Live Breaking News & Updates on It trial

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from It trial on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in It trial and stay connected to the pulse of your community

The Situation Room With Wolf Blitzer

he's always complied with the law, and if compelled by law, he'll follow the law. >> i want you to listen to one of trump's attorneys now describing as that possibility, listen to this. >> if you look at mike pence's words and what he's said time and time again, it actually supports donald trump. it's actually, i think -- mike pence, if this ever goes to trial, and i don't think it should go to trial, i think it should be dismissed. if it ever does make to it trial, mike pence is going to be a star witness for donald trump. >> you think he's right? that mike pence will be a star witness for donald trump? >> well, again, i think that there's -- they've been saying two different things. because the president himself this weekend refuted the notion that he ever said that mike pence was too honest and more or less castigated him as misrepresenting the facts. yet his attorneys are saying, mike pence will be a great witness because he's honest and he chronicled everything that transpired around january 6th. it seems they're continuing to have messages that are conflicting. >> you know, i thought it was interesting, because pence says

Mike-pence , Which-trump , One , Attorneys , Words , Possibility , Law , Trial , Star-witness , It-trial , President , More

The Daily Global

why the arraignment is happening here and buy it trial will happen here and buy it trial will happen here is because it's the scene of the alleged crime. but the argument donald trump is making is that it shouldn't be held here, he won't get a fair hearing, thejury pool is biased, and therefore the trial, whenever that will be, should be held in the state of west virginia which is more sympathetic towards donald trump. that argument will really wash with the judge, with the federal courts because it's the same argument that a lot of the january 6th defenders have made. remember, this house is still looking at the cases of the writers of that day, many have been given jail sentences, and when they had their arguments, they made the same argument, that they made the same argument, that thejury pool was they made the same argument, that the jury pool was biased and making claims that the only americans that traumatised by january 6th are washingtonians. so that won't fly

Donald-trump , It , Hearing , Argument , Arraignment , It-trial , Making , Scene , Crime , Shouldn-t , Thejury-pool , Trial

BBC News

team takes that opportunity to really rebut the allegations and the complaint, they may take this as an opportunity to sort of make more public statements about their version of the events.— of the events. final question and about — of the events. final question and about a _ of the events. final question and about a minute - of the events. final question and about a minute or i of the events. final question and about a minute or so i of the events. final question and about a minute or so we j and about a minute or so we have left, what will you be looking for in the trial when we and double starting the trial? ~ . �* . we and double starting the trial? ~ . �* , , ., trial? what's interesting about this case. _ trial? what's interesting about this case. it — trial? what's interesting about this case, it is _ trial? what's interesting about this case, it is a _ trial? what's interesting about this case, it is a little - this case, it is a little different evidence wise in the documents case. this case is very heavily based on witness testimony. it recounts conversation, indictment recounts conversation after conversation that the former president and his co—conspirators, his alleged co—conspirators, his alleged co—conspirators had with other individuals, so this particular trial will be very witness heavy. so again, scheduling that trial could be pretty cumbersome given that fact. sarah krissoff, as always, great to get your take on the

Question , Team , Events , Opportunity , Statements , Complaint , Version , Allegations , Events- , Trial , Case , Evidence

Newsnight

either the mar—a—lago documents case or now this january 6 case _ either the mar—a—lago documents case or now this january 6 case to _ either the mar—a—lago documents case or now this january 6 case to go - either the mar—a—lago documents case or now this january 6 case to go to - or now this january 6 case to go to trial in— or now this january 6 case to go to trial in the — or now this january 6 case to go to trial in the course _ or now this january 6 case to go to trial in the course of— or now this january 6 case to go to trial in the course of 18 _ or now this january 6 case to go to trial in the course of 18 months. i do not _ trial in the course of 18 months. i do not think— trial in the course of 18 months. i do not think it — trial in the course of 18 months. i do not think it is _ trial in the course of 18 months. i do not think it is going _ trial in the course of 18 months. i do not think it is going to - trial in the course of 18 months. i do not think it is going to happenj do not think it is going to happen even _ do not think it is going to happen even under— do not think it is going to happen even under normal— do not think it is going to happen even under normal conditions. i do not think it is going to happen. even under normal conditions. with an election — even under normal conditions. with an election happening _ even under normal conditions. with an election happening in _ even under normal conditions. with an election happening in the - an election happening in the background. _ an election happening in the background, i— an election happening in the background, i cannot- an election happening in the i background, i cannot imagine an election happening in the - background, i cannot imagine that the judge — background, i cannot imagine that the judge is— background, i cannot imagine that the judge is responsible _ background, i cannot imagine that the judge is responsible for- background, i cannot imagine that the judge is responsible for these| the judge is responsible for these cases— the judge is responsible for these cases are — the judge is responsible for these cases are going _ the judge is responsible for these cases are going to _ the judge is responsible for these cases are going to want _ the judge is responsible for these cases are going to want to - the judge is responsible for these cases are going to want to drag . the judge is responsible for these i cases are going to want to drag the defendant— cases are going to want to drag the defendant in— cases are going to want to drag the defendant in from _ cases are going to want to drag the defendant in from the _ cases are going to want to drag the defendant in from the campaign. cases are going to want to drag the. defendant in from the campaign trail to sit for— defendant in from the campaign trail to sit for a _ defendant in from the campaign trail to sit for a trial. _ defendant in from the campaign trail to sit for a trial. a _ defendant in from the campaign trail to sit for a trial. a defendant - defendant in from the campaign trail to sit for a trial. a defendant has - to sit for a trial. a defendant has a right— to sit for a trial. a defendant has a right and — to sit for a trial. a defendant has a right and abilities _ to sit for a trial. a defendant has a right and abilities to _ to sit for a trial. a defendant has a right and abilities to ask- to sit for a trial. a defendant has a right and abilities to ask for- a right and abilities to ask for extensions. _ a right and abilities to ask for extensions, to— a right and abilities to ask for extensions, to ask _ a right and abilities to ask for extensions, to ask for - a right and abilities to ask for| extensions, to ask for delays, a right and abilities to ask for- extensions, to ask for delays, and so i extensions, to ask for delays, and so i think— extensions, to ask for delays, and so i think now— extensions, to ask for delays, and so i think now that _ extensions, to ask for delays, and so i think now that there - extensions, to ask for delays, and so i think now that there are - extensions, to ask for delays, and so i think now that there are two i so i think now that there are two cases against _ so i think now that there are two cases against donald _ so i think now that there are two cases against donald trump, - so i think now that there are two cases against donald trump, ati so i think now that there are two i cases against donald trump, at the federat— cases against donald trump, at the federal level— cases against donald trump, at the federal level and _ cases against donald trump, at the federal level and others _ cases against donald trump, at the federal level and others perhaps i cases against donald trump, at the federal level and others perhaps at| federal level and others perhaps at the state _ federal level and others perhaps at the state level, _ federal level and others perhaps at the state level, i— federal level and others perhaps at the state level, i do— federal level and others perhaps at the state level, i do not— federal level and others perhaps at the state level, i do not think- federal level and others perhaps at the state level, i do not think any. the state level, i do not think any of these — the state level, i do not think any of these go — the state level, i do not think any of these go to _ the state level, i do not think any of these go to trial _ the state level, i do not think any of these go to trial before - the state level, i do not think any. of these go to trial before november of these go to trial before november of next _ of these go to trial before november of next year — of these go to trial before november of next year-— of next year. coming back to these char: es, of next year. coming back to these charges. is — of next year. coming back to these charges. is a _ of next year. coming back to these charges, is a fairly _ of next year. coming back to these charges, is a fairly broad _ of next year. coming back to these charges, is a fairly broad statutes, | charges, is a fairly broad statutes, so what does this allow the prosecutors to do in trying this case? , . ., . ., prosecutors to do in trying this case? , ., ., ., ., _, prosecutors to do in trying this case? , . ., . ., _, , case? they are going have to come up with some interesting _ case? they are going have to come up with some interesting theories. - case? they are going have to come up with some interesting theories. and . with some interesting theories. and ithink— with some interesting theories. and i think when— with some interesting theories. and i think when the _ with some interesting theories. and i think when the next _ with some interesting theories. and i think when the next few _ with some interesting theories. and i think when the next few hours, - i think when the next few hours, once _ i think when the next few hours, once we — i think when the next few hours, once we are _ i think when the next few hours, once we are able _ i think when the next few hours, once we are able to _ i think when the next few hours, once we are able to absorb - i think when the next few hours, once we are able to absorb the l once we are able to absorb the indictment. _ once we are able to absorb the indictment, we _ once we are able to absorb the indictment, we will— once we are able to absorb the indictment, we will be - once we are able to absorb the indictment, we will be able - once we are able to absorb the indictment, we will be able toi indictment, we will be able to discern— indictment, we will be able to discern a _ indictment, we will be able to discern a little _ indictment, we will be able to discern a little more - indictment, we will be able to discern a little more about. indictment, we will be able to. discern a little more about what their— discern a little more about what their theories— discern a little more about what their theories are. _ discern a little more about what their theories are. it _ discern a little more about what their theories are. it sounds - discern a little more about what| their theories are. it sounds like they're —

Election , Course , Case , Cases , Judge , Trial , Documents , Background , Conditions , It-trial , Happening , January-6

The Last Word With Lawrence ODonnell

now you have a second one to remove surveillance video. to your point that it was not successful, this is such a great piece of evidence for a prosecutor because this is what a prosecutor is going to do it trial. they're going to play the surveillance video and they're going to say, this is the evidence that donald trump and the other defendants did not want you to see. so it is really good evidence of both the obstruction and the underlying crime, because you don't need to obstruct if you didn't commit any crime and have nothing to worry about. so really important evidence of two types of crimes here. and it really bolsters this case, which was already really strong. and so you could understand one thing about this evidence, why they thought it was important to supersede and add additional charges and additional defendant. understanding that the risk is

Evidence , One , Point , Jay-bragg , Surveillance-video , It-trial , Piece , United-states-of-america-versus-donald-j-trump , Obstruction-of-justice , Defendants , Mar-a-lago-documents-case , Crimes

The Last Word With Lawrence ODonnell

a prosecutor is going to do it trial. they're going to play the surveillance video and they're going to say, this is the evidence that donald trump and the other defendants did not want you to see. so it is really good evidence of both the obstruction and the underlying crime, because you don't need to obstruct if you didn't commit any crime and have nothing to worry about. so really important evidence of two types of crimes here. and it really bolsters this case, which was already really strong. and so you could understand one thing about this evidence, why they thought it was important to supersede and add additional charges and additional defendant. understanding that the risk is that it could cause any of these defendants to seek a different trial date. >> this new information is so clear for a jury. it is so clear for anyone

United-states-of-america-versus-donald-j-trump , Evidence , Defendants , Jay-bragg , Surveillance-video , It-trial , Crimes , Obstruction-of-justice , Crime , Nothing , Types , Two

Inside Politics With Dana Bash

broad, it's meaningless, it's just telling them that he is in jeopardy. this is the general area of it and we're not going to know the specifics until we have seen the indictment. >> do you think they will be able to try to wrap this up before the election as we've seen in the classified documents case, they tried to get this done in december or at least begin the trial, doesn't seem the judge will allow it in that case. this is a much more complicated case, how quickly could it get it trial? >> that's going to be the question from now until it actually goes, until the day the trial starts. in this court, in this federal court in d.c. if that's where this case is charged they do typically take a full year to get a case to trial, even more simplistic cases, steve bannon i think was one year in full on the contempt of congress charge. pretty straightforward, he didn't turn over documents, he didn't show up, that's it. so this is very likely a case that would be more robust than that and there are legal issues. now, the one thing that works on the prosecutor's side is there aren't a lot of opportunities

Indictment , Election , Documents , Area , Specifics , Jeopardy , Mar-a-lago-documents-case , Question , Judge , Trial , Case , Doesn-t

Deadline White House

we could have gone it trial, knocked it out of the park and we would not have gotten an apology from fox. >> yeah. >> we would have gotten a damaging [ inaudible ] and at the end of the day that is what our legal system is set up to provide for. it's set up to provide for accountability and for justice, and when we had ticked those two boxes we felt like we had done what we had come here to do. >> appreciate the answer and the question still remains, was that the -- admittedly, the legal system was never going to compel fox news, but you might have tried to compel them to apologize in some way as part of a settlement negotiation, i ask again, was that something that you considered or pursued in the course of those negotiations >> no. i really have to turn to my client, but i'm not really sure what the value of a forced apology would be to them at this point. if fox ever wants to genuinely apologize to dominion voting systems for what they did to them, i know the ceo of dominion, and i'm sure he would listen

Fox-news , The-system , Apology , Inaudible , It-trial , Damaging , The-park , Justice , Question , Accountability , Answer , Boxes

CNN Newsroom

the facts that have been presented so far both in his courtroom and in court filings, whether those facts are sufficient for him to rule and in favor of either dominion or fox news without this case going to trial. that is a very high bar, though, and the likelihood is that this case will go to trial unless fox news in dominion settled before then. and you know, in the hearing this morning, there were these questions about how it trial would proceed and notably here, judge davis said that he could possibly compel fox corporation chairman rupert murdoch to testify at a trial because as this judge put it rupert murdoch does have this special role at fox corporation, and he was aware of the guests appearing on fox news air. in fact, rupert murdoch even acknowledged his deposition that he could have stopped trump's legal team from appearing on the networks air, but he didn't so fox news attorneys. they're saying that any appearance by rupert murdoch on the witness stand or his son ceo lachlan murdoch, they say it would just create an undue burden. it would create a media

Case , Clinical-trial , Fox-news , Facts , Dominion , Courtroom , Likelihood , Bar , Favor , Court-filings , Rupert-murdoch , Questions

Who Can Forget

bed, the marriage is dead.we w bed, the marriage is dead.we w >> i think from my divorce trial, it was child's playme comparedri to that. >> what i didn't fully until we were well into the trial is that there were groups of americans that were really into this.econ >> they call it trial by tiktok. so people who don't have an attention span can just watch 2t seconds. >>icber in terms of public percn this was landslide for journey this was landslide for journey depp. >> he called him a sellout. >> you can see her calculatingls what kinds of emotions should i convey. >> johnny depp came some of cool as a cucumber.sa >>me most of the people rallied aroundda johnniy depp and most f

We-w-bed , Marriage , Trial , Divorce-trial , Child , Playme-comparedri , People , Americans , Kei-don-t , Icber , Groups , It-trial