Stay updated with breaking news from Papers dealt. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
it is no good ed miliband saying controls on immigration if people don't believe that he actually wants to control it in the way the voters labour at that point were losing wanted to. one thing that is interesting, where did keir starmer say read my lips? on the sun on sunday. and i know newspapers are not as powerful or influential as they used to be, their power and influence has been overstated anyway... often by themselves. by themselves and their most ardent critics. they do matter. i don't know if they do, but for those who think they do, if you are watching what is happening with the sun, which endorsed blair, having switched from the conservatives, they like to back a winner and they are giving keir starmer a fair wind, and i think watch out for that in a few weeks. even if you don't think the papers and what they do matter to you, there are big clues on what the parties and where the parties choose
the independent has an exclusive on its front page, reporting that ten years on since the inquiry intojimmy savile's sexual abuse of children in hospitals, the nhs has failed to implement any of the inquiry�*s reccomendations. with me to reflect on the week's politics news and to look ahead to next week's campaigning is our political correspondent damian grammaticas. you have got an array of newspapers out in front of you. what has caught your eye over the weekend? the interesting _ your eye over the weekend? tue: interesting thing your eye over the weekend? tte: interesting thing on your eye over the weekend? "tt2 interesting thing on the your eye over the weekend? tt2 interesting thing on the front pages is the way they are all looking forward to the coming week, and they are picking up leaving behind the arguments of last week, although some of those are still rumbling on, and looking forward to what is coming. you saw those three papers, which all focus on this idea that the conservatives are just putting out this evening, and will be what they want to sort of want to talk
to the same sorts of groups we have seen already, particularly those groups that the conservatives want to hold onto. socially conservative voters. voters who voted last time for the conservatives in 2019, they are trying to make sure they can hold onto them in the coming election. ., , ., ., ., election. that is on the front of three newspapers. _ election. that is on the front of three newspapers. do - election. that is on the front of three newspapers. do you i election. that is on the front of l three newspapers. do you expect election. that is on the front of i three newspapers. do you expect to dominate the agenda about other issues take the forefront? {line dominate the agenda about other issues take the forefront? one issue that is not on _ issues take the forefront? one issue that is not on the _ issues take the forefront? one issue that is not on the front _ issues take the forefront? one issue that is not on the front of _ issues take the forefront? one issue that is not on the front of those i that is not on the front of those papers that the labour party want to talk about tomorrow morning, and i think we'll be making a big effort, so we will hear about it is the issue of defence and security. that issue of defence and security. that is interesting because rishi sunak, remember when he stood on the steps of downing street and the rain and announced the selection, one of the things he said then was that these are uncertain, dangerous times. he pointed to vladimir putin's invasion of ukraine, to what is happening in the middle east. he these uncertain
think the lack of remorse and i think this is a fairly serious crime. this is not falsifying business records to save $1,000 on your taxes. this is falsifying business record in furtherance of manipulating an election that affected millions of people. >> if he doesn't will the judge asked him if he is remorseful at the sentencing hearing? how does that work? >> every defendant has a right to be heard. so the way it will go down is that there will be submissions. both sides will be submitting papers, letters, documents for the judge to review it. at a time, and the judge will read everything that is sent to him and then at that moment, in the courtroom for the sentencing hearing the judge will make sure everyone has seen the probation report and then say, do want to say anything about the probation report? you want to say anything. but prior to sentence to the people, the people will be heard. the defense lawyer, todd blanche will be heard, and then there'll be the personal invitation by the judge to ask whether or not the defendant, donald trump, wants to be heard and moments affect the sentencing. sure. sure.
would understand that. [laughter] but what do you think about that as -- >> well, i want to say a word for my fellow new jerseyite, mrs. if alito. what she she has put up with, as the justice pointed out, is unbelievable. you know, if ruth bader ginsburg were called the name that a mrse neighbor, one of the most vile insults directed at a woman, there'd be calls for -- against this person, they'd be doxxed, it'd be all over the papers. but somehow mrs. alito has put up with it. so i have a lot of she for her, and i think -- sympathy for her, and i think the justice was right. he has an obligation to sit. this doesn't affect if it. and they're reading too much into it. and also it's part of a wider war on the one institution that democrats used to be able to count on instead of votes, get five justices to do your dirty work, and they can't forgive him for -- forgive them for dobbs,
figure. guilty and guilt. and two of them in the new york post, one of the only papers going farther as i mentioned than the wall street your journal, instead of beginning with the facts they started with a tick. as quote injustice. the small queens daily eagle went with an old school way to put it, queens man, convicted. that queens man is just that, a man, a person. a citizen, he has rights as a convict. just as he had rights as a defendant. he's expected to appeal. they're saying they're going to do that. as for the president who replaced donald trump, he's also speaking out. he rarely does on this topic but now that there is a verdict. he spoke about it for the first time. >> i just want to say a few words about what happened yesterday in new york city. >> the american principle that no one is above the law was
day. we've been talking about it for 80 years new _ day. we've been talking about it for 80 years now and _ day. we've been talking about it for 80 years now and not _ day. we've been talking about it for 80 years now and not a _ day. we've been talking about it for 80 years now and not a day - day. we've been talking about it for 80 years now and not a day goes i day. we've been talking about it forj 80 years now and not a day goes by when _ 80 years now and not a day goes by when we _ 80 years now and not a day goes by when we don't talk to each other about— when we don't talk to each other about it — when we don't talk to each other about it. ., �* , when we don't talk to each other about it._ not - when we don't talk to each other about it._ not me, i i about it. that's true. not me, i don't think— about it. that's true. not me, i don't think about _ about it. that's true. not me, i don't think about that - about it. that's true. not me, i don't think about that any - about it. that's true. not me, i l don't think about that any more. there _ don't think about that any more. there are — don't think about that any more. there are wars _ don't think about that any more. there are wars everywhere - don't think about that any more. i there are wars everywhere today. next _ there are wars everywhere today. next week, — there are wars everywhere today. next week, they _ there are wars everywhere today. next week, they will _ there are wars everywhere today. next week, they willjoin - there are wars everywhere today. next week, they willjoin family, i next week, they will join family, friends and foreigners to pay tribute and remember those who fought for their freedom, tribute and remember those who fought for theirfreedom, but tribute and remember those who fought for their freedom, but most of all to say merci, thank you. we will have coverage of the d day commemorations all next week and continue to bring you those stories. let's have a look at the papers. in the daily mail, you can see the headline, trump rages at biden's fascist state. a quote from donald trump. referencing a speech he gave after he was found guilty of 3a counts of falsifying business records. also an article by boris
becomes a moment that is a surreal moment it's a full circle moment for me as soon as i posted on my social media that you were going to be joining me this morning there were more than a few people who said, well, they need to now take out the ad. it's time for the exonerated five to pay for these full page ads. i'm sure you got the same thing. what do you tell people who say turn it on him and you take out the yeah, 100%, you know, i mean, these ads, this was the $85,000 page ad i was calling to reinstate the death penalty for 14 and 15-year-old kids. >> i think for me it's tasteless to call for the death penalty for donald trump and then also these people wanted to take out these ads and his newspapers and these were the same newspapers and 1989 who wrote the most outrageous headlines to sell papers. so they will also decide in a contributing factor to i will conviction. so why would i go and spend promotional dallas.
northeast philadelphia, parts of northeast philadelphia voted for trump last time, and south philly too. i think this is a focus group. a political focus group. politics, you get a bunch of people and set them aside for the rest of the country and fill them with all the facts. give them all the information that's relevant to the discussion and they give you a verdict about what they think about the counting. this was a focus group. aside from the legal factors it was a focus group of people who got for 21 days all the facts. unmitigated truth of what was going on in this matter in this case and they came out with a judgment in a matter of nine or 10 hours. so it's really important in a country where 3/5 of the country don't get the news you don't get the philadelphia inquirer read the washington post or the new york times or other big papers but they don't get the news. they say things like, tiktok didn't really cover the trial. what? or i hear that joe biden
paper record in washington put it at the wall street journal owned by fox news's as news corp., trump convicted. no way to spin the basic fact. the l.a. times, trump guilty on all counts. in miami, a city where the former president now resides, florida, guilty. ex-president donald trump convicted on art of 34 counts and hush money case. the new yorker, known to come with a quick, thoughtful cartoonish spin showing the possibility of this president and his cartoon hands, potentially handcuffed, although sentencing will wait for july pick in new york where the tabloids have long danced with this figure, you can see guilty and guilty in two and the new york post, one of the only papers going further, in the wall street journal, to take a different spin rather than beginning with the facts. they began with a take that