Stay updated with breaking news from Resource base. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
sense ideas on how to provide solutions to the energy challenges in america. >> eric: we have experts here. >> you know what he would say, president obama stop destroying the war on united states. >> anything that we have said that is wrong so far? >> as a matter of fact, we see a policy to tax the industry more. you don't need a study. we do have a study. congressional research service, if you bring the new taxes on, it will increase gasoline prices and reduce energy independence. so you can grow or tax base, grow the resource base and increase the jobs and increase that energy security. it's very clear and sharp choice. we have a lot of opportunities in this country to go for energy that we're not going for. we certainly have prices going high enough. the new information to look to
sense ideas on how to provide solutions to the energy challenges in america. >> eric: we have experts here. >> you know what he would say, president obama stop destroying the war on united states. >> anything that we have said that is wrong so far? >> as a matter of fact, we see a policy to tax the industry more. you don't need a study. we do have a study. congressional research service, if you bring the new taxes on, it will increase gasoline prices and reduce energy independence. so you can grow or tax base, grow the resource base and increase the jobs and increase that energy security. it's very clear and sharp choice. we have a lot of opportunities in this country to go for energy that we're not going for. we certainly have prices going high enough. the new information to look to
nervous bunch of people. the fact of the matter is, there's a great deal of savings that they can conduct. if they follow the leadership of paul ryan and are assertive and bold they can do marvelous things to rationalize, repair, diminish the size of this government and liberate the private sector of the economy to grow on a resource base that allows them to achieve efficiencies. >> congressman, here's the problem. you're now in charge. this isn't a campaign where you can use good rhetoric, and that's good rhetoric -- as i said, i aplud it. now you have to go through the budget and say here is what we're going to eliminate. with all the discussion of rationalization, everybody, every leading republican on capitol hill today, acknowledged you're only going to save $50 billion, and that is not even a drop in the bucket of the deficits that you ran against, the $4 trillion in incremental deficits you added by the tax cuts that you're trying to make permanent. here's the question, the same
nervous bunch of people. the fact of the matter is, there's a great deal of savings that they can conduct. if they follow the leadership of paul ryan and are assertive and bold they can do marvelous things to rationalize, repair, diminish the size of this government and liberate the private sector of the economy to grow on a resource base that allows them to achieve efficiencies. >> congressman, here's the problem. you're now in charge. this isn't a campaign where you can use good rhetoric, and that's good rhetoric -- as i said, i aplud it. now you have to go through the budget and say here is what we're going to eliminate. with all the discussion of rationalization, everybody, every leading republican on capitol hill today, acknowledged you're only going to save $50 billion, and that is not even a drop in the bucket of the deficits that you ran against, the $4 trillion in incremental deficits you added by the tax cuts that you're trying to make permanent. here's the question, the same one i had for you when you're on the show. i wish you were here sitting next to us, it would be more fun. are you going to cut into social security right now to close the
things to rationalize, repair, diminish the size of this government and liberate the private sector of the economy to grow on a resource base that allows them to achieve efficiencies. >> congressman, here's the problem. you're now in charge. this isn't a campaign where you can use good rhetoric, and that's good rhetoric -- as i said, i applaud it. now you have to go through the budget and say here is what we're going to eliminate. with all the discussion of rationalization, everybody, every leading republican on capitol hill today, acknowledged you're only going to save $50 billion, and that is not even a drop in the bucket of the deficits that you ran against, the $4 trillion in incremental deficits you added by the tax cuts that you're trying to make permanent. here's the question, the same one i had for you when you're on the show. i wish you were here sitting next to us, it would be more fun. are you going to cut into social security right now to close the $1 trillion deficit we've got this year?
grow on a resource base that allows them to achieve efficiencies. >> congressman, here's the problem. you're now in charge. this isn't a campaign where you can use good rhetoric, and that's good rhetoric -- as i said, i applaud it. now you have to go through the budget and say here is what we're going to eliminate. with all the discussion of citation to the constitution, all the discussion of rationalization, everybody, every leading republican on capitol hill today, acknowledged you're only going to save $50 billion, and that is not even a drop in the bucket of the deficits that you ran against, the $4 trillion in incremental deficits you added by the tax cuts that you're trying to make permanent. here's the question, the same one i had for you when you're on the show. i wish you were here sitting next to us, it would be more fun. are you going to cut into social security right now to close the $1 trillion deficit we've got this year? because that's where the money is. or medicare or medicaid this year right now? >> eliot, i must have misunderstood your own program because i was certain i heard
and mcadams 22%. she is inching up on you. >> the rasmussen poll showed, -- probably somewhere in the mid those two. from our perspective it doesn't change the way they are approaching this. for us getting the message out which is jobs for alaska. the solution of the federal government to continue to pump money into the state without an -- alaskans taking care of the natural resources that are there is not the answer. job creation has got to be provided through the resource base that we have. that resource base we aren't going to have access to as long as the federal government stays in control of those resources. that's the answer for the crisis that alaska is in. what the other two candidates is providing is more of the same. >> greta: someone handed me a wire politico asked you questions tonight at a fundraiser here about personal finance records that the law
and mcadams 22%. she is inching up on you. >> the rasmussen poll showed, -- probably somewhere in the mid those two. from our perspective it doesn't change the way they are approaching this. for us getting the message out which is jobs for alaska. the solution of the federal government to continue to pump money into the state without an -- alaskans taking care of the natural resources that are there is not the answer. job creation has got to be provided through the resource base that we have. that resource base we aren't going to have access to as long as the federal government stays in control of those resources. that's the answer for the crisis that alaska is in. what the other two candidates is providing is more of the same. >> greta: someone handed me a wire politico asked you questions tonight at a fundraiser here about personal finance records that the law
yan and there has to be something different that can put this nation back on track. frankly this is an opportunity for those in power to recognize what is coming up from below. the answer is getting power to the states and that will be put forward after november when new people take office in congress. jenna: you talk about the new people taking office, who are those new people that you think take office? >> well i think that what you see in a number of these races in the lower 48 you see obviously what happened with lee in utah, sharon angle in nevada, o'donnell in delaware. and of course the numbers are greater than that. they are all focused on the same thin that is reversing the growth of government, getting the federal government back down to a manageable level and transferring power back to the state. in alaska we have more opportunity to use the resource base we have here to fiscally get ourselves in a good position so when the federal government pulls back we can move forward. jenna: you're a veteran, today the senate could be taking up
decisive statement and we also expected to see the senator, of course, honor her word that she would, in fact, stay out of the general election but now we are in a race between two liberals. joe miller between two liberals. the message doesn't change and it is a message of common sense. >> you have to be concerned because it doesn't help your campaign she is going in with the write-in campaign. she has money in the bank, she is willing to spend it and she wants her seat. >> well, she absolutely does. frankly, bahar thi what this is two different positions. the senator wants the same policies in d.c. to continue. the ones that brought to us this crisis that we are in as a nation. we have been looking to washington for answers. that is not the answer. the answer is to restrain the federal government. for alaska, it is the resource base that is worth trillions of