Stay updated with breaking news from Irregardless. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
seen as positive in many ways. first the fact that we have china, russia and iran in the top four are very good. people understand the threat landscape we face. the fact the united states came in as two, i see it as a positive. attacks can come from anywhere. irregardless where they come from, we need to protect against these attacks. we should not have blindspots, especially blind spots of something that could be coming from or appear to come from within the united states. the fact that this is listed i see as a good thing. it means our cybersecurity and i.t. folks and election system are getting ready to repel any kind of attack, to detect any attack, no matter where it comes from. >> we have 30 seconds. when it comes to this issue of disinformation, because that's a part of election interference, are social media companies doing anything to tackle it differently this year compared to elections past?
membership can't happen, but they made real progress and the alliance will lay out the further reforms, both in terms of their security work and their democracy that are necessary to keep moving down that path. >> elizabeth, how do you weigh nato's clear desire to protect ukraine but also try not to antagonize putin to the point where he may do something extreme? >> well, that seems to be what is the debate is focusing on a lot. the point we're missing is whether it is in ukraine's and nato's best interest, irregardless of the response by russia, for us to ukraine on a specific and clear path toward membership. from the ukraine perspective, we know there is very strong interest, i think there would be a big morale boost to be saying, yes, when the war is over, you will be on a path and here is the criteria and here is how it will work and there are a number of nato members who are interested in that. i think if we're considering now, we're not in the position where we were in 2008 when nato membership was first dangled in front of ukraine and georgia. the idea was how do you prevent
may lead to dehydration, which may worsen kidney problems. need to get your a1c down? you may pay as little as $10 per prescription. >> we did not win the election today. i stand here with my head held high and a heart full of gratitude. irregardless of tonight's outcome we fought the right fights and we put this city on a better path, no doubt about it. paul: with her 740 years a chicago bears lost reelection after incumbent democrat lori lightfoot came in third on tuesday and a nine person race. lightfoot sang in her concession specie with the windy city on the path and her four years in office were former chicago public chief paul union organizer brandon johnson are not set to square off april 4 run out a voter concern over
yes, we tend -- we try to be always there. we were just sending product by air to turkey which is, you know, so tragedy thetic -- rachel: yes. >> 40,000 people. and the thing with east palestine was a little bit different, 4700 people. but kind of a forgotten people because, you know, we're not valuing life, we're valuing some lives over others. and we just, i just felt compelled. you know, we need to reach out and help these people because they are not forgotten, you know? their lives are important. irregardless of their voting bloc. so we sent product. i contacted, actually, the police and then these wonderful people, jamie necessary bit at the weigh station, the presbyterian church, and they said, hey, we could use -- people are serving water, but we
been -- the question that dutch is raising, which is who actually -- how did a live round end up on set and in that gun. i don't see if it is declared here in this -- in this information coming from the district attorney. but khloe, just in general, have a statement in from alec baldwin for from hannah gutierrez. >> no, we have not. and i sat down with him in august and he said he had nothing to do with hiring the prop masters, with hiring the woman in charge of the weapons on set hannah gutierrez reed which is charged with two counts of involuntary manslaughter and when he was handed the gun on the set it was declared cold and that he did not pull the trigger and that irregardless of pulling the trigger, there never should have been a live round on set to the guest that you just had on said on point. and at the same time alec baldwin saying from the beginning, this is a tragic
lavandera into the conversation. you're at the border and this is a humanitarian crisis you've been describing for weeks. shelters are already overflowing. do you think the supreme court keeping title 42 in place, at least for now, will have any impact on what's going on there? >> reporter: well, there are still a steady flow of people crossing the border, irregardless of what is going on with title 42. so on this side, there are still a large sized number of people here in the el paso area who are still being released, so that doesn't really weaken the pressure on the shelters and the churches that have been housing many of these migrants here in the el paso area. but, jake, as this news was breaking, i was literally in the middle of an interview with a gentleman named ruben garcia, and he is one of the most well-known advocates for
be borderline, and possibly understandable if it was technically a breach— understandable if it was technically a breach of the rules at the time. but we _ a breach of the rules at the time. but we concentrated on, and certainly _ but we concentrated on, and certainly the gatherings that sue l rey certainly the gatherings that sue grey is— certainly the gatherings that sue grey is concentrating on, are those who guite — grey is concentrating on, are those who quite clearly had no work aspect to them _ who quite clearly had no work aspect to them and were all social. they all took _ to them and were all social. they all took place after conventional working — all took place after conventional working hours and did, there was e-maits — working hours and did, there was emails or— working hours and did, there was e—mails or messages describing them as parties _ e—mails or messages describing them as parties in— e—mails or messages describing them as parties. in the case of the most recent— as parties. in the case of the most recent allegations, the dominic cummings one about may 2020, staff were urged _ cummings one about may 2020, staff were urged to bring their own bottle — were urged to bring their own bottle. there were all sorts of other— bottle. there were all sorts of other activities going on, like christmas games and quizzes, secret santas— christmas games and quizzes, secret santas that _ christmas games and quizzes, secret santas that quite clearly could not be considered work activities. and i think— be considered work activities. and i think that _ be considered work activities. and i think that distinction is really important because irregardless of what a _ important because irregardless of what a rabbit warren number ten
everybody knew and watched in real time. what do you make of these subpoenas and what do you think it means about where the committee is? >> it's getting closer. this is the clown car that was surrounding him. you know, really prior to the election, as they set this all up, that the election may be rigged, and then from election day all the way through january 6th. so it's getting closer and closer to trump, and, you know, hopefully, at the end of the day we are going to, a, learn what happened and who was involved, b, there will be consequences, and c, we to everything possible to make sure this is a one-time event. we are surrounded every day by evidence that consumer protection 2.0 is underway. essentially, in trump's corner, irregardless of how people voted who would call the election the way he sees it. this could not be more grave in terms of the threat to democracy. these are people surrounding the oval office, the desk in the
and this is where it gets really really scary if you ask me. comes a point you are able to criminalize all americans, then suddenly the state is in the position of being able to arrest anybody they want for any reason they want. and my big point that i would like to make to our friends on the left is this. if you are concerned about racial profiling. if you are concerned about the treatment of people who have been charged -- who are charged with crimes, then you should be terrified by this because it is a -- it is a recipe for disaster and it is the way people constitutional's rights are stripped from them. you know, irregardless of whether or not they have committed a serious crimes or not. or are in danger to society or anything. >> you know, some would argue maybe this is by design. charlie, i want to go to you, mollie. you wrote this fantastic piece in the federalist. and it was about people that
had been a critical decision saying we will prioritize this irregardless of what's happening. >> in 2019 your mean? >> 2019, sorry. >> no worries. i wanted to double check on that. look, when you talk about some of the things that i mean the heinous things really that you heard stephen miller say in these meetings, they're not that different from what some folks, especially in right wing media, are saying now about why these people who helped the u.s. should not be allowed to come in. they're painting them as invaders. >> yes. >> do you see a direct link there? >> yeah, absolutely. these are classic talking points that were espoused throughout the entire tenure of the trump administration. this is anti-immigrant, anti-refugee rhetoric. and it's absolutely disgusting. it's terrible to hear these things said once again when these are people that put their lives on the line, there side by side with our military, our civilians and officers on the