>> and welcome to hannity. and tonight, joe biden trashing conftonight, joe biden trashing conference with ukrainian president zelenskyy all because they are making border security a top priority. er snow, the president always ss to fly off the handle when talking about the gop while giving america's geopolitical foes a free pass, even as theyol try to kill u.s. soldiers abroad. almost 100 attacks in, oh,d attk a little over a month. >> we have a full reportst straight ahead tonight. but first, the president of harvardra t is now getting a free pass. >> claudine just receivedss what is a unanimous vote of confidence by the university's governing board after this abhorrent testimony about genoce and virulent anti-semitism now r festering all over her campus. take a look at thi s. is >> so the answer is yes, that calling for the of jews violates harvard code of conduct correct? >> again, ite dependsntex on the context. it does not dependt. is oes not dependt. on the context. the answer is yes. and this is why you shouldyes, s resign. >> these are unacceptable answers across the board, sherd said it would depend on whether actions were associate said itd. courting calling knows the context. a glcontext. violence against jews, the elimination of israel. and when protester s signs that read by any means by they are praisingns what are the barbaric terrorist attacks. on october the seventh and calling for more of the same. now, the entirg r moree student. at harvard, they have been harassed by radical hamathey haa since october the seventh in that terror attack. y didn but claudine didn't seem to care. two days ago'tto, you had this n president resign in disgrace after providing a similarse a response at that very same congressional hearing. but at harvard, their president will skirt by with a simple apolog wity, quoting is, quoter sorry if she offended anyone. i don't consider that an apology anyway. go told the told the harvard crimson that she, quote, got caught uhep in what had become at that point an extended combative exchange about policies and procedures. not really. according to harvard takesfree free speech and free expression very seriously. expren but in reality. and truth. well, she's wronell,g because tw year harvard was named the worst school. speech >> it comes to freedom of speech in america by scoring a whopping 0.0. in a study by the foundation for individual rightsd and expression, now seven of its professors werpressione disd for saying or writing something that the universitngy deemed offensive. one feminist lecturer at harvard canceleone fe lecd hd her speech because she does not, quote, believe therewome are male women. there are strict rules against certain typen." s speech that are deemed hateful, including discussion, includs that couldds be labeled as transphobic or fat phobic. , appa that's right. at harvard, apparently now obesity is off limits. but when it comes to the jewish people, anything goes. goes.make no mistake, claudine so-called apology, it wasy, i disingenuous, but it gets worse. >> at one point during her apology, harvard's president said, quot onee, i fad to convey what is my truth? iden my truth. the president of harvard thinks she owns a special version of truth. let me see. is it true that israel wasel was a victim of terrorism? >> am of is it true that innocet israelis were slaughtered and murdered and and some beheaded and some taken prisonere kidnapped? but of course, her version of the truth is probably lacking in originality. now, of the few academic paper s that claudine has actually managed to publish over the pas gayt two decades. >> well, now we also know that many were allegedly plagiarized. >> that's right. thathat's right. t supposed to be america's most prestigious university is an isn player accused of plagiarism on top of everything else. according to the harvard crimson, quotevard , the crimsod independently reviewed the published allegations, enviewedthough some are minor,no consisting of passages that are similar, identical to sources, lacking quotation marks, including citations. others are more substantial, including some paragraphs and sentences nearly identicalrs to other work and lacking citations. and according university policy, a student at harvard could actually be expelled forut notally be expelled such an infraction. but not claudinenepresidenudintn . >> harvard's board is now allowing her to go back and amend her publicationsow al and here's how congresswoman elise stefanik responded to thiicationss earlier today.d. >> take a look.take this is a mora al failure of harvard's leadership and higher education leadership and higher education leadership and the only change they haved made to code of conduct where they failed to condemn calls fod r of the jewish people. the only update to the code t of conduct is to allow a plagiarist, as the president of harvarda . harvar >> now, by some estimates, harvard has lost billions of dollarss of in donations bec of clotting. but the school would rathe rit the school would rathe stand by its president than admit the moral and academic ro the moralt that is destroying american colleges and poisoningn the minds of young students. now, today, our very own sara carter, she traveleg ydr to harvard, where she caught upr with a research associate who'sc not happy with the conduct of their president but does nott want her face of any kind or any of these kids to be loo disciplined. >> take a look. even harvard presidentk. n harvars not perfect. okay. and she was overly trained ov. y e was overly trained and she you know, she didn't say the right thing. okay. so but it doesn't mean shebe pun should be punished. my resignation. she's goinisbyg learn. you know, i think she wasi th sideswipedin by that question.lr >> all right. here with more from our tripig m to cambridgehe, our very own sara carter. >> sara, to me, there's there's no there's no moral ambiguity here. this is moral clarity. either. harvard stands against murder and and torture and, terrorism and kidnapping, or they don't. this was not a deep question that she was being here.e thin >> and the thing is, if th and the thing is, if least, the phonics question to any other, quote, identity group, you tell me, would there be consequence to us, to any" ye at consequence to us, to any" ye well, absolutely, sean. she's also not a child. sean. she knew she was testifying before congress and she hadan to prepare to testify before congress. shso this wasn't a trickquesti question. you know, many of the students that i interviewedon. here in cambridge also made excuses for president. they they said, you know, she was caught off guard.was sa she didn't really know what she was saying. and what i found reallyi i founy surprising, sean, wa s the fact d that it was difficult for manyif of the students to actually answer theery simplestudents are calls for againstcide a the jewish people against and violating the codega conductating the codega here at harvard university. >> take a listen. >> do you feel, though, that her inabilitythat to respd to whether or not, the calls for violated the ethical codee of standard here at harvard were exposed? that maybe she was wavering on a subject that should have been very simple to answer. i do not know enough about that to comment on the other comment for this person. i thin>> persok that important r university leadership to be held accountable. but i also think that she has tried really hard to like fix a mistake she made. and i do believe that she did make mistakes, like as an administrator. but i thin she's madk it's wrons it'd be wrong to just get rid of her just because she madend these mistakes. and it's important for her tofrm that she's ready to learn and grow from the mistakes that she acted like. i'm not i feel indifferent. i mean, the corporationnocide at harvard supports. in tarvard supports. institutional. doesn't matter. so you feel like her testimonyh- wasn't so much offensive. it's just that bad. it was badt was that that's whe was. >> awful. sean there are a number of major harvard donors who arep not going to let president gates slide. in facre t of them is billionaie bill ackman, who stated that heh will no longer be donatinge' to harvard as long as they kee p president in her position of power after her anti-semiti c testimony and he assessed that $1 billion in donations have already been pulled from from alma mater and other donors jewish as as other non-jewish donors that would have been donating to the campusat woulden sean. >> all right. great report. sara carter at harvard tonight e ,you. w here with more, the author of the bestseller ofr on how h to defeat cultural marxism in america, harvard law school alumni, texas senator ted cruz. you know, it's interesting. i had debating on this program two professors from harvard. ofo professors from harvard. were one of his best students of all time. that would be alan dershowitz, entsl timethe other cornel west, running for president. >> and i said at the endi said of that debate, senator, that the sad part is thist we debate that we had on this show, we wouldon thi be able tod at harvard. we reached out to them. they got back to us. and i think that speaks volumes. that spevowhat ilumes your reac? alma mater? >> look, it it is disgraceful how harvard is behaving. i got to say, claudine gay's ing.testimony was the worst 1 testimony i've seen in the 11 years i've been in the t senate. you had her testimony of the president of penn. you had the presiden t of mit, the president of penn has already resigned in disgrace. i think all three should resign in disgrace. >> not al a one of them could give a simple, clear answer,coul not a one of them could categorically denounce anti-semitism. acategory, denounced against a one of them could figure outt whether calling for mass murdewt of jews violates their harassment policy. >> it was riddlees harassmd. and there's a reason why did t clotting like listen to all these people defending claudine gates? well, she was surpriseg d. what d was surpriseg what do you mean she was surprised? the entire topic of her thy was on this. of her and the reason she gavehe that answer is that she sidese with the protesters. she is a radical leftist. she is a cultural marxist. you talk about my book. on woke how to defeat cultural marxism. this is cultural marxism. they define jews as oppressors . they define palestinians as victims. . they defand the cultural marxiss support the violent revolution of the victims against the so-called oppressors. and the result pressors is because the three of them are leftists. they are cheering for the hamass terrorists. it is disgraceful. and i got to say disan, at harv, you are seeing jewish students being harassed, rvard yog being threatened, mit, you're seeing jewish students afraid to go to class. d thes and these leftists are unwilling to stand ue pudens and defend their students. she should resign. and i got to telshe shn anl, i s there are thousands upon thousands of harvard alums o who are horrified at the behavior of the institution right now. rin, senator,about about identity politics. >> what if theidentity of and fill in the blank had to do with a particular racedo or a particular or against anyone in the lgbtq community or one of of a personit with identity issues? or what if it was against people that believe in islam? >> i think that would be a very different reaction on campus. >> so again, gets spelled gen immediately. >> if you called for of any of thoseocid those groups whom t defines as victims, you would be expelleim d immediately. >> but because they view jews in the context of israel in yor as oppressors, you're allowed to abuse the look. u.s.e banned a jewish professo from coming on campus. >> it was an economicsr, professor who anti-semitic wh. essor who anti-semitic usc ordered him to teach his entire class remotely for the year. you know, my podcast verdict with ted cruz yesterday' mysel podcast is entirely on this harvard testimony. and just disgraceful. it is.and fo en is.and fo to say wtie stand entirely with our president, you know what ir t you what it's saying. it's saying we're okay with anti-semitism. anti-sem want jewish students to feel safe on our campus. and by the way, claudine, in tha and, y,t same testimony,a asked about that with the percentageaske of jewish studenn that has plummeted on harvard's campus. and she said, i don't know. i don't know how many jewish students are there, which is a flat out lie. lie these bean counters, they know evere beany left handed, whatev. >> they know that. they don'ty know how many jewish people are on campus. this is anjee ar institution. >> and by the way, harvard, going back to the 1950s, harvard had in place what were called the jewish quotas, whereo called the jewish quotas, whereo students allowed in because on meritjewis allo jews were doy well and getting good scores and good and gettingcores andon' good grades. and they said harvard said we don't want too many jews. and they put quotay je s place. >> and so for her to claim nowe she doesn't know how many jewss' there. >> and she's apparently not troubled that jews feel threatenedapparent becausereaten she's willing to contribute to the rhetoric that is underminined willingto cong ther own students. and by the way, to be clear, i don't mean safety from comments that are difficult to hear. i mean safety from physics, goal threats. we've seen videos of jewish students at harvar d being harassed, being threatened physically. and i goreatened t to tell you,l student physically threatens another student, that student should be expelled, whether they're jewish or muslim or pelled they arewhat have you. >> university should protect their students. these leftists won't dheiro. >> that. unrelated topic you really want to hav unr topice to senator din for protecting those people on jeffrey epstein's plane, the expres s, as it's called for nott wanting to subpoena the flight logs subpoen would give everybol the names. >> why is he unwilling to get those flight loginhoses? >> look, it's an awfully a good question. he, a fox news reporter, askedwh him in the hall of the senate. d why dick durbin and the senate wey dick durbin and the senate the flight logs of jeffrey epstein's planesght logs and cl, i don't know anything about it. i wasn't there. i don't know about it on m anythin yanythin podcast yesterday i played the video and said, yes, e video idyou were there. my you're the one. it was my colleague, marsha blackburn. colln that i joined that would have subpoenaed the flight logs and said, we planeight logs and said, we need to see who was on that plane. if there are prominent politician, ifs who were involvn in in molesting young girls, we need to know don't protecto them. >> and i got to say, the democrats are freaking out.l >> he literally blocked all amendments. and in my view , on the judiciary committee, we ought to keep pushing to say we're going to vote ougheif you on the record. if you are covering up fore co someonvee who is engaged in molesting children, we're going to exposmolestine that. and i will say, do you knoww wht what painting, jeffrey epstein had hanging in his living room in manhattan? >> i don't he had it's really horrible. he had a painting of bill clinton in a blue dress, linton red pumps, high heels hanging on his wall. >> it's traumatizinga if yt's traumatizinga you google it, you're going to hate the image. that's what epstein had on hisa. wall. maybe that explains why dick durbin and the democrats don't want to subpoena those flight logs. they're not going to like durb. thet going to like >> senator ted cruz of texas, thank you, senator. appreciate your time they , as as always. much of the academic decay at american university stems from its cult like adherencecult to the binary system of oppress versus oppressor. and it is the very foundation of communism. and it is what your kid are being indoctrinated into at many american universities. joining us now with analysis is the author of the upcoming book we'veg into issues how you stand strong for our country's soulgo and sanity. c the host of the brand new show, dr. phil prime time, the one and only our good friend, dr. phil. >> you know,riend, dr. it's alws the finds i look at you wantyo as always to find you to me is your willingness to just say itllingnes as it is and not wory about consequences. >> here you're talking about jes of jews and of course we wantt to back off. >> but we we apply one standardt ,different identity groups, but not to the jewish people. >> whyo th at harvard and thesed other schools? no these, sean, it's really disgusting and it's so hypocriticalisgustin to hear hak talking about. well, it's free speeching . they wouldn't know free speech if it came up and beat them t thin the, because thisou is something that, as you pointed out, fire puts them to 48 out of 248. they had to set up an entire new category for them. >> they were so abysmal at icatt and it's not they don't do free speech. they do their speech. e and as i've had people on my show, dr. carol huberman,ho who you alluded to a few minutes ago that just went out and reported the science just reported the science, and she was labeled as hate speech few m and drummed out of thein university after 20 plus years. but ye the unit you can talk abo of jews and, you know, genocidejewss. an interesting term. it doesn't sound real bad if sa, but theon od real bad if definition of it is to kill a large number of an ethnic group with the purpose of wipingp thm off the face of the earth and destroying their nation. >> and that's what we'rearth and talking about here. but there are even exceptions s to free speech. i'm not a lawyer. i don't mean to brag, but i'm not. 't mean tobut there are exceptis to free speech. >> you cannot incite people to violence, which they're doing. you cannot target someone with specific threats, which they're doing. but stilthreats l not talkingg abou about speech here. we're talking about actions. they're they're impedinglockin people's path to their classesgg . >> they're going iand disrupting their classes, going thsrupting their classes, going and intimidating these students. intimidatih, that just doesn't violate our policies. that's insane. johnn't violate our poli, you i, and so does anybody with common sense. this is nybodya double standard. and it's and you know, carolyn just she's a symptom of theto problem as welm of tl as thepro. perpetrator of the problem. this cuts really deep into, these ivy league universities. >> you know, there's an interesting editoriaean: thel ia the new york post yesterday, one down and hundreds to go that it's not justndto at mit and new penn and harvard. this is now, but it's institutionalized in lower grades as well.. dr. phil, i don't know whyi don' all of a sudden gotten to a point where we're educators for kids from in grammar school, supe from in grammar school, feel that their values are superior to parental values and they feel at liberty to indoctrinate these childrenei into their way of thinking rather than sticking to the basicsathe stickin reading, writ science, history, and computers. >> i don't knoory, andw. call me old fashioned, dr. phil, but i prefer they educate our kids, not indoctrinate them . well. vell. sean over 30% of our fifth graders and eighth graders the most basic% h graders level, 19% of our high schoolofh graduates can't read. they're getting passed so the schools can get paidt , and yet they're wanting to talk about other things. and thatey are is completely ab. >> and what's happening here and it's happening from the primary grades up through college is you're right, they're runninh g their own woke agendas. and that is absolutely their ow. and thlutely and these people that are counseling these students on these