Stay updated with breaking news from All time leading. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
and advocate for civil rights and anti—racism. it's deeply conspiratorial, and it's one that has not advanced past i9th—century science and doesn't recognise that race is this social idea, not a biological one. and you believed in all of this. you were obviously a child at the time, but you're in documentaries — aged about 11, i think — saying, "i would not like to live with non—whites because they don't have the same values, ideals and beliefs that i have." right. i gave my first interview on national television in the united states with my dad when i was ten years old, and i remember feeling really engaged. he asked me over and over, "you sure you want to do this?" and i was enthusiastic. i wanted to be a part of his movement. i had seen him giving interviews my whole life up until that point, and i believed in the ideology as much as a ten—year—old can believe in anything. and then the decade that followed that, i continued giving interviews, i continued
mark: hello america i am marco levin and this is "life, liberty & levin" sunday. former trump lawyer and are buddy pete has a fantastic new book the war on a warrior so irrelevant, so important in our national security the men and women who give their all for our country. but, before we get to them i've been doing a lot of thinking as most of you have as what took place in the courtroom last week. it'its implications beyond gettg into the weeds of grand juries and jury instruction and collateral evidence and so forth and so on. because this is so much bigger so much bigger than the rules of evidence and so forth. what am i talking about? the democrat party. the democrat party is cheering what took place and surrogates are cheering what took place joe biden went to a microphone and
of our military and military personnel that i have ever read and it is extremely readable. you talk about dei taking place. you talk about woke us in taking place. talk about all of these things the cultural rot being projected onto the defense department. your point of the book is a sunset at the end is if you don't know what is going on you can't fix it, right? >> out is exactly right. if you don't fix it, we lose it is not just my story i tell a lot of my story i sure combat moments to share a moment i was deemed extremist, we can get into that in a moment if you and that's why left the militant this after 20 years of fighting extremists being part of the military, you are an extremist. it's not just about me it's a dozens and dozens of guys that i interviewed currently serving lower ranks, hirings all of which said the same thing. we are walking on eggshells. our standards are being lowered.
mark: welcome back america. here is our friend top lawyer james trusty. let's step back from the intricacies and the weeds in this case and the legalese. you look at this case you summon it very easy what took place tierney was rogue from beginning to end the taking of the case i do not blame the jury there should never have been a jury. it should have been dismissed it. all of that said, this has a national impact on the voters, on the nation it has an impact on our constitutional system it has a federal impact on her federal election laws and federal jurisdiction of federal judicial authority. how do you sum this up? when you mawhat you make of all? >> these are the wages of law fair. if it stands we are living in a system where it is okay to announce you're going to target
day-to-day brutalities of war and combat is nothing but how long are greatly i'm looking here as their numbers dwindle, the stories of these remaining veterans are more important than ever. >> do you ever worry that the sacrifices made by the men who stormed the beaches at normandy, that may ultimately they'll be be for not that ultimately this experiment will fail anyone who bets against america has taken a bad bet is the bottom line, but that means that democracy, which she's not a spectator sport, needs all of us to roll up our sleeves and be better citizens of this republic. >> it just sense of responsibility for this experiment and its survival. >> none of what our service members fought for and fight for is a given the american
i was growing up in, and that ideology named its enemies. it said, "who shouldn�*t be here? who didn�*t belong?" muslims. breivik. . .. breivik talked about norway being flooded by muslims. all of his murders, he justified with exactly the ideology that my family and i were advocating. and yet, every time murders like this would happen, they would say, "well, they condemned violence, so therefore, this one psychopath is not their responsibility." and it was something that was so cold and so hard to rationalise that it did eat away at me in a way that i felt like i could just accept — "well, my family is condemning this violence, and yet this movement..." and getting close to a college community of people who i cared about, i knew, i loved, who... many of them were not white, many of them werejewish, and they felt afraid of what i represented and, if not specifically me, they felt afraid of the people in this movement who commit mass murders regularly
justice tonight it's giving the law fair proponents the benefit of incapacitating and for the trial and for calling him a felon in all things are going to do during this campaign and the cases on the flimsiest of foundations. mark: that is the problem. the problem is the people who hatched this are quite diabolical. they are looking at new york state law. who hash this were the people who are outside the government and they came into the das office. and this was the plan. the plan was to time it in a way where number one, they would bog down trump. you don't have an equal playing field when you come to the electoral process one candidate who is unfettered, bite and the other guy is handicapped. so we, the people, the public does not get to meet, speak to a person, hear from the candidate. this horrendous and gag orders placed on him. all of these steps are taken
the power to enforce the bill of rights as it stands in the constitution today. half of that accent and no more he points out. he said gentleman the force of the provisions of the bill of rights the citizens of the united states shall be entitled to all privilege immunities citizens of the nine states into several states. that no person, known to be deprived of life, liberty property without due process of law but they say we are opposed to its enforcement by act of congress under an amended constitution as proposed. that is the sum and substance of all the argument we have heard on the subject. what are the gentleman opposed to the enforcement of the bill of rights as proposed? it would interfere with the rights of the states. who ever before heard any state had reserve to itself the rights under the constitution of the united states to withhold from any citizen of the united states within its limits, under any pretext, what ever put any pretext or privilege of the
is worse between these different constitutional governments the one operating on all of the states the others operating separately in each the aggregate powers of government divided between them it could not escape attention. the controversies wouldn't arise concerning the boundaries of the jurisdictions. some provision ought to be made for such appearances a political system does not provide for a peaceful and authoritative termination of current controversies would not be more than the shadow of a government. the object of a real government being the substitution of law and order for uncertainty and confusion and violence. which of course is exactly what bragg and mershon had done. and there courtroom. not the state legislature. not the governor, two people to people he goes on because the constitution and laws made in pursuance thereof all treaties
ideal of the united states and to appeal to the united states for aid. this was before russian president putin's full-scale invasion. you are retired general when the intel started coming in that putin was going to send russian forces into invade and attack ukraine. what were you thinking when you started hearing it? >> well, my sense was we didn't stop him on the caucuses. they kinda did what he wanted and so the next step for a guy like him is attack someone else. >> it sounds a lot like hitler in terms of their never being satisfied with acquiring land. >> he's not necessarily trying to re-establish. you'll soviet union, but certainly the old russian empire pray, pray, pray that he never crosses that line, but you never know with a guy like putin, if he thinks he can get away with it just like the dictator of north korea, if those kind of people think that they can get away with it, they'll go, which is why these generals argue that another component of nato, article five is so critical. article five states at when someone attacks and nato country all are