Stay updated with breaking news from In belgium. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
and we're closer to world war three. now, you take a look at what's happened in the last few days. putin is now talking about nuclear weapons for the first time, and he's talking about them all the time because ukraine is now talking about hitting russia and biden d doesn't know what the to say. wibut all of these things, i'l they're going to end up leading to irritation. i'll get the ukrainiant ths situation settled and i'll get it settled fast. it would have neveould neve happ the other thing that would have never happened is theen october 7th attack of israel would have never happened. and you know what else? som i had something else that wouldn't have happened. inflation. weg el have worst inflation maybe in the history of our country, far worse than they report is one. because when you see interest rates and when you add energy prices, look at the energy. by the way, gasoline prices are going way up again. when you add all of this in, woi i think it's the worst inflation we've ever had. and let me just say,d ou the country has become shown a failing nation.nger
verdict. and essentially what this looks like is, "a," affecting the justice system through the appropriations process. "b," through different legislation that's put on the floor. and "c," through oversight, and we're already seeing johnson and other republicans put these three ideas into play. last week house judiciary committee chairman jim jordan demanded that alvin bragg, the manhattan d.a., and another prosecutor who was on the hush money case appeared before lawmakers and testify next week. and then we also saw jim jordan fire off a letter to tom cole who's the chairman of the house appropriations committee, making a whole swath of requests as we head into the fiscal year 2025 appropriations process, which includes provisions like defunding the fbi, cutting off funding for federal -- for state prosecutors who republicans say are involved in, quote, law fare and other federal prosecutors who they accuse of being involved in those same efforts. so we're already seeing this develop up on capitol hill now.
concerns about some of the things that we've seen in the region and will continue to do so going forward. but unless you're talking to each other, you don't have the ability to prevent miscalculations and address misperceptions. so i think this is a good first step, but there's a lot more that needs to be done in terms of engaging in, in terms of moving things in the right direction. >> well, good luck on that front. it's a very, very sensitive, potentially very dangerous situation for the us military and us national security. where our time is limited. i want to get your quick thought, mr. secretary on the fbi director christopher wray, recently saying that domestic and international terrorism are some of the most consequential threats against the united states right now, what is in your view, mr. secretary, the most concerning threat against the united states right now well, i mean, there are a number of first of all protection of the homeland is my top priority and we will
concern you, though, that it could not only escalate the war between ukraine and russia but draw the u.s., the west in -- into this in a much larger way? >> it theoretically could, but it's not likely. look, the idea that russia, this juggernaut that is absolute nuclear weapons, this conventional juggernaut, you know how many troops they've lost so far? 350,000 dead or wounded, without a single american troop being engaged, by supplying the ukrainians with the weapons they need. >> david: let me ask about what vladimir putin said last night about this authorization of american weapons inside russia. he said, "the supply of high-precision weapons to ukraine for strikes on russian territory is direct participation in this war." and again talked about russia's nuclear capabilities. does that concern you? >> i've known him for over 40 years. he's concerned me for 40 years. he's not a decent man.
do you remember that moment? do you remember hearing about it? you were still in the movement at the time. yeah. what happened ? violence from this movement was so common my entire life. it was something that...we rationalised, my family rationalised, because they explicitly banned violent rhetoric on stormfront, on my dad�*s website. people could be banned for that. and breivik wasn�*t banned because he never said anything explicitly violent. hejust said everything else about this ideology that i was growing up in, and that ideology named its enemies. it said, "who shouldn�*t be here? who didn�*t belong?" muslims. breivik. . .. breivik talked about norway being flooded by muslims. all of his murders, he justified with exactly the ideology that my family and i were advocating. and yet, every time murders like this would happen, they would say, well,
executive pleaded guilty to one count of falsifying records as part of a bribery scheme. he was sentenced to one year of partial imprisonment, spending monday evenings through wednesday evenings at rikers dale but was free other days. a 30 year veteran of the new york police department. he had an article in the maritimes, i supervised new york city judgesme now. the normal order of operations is the person convicted sits down for an interview and the probation officer writes up a memo. how do they come to the conclusions and how important are those recommendations? >> it is called a presentencing investigation and report that follows from it. one thing you mentioned in the lead up is the indictments he has pending. i really don't think that should factor in at all, because he is presumed innocent. what could ultimately factor in -- >> for another person just
before i get to rubio very quickly. marjorie taylor greene who's easy to dismiss because of her outlandish rhetoric told me in a conversation outside the speaker's office that she would withhold various funds from various prosecutors and suggested that chuck schumer should intervene if he wants those funds in the new york case that convicted donald trump, and get the judge to overturn it. i mean, these things, katy, would be, again, easy to dismiss, because they're from fringe elements of the party, but unlike ten years ago, five years ago, seven years ago, the fringe elements of the party are driving the agenda. so i think that you could foresee if trump is in the white house, and republicans are in the house majority, that we're just going to be in a forget, you know, leave aside january 6th who was horrific in and of
>> because we have a responsibility here, congress has a very particular duty on to the constitution, we have the responsibility of oversight and that's what we have been engaging in, we have the responsibility to legislate an appropriate. and we talk about funding for prosecutors and alvin bragg by some estimates are early estimates he received almost $1 million of federal taxpayer funds in the last year to do what? to have politicized prosecutions a political opponent of his party? he ran on that. that was the promise of his election to --'s. >> neil: i certainly understand where you're coming from mr. speaker, but are you up and rising to the house the same way you say democrats are weapon isaac the doj to get what they wanted? ages doing it in a bigger platform, the entire house of representatives? >> it know, it is a very clear distinction between what we are doing and what they have done in weapon rising the judicial system, what we're doing it nihilism the opposite a guy hit
and now that we have left the eu we need to be pragmatic about what happens, we need to start with building the relationships and getting back the trust that has been lost and damaged between us and our european partners, we want to look at some of those side agreements and the youth mobility schemes, mutual recognition and professional qualifications... i recognition and professional qualifications. . .— recognition and professional qualifications... i will go back to the 2019 lib _ qualifications... i will go back to the 2019 lib dems _ qualifications... i will go back to the 2019 lib dems manifesto, . qualifications... i will go back to the 2019 lib dems manifesto, itj qualifications... i will go back to - the 2019 lib dems manifesto, it was very clear, and we had left... we were about to leave, stop brexit, it says, do you still want to stop brexit? in says, do you still want to stop brexit? ii' ' says, do you still want to stop brexit? ::' ' ., , ., brexit? in 2019 there was an opportunity _ brexit? in 2019 there was an opportunity still _ brexit? in 2019 there was an opportunity still to _ brexit? in 2019 there was an i opportunity still to stop brexit by democratic means. what we are saying now, we are in a different place. you don't want to overturn it? taste you don't want to overturn it? we need to you don't want to overturn it? - need to move back to a closer relationship with europe and we have a four step process and i was talking you through the steps. i want to be clear, and you can say
to go all out or go all in with four stars and rising stars. northern california's premier casino resort is the perfect place to do as much... or as little as you want. make your getaway now and cache in at cache creek casino resort.