Stay updated with breaking news from Labour don t. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
smugglers that encourage asylum seekers to cross the english channel. platforms like facebook and tiktok will work with the national crime agency. our political correspondent georgia roberts can tell us more. georgia, good morning to you. do we know how this will work? goad know how this will work? good morning- _ know how this will work? good morning. this _ know how this will work? good morning. this is _ know how this will work? good morning. this is a _ know how this will work? good morning. this is a voluntary i morning. this is a voluntary partnership that will build on what the government has said is already a successful approach being used by big tech firms to tackle this content and it will actually be redirected, this content, away from people who search for it and they will be presented with alternative messages to rebut the damaging content they search for. it is something the prime minister, rishi sunak, wants to see, for example, both on group discounts on small boats, free spaces for children, and also offers of false documents. labour don't think too much of this, they say that the home secretary has lost control of the government's
for a story and _ gallery. welcome i think you is look for a story and he _ gallery. welcome i think you is look for a story and he was _ gallery. welcome i think you is look for a story and he was really - for a story and he was really interested in people, think, more than anything. and some of his photographs he has taken them with people but they have passed, don't think anybody ever said no. this people but they have passed, don't think anybody ever said no.- think anybody ever said no. this is the last picture — think anybody ever said no. this is the last picture of— think anybody ever said no. this is the last picture of roger— think anybody ever said no. this is the last picture of roger before i think anybody ever said no. this is| the last picture of roger before his death in september. he had known about the exhibition, it was to be based on a book he had just finished. he based on a book he had 'ust finished. ., ., , ., ., finished. he wanted to show that he wasn't 'ust finished. he wanted to show that he wasn't just a — finished. he wanted to show that he wasn'tjust a press _ finished. he wanted to show that he wasn'tjust a press photographer- finished. he wanted to show that he l wasn'tjust a press photographer who took news images, he was somebody who made ordinary things extraordinary.— who made ordinary things extraordinary. who made ordinary things extraordina . ., ,, “ extraordinary. sarah smith, bbc news. stunning pictures. if someone made me look like that. _ stunning pictures. if someone made me look like that. you _ stunning pictures. if someone made me look like that. you certainly i me look like that. you certainly need the umbrella. really incredible images there of roger bamber. irate images there of roger bamber. we will get more on the grim weather later on. right now let's take yourself off to a different place and go to the travel show. ——
only way to give the conservatives out of offices for the lib dems to win seats in areas like this where labour don�*t have much of a support base at all and really can�*t learn. —— really can�*t win. they paint these races is a two horse race between the lib dems and conservatives, and at times, that does involve large amounts of people switching allegiances from one party to the other, as you put it, tactical voting, and i�*m sure we will see that in play in many areas on the ground in the run—up to the next election, and it may well shape the election campaign as a whole to a large degree. as you can see behind me if you are watching, there is a couple of dozen lib dems activists gathering now. their famous orange diamond placards, claiming that the party is winning here, and they are getting ready for what will be another eye—catching photo opportunity or stunt, if i can put it like that, which the party
but failed to back him when he attempted to overturn the 2020 election results, so mike pence throwing his hat in the ring in a bid to take on donald trump, the frontrunner for the bid to take on donald trump, the frontrunnerfor the 2024 bid to take on donald trump, the frontrunner for the 2024 republican presidential nomination. that news just coming in. one other completely different story, lovely news coming in that princess eugenie has given birth to a boy named ernest george ronnie brooks bank. that has been posted on her instagram account in the last little while, so a baby boy for princess eugenie. as promised, let's return to that political story we were just on there at the house of commons, with the home secretary, the shadow home secretaryjust talking and jonathan blake was listening to that in westminster. just sum up where we are bare because of course conservative saying labour don't have a plan and the labour opposition saying this is continued conservative chaos when it comes to basic numbers here. yes. continued conservative chaos when it comes to basic numbers here. yes, we have seen an —
debate _ sense is at the moment is that the debate is — sense is at the moment is that the debate is actually beginning to move to more _ debate is actually beginning to move to more of— debate is actually beginning to move to more of a discussion about how do we resolve _ to more of a discussion about how do we resolve those areas where there are conflicts. | we resolve those areas where there are conflicts-— are conflicts. i get the sense there is a generational— are conflicts. i get the sense there is a generational divide _ are conflicts. i get the sense there is a generational divide on - are conflicts. i get the sense there is a generational divide on this - are conflicts. i get the sense there| is a generational divide on this one as well. ,, �* ., �* , ., as well. sure. but i don't see at the moment. — as well. sure. but i don't see at the moment, there _ as well. sure. but i don't see at the moment, there isn't, - as well. sure. but i don't see at - the moment, there isn't, comparing this with _ the moment, there isn't, comparing this with what has happened in the united _ this with what has happened in the united states with roe v wade and abortion— united states with roe v wade and abortion rights, that is a big trigger— abortion rights, that is a big trigger issue for women in the united — trigger issue for women in the united states and it is showing up in the _ united states and it is showing up in the polls with republican women voting _ in the polls with republican women voting either choosing to stay home or voting _ voting either choosing to stay home or voting democrat or independent as a result— or voting democrat or independent as a result of— or voting democrat or independent as a result of what is happening at state _ a result of what is happening at state level now in the united states — state level now in the united states. so there is a very clear trigger— states. so there is a very clear trigger issue where people feel passionately about it but there is something to mobilise around because there is— something to mobilise around because there is legislation going through at state _ there is legislation going through at state level and so on and there are selections where that's actually important — are selections where that's actually important issue. you are selections where that's actually important issue.— important issue. you don't think it has the same _ important issue. you don't think it has the same traction? _ important issue. you don't think it has the same traction? there - important issue. you don't think it has the same traction? there is i
your perspective, a pact? you are talking to me? ok, like _ your perspective, a pact? you are talking to me? ok, like i - your perspective, a pact? you are talking to me? ok, like i said - your perspective, a pact? you are talking to me? ok, like i said i. your perspective, a pact? you are| talking to me? ok, like i said i am talking to me? 0k, like i said i am a liberal— talking to me? 0k, like i said i am a liberal democrat councillor here, having _ a liberal democrat councillor here, having been burned by the coalition because _ having been burned by the coalition because we had not done the best thing _ because we had not done the best thing preparing for going into a coalition — thing preparing for going into a coalition, because of that the confidence and supply arrangement is probably— confidence and supply arrangement is probably more like what we are going to get— probably more like what we are going to get because i think labour don't want _ to get because i think labour don't want to— to get because i think labour don't want to fully commit to coalition with the — want to fully commit to coalition with the lib dems and the lib dems might— with the lib dems and the lib dems might feel— with the lib dems and the lib dems might feel a bit apprehensive about going _ might feel a bit apprehensive about going into _ might feel a bit apprehensive about going into it. i will say there is a positive — going into it. i will say there is a positive case for a coalition that could _ positive case for a coalition that could be — positive case for a coalition that could be the best thing for the country— could be the best thing for the country including something like thinking — country including something like thinking about going back into the customs _ thinking about going back into the customs union and reducing the difficulty— customs union and reducing the difficulty of getting people and goods— difficulty of getting people and goods into the country. let difficulty of getting people and goods into the country. let me stop ou there. goods into the country. let me stop you there- you _ goods into the country. let me stop you there. you have _ goods into the country. let me stop you there. you have stated - goods into the country. let me stop you there. you have stated clearly l you there. you have stated clearly and very well. i have to move on. i
voting for because you don't know what _ voting for because you don't know what you — voting for because you don't know what you are _ voting for because you don't know what you are going _ voting for because you don't know what you are going to _ voting for because you don't know what you are going to end - voting for because you don't know what you are going to end up- voting for because you don't knowl what you are going to end up with. so we _ what you are going to end up with. so we vote — what you are going to end up with. so we vote on— what you are going to end up with. so we vote on a _ what you are going to end up with. so we vote on a manifesto - what you are going to end up with. so we vote on a manifesto and - what you are going to end up with. i so we vote on a manifesto and then we held _ so we vote on a manifesto and then we held them — so we vote on a manifesto and then we held them to _ so we vote on a manifesto and then we held them to account _ so we vote on a manifesto and then we held them to account if- so we vote on a manifesto and then we held them to account if they - we held them to account if they don't _ we held them to account if they don't perform _ we held them to account if they don't perform that _ we held them to account if they don't perform that manifesto. i we held them to account if they. don't perform that manifesto. as soon _ don't perform that manifesto. as soon as— don't perform that manifesto. as soon as there _ don't perform that manifesto. as soon as there is _ don't perform that manifesto. as soon as there is a _ don't perform that manifesto. as soon as there is a hung - don't perform that manifesto. as i soon as there is a hung parliament there _ soon as there is a hung parliament there has— soon as there is a hung parliament there has got— soon as there is a hung parliament there has got to _ soon as there is a hung parliament there has got to be _ soon as there is a hung parliament there has got to be negotiation. i there has got to be negotiation. thus— there has got to be negotiation. thus the — there has got to be negotiation. thus the first _ there has got to be negotiation. thus the first point. _ there has got to be negotiation. thus the first point. the - there has got to be negotiation. thus the first point. the secondj thus the first point. the second thing _ thus the first point. the second thing is — thus the first point. the second thing is this— thus the first point. the second thing is this going _ thus the first point. the second thing is this going back- thus the first point. the second thing is this going back into - thus the first point. the second i thing is this going back into europe thing _ thing is this going back into europe thing we — thing is this going back into europe thing we had _ thing is this going back into europe thing we had a— thing is this going back into europe thing. we had a deal— thing is this going back into europe thing. we had a deal where - thing is this going back into europe thing. we had a deal where we - thing is this going back into europe. thing. we had a deal where we were not politically— thing. we had a deal where we were not politically involved _ thing. we had a deal where we were not politically involved or— not politically involved or financially _ not politically involved or financially involved - not politically involved or financially involved with. not politically involved or- financially involved with europe. if we choose — financially involved with europe. if we choose by— financially involved with europe. if we choose by some _ financially involved with europe. if we choose by some stupid - financially involved with europe. if| we choose by some stupid mistake financially involved with europe. if. we choose by some stupid mistake to want to— we choose by some stupid mistake to want to go— we choose by some stupid mistake to want to go back— we choose by some stupid mistake to want to go back into _ we choose by some stupid mistake to want to go back into europe, - we choose by some stupid mistake to want to go back into europe, first- want to go back into europe, first they would — want to go back into europe, first they would have _ want to go back into europe, first they would have to _ want to go back into europe, first they would have to accept - want to go back into europe, first they would have to accept us. - want to go back into europe, first| they would have to accept us. but want to go back into europe, first- they would have to accept us. but we would _ they would have to accept us. but we would be _ they would have to accept us. but we would be fully— they would have to accept us. but we would be fully back _ they would have to accept us. but we would be fully back into _ they would have to accept us. but we would be fully back into europe - they would have to accept us. but we would be fully back into europe and i would be fully back into europe and i would be fully back into europe and i don't _ would be fully back into europe and idon't think— would be fully back into europe and i don't think there _ would be fully back into europe and i don't think there is _ would be fully back into europe and i don't think there is anybody - would be fully back into europe and i don't think there is anybody in - i don't think there is anybody in the uk — i don't think there is anybody in the uk there _ i don't think there is anybody in the uk there wants _ i don't think there is anybody in the uk there wants to - i don't think there is anybody in the uk there wants to be - i don't think there is anybody in - the uk there wants to be financially and politically— the uk there wants to be financially and politically bound _ the uk there wants to be financially and politically bound into _ the uk there wants to be financially and politically bound into europe, i and politically bound into europe, even _ and politically bound into europe, even remainers. _ and politically bound into europe, even remainers. so— and politically bound into europe, even remainers. so those - and politically bound into europe, even remainers. so those are - and politically bound into europe, even remainers. so those are my and politically bound into europe, - even remainers. so those are my two points _ even remainers. so those are my two oints. ~ ., ., , ., ., points. what does that mean financially — points. what does that mean financially and _ points. what does that mean financially and politically? i points. what does that mean | financially and politically? we points. what does that mean - financially and politically? we were not in a political _ financially and politically? we were not in a political union, _ financially and politically? we were not in a political union, we - financially and politically? we were not in a political union, we had - not in a political union, we had opted — not in a political union, we had opted out _ not in a political union, we had opted out of— not in a political union, we had opted out of most _ not in a political union, we had opted out of most of _ not in a political union, we had opted out of most of the - not in a political union, we had i opted out of most of the political clauses _ opted out of most of the political clauses of—
russell—moyle absolutely attack a fellow female verbally in the house of commons. i wrote to the labour party i felt so strongly about that, i've never written to the labour party in my life, ifelt i've never written to the labour party in my life, i felt it was so atrocious. party in my life, i felt it was so atrocious-— party in my life, i felt it was so atrocious. ~ ., , ' atrocious. was that rosie duffield? yes, it atrocious. was that rosie duffield? yes. it was — atrocious. was that rosie duffield? yes, it was dreadful. _ atrocious. was that rosie duffield? yes, it was dreadful. i _ atrocious. was that rosie duffield? yes, it was dreadful. i don't - yes, it was dreadful. i don't normally see that, and it was absolutely appalling. i know loads of other women who were appalled by that as well. there is quite strong evidence i think i've been reading a lot about this, don't come to my opinions lightly, i really try and think about them because i think it is important that we vote and think how we vote. there is evidence that the liberal democrats and ed davey have taken funding from a puberty blocking company. let’s have taken funding from a puberty blocking company.— have taken funding from a puberty blocking company. let's not go there because he is — blocking company. let's not go there because he is not... _ blocking company. let's not go there because he is not... i'm _ blocking company. let's not go there because he is not... i'm only - blocking company. let's not go there because he is not... i'm only saying. because he is not... i'm only saying it because he is not here to answer it. you've made an interesting point. i'm not closing you down but you have made an interesting and substantive point. can you have made an interesting and substantive point.— substantive point. can i mention women's sport— substantive point. can i mention women's sport which _ substantive point. can i mention women's sport which is - substantive point. can i mention women's sport which is under. substantive point. can i mention - women's sport which is under attack around the world. in australia there
of her~ _ don't like to see people being taken of her~ i_ don't like to see people being taken of her. i think there is a slight irony— of her. i think there is a slight irony and _ of her. i think there is a slight irony and a _ of her. i think there is a slight irony and a slight hypocrisy because iwonder— irony and a slight hypocrisy because i wonder how many of the same people calling _ i wonder how many of the same people calling for— i wonder how many of the same people calling for gary lineker to be restored _ calling for gary lineker to be restored were calling forjeremy clarkson — restored were calling forjeremy clarkson a few weeks ago to be removed — clarkson a few weeks ago to be removed. , ., , _ removed. used the word hypocrisy there and i— removed. used the word hypocrisy there and i know _ removed. used the word hypocrisy there and i know on _ removed. used the word hypocrisy there and i know on twitter - removed. used the word hypocrisy there and i know on twitter you i removed. used the word hypocrisy i there and i know on twitter you said there and i know on twitter you said there was something about hypocrisy about this row, what did you mean by that? ~ 4' about this row, what did you mean by that? ~ ~ , , , that? well, ithink, firstly, gary lineker that? well, ithink, firstly, gary linekerwas— that? well, ithink, firstly, gary lineker was right _ that? well, ithink, firstly, gary lineker was right to _ that? well, ithink, firstly, gary lineker was right to call- that? well, ithink, firstly, gary lineker was right to call out - that? well, ithink, firstly, gary lineker was right to call out the | lineker was right to call out the government— lineker was right to call out the government bill— lineker was right to call out the government bill and _ lineker was right to call out the government bill and i— lineker was right to call out the government bill and i think, - lineker was right to call out the. government bill and i think, yes, lineker was right to call out the - government bill and i think, yes, he works— government bill and i think, yes, he works for— government bill and i think, yes, he works for the — government bill and i think, yes, he works for the bbc— government bill and i think, yes, he works for the bbc and _ government bill and i think, yes, he works for the bbc and it _ government bill and i think, yes, he works for the bbc and it is - works for the bbc and it is important _ works for the bbc and it is important that— works for the bbc and it is important that the - works for the bbc and it is important that the bbc- works for the bbc and it is important that the bbc is| works for the bbc and it is - important that the bbc is impartial but important that the bbc is impartial hut as— important that the bbc is impartial but as you — important that the bbc is impartial but as you say, _ important that the bbc is impartial but as you say. he _ important that the bbc is impartial but as you say, he is _ important that the bbc is impartial but as you say, he is a _ important that the bbc is impartial but as you say, he is a sports - but as you say, he is a sports presenter, _ but as you say, he is a sports presenter, not _ but as you say, he is a sports presenter, not a _ but as you say, he is a sports presenter, not a news - but as you say, he is a sports - presenter, not a news presenter. if we are — presenter, not a news presenter. if we are going — presenter, not a news presenter. if we are going to— presenter, not a news presenter. if we are going to talk— presenter, not a news presenter. if we are going to talk about - we are going to talk about impartiality. _ we are going to talk about impartiality, let's - we are going to talk about impartiality, let's talk - we are going to talk about i impartiality, let's talk about we are going to talk about - impartiality, let's talk about the fact that — impartiality, let's talk about the fact that bbc _ impartiality, let's talk about the fact that bbc chairman - impartiality, let's talk about the fact that bbc chairman donated | fact that bbc chairman donated £400,000 _ fact that bbc chairman donated £400,000 to— fact that bbc chairman donated £400,000 to the _ fact that bbc chairman donated £400,000 to the conservativel fact that bbc chairman donated - £400,000 to the conservative party and arranged — £400,000 to the conservative party and arranged and _ £400,000 to the conservative party and arranged and £800,000 - £400,000 to the conservative party and arranged and £800,000 loan i £400,000 to the conservative party and arranged and £800,000 loan toj and arranged and £800,000 loan to boris johnson — and arranged and £800,000 loan to borisjohnson. but— and arranged and £800,000 loan to boris johnson. but what _ and arranged and £800,000 loan to borisjohnson. but what i— and arranged and £800,000 loan to boris johnson. but what i think - and arranged and £800,000 loan to boris johnson. but what i think we . boris johnson. but what i think we mustn't _ boris johnson. but what i think we mustn't he — boris johnson. but what i think we mustn't be distracted _ boris johnson. but what i think we mustn't be distracted by— boris johnson. but what i think we mustn't be distracted by is- boris johnson. but what i think we mustn't be distracted by is from i boris johnson. but what i think we i mustn't be distracted by is from the bill mustn't be distracted by is from the hill itself, _ mustn't be distracted by is from the bill itself, which — mustn't be distracted by is from the bill itself, which is _ mustn't be distracted by is from the bill itself, which is what _ mustn't be distracted by is from the bill itself, which is what gary - bill itself, which is what gary lineker— bill itself, which is what gary lineker was— bill itself, which is what gary lineker was drawing - bill itself, which is what garyl lineker was drawing attention bill itself, which is what gary - lineker was drawing attention to. the government— lineker was drawing attention to. the government is— lineker was drawing attention to. the government is trying - lineker was drawing attention to. the government is trying to - lineker was drawing attention to. the government is trying to playl the government is trying to play divide _ the government is trying to play divide and — the government is trying to play divide and rule, _ the government is trying to play divide and rule, pure _ the government is trying to play divide and rule, pure and - the government is trying to playl divide and rule, pure and simple, the government is trying to play- divide and rule, pure and simple, by criminalising — divide and rule, pure and simple, by criminalising asylum _
who are complaining about gary lineker. ..but until the budget. the calm down chancellor will be on his feet on wednesday with a vow to get the country back to work. we think that we have the chance to be one of the fastest—growing countries in europe. politicians agree the way we make our living isn't good enough. growth has been measly. but the government and labour don't agree on the fix. we have one big question this morning — not whether the bbc and its biggest star can kiss and make up, but whether politicians can find ways to show the economy is live and kicking. jeremy hunt is with us — as he puts his finishing touches to his first budget. hoping to step into the chancellor's shoes at the next election — labour's rachel reeves is here. mark thompson was no stranger to crises in his years a bbc director general.