Live Breaking News & Updates on Justices prithviraj chavan
Stay updated with breaking news from Justices prithviraj chavan. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
he is to fine-tune supreme court ruling sees that tax supreme court justices. he attacked the supreme court has a militia of the dobbs decision is harassing and threatening to supreme court justice he did not say anything about any of it. he didn't say a thing when his buddy schumer when you say to joe biden, leo? do not listen. he's going to lecture us from the white house. this meant has no credibility when it comes to the supreme court whatsoever or the court system for he does not respect him. he was bragging last week about ignoring the supreme court ruling on student loans. this man only uses the supreme court or the legal system to his advantage. no it in this country should respect a ruling that came out on thursday against president trump. why? because you had a district attorney, a state judge
majority of the justices are perfectly fine with that. that's a big flashing red light. if donald trump comes into the presidency and controls congress, you have seen the way leading republicans have reacted to this verdict. they are mimicking what he says. the verdict as part of a legal system and rule of law that is rotten and should be thrown out. you have a presidency, presidents have too much power. they run the department of justice. they run the defense department, fbi, bureau of prisons. if you have a president who wants to be a dictator, the founders and the constitution did not protect us. what is going to stop the? impeachment? how has it worked. he was impeached twice and it was like a snowflake falling on the potomac. all i am saying is if donald trump is selected, you have to
ruth ben-ghiat -- michael beschloss, under this current congress will not be a guard rail let alone republicans of congress. that she does speaker of the house was one of the cheerleaders of the stop the steal movement. the supreme court is not going to be a guard rail. we are still waiting for the immunity decision. the guardrails do not exist. who the president is matters and staff will be a guard rail because donald trump will not hire people that will try to hold him accountable like the generals of his last administration. >> take everything donald trump says extremely seriously. you are absolutely right. justices on the supreme court, we have seen it in the last month, are complicit. they are dragging their feet on presidential immunity on this case so this january 6 case cannot go forward before the election. that's not the only motive, but everything we know suggests a
the money flows in and out of this court to certain justices. we don't have an ethical or political obligation to address that with the congress but the chief justice, presumably or some justices, are having a conversation with the speaker of the house about the trump case. and when he says, this will be overturned, so i connect dots. i don't know about you all but i connect dots. johnson says, i think they are deeply combing the justices he spoke to, are deeply concerned about that, this case. really. you had a conversation about the trump case just now. which justices did you talk to? because you know this matter may get in front of that person. so for me, it is not a dilemma for democrats in the senate. this is not a dilemma. you demand the conversation with the chief justice because it is flagrant violation of
i would like to play them for everyone because i am thoroughly confused. i do believe the supreme court should step in. obviously, this is totally unprecedented and it is dangerous to the system i think the justices on the court, i think they are deeply concerned about that as we are. i think they will set this straight. but it is going to take a while. you are right. the process takes a while to play out. this will be overturned but it will just take time to do it. >> the chief justice won't meet with the head of the senate judiciary committee because you know, optics. but somehow these justices are having conversations with the speaker of the house about a case, please, make it make since. this is stressing me out. how is this okay and when of the democrats going to march up to the supreme court and knock on the door and say, we are going to have this discussion right now? >> standing on virtue or being on mount olympus the day after
itself. these are just average citizens that did their civic duty and he is still going after them in the aftermath. >> one of the things notable is that this jury valued and honored its oath more than a lot of people in the united states congress and certain judges and justices. they really stood up and did their job. it is normal for a defendant to say, it was unfair. that is what they do. they don't usually own what they are doing when they go to trial. for donald trump to say that is fine. that the statement is false but that is what defendants do. but the tell is that, if he really wanted to instead of saying it is the witchhunt, why doesn't he delay three of the trials? with the florida jurors, they will be my people. is not going to go to trial there or in georgia or in d.c.?
flag and shared on social media. in this context, the upside down flag can serve as more than one symbol. it shows allegiance to the january 6th insurrectionist, sure, and served as a protest against the rule of law that prevailed in trump's criminal hush money cover up case. that symbol was flying over the home of a supreme court justice who will help decide if donald trump will be permitted to use presidential immunity to make his legal troubles disappear. joining me is melissa murray, professor of law at nyu and cohost of the legal podcast scrutiny and msnbc legal analyst. good to see you, thank you for being with us. i want to talk about the flag and the normalizing of this weird symbol. but more importantly, attention has been drawn by americans onto problems at the supreme court and how we are supposed to deal with them when supreme court justices themselves say, not going to do and the chief justice says not going to engage in the conversation. how do we move forward?
in the aftermath of the conviction, the majority of the party lined up behind him to attack the judicial system. take mike johnson. he's second in line for the presidency. he called the verdict absurd and said his friends on the supreme court should overturn the conviction. >> i believe the supreme court should step in. this is dangerous to our system. the justices on the court, i know many of them personally, i think they are concerned about that. i think they will set this straight. >> mike johnson is saying, and i think this is important to repeat. i know these guys and they are on our team and they will set things straight. then there was a congressman who said this. >> what is your reaction. to respect what the jurors had to say? >> no, i don't.
justices. i know the justices. i have no idea what they might be thinking about this. and it's important to point out that he has been a dead loser in the supreme court every time it comes up. 8-1 on executive privilege with justice thomas siding with him. and i don't think the u.s. supreme court sits to review state convictions generally. maybe they will find a federal issue and maybe there will be an appeal, but it's tough because the jury unanimously found trump guilty and not just of one count but 34 separate criminal convictions that are felonies. and they did it under the legal standard that's the hardest to prove. beyond a reasonable doubt. they did it unanimously.
much of an effect donald trump's felony conviction will have on the election. for now in an interview donald trump says the gop is standing behind him. he is also continuing to falsely claim the biden administration is behind the charges.>> the republican party has really stuck together in this. they see it is weaponization of the justice department and fbi. that is all coming out of washington. you may think it is bad. take a look at who opened the case. i am not allowed to talk about it. i have a gag order.>> susan, i want to start with you. could the republican party being so united against the justices to make them vulnerable? especially when you think about where voters are going to say