Live Breaking News & Updates on Adjudicated

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from Adjudicated on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in Adjudicated and stay connected to the pulse of your community

The Lead With Jake Tapper

in what's called a, in new york has sandoval hearing do, you think that it is relevant? and we had some other laura is talking about this, the letitia james case, attorney general, letitia james is saying the donald trump falsified business records and the judge ordered $355 million or whatever it was unbelievable i can't even wrap my brain around it. >> the argument would be it's it goes to credibility if he has been adjudicated as not ing nest and pay and find accordingly, that's relevant. correct i do thinkhat that one's gonna be problematic for them because it is something that's currently being contested on appeal, and it is also something that is so closely you know, paralleling this where it's a falsifying business records that it could be one of those things that they will find him more prejudicial than probative and so i think a judge probably would disallow that, but it is certainly something that i would have expected them to raid so this week, both the

Case , Columbia-university-in-new-york , A , Hearing-do , Attorney-general , Letitia-james , Laura , Sandoval , Donald-trump , Judge , Argument , Business-records

The Lead With Jake Tapper

said the other day. it needs to get done. it needs to get settled, so that the voters can settle our politics in 2024. >> this announcement comes the same day that president joe biden, gave a big speech on democracy. we know how donald trump poses a direct threat to democracy in his view. he has not weighed in on whether or not he has an opinion, of whether or not donald trump should be on the ballot in colorado , the state of maine, et cetera. do you think there would be an upside for president joe biden, to say i think that donald trump should be on the ballot? he has been adjudicated of being guilty in insurrection. would that help? that is where it is going to go anyway. you think that would be a political plus to that? >> i think not. in his heart of hearts, he

Joe-biden , Voters , Announcement , Politics , 2024 , Donald-trump , Democracy , Threat , Whether , View , Big-speech-on-democracy , Opinion

All In With Chris Hayes

these laws? we are now in a process, which is a landmark as a democracy for us, that he is not in control of how this adjudicated, that this is going to be decided by a court, with consequences for him, if, in fact, he violates those written terms of his bail. >> and two judges, i think, and he has a similar warning from judge chutkan in washington, d.c.. i'm not a lawyer but i think it eight years that we've been covering trump, but i think this idea of a different enforcer of the violation of the norm is super interesting. it remains to be seen, because arguably what he said in tucker carlson does violate a threat. there's a lot of passion and a lot of anger and hatred. now what's going to happen? to this reptilian sense of survival that he always uses to slink through, this may be the

Process , Court , Us , Democracy , Laws , Consequences , Adjudicated , Control , Landmark , Fact , Judge , Terms

The 11th Hour With Stephanie Ruhle

that you wouldn't want people to violate in a healthy democracy, breaking the rules. the issue has always been, and so what? who's going to enforce these noel roll norms, these rules, these laws? we are now in a process, which is a landmark as a democracy for us, that he is not in control of how this adjudicated, that this is going to be decided by a court, with consequences for him, if, in fact, he violates those written terms of his bail. >> and two judges, i think, and he has a similar warning from judge chutkan in washington, d. c.. i'm not a lawyer but i think it eight years that we've been covering trump, but i think this idea of a different enforcer of the violation of the norm is super interesting. it remains to be seen, because arguably what he said in tucker carlson does violate a threat.

Process , People , Democracy , Laws , Rules , Norms , Issue , Fact , Court , U-s- , Consequences , Adjudicated

The Beat With Ari Melber

defendant, who repeatedly tried to overturn and steal the election. that fact is not in doubt. whether that fact became a crime, did it go beyond talking about it, musing about it, thinking about it? did it go into criminal territory of stealing the election? that is what will ultimately be adjudicated. this is a big deal. to the fulton county court system, i can tell you this defendant is now not just so much an ex-president, although he was treated with certain legal measures that reflect that, like having his guards with him as he legally may. but he is, according to georgia, this identification number. po 1135809. that is in the court documents, which are public record for him and any other defendant, along with his $200,000 bond on which he was released. this is significant, and one of those nights where we want to make sure to reflect how it is playing out not only in our country but around the world.

Defendant , Fact , It , Election , Crime , Thinking , Doubt , Big-deal-for-america , Measures , Ex-president , Fulton-county-court-system , Territory

CNN News Central

insufficiency. take this january 2nd call to raffensperger. just find 11,780 votes. you owe me $11,780. if i break into your house no matter my good faith belief, there are laws. >> it's more than that. the former president and rudy and all these people, they actually filed lawsuits. about 60 lawsuits. >> it's actions. >> right. and they were rejected. >> so there is a process by which you can make, you can put forward those claims and they were adjudicated. they were seen by the courts. the republican leadership of georgia said that it's not true. what else is there that you can do? >> these are actions based on claims that are false and that they know to be false. in some cases, there is actual

Votes , Insufficiency , Raffensperger , January-2nd , 11780 , 2 , 1780 , President , People , Actions , Lawsuits , House

All In With Chris Hayes

>> so harry, you're right about this in the la times. the rico law permitted willis to pack a georgia indictment with much of trump's nationwide schemes to steal the election. if that sounds amorphous because it is, as regrows critics have long argued. i do want to just sort of, i mean, this is neither here nor there insofar as on trump's already facing federal charges for this the don't implicate rico at all. but in this case, there is some part of me, is this constitutional? doing a little bit of research on scotus, it does seem like maybe it attenuate some of the constitutional protections that one would want. it may be at the edges criminalizes membership in an organization. it does seem that there might be some things that are constitutionally daisy. >> and a lot of people have had at squeamishness. but that has been adjudicated in fountain be fine, whether or not it's for mafia. but when you burrow down a little bit georgia law. i was also interested to jurors

Donald-trump , Indictment , Election , Georgia , Rico-law , Much , Schemes , Los-angeles-times , Critics , Regrows , Georgia-case , Part

All In With Chris Hayes

for this the don't implicate rico at all. but in this case, there is some part of me, is this constitutional? doing a little bit of research on scotus, it does seem like maybe it attenuate some of the constitutional protections that one would want. it may be at the edges criminalizes membership in an organization. it does seem that there might be some things that are constitutionally daisy. >> and a lot of people have had at squeamishness. but that has been adjudicated in fountain be fine, whether or not it's for mafia. but when you burrow down a little bit georgia law. i was also interested to jurors balk at these charges in georgia because they do seem kind of vaporous. the short answer seems to be now. they find them just fine. in terms of the law, stick with me, it's not that complicated, but it's pretty open-ended. what the charge here is, is that they conspired so the agreed to do something unlawful and commit an overt act, one of those hundred and 61. what was the unlawful thing?

Things , People , Georgia-case , Bit , Part , Lot , Organization , Some , Adjudicated , Fine , Supreme-court , Membership

All In With Chris Hayes

president, the constitution says you have to be 30 51. if the procedure is a little different in different states, but a citizen can go to court and say this person is not qualified. and the court will hold an evidentiary hearing, look at the evidence, and make that determination. also, a secretary of state, the chief election officer in a state, can make that determination themselves. they can say, you know, again, this person is 32 years old, they can't be president. we will take them off the ballot. the same thing applies here, even if the stakes seem a lot higher, it is really the same kind of qualification from the constitution. >>, crew 4 whom you, eric has written that section three's historical application made clear that a criminal charge or conviction is not necessary for the judge to disqualify. it it can be adjudicated for civil lawsuits and with respect rip -- the disqualification clause can be enforced by, as you, said

President , Constitution , Court , Person , States , Procedure , Citizen , 51 , 30 , Hearing , Evidence , State

CNN Primetime

facts in the indictment, i am not sure a jury will quick the president on conspiracy charges. i look at that differently. that's my honest assessment of the cases as i see it. >> i can appreciate the idea of not wanting to try this case in the court of public opinion. you know the merit of having this adjudicated before the jury, having the parameters of a judge set the actual pace, the tone, the evidentiary burdens, all these things, and yet we know that the former president is attempting to, in many ways, try this case or present the evidence in a court of public opinion. obviously, he is running for re-election. he knows the consequences of this. what do you make of the timing here? because i don't know if you realize this, but the special counsel team actually cited your case in their briefing in support of their trial date of january 2nd because they say, look, that was a rocket docket sort of case. it can be done in a shorter window than others maybe believe. what do you make of the tlienl that jack smith is laying out

Case , President , Idea , Charges , Indictment , Facts , Cases , Jury , Court-of-public-opinion , Conspiracy , Assessment , Things