Live Breaking News & Updates on Conversation didn t
Stay updated with breaking news from Conversation didn t. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
"This Conversation Didn't Happen": Matt Gaetz Demands Investigation After CIA Program Manager Gets Loose Lips About Trump Congressman Matt Gaetz (R-FL) has…
in this meeting, jim trusty, telegraphed something of an agenda for what he was hoping to talk about with merrick garland himself. obviously, that conversation didn't happen, but he said in a tv interview that he hoped to sort of level accusations of prosecutorial misconduct, that he wants to claim prosecutors work for jack smith's team have engaged in problematic behavior that should shape doj's charging decision in this case. of course certainly it seems like garland, lisa monaco and the other top brass at the justice department did not decide to engage with that overture that trusty made publicly. my sense in general is when defense attorneys are making overtures like this publicly, it's because private outreach has not proven fruitful the way they would hope it to be. that said, of course this meeting also comes at the investigation by all available public evidence appears to be
brush, hair brush and made a dna connection before they got to pennsylvania. >> martha: mark, what are your thoughts on the father's trip out there and their trip back in that car? you know, the potential for him to be looked at as well in all of this. >> well, i think in a vacuum, it's not strange. somebody is going to be driving that long distance by themselves in bad weather conditions. if the father's retired, that doesn't seem strange to me. what it does seem a little strange is the conversation that the father might have had with his son. you don't have stupid people here. you're driving a white elantra and on the radio and everywhere you look where you stop on the tv, they're looking for a white elantra from a murder in idaho and his season lives eight miles away from. it's pretty odd that the conversation didn't come up. i don't think it will be
shocking roe v. wade supreme court decision leak, the conversation didn't and there though. bringing the rest of today. this is velshi. this is velshi me? about 1000. walgreens...millions. ♪♪ i cannot miss her big debut. with your booster, i think you'll be there. for every twirl. i got a shot so my sister won't get sick. way to go, big bro! so while we're here... flu shot, as well? let's do it. when you need to talk vaccinations, our pharmacists are here ♪♪ in a 1776 letter to a fellow
totally definitive, confident way if you're running the type of probe that these members of congress are running. it's very difficult to prove the negative. it's very difficult to get enough total, thorough, complete information about some of these conversations and phone calls, to be able to say with confidence, that conversation didn't happen. but cheney was able to say that with confidence, in large part because of the extraordinary leverage this committee has. another -- was about rod publican members of congress seeking pardons. those topics. people going to white house for pardons, and the relationship between white house and capitol hill, those are very much topics that -- a former white house say it is in the process of potentially increasing her cooperation with the committee. those are topics she would have a significant amount of visibility into. i expect to hear a lot more on
the administration will appeal the ruling. at one point today, biden tod sm that wearing a mask was anhe individual choice and a fewn hours later he demanded everyone continue to wear their masks. clearly leadership is not clearlde something the administration does well and that's because joe biden is a leader is correct. he's cognitively struggling. he's a career politician who is a few decades past his prime. ac i have no idea if he'll actually run for reelection, but i do know that almost no one outside of the white house wants another four years off joe biden here with reaction, white house correspondent peter doocy. i'm not going tocy. belabor thi, but i do need to ask you,ou joe did call you a son of a and i'm not sure if that gives me as a host to m talk license o call administration officials a sonis of a . i think if i did, i might get a different reaction. but he did calll you and you told us on the air that you had a conversation didn't quite apologize. it happened again. but i wanted to ask i want to
make sure i have this right. didn't the biden administrationb say there'd be diree consequences if people were disrespected? let me just play this tape. i'm not joking when i say ifng you ever worked w with me and i hear you treat anothero colleague with disrespect, talk down to someone. i promise you i will fire you on the spot on the spot. no ifss no ifs, ands or, buts. everybody everybody is entitled to be treated with decency and dignity. notitl, i got to be honest, pet, i watch the exchange that you jen psaki, you are respectful. a questiinformed. has anyone foxon ever given you a question? i doubt it. but i think i give you a chance to respond.oo thinknkwhy d there'sos hostility toward you? you? nobody has ever given me h a question and we've spoken about this before. i spent hours on questionst and ideas for questions and backup material for questions because i am the only
had become tied to the issue of investigations. i recall mentioning that before the zelensky meeting. and the vice president nodded, like had heard what ai said and that was it. >> he said the two of them never met in that capacity and didn't bring up his concern. >> after they meet. sondland also goes and talks to a top ukrainian official. and makes clear that aide is likely held up until ukraine announces investigations. >> i told mr.ier mac i believe the resumption would not occur until ukraine took action on the public statement we had been discussing for many weeks. as my other state department colleagues have testified, this security aide was critical to ukraines defense and shouldn't
scheduled. >> was he specific about the investigations he was referring to? >> the investigations into bris ma. >> investigations into the bidens in 2016. >> i'm aware of accounts of the meeting from hill and vindman, their recollections simply don't square with my own. or with those of ambassador volker or secretary perry. i recall mentioning the prerequisite of investigations before any white house call or meeting. i do not recall any yelling or screaming or abrupt termination. >> the meeting was over. when ambassador sondland made a general comment about investigations. all of us thought it was inappropriate. the conversation didn't continue. and meeting concluded. later on in the i may have been engaged in a side conversation or left the complex because i do not recall further discussion regarding investigations. >> you also reported this
volker aemding earlier testimony now recalling sondland talking about investigations. >> at the end of the meeting i recall having seen some of the other testimony i believe sondland did raise the point of investigations. this was after the meeting was already wrapping up. and i think all of us thought it was inappropriate. and the conversation didn't pick up from there. the meeting was over. >> top republican used his time to bat back democrats new focus on bribery. by the white house. >> did anyone ever ask you to bribe or extort anyone at any time during the time in the white house? >> no, sir. >> did anyone at the white house ask you to bribe or extort anything out of anyone at any time? >> no, sir. >> there was a lot of testimony. a lot to talk about. joining us our legal and political team.