Live Breaking News & Updates on Bombshells hair studio
Stay updated with breaking news from Bombshells hair studio. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
potentially criminal conduct. these violations of the public trust are alarming and show a systemic pattern of behavior that every member of our committee felt needed to be addressed in a public forum. this is already a historic vote. ken paxton is the first attorney general in texas to get impeached. but there are bombshells during this hour's long debate that led to the impeachment. in part it was because house members said that ken paxton has called them, threatening them if they voted yes that there would be political consequences. some were so concerned that one even tweeted this. take a listen. the tweet says, quote, i will be submitting a journal statement to amend charge documents to include abuse of power, intimidation of house members and grand jury system that ag paxton called and threatened house and senate members. i have asked ken paxton's office
premium payments. we plan to speak with frances in person, but due to covid concerns, we met via zoom. she denies the charges and the indictment. >> i'm an honest woman. i didn't do anything illegal. i didn't falsify anything. i'm innocent. i don't have anything to hide. >> how many more bombshells is they're going to be? >> we also caught up again with bonnie contreras. to hear her thoughts on francis's latest troubles. >> she looks like a liar, she looks like a con, she just -- she looks bad all the way around. >> bonnie now run some businesses of her own, including a cbd spa. she believes the new charges just might change some peoples perceptions of frances and herself. >> they were constantly calling me a gold digger. so who looks like the gold digger now? is it me? or is it her? >> i don't even think she knows what the word gold digger means. what i'm going through right
personal gain. >> all right. let's get the latest with cnn's rosa flores. rosa, thanks so much for updating us and our viewers on all of this. where are we in the process? are they into the voting yet? are they in the -- still in the talking phase, i guess? >> they're still in the talking phase. jim, we're already hearing some bombshells. some of the committee members said -- and said before the full house that -- that ken paxton, the attorney general of texas, had threatened some of the house members. now i'll get to those threats, but let me start with where we are so far because the full articles of impeachment have been read before the full texas house of representatives. now some of those include dereliction of duty, abuse of power, bribery. take a listen. >> while holding office as
occurred during trump's term in office? it was his justice department and fbi. so, it just kind of proves the point. are you mad at trump? jim, are you mad at trump? are you mad at mr. barr? who are you mad at? what are you trying to, where was the weaponization against trump's own people by trump? that's what basically we're looking at here. >> right. >> katie, let's switch gears to the durham report. what can you tell us about the special counsel's finding? are we missing any bombshells that in misreading this report as a -- and a dad? >> i'm going to try to be as charitable to this as possible. it was a four-year investigation. it did have a few -- to self prosecutions, one guilty plea, for misconduct that had already been found by the attorney general. a doubles down on and underscores findings by the inspector general a few years ago when trump was still in office. that there were issues at the
of this, little line over here about something else. and none of it ever comes together. so, this idea of weaponization of the government is being done by the very people who are supposed to be investigating weaponization by, i guess the biden administration? because didn't all this occurred during trump's term in office? it was his justice department and fbi. so, it just kind of proves the point. so, you are mad that trump? jim jordan, are you mad at trump? are you mad at mr. barr? who are you mad at? what are you trying to -- where was the weaponization against trump's own people by trump? because that's what basically we're looking at here. >> right. >> katie, let's switch gears to the durham report. what can you tell us about the special counsel's finding? and are we missing any bombshells that in misreading this report as a -- cooper and the dad dud?
you are grasping about a little line over here or there are something else, and nothing comes of it. this idea of weaponization of the government is being done by the very people who are supposed to be investigating's weaponization, i guess by the biden administration? didn't this all occurred during trump's term in office? it was his justice department, his fbi. so kind of proves the point. so, are you mad at trump? jordan, jim, are you mad at trump? are you mad at mr. barr? who are you mad at? where was the weaponization against trump's own people by trump? that's basically what we are looking at here. >> katie, let's switch gears to the durham report. what can you tell us about the special counsel's finding? are we missing any bombshells, that is report says is a whimper and a dad? >> i will try to be as charitable to this report as
2016 campaign and russia, special counsel john durham released his findings yesterday, a 300-page report. and in it, durham, who was first appointed by that attorney general william barr in 2019, accuses the bureau of acting negligently but did not reveal any bombshells, as many republicans had long claimed he would. durham found no evidence the justice department and the fbi conspired in a deep state plot to investigate trump's ties to russia in 2016. in addition, durham did not recommend any wholesale changes at the fbi. the special counsel also appears to relitigate two of the cases he lost that went to trial, in which he brought criminal charges. the durham report has been contradicted by two of the reports, including one released in 2020 by the republican-led senate intelligence committee. the committee's report as well
decision. that is toxic for the court and it's political capital and confidence in it, that's really all it's got. that's the coin of the realm for the court and digging its way out from this hole is going to be the work of generations and we have more bombshells to come in the next six weeks with more unpopular and what people will perceive as politicized decisions. >> yeah. harry, justice sotomayor called it the stench of the court. what she was talking about were republicans in state legislatures passing abortion bans because of who trump appointed. trump confirms the comments, donald trump took credit wednesday for the elimination of roe versus wade embracing his role in selecting the supreme court justices who were instrumental in ending the half century precedent that protected abortion rights nationwide. quote, after 50 years of failure with nobody even coming close, i
barr tapsed, the durham report. turned out to be a lengthny op-ed that came after durham, that prosecutor, lost both cases at trial. views are free to share, but it didn't have any bombshells and didn't come with any indictments. he's 0-2 in a court dha shares his thoughts about the fbi. we take it all together, and what are we seeing here? it is bigger than any random hearing or even the final very tardy resolution of that bill barr ordered probe. it is a republican party that is facing choices. we covered these elections this week. we've heard that governor ron desantis may mull running for president. he is considering making some sort of news on that as early as next week. the republican party has choices to make, and yet it is using its power -- i'm not talking about meeting or rallies. i'm talking about the oversight power in the house to double down on conspiracy theories that are designed to try to help
and it is really baffling to see they're not covering a lot of this information. >> it's almost like we're living in two separate planets here. a lot of the abc networks aren't covering the issues as they should be. i mean, look, think about the durham report and how that was covered. not a lot of coverage there. huge revelations, huge bombshells. obviously, fox news covered it, but it just shows where we are as a country right now where we have folks in the media who are not doing their jobs and supporting this administration and almost carrying water for them. >> trace: by the way, we should just say breaking right now, i'm being told president biden has announced that sunday in japan at the g7 meetings, he'll hold a news conference if you're ready for that. stephanie hamill, great to have you on as always, thank you. new york city has a new plan to deal with the influx of migrants from the southern border, house them in public school gymnasiums, a move one