Live Breaking News & Updates on Hunter biden doesn t

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from Hunter biden doesn t on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in Hunter biden doesn t and stay connected to the pulse of your community

The Journal Editorial Report

hoping to do. it was a set up to allow democrats to make hunter biden's pr point for him. republicans just want to use this as a political con and all they are interested in is having him go behind closed doors and twist and contort the story. this is a sideshow to what's really going on. hunter biden doesn't want to do the testimony about his prior business dealings because they are unpleasant and ugly and might not speak well to his father so they latched onto this we will only do it if you do it in public, but that is an excuse to get out of it and this was another stunt to make that political point and they succeeded in that regard. paul: kyle petersen, dan heninger and jason riley.

Hunter-biden-in-contempt , Republican , Democrats , Pr-point , Political-con , Hunter-biden-doesn-t , Testimony , Behind-closed-doors , In , Sideshow , Story , Twist

Hannity

tax years, 2014, 2050, when he got the income from burisma. >> in fact, he let the statute of limitations expire because it's one thing to have a gun charge in delaware that doesn't get you to the white house. another thing to have tax charges in l.a. that doesn't get to the white house. but the burisma tax years do. and that's what's in that 1023 form? that's why they want the earlier one as well. >> and we've asked the fbi to produce when this became an issue, why wouldn't they automatically have handed i handed you the other 1023 for in other words, were they hiding it from you? >> don't they seem like the very cooperative? >> great question. i don't know. they were hiding it from us, but we learned it when we talked to scott brady, the u.s. attorney who bill barr charged ,filtering all this stuff and getting it out to the appropriate u.s. attorneys for investigate. >> and he started he filed it out finally, after six months when they should have turned it over to him. he's the one that asked for it. so once we've talked to him, we felt we should go pursue and get this. so we're hoping that chris will turn it over. >> all right. let's turn to you, james colmer. let's talk about yesterday,

Fact , White-house , Thing , Statute , Hunter-biden-doesn-t , Burisma-holdings-out , Tax-charges , Limitations , Gun-charge , L-a- , Income , Delaware

Hannity

former trump advisers. they are now facing prison time for the exact same act that. steve bannon. that's peter navarro. but hunter biden doesn't appear worried at all, after all, is that his doj will more than likely go to great lengths to protect him. so yesterday, while hunter flouted his impunity during that surprise appearance on capitol hill to attend his very own contempt hearing, he sat in the back of the room, glaring at lawmakers. his camera crew in tow. it was either a sad attempt to intimidate members of congress or probably likely a stunt for his upcoming documentary. either way, hunter didn't stick around for very long, fleeing the room after getting publicly humiliated by congresswoman nancy, south carolina. >> take a look at this. you are the epitome of white privilege coming in to the oversight committee, spitting in our face, ignoring a congressional subpoena to be deposed.

All , Peter-navarro , Steve-bannon , Hunter-biden-doesn-t , Prison-time , Act , Trump-advisers , Doj , Contempt-hearing , Back , Lengths , Impunity

Morning Joe

to testify. he was there to testify in public, but they didn't have the guts to let him testify. they did not want transparency. they did not want the american people to hear the truth. they wanted to take it behind closed doors. again, republicans shooting themselves in the political foot. >> first of all, why is it that republicans don't have the guts but hunter biden doesn't have the stones? these are just questions. thank you to you and willie for saying stones because this is an important distinction here. look, the hypocrisy is itself explanatory. i also remember the white house saying when it was a really close -- when the house underperformed for republicans in the last midterms, they loved the idea, and they saw this coming, that this was going to be the circus that was going to be front and center for the republican party. sort of the sideshow to donald trump, which is saying something. >> jackie -- >> what are they getting done,

Guts , Transparency , Public , People , All , Truth , Stones , Republican , Hunter-biden-doesn-t , Foot , Behind-closed-doors , White-house

Chris Jansing Reports

was attempting to convey here is he's not hiding from republicans, he's not refusing to testify as part of the investigation, he's happy to do so under oath. he's adamant he do so publicly in the light of day, and not behind closed doors. he said republicans will rip his context out of context in bad faith. after that surprise appearance, his attorney abbe lowell spoke about that position. let's play what he had to say. >> hunter chose a hearing where republicans could not distort, manipulate, or misuse that testimony. the republican chairs today then are commandeering an unprecedented resolution to hold someone in contempt who has offered to publicly answer all of their proper questions. the question there is what are they afraid of? >> reporter: now the republican response is essentially, hunter

Investigation , Part , Light , Oath , Gop , Hunter-biden-doesn-t , Hearing , Context , Abbe-lowell , Surprise-appearance , Position , Let-s-play

Chris Jansing Reports

mayorkas is going to solve these problems. you want to get rid of president biden, and then perhaps you can put your own secretary in there that will come up with a different policy, but just impeaching mayorkas, we'll have another appointment of another secretary who follows the policy of the administration, and you won't like that either. so. >> and that was the point of today, really, the last time a secretary has been impeached, a cabinet level secretary was under the grant administration, that was for blatant corruption. what democrats said today is this has nothing to do with mayorkas, and more to do with policies that republicans disagree with. >> julia, thank you very much. coming up next on "katy tur reports" at 3:00 p.m. it used to be that donald trump voters were worried about supporting him, now some republican voters tell us they're scared to admit they don't support him. what might that mean for a surprise at the ballot box. llotx organic ingredients, and fermentation.

Hunter-biden-doesn-t , Alejandro-mayorkas , Problems , Secretary , Policy , Mayorkas , Impeaching-mayorkas , Appointment , Administration , Point , Level , Grant-administration

Chris Jansing Reports

get more engaged. get more excited about this issue. it helps hunter biden's lawyers make the point that quite frankly otherwise would be farther down in the news coverage, and i think the white house belief is that something like an impeachment inquiry without any evidence related to president biden is a loser politically for republicans. >> is it a good idea for hunter biden to show up unannounced like he did today and suddenly leave the hearing room after only a few minutes when marjorie taylor green starts talking, robert? >> well, look, i think the point clearly that hunter biden and his lawyer wanted to make today was if the committee was interested in hearing directly from hunter biden, as they've said they are, and they're holding him in contempt of not doing, here he is to answer questions. so in reality, i think being there, being present and having them not take him up on doing that does help his side of this. there's no doubt that there's

Hunter-biden-doesn-t , Something , Point , Lawyers , White-house , Impeachment-inquiry , Issue , Belief , News-coverage , Evidence , Biden-doesn-t , Hearing-room

Chris Jansing Reports

but democrats and republicans meanwhile on the house oversight committee are still debating the matter right now as we speak, and were anticipating several amendments to continue to be introduced, including an amendment introduced by democrats that would essentially bar the members, scott perry, andy bigs and jim jordan, the three who have previously defied congressional subpoenas from voting on this contempt resolution if and when it does make it to the house floor for a full vote. >> let me ask you, the house republicans say that their ultimate goal here is to impeach president biden, and they need hunter biden to help gather evidence. what evidence have they so far gathered, what evidence do they have to even open this impeachment inquiry? >> that's really the most important question of all, that republicans have yet to answer. they have still not been able to produce any evidence that supports their allegations and the entire thesis of this investigation that president biden, these allegations, again,

Democrats , Amendments , Matter , Amendment , House-oversight-committee , Gop , Isn-t-it , Get-out-the-vote , Subpoenas , White-house , Three , Jim-jordan

Chris Jansing Reports

unsubstantiated, that president biden benefitted financially from his son's business dealings in ukraine and across the world really, and china as well. and that his policy decisions were influenced by hunter's business interests. they have brought in countless witnesses and people who have testified publicly and privately before them over the past year, and very little evidence has materialized that directly connects joe biden to his son's business dealings. we've seen republicans again and again mischaracterize and misrepresent some of the evidence that they have obtained about hunter's business dealings that wasn't previously public, and does have -- is slightly nefarious in the sense that hunter was clearly trying to trade off the biden family name. but again, does not show any wrong doing by joe biden in his capacity post vice presidency

Biden-doesn-t , Son , Business-dealings , World , Ukraine , Hunter-s-business-interests , Policy-decisions , China , Unsubstantiated , People , Evidence , Joe-biden

Chris Jansing Reports

peril on either side. democrat and republican for this strategy. there's no doubt that this is going to be a much bigger story today because hunter was there. but it's more likely that the points that hunter biden and his lawyer want to get into that coverage are going to be more prominent because of the stunt that he pulled today. >> robert gibbs, sahil kapur, jacqueline alemany, thank you very much. donald trump won't be able to give his own closing argument at his civil fraud trial tomorrow. he wanted, to but the judge said no when donald trump refused not to say certain things. what those are in 60 seconds. (dad) it's our phone bill... we pay for things that we don't need. (mom) that's a bit dramatic. (dad) we must tighten our belts! (mom) a better plan to save is verizon! (vo) that's right! plans start at $25 per line guaranteed for 3 years. only on verizon. ♪everything i do that's for my health is an accomplishment.♪ ♪concerns of getting screened faded away♪

Hunter-biden-doesn-t , Side , Lawyer , Story , Points , Democrats , No-doubt , Strategy , Peril , Donald-trump , Closing-argument , Robert-gibbs