Live Breaking News & Updates on Marbury

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from Marbury on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in Marbury and stay connected to the pulse of your community

The ReidOut

get the supreme court to toss out the votes in several swing states. just so we understand him. i want to play for you one of the arguments here. because judge henderson, one of the three judges, asked whether or not the oath the president takes to insure the laws are faithfully executed applies to this president. >> i think it's paradoxical to say that his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed allows him to violate criminal laws. now, we're at the motion to dismiss stage. the government has charged the specific criminal laws. we have to assume they're true. >> my response to that i think would be to emphasis what they said in marbury. >> this gentleman also clerked

Donald-trump , Supreme-court , One , Arguments , Laws , Votes , Judges , Oath , Henderson , Swing-states , Three , Care

Trump Immunity Appeal

conduct in the later krarticlesn the acquittal which is the strongest case of double jeopardy, but if there is unrelated -- >> well, you just made a statement of he is only prosecuted for crimes while in office. and so that is why i am asking about leaving office and then thereafter being prosecuted for something different. >> the point is actually that the best reading is impeach and convicted for the prosecution. and if he were impeach and then removed from office and then concon vi convingt -- convicted for something else unrelated to office, that is under marbury. >> i want to confirm. your position is that if president trump had been convicted after his impeachment trial on incitement of insurrection and he had been

Conduct , Acquittal , Double-jeopardy , Case , Statement , Unrelated , Office , Something , Point , Crimes , Prosecution , Reading

Trump Immunity Appeal

are inherent in marbury versus madison are like delivering a seal when requested, because there is a separate statute, and the secretary of the state had two of the hats on and he was on one hand the direct agent of the president, and that could never be examinable by the courts, but on the other hand, the original statute had imposed all of the purely ministerial duties that had to do with the recordkeeping and delivering of documents and if you had a land deed that had a seal on it, and the person asked for it no, discretion at all, but the take-care clause, there is no statute that could impose on the president, a, a mandatory duty to engage, and the notion that when the president is meeting with the department of justice and enforce federal fraud statutes and that being ministerial strikes me as insupportable. >> well, i think that you are missing what i am asking. which is, i think that it is

President , Statute , Marbury , Seal , Hand , Secretary , State , Two , Agent , Hats , One , All

Trump Immunity Appeal

paradoxical to say that his constitutional duty to take care of the laws be faithfully executed allows him to violate criminal laws. now, we are at the motion to dismiss stage, the government has charged a specific criminal laws, and we have to assume that they are true. >> i mean, my response to that is to emphasize what chief justice marshall said in marbury, they cannot be examinable by courts and that includes a criminal proceeding. >> i thought that you agreed with me that we have gotten beyond marbury that official acts have been subdivided into discretionary and duty-bound or ministerial and in the ministerial or the duty-bound that at least with respect to legislative, and even legislators and judges they have

Laws , Duty , Care , Government , Response , Motion , Stage , Chief-justice-marshall , Courts , Marbury , Proceeding , Acts

Trump Immunity Appeal

merits. >> let me ask you about marbury versus madison and what is your interpretation of the progeny or the case, itself? >> so, our interpretation is more in line of judge pan and yours, in that it does not erect an unreviewable power of the presidency and sort of the prime example of that is the steel seizure case, the youngstown case, and that is president truman closing steel mills, and the court coming in to review that. we see it all of the way through to the present, and so it is hard to see any world in which the court just says, you know, we can't intervene here. we do see the judge henderson's distinction between ministerial a acts and the discretionary call, because it is something that i

Merits , Marbury , Case , Interpretation , Progeny , Steel-seizure-case , Presidency , Childs , The-youngstown-case , Line , Power , Example

Trump Immunity Appeal

of the article 2 interests -- >> the balancing of marbury and to the extent that the court is reaching policy considerations of the court those are decisively outweighed by the sort of the republic shattering consequences of subjecting chief executives in an endless cycle to prosecution once they leave office. the founders were very much against that and deeply concerned with that, and you can see it in hamilton's writings in federalists 67, 68, and 69, and you can see that in the other writings of the meaning of the constitution. >> do you think that we should -- it occurred to me. do you think that we should take any cognizance of the fact that when they wrote that george washington was the president, and albeit a very, very strong executive that congress was

Interests , Marbury , Article , Policy-considerations , Balancing , Supreme-court , Extent , 2 , Prosecution , Office , Sort , Writings

Ana Cabrera Reports

assume they are true, and -- >> that naturally -- >> but i thought you agreed with me that we have gotten beyond marbury. >> so that wasn't the exact sound bite, but that was another point that stood out to us that we heard from judge henderson, just this idea if he is trying to protect the laws, can he break laws in those actions? it just describes a little bit of the lack of common sense in the argument that we are hearing from john sour. i want to go to ken dilanian outside of the courtroom, and what is top of mind for you after listening to the arguments today? >> first of all, ana, i was struck by the fact that this hearing was much shorter than the one on the gag order in this case, which suggested that there

Wasn-t , Marbury , Point , Judge , Laws , Actions , Idea , Henderson , Sound-bite , Argument , Lack , Hearing

FOX and Friends

is he trying to go around another way? if you get the president saying don't regard supreme court decisions as law of the land, you have a new form of government, not separation of power. presidents get to nominate supreme court justices. but once they speak, that's it. 1803 decision by marshall still stands. >> steve: sure. decider of what is constitutional is, you cited marbury, u.s. supreme court, regardless of what people think or they do not like what the supreme court is saying, that is elections have consequences. >> bill: right, elections have consequences, the court is the final word. the worry is biden has been critical supreme court decisions, which is fine issue

Hunter-biden , Don-t-regard-supreme-court , Way , Saying , Decisions , Form , Law-of-the-land , Government , U-s-supreme-court , Presidents , Power , Justices

Fox Report With Jon Scott

hail is going to be a concern your time of flash flooding very strong winds to matter what the long line of storm sweeps across the region's threat is going to continue to march off to the east. other tending into tomorrow afternoon and evening or something talk about severe storm threat in the mid atlantic running up to d.c., philadelphia up towards new york. the darker red color that three out of five on the risk of severe storms means very likely put anything in the right is a two out of five. we are likely going to see severe thunderstorms, some of these once again could be tornado risk. so jon this is certainly something will be paying attention to to marbury folks and down the box weather app tracking all of this throughout the day. jon: right adam thanks very much will talk to in a minute. coming up, heads up. the asteroid the size of a three-story building is about to make its closest approach to planet earth. we will tell you when. plus his hats off to the fab four today. this is world beatles day.

Something , Line , Region , Threat , East , Hail , Storm-threat , Flash-flooding , Winds , Concern , Mid-atlantic-running-up-to-d-c- , Storm-sweeps

Symone

courts ruling. and the idea that state governments can now force people to give birth. meanwhile, democratic members of congress are sounding the alarm. but, how are they talking about this? well, they are talking about how the decision will affect americans everywhere. take a listen to democratic congresswoman alexandria ocasio-cortez on nbc's meet the press this morning. >> forcing women to carry pregnancies against their will will kill them. it will kill them. especially in the state of arkansas, where there is very little to no support for life after birth. in terms of health care, in terms of childcare and in terms of combatting poverty. this decision and this policy will kill people. no matter what's their spin and what their talking points are. and that is with the data shows. and that is with the statistics show. >> nbc's marbury is outside the supreme court, where supporters of abortion rights and some

People , Landmark-decision , Members , Idea , Congress , Birth , State-governments , Alarm , Courts-ruling , Women , Will , Working-americans