Of defence analyst, margaret myers. thank you all forjoining u5. first of all it if i can come to you in johannesburg, do you get any sense that these five are pulling in the same direction? same direction? that is a very interesting same direction? that is a very interesting question same direction? that is a very interesting question and - same direction? that is a very interesting question and the l same direction? that is a very i interesting question and the best way to answer that is they are all coming from different places, so it is difficult to go in the same direction when there are different personalities and views on the alliance itself. as the insert said, there is a very clear framing from russia and china for this to become a very powerful counterweight and counterforce to the west, but there is much less enthusiasm and appetite from india and south africa for that. ~ ., ., , that. who would it benefit if there is a big expansion? that. who would it benefit if there is a big expansion? might - that. who would it benefit if there is a big expansion? might the - is a big expansion? might the delusion of the original five beta
Was warned, but that is the outstanding question. i want to ask all of you about this very frightening arrest yesterday and the threat to supreme court justice brett kavanaugh. clint, you know, we talk a lot about political violence, it s something that you have warned about now for many, many months. we saw a foiled attempt on the supreme court justice s life yesterday. that s right, nicole. very troubling because this is that contagion effect we ve talked about over several weeks, when there s one violent attack, you oftentimes see several other violent attacks or people thinking about violent attacks. we also see the reciprocation. every force is met with a counterforce, meaning uvalde, this individual that was showing up or appears to be showing up at justice kavanaugh s house, was upset about uvalde and he was upset about the leaked abortion document that had been out and what he thought might be a court case that comes in the summer. what s interesting about it, it was not justice alito.
tucker: it s hard to believe that happened in this country. if we are to be honest it is hard to believe the federal ministry she didn t send troops and immediately. we all sat back and watched it. then we watch the people in charge certainly in our business community and among politicians endorse these riots and send money to help theus rioters. kamala harris is at the very front of that group. s she literally praised blm for its role in the violence. watch. black lives matter has been the most significant agent for change within the criminal justice system because it has been a counterforce to the force within the system that is so grounded in the status quo and in its own traditions, many of which have been harmful and discriminatory in the way that they ve been enforced. tucker: that wasn t that long ago but it s relevant what
tucker: it s hard to believe that happened in this country. if we are to be honest it is hard to believe the federal ministry she didn t send troops and immediately. we all sat back and watched it. then we watch the people in charge certainly in our business community and among politicians endorse these riots and send money to help the rioters. kamala harris is at the very front of that group. she literally praised blm for its role in the violence. watch. black lives matter has been the most significant agent for change within the criminal justice system because it has been a counterforce to the fourth within the system that is so grounded in the status quo and in its own traditions. many of which have been harmfuld discriminatory in the way that
MIKÄ OLEMINEN JA UUSI MAAILMANJÄRJESTYS? - Kulttuurivihkot kulttuurivihkot.fi - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from kulttuurivihkot.fi Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Of new democracy. we are building an enduring partnership with them. together wee matter tremendous progress. and through all of this, the world from the field has always been positive. you hear and see it over and over again, where we re, quote, making problem. today we re face-to-face with a report that all these gung ho assessments were wrong, that we have failed to built a counter-force, that the afghan army is not up to defending itself or the country. stable areas don t outlost the on the ground presence of american allied troops. reports, offer reasons, that afghan lacks a history of a central government, our military commanders could never steve articulate a mission over there. nbc news has not verified the
not necessarily trust that a lot of people around the world they want power and unfortunately they are drastic. generally terrible people. you have some counterforce to that. give an afghan government that is not exactly awesome at what it does but nonetheless it will be a counterforce in of course the threshold issue could not be that it is sort of trustworthy or good people is whether we have achieved our fundamental objectives and whether these forces would be better used elsewhere. do you think we can achieve those objectives of preventing afghanistan from being a terrorist base if we withdraw? the first objectives weren t as sweeping as those. it was to get the person that brought us september 11 as far as well there be jihadist
United states he couldn t have conflicts of interest so he didn t have to divest himself of financial or business holdings. who knew health care was hard. who knew. who knew article 2 made you all powerful? he s going to interpret everything he learns on the go as empowering him to do whatever he wants to do. that s not going to be a new phenomenon. the problem we re seeing in this is there s no counterforce. there s no one in the gop specifically who is saying no, you re demeaning the office. no, you re redefining the office in the wrong direction, and we as a party and as a country should hold this institution in a different regard. mike, you get the final 30 seconds. can the house compel don mcgahn to come in? this is going to be a real fight. what democrats are hoping tomorrow is mueller helps them make the case legally for why it s critical to bring him in. mcgahn is perhaps the most critical witness. the contradiction is not courts,
Powerful? he s going to interpret everything he learns on the go as empowering him to do whatever he wants to do. that s not going to be a new phenomenon. the problem we re seeing in this is there s no counterforce. there s no one in the gop specifically who is saying no, you re demeaning the office. no, you re redefining the office in the wrong direction, and we as a party and as a country should hold this institution in a different regard. mike, you get the final 30 seconds. can the house compel don mcgahn to come in? this is going to be a real fight. what democrats are hoping tomorrow is mueller helps them make the case legally for why it s critical to bring him in. mcgahn is perhaps the most critical witness. the contradiction is not courts, you may need an impeachment process already underway to pierce that executive privilege which the white house says bars mcgahn from testifying and