State could no longer stand by that conviction. what happens next? how the supreme court has granted this stay? reporter: the hold on his execution will stay in place until the supreme court justices consider glossip s requests that they formally take up the case. the support needs to rule on two motions in front of it, including the state of oklahoma s declaration that it can no longer stand by this conviction. so he has a reprieve. we just do not know for how long. brian todd, appreciate it. another major story involving the court, the washington post report ins 2012, conservative judicial activist leonard leo arranged for the wife of clarence thomas to be paid tens of thousands of dollars for consults work. leo told gop pollster kellyanne conway to bill the educational project, a nonprofit group he advises. conway was to pay ginny thomas but leave her name off the paper
A look at it and see if this should go back to a lower court for a jury to take a look at the case again. brynn, thank you so much. with us now, republican member of the house of representatives, kevin mcdougal as his wife, leah, let me start with you, this temporary stay of execution from the supreme court from brett kavanaugh, it s huge, what s your response? it was incredible. we went into today thinking it was going to be our last physical good-bye together before richard was due to be moved on death watch. and that was a lot. that was us facing our last hug, our last kiss, our last touch good-bye, with the one you love, that s a whole incredible weight that i think people don t quite realize that we were facing today. and we went into the day thinking that s what we were getting ready to do. and, you know, the clock was ticking down, and that moment was coming when our visit was ending, and the warden came in,
And pulled us out to break the news to us, and we just crumbled. it truly felt like an answered prayer, really an answered prayer, that god is watching. and representative mcdougal, what s your reaction to the news today? i couldn t hardly hear your question. i just heard you say representative mcdougal. what s your reaction to the news today of the stay of execution, and what needs to happen now? i don t know, if he it doesn t sound like he can hear me. we ll work on that correction. leah, obviously i can t even imagine what you and richard are going through. what now needs to happen? obviously, the supreme court, the u.s. supreme court has an opportunity to learn about all of the reasons why it seems questionable that your husband is in prison, even, much less on
Some in some of the times are also for it.big absolutely. it s a chamber of commercehe and wall street and the border could be closed tomorrow if people didn t count on cheap labor. and who who suffers from that? the american middle class worker who gets undercut by cheap labor. and remember,wh when these people come in, there s nos audit, there s no backgroundnolr check, and they re unleashede fo on communities of lower middle claswe and poos and poor people and you re in san francisco right now, laura .au and remember, katera, , finally, i think about her every week.n she was murdered in san francisco eight years ago by a person who was deportedd fi ve y sifive times. very similar to the case in the news today. and these people are heartlessls ,are a amoral that that reafted this open borders policy. and that s wha at it is . they re really amoral people. they don t care aboutthoucts the effectit hass that has on sl people that they don t care about. it s alwayra: no, s somebody na you call them out on what they re doing. leah, big business. and the republicans alliedau
3-year-old tabloid story, arthel. arthel: is a lot to break down what you did that for us. thank you alexandria cough. stiffler president biden spend this weekend at camp david reportedly getting ready to meet with donors ahead of announcing his reelection campaign for president next week. lucas and tomlinson is on the north end of the white house with the great leah on the plans going on this weekend in there. hey lucas. quite as we just heard from alex s same time hunter biden s lawyers are meeting with the d.o.j. is father the president of the united states could be announcing his reelection bid for the white house as owner talk about any of this. i m not going to talk about what 2024 is going to look like. i m not going to talk about them from here. as a government employee federal law prohibits me from discussing campaign related topics from this podium. we will be able to address questions about 2024? i don t have anything to say about 2024.
fox as admitted to telling lies about dominion that caused damage to our company, employees, and the customers that we serve. nothing can ever make up for that. there s that piece, leah. i want to you weigh in on that, and also the damage that has been done to our democracy. so, two aspects one is i think it s slightly overstated to say fox acknowledged the lies. all fox did was acknowledge the court s finding that their statements were false, and i think that people want the kind of accountability of fox admitting that the big lie was just that, a lie, would have offered, and it s not clear that that s going to come that being said, what this lawsuit and the settlement does is gives some accountability and compensation to dominion, but dominion was just one of the entities that was harmed, entities like fox fuelling the big lie in addition to the employees of the company and, you know, the people who invest in the company, the country more
Broadly was injured, including election workers who were singled out by president trump as well as commentators. and those people, as well as our democracy more generally are not going get anything from this settlement, even though i hope that pricing in the cost of lying to a business model will deter other companies from engaging in similar behavior. i will hang my hat on that hope nick, it has not been reported if this is in the final agreement, with you the new york times reporting yesterday that dominion would only take a settlement if it included fox issuing them an apology. do you think that might be in the agreement? i m not sure if it is and it doesn t make a difference. what really matters is they ve acknowledged that they have lied and all the lies a whole series of lies found by the court in its summary judgment motion were correct that they lied, and that s the most important part. take me through leah s point, which is they haven t acknowledged they ve lied. they have they admitted what s there were lies they acknowledged what the judge
Were hoping that this would transform this would save us all, right i don t think that that happened, but for the dominion investors, they made a fortune off this, and part of the reason why is there was a fear on fox s end of punitive damages. katie mention add a moment ago a potential master looking at discovery issues, but i think there s also potential that the jury was going to award some measure of punitive damages. it s a significant message i m not quite as bullish as nick is as the impact on fox, but i think it definitely sends a message and ultimately at the end of the day, corporations do react to cost. they do react to incentives and disincentives that are placed on them and i do agree with nick that this does provide a strong disensentive for fox in the future it will have some impact. leah, i want to you take a listen to what the dominion ceo said outside fox.
Dominion has legal actions they re going to be bringing in the future as well so i don t think this is the end, and i do think it s a significant development. leah, i am following this as a journalist s that different than following it as a lawyer and legal expert. what is it that i am missing i m not sure we re really missing anything again, the most significant aspect of this settlement is just the size of the settlement and the hope that it makes lying in such a clear and brazen way expensive for fox to do in the future the settlement was two-thirds of fox s income and you would hope that that is enough to cause fox to rethink in the future a business decision where they essentially said we re worried we re going to lose viewers if we stop covering and fuelling the big lie. and now, you know, the next time they re faced with a similar decision they ll have to say, and is that worth handing over two-thirds of our net profits from a previous year that s to say nothing from the lawsuits they face from other
That had significant life changing experiences because of what happened to her personally and athletically. why is this elected official weighing? that s what many of them do. she s a professional purveyor of a narrative. it s raising money and votes and hopefully keeping control. that s what politics has become. so much is not about representing us. she accused riley of trying to get likes. i think riley was trying to get a trophy that a dude named leah stole from her in a swim meet. i think they had the exact same time but riley was entirely too biologically normal to hold the trophy for the picture. i don t know that i m anti anything but i m 100% against anyone telling me that the grass is blue and the sky is green. there isn t a difference between a man or woman or a man can decide to be a woman.