Stay updated with breaking news from English maybe. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
made followed by executive action on the part of the administration. must bring in bill bennett fox news contributor former education secretary with the reagan administration. were limited on time here but i want to get your thoughts on the wall street journal is -- migrants are settling in cities and entering public schools around the u.s. adding financial logistical strains and communities rather have arrived in large numbers. districts are faced with a need for additional teachers and staff who can dig english and space for new students often while waiting for promise of omental federal or state funding in many cases not even able to obtain it. what is it like for the schools? >> well it's a billion dollar price tag and probably a million students who don't know win to show up differently -- will often don't speak english, they have never -- the schools were having difficulty anyway than covid, poor performance. one thing that happen in the
impact on cities with crime, looking at the schools and hotels that we have had taken over to house these migrants who have been hastily thrown into these cities. all over the country. you look at the impact on education we are about to have bill bennett on that issue. there are kids overflowing into the schools that don't speak english. schools that have horrible report cards following covid. massive implications here. the question, right now, what this really does, is it too little also so late? >> this interview with the statements of the president that the patients are wearing thin and you ignored the three and a half years but my senses, sa sandra, that jon tester and montana and in wisconsin, kate seen pennsylvania and rosen in
morning. we'll get right to the video. this was 1:30 am pacific time here in holcomb by each -- east of sundown -- really from all around the planet crossing illegally with no resistance whatsoever. they walk on the mexican military underside of the border then came through a gap in the border wall here. the game from all the place. mostly single -- and africa at the time there was only one single border patrol agent on hand trying to corral all of these illegal immigrants. some of them were from countries that are considered as special -- special interest countries, some of them didn't know where they were going. they were asking us where they were and where is border patrol. we had a chance to talk to some of them, take a lesson. where are you guys from, what country or? >> mauritania. >> from africa? >> yes. >> why did you guys come to the united states? what country? >> nepal. >> are all of you from nepal? >> yeah. >> know english. >> what country? >> vietnam.
past. so he's continuing to attract attention and divide opinion right across the country.— attention and divide opinion right across the country. mike, one of his to to across the country. mike, one of his go to sound — across the country. mike, one of his go to sound bites _ across the country. mike, one of his go to sound bites on _ across the country. mike, one of his go to sound bites on migration - across the country. mike, one of his go to sound bites on migration is i go to sound bites on migration is that there are streets around the country, in oldham, perhaps burnley where people don't speak english. some parts of our country where he says there's not enough assimilation. is he right? i says there's not enough assimilation. is he right? i think it's an old _ assimilation. is he right? i think it's an old stereotype. _ assimilation. is he right? i think it's an old stereotype. look, - assimilation. is he right? i think it's an old stereotype. look, in. it's an old stereotype. look, in lancashire, _ it's an old stereotype. look, in lancashire, we are no strangers to migration, — lancashire, we are no strangers to migration, it's not a new thing. i think— migration, it's not a new thing. i think particularly around the brexit campaign, — think particularly around the brexit campaign, it was quite high up people's— campaign, it was quite high up people's agenda when you talk about what issues matter to them. at the minute, _ what issues matter to them. at the minute, it— what issues matter to them. at the minute, it doesn't seem to be that high _ minute, it doesn't seem to be that high there — minute, it doesn't seem to be that high. there is an awful lot of community cohesion around the northwest. there is the odd issue, but talking — northwest. there is the odd issue, but talking about no go zones and things— but talking about no go zones and things like that, it'sjust not something that you do see. and i
have to come out a bit more forcefull . a ., ., , , forcefully. vicki young, a deputy olitical forcefully. vicki young, a deputy political editor. _ forcefully. vicki young, a deputy political editor. if _ forcefully. vicki young, a deputy political editor. if you _ forcefully. vicki young, a deputy political editor. if you want i forcefully. vicki young, a deputy political editor. if you want to i political editor. if you want to follow this debate blow by blow, you can scan a qr code on the screen next to me. our correspondence art delivering regular updates and analysis, and of course, there will be plenty more throughout the evening here on the bbc news channel. studio: thank you very much indeed. time now for the sport. hello from the bbc sport centre. it's been revealed that manchester city are planning to launch legal action against the premier league over the organisations commercial rules. bbc sport understands an arbitration hearing regarding the legality of the league's transaction rules has been set for next week. those rules determine whether sponsorship deals are financially �*fair�*. the times newspaper is reporting that it has seen a legal document in which city claim they are victims of "discrimination", and that the amended rules were approved by rivals to "stifle" their success on the pitch. last month city became the first club in english football history
the proceeding in defamation cases, once something has already been proven false, you can have it injunction against repeating the same statement but to try to do this because of politics or the campaign. >> i don't think that that's a great argument. they should really focus on exactly what it just said the proceedings are done. most gag orders expired the moment that the jury is sworn in, because as soon as the jury is sworn in, then they have been ordered not to review the media. therefore, public statements can no longer affect them the same way that it would prospective jurors so most gag orders and there this gag order went on further because of the intimidation of witnesses, which would impair their ability to testify at the trial that's also done. interesting, how does this trump conduct? how does that play into the eventual sentencing is scheduled for july 11? that's not too far down the road. so what we in english recall remorse, what lawyers would call acceptance of responsibility is a factor that plays an at sentencing.
up here, very nonchalantly and crossing illegally. this someone of the hot spots in so call. they walk through the mexican military and walk through a gap in the border wall. no resistance. most of from africa and asia and special interest countries that dhs vetting on for terror concerns. there was one single border patrol agent out here trying to corral hundreds upon hundreds of people who crossed. the migrants were asking us where they were, where's america and where's border patrol? take a listen. >> >> bill: where are you guys from what country. >> mauritania. >> from africa. >> yes. >> bill: why did you guys come to the united states? what country? >> nepal. >> bill: nepal? all of from you nepal. >> yes. >> no english. >> bill: no english. what country? >> vietnam. >> bill: vietnam. what country are you from. >> mauritania. >> bill: more takennians? what country are you from? >> india. >> bill: this is america. see the red lights?
the times newspaper is reporting that it has seen a legal document in which city claim they are victims of "discrimination", and that the amended rules were approved by rivals to "stifle" their success on the pitch. last month, city became the first club in english football history to win the league title in four consecutive seasons. neither the premier league nor manchester city have responded to requests for a comment on the case. here's our sports editor dan roan. we've known for some time that the premier league faced the threat of legal action from one of its member clubs over the rules that govern so called associated party transactions or the deals that some clubs signed with companies linked to their owners. now we know it's been elevated, a threat to reality and its manchester city no less, the dominant force in the english game who are taking this action. according to the times they are arguing that these according to the times they are arguing that these rules are unlawful and anti—competitive, the discriminatory against middle eastern owners, that they are seeking damages from the league
benjamin netanyahu called it a tragic mishap. after condemnation came in, the prime minister's office insisted that the correct english translation was tragic incident. whatever translation you want to use, we've heard them use this excuse many times in april airstrikes on clearly marked vehicles belonging to the world central kitchen killed seven workers and the government called it a serious mistake. in march they released footage of a drone strike on two men that they said were carrying an rpg. it was later revealed it was a bicycle. another mistake. on christmas eve and israeli attack killed 86 palestinians. many of them women and children. a government spokesman called a
and neither side wants to appear weak. the soviet union had something like 33,000 nuclear weapons. we had something like 22,000. way too many and way too scary. [crowd cheering] [reporter speaking russian] [tim, in english] the cold war was an existential struggle over the future of world civilization. and this is what makes this moment in history so dangerous, is you have both sides completely misunderstanding both the power of their adversary and the intentions of their adversary. [dramatic music playing]