Inside iran, towards facilities, we saw the killing of scientists, we saw the killing of scientists, we saw targeting radar posts, we saw all of this before, and this did not require retaliation from iran to attack israel. so, we see two back attack israel. so, we see two back at square one, the long standing game between israel and iran with the shadow wars. i5 game between israel and iran with the shadow wars. is it game between israel and iran with the shadow wars. the shadow wars. is it your assumption the shadow wars. is it your assumption that the shadow wars. is it your assumption that this - the shadow wars. is it your assumption that this is - the shadow wars. is it your assumption that this is the j the shadow wars. is it your - assumption that this is the end of it, in theory, it could be an opening salvo from israel and then they could do more, but you are tempted to say that this might draw a line under it? a line under it? what we can see from all parties, a line under it? what we can see from all parties, after a line under it? what we can see from all parties, after this, - a line under it? what we can see from all parties, after this, that l from all parties, after this, that this might be returning back to the shadow wars and we might not see the tit for tat, unprecedented attack
Iran, do you mean? one this morning iran, do you mean? one this morning iwas iran, do you mean? one this morning iwasjust iran, do you mean? one this morning i wasjust asking iran, do you mean? one this morning i wasjust asking you iran, do you mean? one this morning i wasjust asking you what - iran, do you mean? one this morning i wasjust asking you what you - i was just asking you what you thought of the method of the attack, suggested that somehow drones were used by the israel is, although not confirmed, what do you think of that? i confirmed, what do you think of that? 4 ., , that? i think the method is interesting, that? i think the method is interesting, it that? i think the method is interesting, it is that? i think the method is | interesting, it is calculated, appears to have targeted very specifically. it is not something that the. they have done this before, in syria, for example, they have attacked targets in syria previously so this is not different from what israel has done before, regarding iranian targets in the middle east. regarding iranian targets in the middle east. ., ,, , l, , l regarding iranian targets in the middle east. ., ,, , l l, middle east. thank you very much for “oinini us.
Crowd to get his take on this trial, to get his take on the judge, if he chooses to say something or on the process that s going around. we already have this hearing scheduled for next week about whether he s violated the gag order. saturday may be the first test of how far he s willing to push that. clearly he does seem to want to provoke the judge, and i think that that s you know, it will be interesting to see how much he can, you know, how far he can push it without getting in trouble. and that hearing, joyce, we told you a little bit about this before, but this will test whether or not he wants to live up to his what he said he wants to do, which is to get on the stand, which is dicey for any defendant, but to say that he was going to do it, well, now what we ve heard from the prosecutors is they plan to bring up what happened in these previous cases, and the cases where he s lost significant judgments so that he could be cross examined on that. the judge has to make that
Target in the next couple of months. and what that said is that the very difficult decisions that we took when inflation was over 11% have borne fruit, and we now need to stick with that approach which is clearly working. but mobile, broadband prices are going up, living costs, housing, that s going up as well. it s still quite tough for people. it is very tough. and we have been through a very tough period. but when it comes to living standards, 18 months ago, the obr said we would have the biggest decline in living standards for half a century, actually, they have gone up and they are now saying we will return to pre pandemic living standards two years earlier than they thought. so what we see is overall a picture that is much more positive than before, but we need to be sensible, cautious, prudent on the approach we take going forward. sensible, cautious and prudent. we have been hearing a lot from the person who appointed you chancellor, liz truss,
Calls. but because they captured the data, they were able to call them back on hard lines and say, did you call the police so they worked are rounded but the question is, what happened to multiple 911 systems at the same time across the country. now, one thing that we ve learned this morning is that the same provider, the same technical company, provides 911 service for las vegas metro and south dakota so one logical question, where are they doing a systems update overnight to correct some of the glitches from before, did the system crash? it s exactly what we saw with at and t going back a couple of months where it was an internal thing or two, as we ve seen, the warnings from dhs, as we saw an ad lavanderia is reporting yesterday about russian hacking into a texas water system command and control of critical systems has been under attack by hostile foreign powers. now that s a giant leap and they have a lot of sorting out to do, going
Defense and prosecution have an opportunity to see the jurors, see their questions, make this determination. the judge in this case is going to have to get a better handle. when you have jurors who are unmasked, identities are being disclosed, this is something the judge will probably have to address. that is not the typical court reporter sketch we see. that is unfortunate. it is not the same as before, but it is pretty good. his hair looks good. not too much to add. if i were president trump s team, i would take him someplace tonight to shake it off. he says it is freezing, it is a
Shld help putin to win murkski. that s amazing. that s russian state telesiin fa, ever since marjoe taylor greene arted speaking t against helping you cre russian state television t geenough oher look at all that. n t ju listen to us saying this. i mean, listen to what former republica congressman ken buck told me moscow, marjorie is focused now on this ukraine issue an getting are talking points from thkremlin and making sure that she is popular and she is tting a lot of coverage let s , marjorie, he calls that the nickname took on a life of itown d eene does have, does share frankly, a lot of putin s views on ukraine. take for instance, this tweet where she accuses the ukrainians are being nazis well, you ve certainly heard that before, right? on russian state tv be u-shaped was a flagrantly brutal provocation
This before, but i guess we haven t seen a cabinet secretary and peach. yeah, we have 100 years. one long. so my first impeachment, which is a little i mean, it wasn t as exciting as everyone told me will be three hours wasn t much going on there. wasn t much going on, no members were bored. i spoke with senator chris murphy after we said that this this is his third time. it won t be making it to his memoir, which is fair enough. all people did was signed an oath book and there was minimal debate but really, i mean, this was what majority leader chuck schumer had told us all along they were going to dismiss these articles. they do not believe they rise to the level of high crimes and misdemeanors that is required under the constitution for impeachment. and you re seeing but republicans came out, especially senator josh hawley and said that this is going to set precedent and republican majority in the senate if they again have event where they decide to impeach a cabinet official or a president in that case they will look to this precedent once again. yeah. catherine, i mean, i kind of wonder what the white house was
One of the state representatives that was part of the debate yesterday, a republican, talked about how, you know, pregnancies don t have to be picture perfect. meaning, you know what? suggesting that it s okay if pregnancies come about by rape or incest. they don t need to be picture perfect in order for a woman to need to have that child. my god. just the hypocrisy of that, of course. they say it generally. if it comes into their own home, it happens in their own home, if their 10-year-old daughter were raped by an illegal immigrant, they d be the first to say, okay, we re going to take care of that. they d be the first. the hypocrisy is staggering. charlie sykes, jen is right. donald trump has been just absolutely terrible and destructive for the rights of women, for the rights of rape victims, for the rights of incest victims. you move it to politics, so destructive. we ve said this before, because we re really kind people and