to say, in all my readings of lol, thousands and thousands that i have read, it never occurred to me, never occurred to me, that lol would end up being an evidentiary smoking gun. yeah, so, look, i think the bottom line here is that the prosecutor, jack smith, has to prove that donald trump thought that he had lost the election, and still conducted all these things, whether it s fake electors, disrupting january 6th, or the like. and i think what tim says is really important because the only times we hear of trump saying that, or his public statements where he is actually
Knew was baseless was part and parcel of the overall scheme. that makes him arguably a co-conspirator. so my guess is the special counsel is evaluating a number of individuals trying to determine, a., is there conspiracy and, b. if so how broad does that conspiracy reach? how many people whose conduct rose to the level of responsibility of intentional conduct might get them implicated in the conspiracy indictment? charlie sykes, bring you in to this. john eastman did not go quietly into the night after the coup. john eastman continued for many months to peddle his conspiracies about the results of the 2020 election. they are conspiracies he repeats to this day. this is defense in his disbar ment proceeding in california. he remain assess threat to the institutions that the 2020 elections sit at a fulcrum of
Holiday while they re in the middle of deliberations. that always slows things down. maybe that impacted the verdict here, maybe it didn t. this was a very solid result for the government. the last time seditious conspiracy was charged the case resulted in the judge dismissing the indictment because it s such a difficult, such an unusual sort of charge to bring. it involves an agreement, and that s the essence of a conspiracy indictment. it s an incoate crime. that means they didn t get it across the finish line. because congress has set forth the series of rules that say we re concerned about groups of individuals who agree to break the law, we have these statutes, but they can be tough to prove. i think andrew said this very appropriately. if you re going to charge seditious conspiracy, this is the case to do it in. these are people who tried to interfere with certification of
Zone, where it becomes, without question, a crime, and you walk it up the ladder from that, so could you take it and turn into an indictment? it. could that could be a single conspiracy. that is to say that all of these people were connected and all knew what was going to happened and all planned what was going to happen and had various means to do it and the objective was to overturn the election. so john, we have it up on the screen for your analysis, we endeavor to accurately show this over time, this is our original reporting, as you see. right. you re saying, as an additional thought, that some of that factual evidence on the screen could be a conspiracy indictment. explain, as we look at the arrows. sure, i ll be glad to do that. i enjoy doing this with you. first of all, the lawsuits you have is green because people can