Live Breaking News & Updates on Investigator

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from Investigator on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in Investigator and stay connected to the pulse of your community

Carson City Sheriff to speak at Democratic luncheon

The featured speaker at Monday's Democratic luncheon will be Sheriff Kenny Furlong, the 26th Sheriff to serve Ormsby County/Carson City since 1861, and the 6th Sheriff of the Combined Municipality of the City/County of Carson City.

United-states , Nevada , Carson-city , Crisis-negotiating-team , Boys-girls-club , National-night , Bachelor-degree-in-criminal-justice-administration , Investigations-division-major-crimes , Degree-in-police-science , Office-of-sheriff , United-states-air-force

BBC News Now

particular case, mr ishaq. and it is sent to you-— sent to you. she was part of the casework team. _ sent to you. she was part of the casework team. she _ sent to you. she was part of the casework team. she was - sent to you. she was part of the casework team. she was a i sent to you. she was part of the casework team. she was a case | casework team. she was a case worker, casework team. she was a case worker. you — casework team. she was a case worker. you are _ casework team. she was a case worker, you are an _ casework team. she was a case worker, you are an investigatorj casework team. she was a case i worker, you are an investigator and she gives an opinion as to sufficiency of evidence. ida. she gives an opinion as to sufficiency of evidence. no. not at all. what sufficiency of evidence. no. not at all- what she _ sufficiency of evidence. no. not at all. what she is _ sufficiency of evidence. no. not at all. what she is basically - sufficiency of evidence. no. not at all. what she is basically done i sufficiency of evidence. no. not at all. what she is basically done is l all. what she is basically done is forwarded on. that's been addressed from legal services because this is a round about the time of the crossover between the criminal law team and cartwright king taking over completely. so the legal services, as the royal mail group when the split came, all these royal mail letters they would then send it to the casework team and in this case maureen and they would be forwarded on and be attached to the files. tiara on and be attached to the files. two whose attention was this particular document. i5 whose attention was this particular document. . ., whose attention was this particular document. , ., , . , document. is to let the security team know- _

Khayyam-ishaq , Seema-misra-case , Case , Evidence , Team , Casework-team , Opinion , Part , Case-worker , Sufficiency , Investigator , You

Verified Live

sefton and anne nield. they were post office clerks in liverpool and they were convicted of false accounting and given custodial prison sentences, suspended. now, the reason why they were focusing on these cases is because stephen bradshaw was the investigator of these two women's involvement in what was alleged to be false accounting. they were convicted of false accounting. and their convictions were overturned in 2021. and at the court of appeal, the post office accepted that the prosecution of these two women had been unfair and an affront to justice, and the post office admitted that they had failed to carry out a proper investigation, and that evidence

Angela-sefton , Anne-nield , Clerks , Liverpool , Cases , Investigator-stephen-bradshaw , False-accounting , Investigator , Reason , Women , Prison-sentences , Involvement

BBC News Now

than in fact the correct position? yes, as i say, that has come from them. i wasjust yes, as i say, that has come from them. i was just at the very end of them. i was just at the very end of the branwell case, the one underneath london road, sunnydale. i was sort of a liaison for these. i would go in, and, as you say, yes, it shows that mr bolts knew about theissues it shows that mr bolts knew about the issues and should have taken it up the issues and should have taken it up accordingly if he felt. but the issues and should have taken it up accordingly if he felt.— up accordingly if he felt. but it also shows _ up accordingly if he felt. but it also shows that _ up accordingly if he felt. but it also shows that you _ up accordingly if he felt. but it also shows that you were - up accordingly if he felt. but it | also shows that you were aware up accordingly if he felt. but it - also shows that you were aware of a court position of a particular line being taken. he court position of a particular line being taken-— court position of a particular line beinr taken. .,, ., ., , being taken. he has informally come of it as i being taken. he has informally come of it as i say. — being taken. he has informally come of it as i say, these _ being taken. he has informally come of it as i say, these were _ being taken. he has informally come of it as i say, these were all- being taken. he has informally come of it as i say, these were all cases i of it as i say, these were all cases that were well ongoing, and i was just a liaison man to sort out at the very end. if that team hadn't changed, then e—mails never would have even been on there. you changed, then e-mails never would have even been on there.— have even been on there. you were not a have even been on there. you were rrot a liaison — have even been on there. you were not a liaison man, _ have even been on there. you were not a liaison man, you _ have even been on there. you were not a liaison man, you were - have even been on there. you were not a liaison man, you were the - not a liaison man, you were the investigator charged with investigating theft in the neald

Case , Fact , Yes , Branwell-one , The-one , Position , Sunnydale , London-road , One , Dinsdale , Issues , Bolts

Verified Live

and this _ probably not. thank you. and this is _ probably not. thank you. and this is the _ probably not. thank you. and this is the case - probably not. thank you. | and this is the case where probably not. thank you. - and this is the case where you probably not. thank you. _ and this is the case where you were the investigator in the case? as i was trying to explain, there was also a defence expert, and that would have been part of the discussion within the court as well, whatever the defence expert said. it might be something that was accepted, but i think your evidence you accept it would not be appropriate for the post office to make that condition in the first place. certainly with today's knowledge, no. �* . certainly with today's knowledge, no, i ., ., , ., certainly with today's knowledge, no. �* ., ., ~ ., i. no. but what about the knowledge you had then? that — no. but what about the knowledge you had then? that was _ no. but what about the knowledge you had then? that was 2011. _ no. but what about the knowledge you had then? that was 2011. as _ no. but what about the knowledge you had then? that was 2011. as | - no. but what about the knowledge you had then? that was 2011. as i said - had then? that was 2011. as i said there, had then? that was 2011. as i said there. that — had then? that was 2011. as i said there. that is _ had then? that was 2011. as i said there, that is the _ had then? that was 2011. as i said there, that is the way _ had then? that was 2011. as i said there, that is the way some - had then? that was 2011. as i said there, that is the way some of- had then? that was 2011. as i said there, that is the way some of the j there, that is the way some of the cases were going, because of... whether the instructions come from the solicitors, because that's two. who's idea was it? we have seen it now in two cases. we have it in no thomas's case and missmchugh's case.

Credit-case , Part , Credit-someone-s-case , Investigator , Defence-expert , Post-office , Crown-court , Evidence , Something , Knowledge , Defence , Discussion

Verified Live

from the horizon it system was essential to their defence. why am i giving you that background? because what stephen bradshaw has been asked this afternoon is, why is it that when angela sefton and anne nield's lawyers requested access to horizon because they wanted a forensic accountant to examine the it system to see whether the horizon system was to blame for the missing funds that they were accused of stealing, they were denied that access. as i say, at the court of appeal, the post office admitted that was wrong. what stephen bradshaw was asked this afternoon was, why was that access denied? he essentially kept saying it wasn't his decision is the investigator. that as far as he was concerned, the horizon system was not relevant in their case, and that decision was made by the higher up

Investigator-stephen-bradshaw , Horizon-it-system , Afternoon , Defence , Background , Horizon-system , Lawyers , Access , Angela-sefton , Anne-nield , It-system , Accountant

BBC News at One

being diagnosed with terminal cancer, but he says he will resist it for as long as he can. good afternoon. the public inquiry into the post office it scandal has been hearing from the investigator who's work led to criminal prosecutions of some sub—postmasters and postmistresses. yesterday, the government announced plans for a new law to exonerate and compensate hundreds of post office staff wrongly accused because of the faulty horizon it system. well, this morning, this man — post office investigator stephen bradshaw — told the public inquiry he hadn't known there was anything wrong with the horizon system. and he denied a claim that he and other investigators behaved like mafia gangsters using threats and lies to collect their bounty. ben boulos reports.

Public-inquiry , Terminal-cancer , Post-office , Sub-postmasters , Government , Investigator , Work-led , Prosecutions , Plans , Staff , Law , Hearing

BBC News Now

left, they were allowed to collect any personal items from behind the counter. again, they apologised and said sorry for all they had done and that they felt terrible. was that your recollection as well, that they were apologising and felt terrible? yes, miss sefton and miss neald apologised all the way through. it was mr ryan who went with miss neald to recover the deposit slips, and they brought them back. he counted them up and there was 40 that was, give or take a bit, £35,000. was this again a case where you were the lead investigator? yes. can we look at paul 008734, please? the second e—mail on the pages from your self to andrew bolts. he was a lawyer at cartright king. you say as follows. on another point

Counter , Recollection , Felt , Terrible , Well , Items , Miss , Deposit-slips , Neald , Yes , Way , Sefton

BBC News

had found out _ they let all the media know that i had found out i— they let all the media know that i had found out i have _ they let all the media know that i had found out i have five - had found out i have five charges against _ had found out i have five charges against me — had found out i have five charges against me by— had found out i have five charges against me by the _ had found out i have five charges against me by the front - had found out i have five charges against me by the front page of. had found out i have five charges�* against me by the front page of a newspapen — against me by the front page of a newspaper. thal— against me by the front page of a newspaper. that is— against me by the front page of a newspaper. that is how- against me by the front page of a newspaper. that is how i - against me by the front page of a newspaper. that is how i find - against me by the front page of a newspaper. that is how i find out for that _ newspaper. that is how i find out for that that _ newspaper. that is how i find out for that that was _ newspaper. that is how i find out for that that was horrendous. - newspaper. that is how i find out| for that that was horrendous. you newspaper. that is how i find out. for that that was horrendous. you go from being _ for that that was horrendous. you go from being knowing _ for that that was horrendous. you go from being knowing where _ for that that was horrendous. you go from being knowing where your - for that that was horrendous. you go from being knowing where your life i from being knowing where your life is an enjoying — from being knowing where your life is an enjoying life _ from being knowing where your life is an enjoying life and _ from being knowing where your life is an enjoying life and being - from being knowing where your life is an enjoying life and being part i is an enjoying life and being part of the _ is an enjoying life and being part of the community— is an enjoying life and being part of the community and _ is an enjoying life and being part| of the community and everything is an enjoying life and being part. of the community and everything to being _ of the community and everything to being an _ of the community and everything to being an outsider— of the community and everything to being an outsider for— of the community and everything to being an outsider for that _ of the community and everything to being an outsider for that year- of the community and everything to being an outsider for that year spat| being an outsider for that year spat at, being an outsider for that year spat at. you _ being an outsider for that year spat at. you are — being an outsider for that year spat at, you are called _ being an outsider for that year spat at, you are called names, - being an outsider for that year spat at, you are called names, you - being an outsider for that year spat at, you are called names, you justl at, you are called names, you just can't _ at, you are called names, you just can't describe _ at, you are called names, you just can't describe it. _ at, you are called names, you just can't describe it. i— at, you are called names, you just can't describe it. i had _ at, you are called names, you just can't describe it. i had my- can't describe it. i had my investigator, _ can't describe it. i had my investigator, because - can't describe it. i had my investigator, because my| can't describe it. i had my- investigator, because my daughter worked _ investigator, because my daughter worked for— investigator, because my daughter worked for me _ investigator, because my daughter worked for me he _ investigator, because my daughter worked for me he banned - investigator, because my daughter worked for me he banned me - investigator, because my daughter worked for me he banned me from having _ worked for me he banned me from having any— worked for me he banned me from having any communication - worked for me he banned me from having any communication with - worked for me he banned me fromj having any communication with my daughter— having any communication with my daughter for— having any communication with my daughter for 18 _ having any communication with my daughter for 18 months. _ having any communication with my daughter for 18 months. with - having any communication with my daughter for 18 months. with your| daughter for 18 months. with your daughter? — daughter for 18 months. with your daughter? i— daughter for 18 months. with your daughter? i couldn't _ daughter for 18 months. with your daughter? i couldn't even - daughter for 18 months. with your daughter? i couldn't even send i daughter for 18 months. with youri daughter? i couldn't even send her daughter for 18 months. with your. daughter? i couldn't even send her a christmas _ daughter? i couldn't even send her a christmas card _ daughter? i couldn't even send her a christmas card. it _ daughter? i couldn't even send her a christmas card. it was _ daughter? i couldn't even send her a christmas card. it was like _ daughter? i couldn't even send her a christmas card. it was like a - christmas card. it was like a lroulder_ christmas card. it was like a boulder coming _ christmas card. it was like a boulder coming into - christmas card. it was like a boulder coming into my- christmas card. it was like a i boulder coming into my home christmas card. it was like a - boulder coming into my home and christmas card. it was like a _ boulder coming into my home and just destroying _ boulder coming into my home and just destroying my— boulder coming into my home and just destroying my house. _ boulder coming into my home and just destroying my house. destroying - boulder coming into my home and just destroying my house. destroying my. destroying my house. destroying my family _ destroying my house. destroying my famil . ~ destroying my house. destroying my famil. ,, ., destroying my house. destroying my famil . ,, ., family. mark, i read somewhere because you've _ family. mark, i read somewhere because you've done _ family. mark, i read somewhere because you've done several- because you've done several interviews but for a while or a long while you blamed yourself, didn't you? while you blamed yourself, didn't ou? , , , ., . you? yes because i thought at the time if that _ you? yes because i thought at the time if that solicitor, _ you? yes because i thought at the time if that solicitor, i _ you? yes because i thought at the time if that solicitor, i think -

Life , Charges , Part , Tell-me , Community , Newspaper , Being , Media , The-front-page , Me , Against-me , Newspapen

World Business Report

have protected the business, prevented the wider impact on the business, do you think that might lead to a bonus? tt business, do you think that might lead to a bonus?— business, do you think that might lead to a bonus? it may do or it may not do depending — lead to a bonus? it may do or it may not do depending on _ lead to a bonus? it may do or it may not do depending on who _ lead to a bonus? it may do or it may not do depending on who looks - lead to a bonus? it may do or it may not do depending on who looks at i lead to a bonus? it may do or it may| not do depending on who looks at the forms that are put in.— forms that are put in. thank you. that may be _ forms that are put in. thank you. that may be an — forms that are put in. thank you. that may be an appropriate - forms that are put in. thank you. i that may be an appropriate moment forms that are put in. thank you. - that may be an appropriate moment to take our break. that may be an appropriate moment to take our break-— take our break. when we restart? if we restart at... _ take our break. when we restart? if we restart at... at _ take our break. when we restart? if we restart at... at ten _ take our break. when we restart? if we restart at... at ten to _ take our break. when we restart? if we restart at... at ten to 12. - take our break. when we restart? if we restart at... at ten to 12. you i we restart at... at ten to 12. you are watching special coverage of the post office public inquiry, the inquiry is now taking a breakfor about 15 minutes and we have been listening to stephen bradshaw, an investigator for the post office give evidence. remember, none of this is new, this inquiry has been going on for years, it started in

The-business , Tt-business , Impact , Bonus , Lead , Put , In-forms , Have , Who , Break , Forms , Appropriate-forms