Stay updated with breaking news from Rudderless. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
HANOI -- A series of high-profile resignations at the top of Vietnam's political class amid an anti-corruption campaign is raising questions about the
victory for meritocracy, describing race conscious admissions policies, that he himself benefited from, as rudderless, race based preferences designed to ensure a particular racial mix in their entering classes. well, justice ketanji brown jackson talked about that claim in her dissent, writing, those who demand that no one think about race refuse to see, much less solve for the elephant in the room, the race linked disparities that continue to impede achievement to our nation's greatest potential. the disconnect from reality that informed this decision will have consequences far beyond the reaches of a college campus. the new york times is already siding royal lawyers, diversity experts, and political activists across the spectrum, warning that, quote, the ruling will discourage corporations from putting in place ambitious diversity policies in hiring and promotion, or prompting them to rein in existing policies by encouraging lawsuits under the existing
the second they accepted the application to the second they accepted or rejected it, race was used in their decisions. the court says harvard's admission process relies on a stereo type that, quote, a black student can usually bring something that a white person cannot offer. justice clarence thomas wrote this. the court sees the university's policies for what they are. rudderless, race-based preferences designed to ensure a particular racial mix in their entering classes. those policies fly in the face of our color blind constitution and our nation's equality ideal. the court found that harvard, for the last decade, created the same exact racial mix of every single freshman class. so how did these harvard officials decide that this was going to be the racial mix of every single harvard freshman class year after year after year? well, it wasn't based solely on
party. more specifically, the house democrats, not the house republicans. >> for years we've watched as democrats in congress spent your hard-earned tax dollars, like the dollars were imaginary. >> you have to be worried about what it means to have a weak, rudderless president who cannot stand up to out of control spending. >> by the way, have the democrats stopped spending? no! >> sometimes it's stated more as an obvious shared premise than a claim or an accusation that this is all democrats. what's funny is we talk about how american politics have changed, and lately it has, i bet you've noticed in the last six years or so. but this has not. from the day of newt gingrich to now kevin mccarthy, you have clashes over spending debts and the debt ceiling, and they're against this backdrop where this is a one-note thing. it's the idea that the republicans are the lower spending more fiscally conservative party. is that true?
she is such a believer. in her own perfect view of the way we should go, i i kinda feel like it's the flip side of the jeremy corbyn coin. "they know better than we do what's good for us. _ "and don't let the facts get in the way." - she would say you've signed up to the anti—growth coalition. she would, and these i are very good rhetorical, you know, build back better. and these three—word rhymes that allow them to sayjust get it done or get brexit done, - whatever it was. she is hoping that it sticks and she can distract us- with this kind - of empty rhetoric. the reality is, i think- the people of britain really need to ask themselves what's going on. - we had a negligent prime . minister in cameron who let the referendum happen, - thinking he could sail through. we had a rudderless. prime minister in may, a narcissistic and vacuous i prime minister injohnson, and now this ideologue. i think the people of this country... | it's interesting, the polls.
voting for democrats. but also, i would say, president biden not only taking heat from the left, moderates also waffling as well, some of them running away from him, on the campaign trail when he comes to their states. this is emblematic of a larger issue among democrats who just don't see this level of public disunity among republicans. they do not marginalize or isolate their most fringe members, most often, they sort of stay in line, but we do see often this very public dissension among democrats. >> look at some of these headlines real quick and i will let you respond. rudderless, aimless, and hopeless, that is from a member of congress. there is no fight, what you want to see is the president out there swinging. another member of congress, and there is a leadership vacuum right now and he is not filling it. >> i think the white house is frustrated because they feel like they have accomplished a lot.
i'd say you can say i was relaxed and conference jewish people. i will save a life today wherever in the world if youan wish to do is to feed the hungry for the widows and orphans. ess his pe elavilop please please go on lie now and say i will to israel it's time for our seen and unseen segment. we expose the stories behind the headlines that we turn to fox news contributor raymond arroyo. all right, raymond, if that recent cnn report is believed, the leading democrats are now fed up with biden calling him what , rudderless, aimless, hopeless? >> well,p the gas crisis,si international blunders and inflation of sidlers,, those are the primary reasons democrats are abandoning biden. his powerful audience in recent days is living up to that rudderless, aimless,
at our phones, 2:24, notification, donald trump sends the mike pence tweet. i think we're going to get an inside view. >> another live witness who was a white house staffer who can corroborate perhaps cassidy hutchinson who may have stories of her own from what she literally saw during that day. >> thank you so much for being with us. >> thank you. rudderless, aimless and hopeless, that's what one democratic member of congress thinks of the performance inside the white house. and what actress deborah messing said on a doll with white house aides as the supreme court overturned roe versus wade, we have new cnn reporting ahead. plus, the legendary carlos santana suffering a medical emergency on stage. we will have the latest on his condition ahead. when you havave technology that's easier to control...
yourself and the rest of your famil ? . , , yourself and the rest of your famil ? .. , .,, ., yourself and the rest of your famil ? , ., ~y family? it has been devastating. my dad was very _ family? it has been devastating. my dad was very much _ family? it has been devastating. my dad was very much the _ family? it has been devastating. my dad was very much the leader - family? it has been devastating. my dad was very much the leader of. family? it has been devastating. my| dad was very much the leader of our family, it has left us rudderless. he was supporting and encouraging and caring and he was a confidant and caring and he was a confidant and friend to all of us, his wife and friend to all of us, his wife and children. his sudden loss has been dramatic and very, very destabilising.— been dramatic and very, very destabilisinu. . . , ., ., destabilising. can i ask you what ou destabilising. can i ask you what you thought _ destabilising. can i ask you what you thought of — destabilising. can i ask you what you thought of what _ destabilising. can i ask you what you thought of what the - destabilising. can i ask you what you thought of what the prime i you thought of what the prime minister said in the house of commons yesterday? i minister said in the house of commons yesterday?- minister said in the house of commons yesterday? minister said in the house of commons esterda ? ~ ., commons yesterday? i think what the prime minister _ commons yesterday? i think what the prime minister said _ commons yesterday? i think what the prime minister said just, _ commons yesterday? i think what the prime minister said just, to _ commons yesterday? i think what the prime minister saidjust, to me, - prime minister said just, to me, speaks to a continued contempt for the public. as many people have said, and as you've stated from the messages you have received, it wasn't a real apology. saying sorry doesn't really mean anything if your behaviour doesn't change and it doesn't seem to me as if his attitude changed at all. the idea that the prime minister is taking responsibility for what happened,