Live Breaking News & Updates on Investigator alex haskins
Stay updated with breaking news from Investigator alex haskins. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
want to make gaza uninhabitable and do make gaza unlivable. do those play into these hearings? >> absolutely. this isn't just about whether genocide is happening. there's a question of intent and there's a question here of a risk and part of the case being put forward by south africa's these more genocidal statements from the top tier of israeli leadership. not normally one tries to hide crimes. but in this case you don't need to be an investigator, you just need to go on tiktok to see how extreme the genocidal ambition is. but then you look at the material commission conditions on the ground, that level of discretion, risk of starvation, the spread of disease, 85% of
could be would be to add to the pressure that is building all the time on israel to try to modify its behaviour. we have already heard for weeks now the americans, israel's chief international backer, asking, pleading with the israelis to go about things in gaza differently. so far, there is little sign that the israelis have heeded those please. so, another one coming from the international, from the un's top legal body, would add to that sense of pressure. legal body, would add to that sense of pressure-— of pressure. paul, thank you very much for now. _ the 15 the isjudges now are presiding there. we can see the president of there. we can see the president of the international court ofjustice, joanne donahue, she is making her opening comments. we will of course keep across what is happening there and update you in the coming hours. here in the uk, a former post office investigator — whose work led to criminal proceedings against sub—postmasters — is to face questions at the public
to get to the truth of why so many sub—postmasters were wrongly prosecuted — today a former investigator will be questioned. he was part of the team whose work led to a number of criminal actions. the deteriorating performance of the nhs — bbc news finds that almost all key health service targets are being missed, putting lives at risk. good morning. the super subs save liverpool in their league cup semifinal. it is only the first leg against fulham. the liverpool boss says he won't michael beer booking any hotels for wembleyjust michael beer booking any hotels for wembley just yet. she's the army medic who keeps making history — we'll be talking to captain preet chandi after her latest world record challenge to the south pole. not quite as cold as the south pole but the cold weather is staying with us into next week. for today, a lot more cloud. not as frosty first thing.
behind closed doors what's the difference? >> >> so, for one, there is a huge committee practice and as an investigator, you have to be able to go behind closed doors to be able to get all the information. did you go in one hour rounds where each side republicans and democrats get to ask their questions for an hour. that's how you get all the substantive information. committee hearings are not designed in 5 minutes investigating and getting that information. you have to have a transcript. you have to have all the underlying documents. otherwise, as we have seen in many hearings, people can sometimes, you know, just get away with whatever they want in a everything ha. because there is not enough to time to dig substantively into issues. >> brian: hopefully a judge understands that he is one way or the other of contempt charges. let's talk about what kind of tax trouble is he. in he is accused of and arraigned filing a false return, that's a felony on two counts goh. tax evasion two counts.
The featured speaker at Monday's Democratic luncheon will be Sheriff Kenny Furlong, the 26th Sheriff to serve Ormsby County/Carson City since 1861, and the 6th Sheriff of the Combined Municipality of the City/County of Carson City.
had found out _ they let all the media know that i had found out i— they let all the media know that i had found out i have _ they let all the media know that i had found out i have five - had found out i have five charges against _ had found out i have five charges against me — had found out i have five charges against me by— had found out i have five charges against me by the _ had found out i have five charges against me by the front - had found out i have five charges against me by the front page of. had found out i have five charges�* against me by the front page of a newspapen — against me by the front page of a newspaper. thal— against me by the front page of a newspaper. that is— against me by the front page of a newspaper. that is how- against me by the front page of a newspaper. that is how i - against me by the front page of a newspaper. that is how i find - against me by the front page of a newspaper. that is how i find out for that _ newspaper. that is how i find out for that that _ newspaper. that is how i find out for that that was _ newspaper. that is how i find out for that that was horrendous. - newspaper. that is how i find out| for that that was horrendous. you newspaper. that is how i find out. for that that was horrendous. you go from being _ for that that was horrendous. you go from being knowing _ for that that was horrendous. you go from being knowing where _ for that that was horrendous. you go from being knowing where your - for that that was horrendous. you go from being knowing where your life i from being knowing where your life is an enjoying — from being knowing where your life is an enjoying life _ from being knowing where your life is an enjoying life and _ from being knowing where your life is an enjoying life and being - from being knowing where your life is an enjoying life and being part i is an enjoying life and being part of the _ is an enjoying life and being part of the community— is an enjoying life and being part of the community and _ is an enjoying life and being part| of the community and everything is an enjoying life and being part. of the community and everything to being _ of the community and everything to being an _ of the community and everything to being an outsider— of the community and everything to being an outsider for— of the community and everything to being an outsider for that _ of the community and everything to being an outsider for that year- of the community and everything to being an outsider for that year spat| being an outsider for that year spat at, being an outsider for that year spat at. you _ being an outsider for that year spat at. you are — being an outsider for that year spat at, you are called _ being an outsider for that year spat at, you are called names, - being an outsider for that year spat at, you are called names, you - being an outsider for that year spat at, you are called names, you justl at, you are called names, you just can't _ at, you are called names, you just can't describe _ at, you are called names, you just can't describe it. _ at, you are called names, you just can't describe it. i— at, you are called names, you just can't describe it. i had _ at, you are called names, you just can't describe it. i had my- can't describe it. i had my investigator, _ can't describe it. i had my investigator, because - can't describe it. i had my investigator, because my| can't describe it. i had my- investigator, because my daughter worked _ investigator, because my daughter worked for— investigator, because my daughter worked for me _ investigator, because my daughter worked for me he _ investigator, because my daughter worked for me he banned - investigator, because my daughter worked for me he banned me - investigator, because my daughter worked for me he banned me from having _ worked for me he banned me from having any— worked for me he banned me from having any communication - worked for me he banned me from having any communication with - worked for me he banned me fromj having any communication with my daughter— having any communication with my daughter for— having any communication with my daughter for 18 _ having any communication with my daughter for 18 months. _ having any communication with my daughter for 18 months. with - having any communication with my daughter for 18 months. with your| daughter for 18 months. with your daughter? — daughter for 18 months. with your daughter? i— daughter for 18 months. with your daughter? i couldn't _ daughter for 18 months. with your daughter? i couldn't even - daughter for 18 months. with your daughter? i couldn't even send i daughter for 18 months. with youri daughter? i couldn't even send her daughter for 18 months. with your. daughter? i couldn't even send her a christmas _ daughter? i couldn't even send her a christmas card _ daughter? i couldn't even send her a christmas card. it _ daughter? i couldn't even send her a christmas card. it was _ daughter? i couldn't even send her a christmas card. it was like _ daughter? i couldn't even send her a christmas card. it was like a - christmas card. it was like a lroulder_ christmas card. it was like a boulder coming _ christmas card. it was like a boulder coming into - christmas card. it was like a boulder coming into my- christmas card. it was like a i boulder coming into my home christmas card. it was like a - boulder coming into my home and christmas card. it was like a _ boulder coming into my home and just destroying _ boulder coming into my home and just destroying my— boulder coming into my home and just destroying my house. _ boulder coming into my home and just destroying my house. destroying - boulder coming into my home and just destroying my house. destroying my. destroying my house. destroying my family _ destroying my house. destroying my famil . ~ destroying my house. destroying my famil. ,, ., destroying my house. destroying my famil . ,, ., family. mark, i read somewhere because you've _ family. mark, i read somewhere because you've done _ family. mark, i read somewhere because you've done several- because you've done several interviews but for a while or a long while you blamed yourself, didn't you? while you blamed yourself, didn't ou? , , , ., . you? yes because i thought at the time if that _ you? yes because i thought at the time if that solicitor, _ you? yes because i thought at the time if that solicitor, i _ you? yes because i thought at the time if that solicitor, i think -
and this _ probably not. thank you. and this is _ probably not. thank you. and this is the _ probably not. thank you. and this is the case - probably not. thank you. | and this is the case where probably not. thank you. - and this is the case where you probably not. thank you. _ and this is the case where you were the investigator in the case? as i was trying to explain, there was also a defence expert, and that would have been part of the discussion within the court as well, whatever the defence expert said. it might be something that was accepted, but i think your evidence you accept it would not be appropriate for the post office to make that condition in the first place. certainly with today's knowledge, no. �* . certainly with today's knowledge, no, i ., ., , ., certainly with today's knowledge, no. �* ., ., ~ ., i. no. but what about the knowledge you had then? that — no. but what about the knowledge you had then? that was _ no. but what about the knowledge you had then? that was 2011. _ no. but what about the knowledge you had then? that was 2011. as _ no. but what about the knowledge you had then? that was 2011. as | - no. but what about the knowledge you had then? that was 2011. as i said - had then? that was 2011. as i said there, had then? that was 2011. as i said there. that — had then? that was 2011. as i said there. that is _ had then? that was 2011. as i said there, that is the _ had then? that was 2011. as i said there, that is the way _ had then? that was 2011. as i said there, that is the way some - had then? that was 2011. as i said there, that is the way some of- had then? that was 2011. as i said there, that is the way some of the j there, that is the way some of the cases were going, because of... whether the instructions come from the solicitors, because that's two. who's idea was it? we have seen it now in two cases. we have it in no thomas's case and missmchugh's case.
BBC News Now vimarsana.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from vimarsana.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
sefton and anne nield. they were post office clerks in liverpool and they were convicted of false accounting and given custodial prison sentences, suspended. now, the reason why they were focusing on these cases is because stephen bradshaw was the investigator of these two women's involvement in what was alleged to be false accounting. they were convicted of false accounting. and their convictions were overturned in 2021. and at the court of appeal, the post office accepted that the prosecution of these two women had been unfair and an affront to justice, and the post office admitted that they had failed to carry out a proper investigation, and that evidence
reasons for the discrepancy were simply relevant? not at all. they sa if simply relevant? not at all. they say if there _ simply relevant? not at all. they say if there is _ simply relevant? not at all. they say if there is losses, _ simply relevant? not at all. they say if there is losses, but - simply relevant? not at all. they say if there is losses, but it's i say if there is losses, but it's very difficult to try and find the losses if they make the accounts and paperwork that correct, as shown by the audits on the day, that was £550 surplus. the audits on the day, that was £550 surlus. ., ., , , . , ., ., surplus. one of the aspects, one of the thin . s surplus. one of the aspects, one of the things people — surplus. one of the aspects, one of the things people think— surplus. one of the aspects, one of the things people think about i surplus. one of the aspects, one of the things people think about when j the things people think about when they are deciding whether to charge somebody with a criminal offence, is the public interest in pursuing that charge. do you think the reliability of the underlying system that causes a discrepancy of a significant value, do you think that is important for considering the public interest in pursuing a criminal allegation? {lit interest in pursuing a criminal allegation?— interest in pursuing a criminal alleration? , , . , allegation? of the public interest in this case _ allegation? of the public interest in this case was _ allegation? of the public interest in this case was a _ allegation? of the public interest in this case was a charity - allegation? of the public interest in this case was a charity did i allegation? of the public interest in this case was a charity did not| in this case was a charity did not get credited with nearly £35,000 of people's money that they had donated to it. �* , ., people's money that they had donated to it. �* people's money that they had donated toit.�* . i, to it. and you can close your eyes entirely to — to it. and you can close your eyes entirely to the _ to it. and you can close your eyes entirely to the reason _ to it. and you can close your eyes entirely to the reason for - to it. and you can close your eyes entirely to the reason for that? i entirely to the reason for that? that's their rationale, but it doesn't affect that inquiry of the charity not being credited with £35,000 over a period of time. did ou see £35,000 over a period of time. did you see any burden on yourself as the investigator to pursue those