Stay updated with breaking news from Ohio well. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
at that time in 2002, as an information service, not a telecommunication service. and it s the communications act of 1996 that makes that important distinction. the reason he classified it and the fcc classified it as an information service at the time, was to be regulated but to be more lightly regulated than the telephone monopoly, which was very tightly regulated. and the reason for wanting to be a little less regulated was to encourage investment and innovation. so, what is happening what happened in that ensuing, what, 13 years now, since it had been classified as an information service, was the broadband service providers, both over cable modems and dsl, and then wireless, invested well over $100 billion in infrastructure, and so much innovation that we re benefiting from today, resulted from all of that investment. in a sense, it was a little built of a bait and switch. and i don t mean that so much to criticize today s fcc because the fcc does change hands, bu ....
is because they have done better with every group across the board. we have divided the electorate in the chart, available on our website, into voters with college degrees, voters without college degrees, because we have found that educational attainment has been a pretty votective component of the when you look back a couple of decades. democrats have been doing better and better with voters with clege doing better and better. that is another interesting aspect. let s get a couple more calls. dearborn heights michigan independence line. hello. i m calling about south carolina. therecarolina. there is a state that is probably almost 50 percent black and 50 percent white. i might be wrong about that. unless i am mistaken there is only one black congressman. this idea that the supreme court, redistricting is wrong. about a computer idea is great. i m a democrat. independent democrats. the.is, we have to make the election fair. take three states like texas, florida, ....
what we have is an authoritative written text which declares itself to be the supreme law of the land. the framers did not think that their private expectations or the subjective intentions or what counted. what counted with the words they wrote down on paper. and the meaning of those words. a lot of that is obviously affected by your understanding of history and the social context, but one of the leading debates these days is whether the constitution is interpreted in accordance with the original meaning of its words, or should it be the subjective intentions of its authors, or another variation is, some people argue that the meaning of the constitution evolves over time. we tend to lean against the idea that the meaning of the words evolves. rather the meaning of the word sometimes was upon meaning. it permits different generations to adopt different policies for democratic governance all caps us to the constitution. so that is a debate that we sort of introduce and s ....
home for self protection and it s part of our american tradition even if we didn t have the tradition. one way to find this is to count and i had a great student, 27 years ago who wrote a student note about unenumerated rights and how you can find them in part by looking at state constitutions. and that is the student and so liberals believe in privacy. and it s not necessarily enumerated in the federal constitution. so even if there wasn t an amendment, i think that they can have a pro-guns. give them both what they want, this is america. live and let live, let s be tolerant in the northern california tradition. that is one thing. they would have in unenumerated right because every state has it as part of the american egos. the second point is forget the founding. you live in lincoln s house. we taught jefferson, jefferson died a slaveholder, enough with this jefferson stop. okay? you live in lincoln s house, he reinterprets jefferson and four score and seven years ago ....
think that the evidence doesn t support that. so the first supreme court case talks about being important was for me to 86-point into another harvard man who was on the massachusetts supreme court and wrote a book know who is a lot cleric it is brandeis the senate is a big deal liz his protege from frankfurter and john barbour its who went to harvard so it is all about massachusetts for gore love massachusetts purported my collection of but it the center of all things of the american revolution and it is said to not quite so. could a fellow named john wilkes added wilkes-barre pennsylvania there is no bonus. you can learn things from geography. john wilkes booth and ashley wilkes is an allusion. so everyone does pay attention a little bit after said judges name camden such as camden new jersey jersey, maine, of baltimore baltimore, a day ariels plea in camden yard. so it is of very big deal you can see it on a map. in the last chapter, you have heard the a great city of ....