Live Breaking News & Updates on Court of

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from Court of on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in Court of and stay connected to the pulse of your community

Anderson Cooper 360

presidential immuniity in any circumstances from criminal prosecution, that would be something that the court has to address. if the court is limited in the centrally says there might be in some circumstances but not in the circumstances presented here? or, we are going to reach the question of whether these were official acts or not, maybe the court leaves that -- >> and, kaitlan the former president is going to be in court again thursday on the civil fraud trial. i mean, we've got the iowa caucuses coming up, he is choosing to be here at these court cases. he clearly thinks both from a fundraising standpoint and a political standpoint, that that is where the cameras, are there is a benefit from him being. there >> and they are fundraising off of this today. eric trump was sending out an email from the other fundraising saying my father is in court right now, he is not able to be in iowa. he was choosing to be in the court of, today he is choosing to be here in new york on thursday for those closing arguments in the civil fraud case, as he has chosen to be there many other times. there, will if this does happen, if the supreme court does rule in this, the trial does go forward there will be days where he does not get to choose, where he does have to be there in court. but i do think it speaks to the point where right now, they think this helps them.

Supreme-court , Question , Something , Acts , Prosecution , Circumstances , Immuniity , Centrally , President , Kaitlan-collins , Fundraising-standpoint , Court-cases

Breakfast

the same mentality. it wasn't like he was hitting _ the same mentality. it wasn't like he was hitting the _ the same mentality. it wasn't like he was hitting the top _ the same mentality. it wasn't like he was hitting the top court - the same mentality. it wasn't like he was hitting the top court of. the same mentality. it wasn't like he was hitting the top court of all| he was hitting the top court of all the time in training, one of his first trainings with a big senior group, he missed a big chance, and he got a telling off from one of the senior boys, and maybe you would expect them to be a bit timid because of that, play within himself for the next couple of minutes but the next time he got the ball he tried to dribble past one of the best offenders on the team and completely was not bothered by any of that, and that stood out at the time is a sign that maybe there is something different about this guys. he had the grid, you could see it in his eyes _ he had the grid, you could see it in his eyes. when he lost, you can see the disappointment on his face, and other— the disappointment on his face, and other players, and i think that was a good _ other players, and i think that was a good thing, i don't want them to smile _ a good thing, i don't want them to smile if— a good thing, i don't want them to smile if they lose, but they have to behave _ smile if they lose, but they have to behave respectful for the opponents and try— behave respectful for the opponents and try even harder next time not to lose _ and try even harder next time not to lose. ., , . ., . and try even harder next time not to lose. .,, _, . ., lose. erling was confidence from ounr lose. erling was confidence from young age _ lose. erling was confidence from young age and — lose. erling was confidence from young age and in _ lose. erling was confidence from young age and in classroom - lose. erling was confidence from young age and in classroom you |

One , It-wasn-t , Training , All , Group , Mentality- , Court , Mentality , Chance , Trainings , Boys , Court-of

The Ingraham Angle

indictment is just the capstone indicting not only a man who is a former president, chief political opponent today on charges which i think is clearly first amendment protected activity on novel, creative legal theories that have never been tested in a court of. >> laura: law senator, you and i talked about how the biden administration always pretends to care so much about norm and dignity and bringing respect back to the united states, that joe biden was going to be the conduit for that. with all of your experience in foreign affairs, what do you think other countries, other governments are thinking about our country now with all of this playing out? >> i'm sure many of our friends and partners around the world are dismayed as they see a scene reminiscent of a third world banana republic, seeking the

Indictment , Joe-biden , Charges , Amendment , Opponent , Man , Capstone-indicting , Activity , Novel , Chief , Laura , Administration

Newsday

the united states. more important than - the united states. more important than the - the united states. more - important than the indictments of the — important than the indictments of the watergate _ important than the indictments of the watergate conspirators i of the watergate conspirators or even — of the watergate conspirators or even the _ of the watergate conspirators or even the atomic— of the watergate conspirators or even the atomic bomb, - or even the atomic bomb, because _ or even the atomic bomb, because it _ or even the atomic bomb, because it goes _ or even the atomic bomb, because it goes to - or even the atomic bomb, because it goes to the - or even the atomic bomb, i because it goes to the future of our— because it goes to the future of our democracy. _ because it goes to the future of our democracy. our- because it goes to the future - of our democracy. our democracy has been — of our democracy. our democracy has been robust _ of our democracy. our democracy has been robust since _ of our democracy. our democracy has been robust since the - has been robust since the 1780s _ has been robust since the 1780s if_ has been robust since the 1780s. if trump— has been robust since the 1780s. if trump is - has been robust since the 1780s. if trump is not- has been robust since the i 1780s. if trump is not held accountable _ 1780s. if trump is not held accountable for— 1780s. if trump is not held accountable for his - 1780s. if trump is not heldl accountable for his attempt 1780s. if trump is not held i accountable for his attempt to destroy— accountable for his attempt to destroy that _ accountable for his attempt to destroy that democracy, - accountable for his attempt to destroy that democracy, then| destroy that democracy, then the future _ destroy that democracy, then the future of _ destroy that democracy, then the future of american - the future of american institutions, _ the future of american institutions, american| institutions, american democracy, _ institutions, american democracy, indeed i institutions, american| democracy, indeed our institutions, american— democracy, indeed our freedoms, and freedoms _ democracy, indeed our freedoms, and freedoms of _ democracy, indeed our freedoms, and freedoms of people _ democracy, indeed our freedoms, and freedoms of people around i and freedoms of people around the world — and freedoms of people around the world to _ and freedoms of people around the world to depend _ and freedoms of people around the world to depend upon - the world to depend upon america. _ the world to depend upon america, is— the world to depend upon america, is in— the world to depend upon america, is injeopardy. l the world to depend upon. america, is injeopardy. so there— america, is injeopardy. so there is— america, is injeopardy. so there is far— america, is injeopardy. so there is far more _ america, is injeopardy. so there is far more to- america, is injeopardy. so there is far more to this i america, is injeopardy. so l there is far more to this case than — there is far more to this case than donald _ there is far more to this case than donald trump's - there is far more to this case than donald trump's future. i there is far more to this case i than donald trump's future. it is america's_ than donald trump's future. it is america's future _ than donald trump's future. it is america's future and - than donald trump's future. it is america's future and the - is america's future and the world's— is america's future and the world's future. _ is america's future and the world's future. by - is america's future and the world's future. by the - is america's future and the| world's future. by the way, is america's future and the . world's future. by the way, all of this— world's future. by the way, all of this bluster— world's future. by the way, all of this bluster by— world's future. by the way, all of this bluster by donald - world's future. by the way, alli of this bluster by donald trump about— of this bluster by donald trump about the — of this bluster by donald trump about the weaponisation - of this bluster by donald trump about the weaponisation of- about the weaponisation of justice _ about the weaponisation of justice getting _ about the weaponisation of justice getting out - about the weaponisation of justice getting out to - about the weaponisation of justice getting out to get . about the weaponisation of. justice getting out to get him. but that— justice getting out to get him. but that counts _ justice getting out to get him. but that counts for— justice getting out to get him. but that counts for when - justice getting out to get him. but that counts for when you i but that counts for when you -et but that counts for when you get into _ but that counts for when you get into a _ but that counts for when you get into a court _ but that counts for when you get into a court of— but that counts for when you get into a court of law, - but that counts for when you get into a court of law, it- get into a court of law, it accounts _ get into a court of law, it accounts for _ get into a court of law, it accounts for zero. - get into a court of law, it accounts for zero. it - get into a court of law, it. accounts for zero. it makes absolutely _ accounts for zero. it makes absolutely no _ accounts for zero. it makes absolutely no difference. . accounts for zero. it makes l absolutely no difference. the judge — absolutely no difference. the iudge will— absolutely no difference. the judge will probably _ absolutely no difference. the judge will probably not - absolutely no difference. the judge will probably not evenl judge will probably not even allow— judge will probably not even allow those _

Atomic-bomb , It , Indictments , Democracy , Conspirators , United-states , Atomic , 1780 , Trump , Institutions , Attempt , Freedoms

The Beat With Ari Melber

by justice roberts and some of his colleagues given to us amidst high-minded talk about equality and the end of discrimination and how the civil rights advocates and the people at harvard who have been trying to do this, they are the people doing the discrimination. it's a free country. the people will decide whether they buy this and believe this. it's also a country governed by the rule of law, so we, as citizens, will live under these laws. no one is talking about immunity here, but they may prove to be controversial decisions. today, the president responded to the decision, accusing the court of, among other things, rolling back the president, vice president harris says schools will clearly become less diverse, and while we know that barack obama and former first lady michelle obama don't weigh in on every political scuffle, they say this is far more than politics. they weighed in, arguing the nation must do the real work to uphold equality and make fairness a reality. >> today, the court once again walked away from decades of precedent. this is not a normal court.

Country , People , Harvard , Chief-justice-roberts , On-civil-rights , Discrimination , Some , Equality , Us , End , Colleagues , Talk

Newsnight

they wouldn't be _ aren't obliged to disclose anything they wouldn't be required - aren't obliged to disclose anything they wouldn't be required to - they wouldn't be required to disclose _ they wouldn't be required to disclose before _ they wouldn't be required to disclose before a _ they wouldn't be required to disclose before a court - they wouldn't be required to disclose before a court of. they wouldn't be required tol disclose before a court of law they wouldn't be required to - disclose before a court of law but private _ disclose before a court of law but private information _ disclose before a court of law but private information is— disclose before a court of law but private information is disclosed l disclose before a court of law but| private information is disclosed to inquiries — private information is disclosed to inquiries all— private information is disclosed to inquiries all the _ private information is disclosed to inquiries all the time. _ private information is disclosed to inquiries all the time. it's - private information is disclosed to inquiries all the time. it's not- inquiries all the time. it's not unusual _ inquiries all the time. it's not unusual the _ inquiries all the time. it's not unusual. the normal- inquiries all the time. it's not unusual. the normal course i inquiries all the time. it's noti unusual. the normal course is inquiries all the time. it's not. unusual. the normal course is if inquiries all the time. it's not- unusual. the normal course is if it is relevant, — unusual. the normal course is if it is relevant, it— unusual. the normal course is if it is relevant, it is— unusual. the normal course is if it is relevant, it is disclosed. - unusual. the normal course is if it is relevant, it is disclosed. this i is relevant, it is disclosed. this argument — is relevant, it is disclosed. this argument is _ is relevant, it is disclosed. this argument is about _ is relevant, it is disclosed. this argument is about the - is relevant, it is disclosed. this argument is about the privacy. argument is about the privacy rights — argument is about the privacy rights~ if— argument is about the privacy rights. if something - argument is about the privacy rights. if something is - argument is about the privacy. rights. if something is irrelevant then— rights. if something is irrelevant then the — rights. if something is irrelevant then the privacy— rights. if something is irrelevant then the privacy rights _ rights. if something is irrelevant then the privacy rights are - rights. if something is irrelevantl then the privacy rights are meant rights. if something is irrelevant. then the privacy rights are meant to play but _ then the privacy rights are meant to play but i _ then the privacy rights are meant to play but i think— then the privacy rights are meant to play but i think we _ then the privacy rights are meant to play but i think we should _ then the privacy rights are meant to play but i think we should be - play but i think we should be careful— play but i think we should be careful about _ play but i think we should be careful about putting - play but i think we should be careful about putting too - play but i think we should be l careful about putting too much emphasis _ careful about putting too much emphasis on _ careful about putting too much emphasis on it. _ careful about putting too much emphasis on it.— careful about putting too much emphasis on it. careful about putting too much emhasis on it. , , , , ., emphasis on it. very quickly, yes or no, do emphasis on it. very quickly, yes or no. do you — emphasis on it. very quickly, yes or no. do you think — emphasis on it. very quickly, yes or no, do you think that _ emphasis on it. very quickly, yes or no, do you think that baroness - no, do you think that baroness hallett might be minded to resign if this doesn't go her way? i hallett might be minded to resign if this doesn't go her way?— this doesn't go her way? i can't answer. this doesn't go her way? i can't answer- i _ this doesn't go her way? i can't answer. i don't _ this doesn't go her way? i can't answer. i don't know. - this doesn't go her way? i can't answer. i don't know. that's i this doesn't go her way? i can't i answer. i don't know. that's what this doesn't go her way? i can't - answer. i don't know. that's what i want to do — answer. i don't know. that's what i want to do thank— answer. i don't know. that's what i want to do thank you. _ andrew tate, the controversial british american social media personality, and to many a toxic influencer who endlessly promotes misogny, has given a rare interview to the bbc today, and immediately afterwards called it a "hitjob." he was interviewed by lucy williamson at his home in romania where he is under house arrest, undersuspicion of human trafficking,

Course , Inquiries , Information , Law- , Court , Anything , Aren-t , They-wouldn-t , Disclose , Wouldn-t , Court-of , Something

The Context with Christian Fraser

justice _ privilege can mean in these kinds of justice systems in america. certainty— justice systems in america. certainly tuned in, and notjust in the us. most popular crime stories, chris, have one or two elements that we've discussed tonight. this has it all, which is why it's may be reverberated so widely. tt’s reverberated so widely. it's extraordinary. _ reverberated so widely. it's extraordinary. a _ reverberated so widely. it's extraordinary. a gruesome double murder— extraordinary. a gruesome double murder and — extraordinary. a gruesome double murderand other— extraordinary. a gruesome double murder and other unexplained - extraordinary. a gruesome double - murder and other unexplained deaths. we have _ murder and other unexplained deaths. we have to _ murder and other unexplained deaths. we have to remind _ murder and other unexplained deaths. we have to remind ourselves- murder and other unexplained deaths. we have to remind ourselves we - murder and other unexplained deaths. we have to remind ourselves we are l we have to remind ourselves we are in a court of— we have to remind ourselves we are in a court of law, _ we have to remind ourselves we are in a court of law, but— we have to remind ourselves we are in a court of law, but has— we have to remind ourselves we are in a court of law, but has a - we have to remind ourselves we are in a court of law, but has a cast - we have to remind ourselves we are in a court of law, but has a cast of. in a court of law, but has a cast of characters— in a court of law, but has a cast of characters that it _ in a court of law, but has a cast of characters that it feels _ in a court of law, but has a cast of characters that it feels like - characters that it feels like you couldn't — characters that it feels like you couldn't quite _ characters that it feels like you couldn't quite make _ characters that it feels like you couldn't quite make up. - characters that it feels like you couldn't quite make up. i- characters that it feels like you couldn't quite make up. i thinkj characters that it feels like you - couldn't quite make up. i think the other— couldn't quite make up. i think the other thing — couldn't quite make up. i think the other thing from _ couldn't quite make up. i think the other thing from this _ couldn't quite make up. i think the other thing from this side - couldn't quite make up. i think the other thing from this side of- couldn't quite make up. i think the other thing from this side of the i other thing from this side of the attantic— other thing from this side of the atlantic that _ other thing from this side of the atlantic that feels _ other thing from this side of the atlantic that feels different i other thing from this side of the atlantic that feels different is i other thing from this side of the i atlantic that feels different is the tetevising — atlantic that feels different is the tetevising of— atlantic that feels different is the televising of high—profile - atlantic that feels different is the televising of high—profile murder| televising of high—profile murder triats _ televising of high—profile murder trials that— televising of high—profile murder trials that adds _ televising of high—profile murder trials that adds to _ televising of high—profile murder trials that adds to the _ televising of high—profile murder trials that adds to the drama. i. televising of high—profile murder. trials that adds to the drama. i was living _ trials that adds to the drama. i was living in_ trials that adds to the drama. i was living in washington, _ trials that adds to the drama. i was living in washington, dc _ trials that adds to the drama. i was living in washington, dc in - trials that adds to the drama. i was living in washington, dc in the 905j living in washington, dc in the 905 during _ living in washington, dc in the 905 during the — living in washington, dc in the 905 during the 0j — living in washington, dc in the 905 during the oj simpson _ living in washington, dc in the 905 during the oj simpson trial, - living in washington, dc in the 905 during the oj simpson trial, when. during the oj simpson trial, when the former— during the oj simpson trial, when the former all—star— during the oj simpson trial, when the former all—star wa5 _ during the oj simpson trial, when the former all—star was rather i the former all—star was rather sensationally— the former all—star was rather sensationally acquitted - the former all—star was rather sensationally acquitted of- the former all—star was rather - sensationally acquitted of murdering his ex-wife — sensationally acquitted of murdering his ex-wife and _ sensationally acquitted of murdering his ex—wife and her— sensationally acquitted of murdering his ex—wife and her friend. - sensationally acquitted of murdering his ex—wife and her friend. the i his ex—wife and her friend. the mixture — his ex—wife and her friend. the mixture of— his ex—wife and her friend. the mixture of celebrity _ his ex—wife and her friend. the mixture of celebrity murder- his ex—wife and her friend. thei mixture of celebrity murder and his ex—wife and her friend. the i mixture of celebrity murder and race turned _ mixture of celebrity murder and race turned it— mixture of celebrity murder and race turned it into — mixture of celebrity murder and race turned it into something _ mixture of celebrity murder and race turned it into something of- mixture of celebrity murder and race turned it into something of a - turned it into something of a circus — turned it into something of a circus i_ turned it into something of a circus. ithink— turned it into something of a circus. i think that _ turned it into something of a circus. i think that was - turned it into something of a circus. i think that was the l turned it into something of a i circus. i think that was the first

Privilege , Chris-morris , Justice , Kinds , United-states , Notjust , Systems-in-america , Crime-stories , Elements , One , Two , Murder

The Sunday Show With Jonathan Capehart

Examining the high stakes surrounding key issues affecting communities across America, cutting through the political noise with compelling, in-depth and unique...

Biden-europa , House-republicans , President , Government , Corner , Social-security , State-of-the-union , Thing , Speech , Pearls , Tape , It

Alex Witt Reports

archives asked the justice department to refer the matter, and then to ultimately search the premises. and so the key difference is the reaction here between the two sides. that is not to say that there isn't a very serious matter here that deserves investigation. >> look, you hundreds and right on all of that, but do you think about fact that you are pointing out there, the cooperation, or the lack thereof, do you think that is being disseminated accurately and and being consumed by the american public? are people seeing it that way? >> i think the responsible news agencies are doing that, and we're doing that at the new york times, and provide the right caveats in the right nuance as we report on this matter. but, look this is a drip drip drip situation. every time we think that we maybe got to the bottom of these classified documents, there is more to learn, and now there with a court of, it and go there with the garage, and the more things keep coming out, the more revelations there are,

Matter , Reaction , Difference , Justice , People-the-department , Sides , Archives , Premises , Isn-t-a , Two , People , All

Life Liberty Levin-20220221-04:06:00

spy on? the extent of the spying, the trump campaign, the trump cans -- transition and surrogates, exhibit one, this is all public, two separate sources with links to counter intelligence community confirmed that fbi sought and was granted a tur this is spying in october. to examine the activity of u.s. persons, in donald trump's campaign, with ties to russia. going on. this is not my. they say first fisa request named trump was denied in june, denied by the court of, but second was granted in october, after evidence was presented of a server possibly related to trump campaign and alleged

Spying , Trump-campaign , Transition , Extent , Cans , Intelligence , Fbi , Public , Links , Community , Tur , Exhibit-one