Stay updated with breaking news from Everyone else s. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
deoliveira and walt nauta -- although i'm leaning towards deoliveira at this point -- be the voice of donald trump. if we're not going to hear donald trump speak, we have these men say what donald trump told them to do. it's pretty explicit from what we've just read from the superseding indictment. your thoughts? >> you know, i just have to say this -- this was such a strong indictment before the superseded indictment. it really was. it was very hard to read this indictment and go, what's the defense here? i think your point is exactly right, katie, and everyone else's, which is lots of questions about why now, but certainly an indicator that this is just shoring up what is already a very strong indictment, and in a context which has also been noted by many, which is a judge that has proven to lean towards trump in ways that were pretty surprising to us earlier, but also a
leave poland after a visit to eastern europe to mark the first anniversary of russia's invasion of ukraine. and you see the plane taxiing. i want to talk to you about this latest column by david ignacious. he writes in it, in the end, war is a test of wills. putin was convinced that his cold-eyed brutal resolve would outlast everyone else's, but a year on, putin's staying power begins to look questionable while zelenskyy and biden have never looked stronger. with us now to talk more about this is david ignacious, "washington post" foreign columnist and associate editor and msnbc contributor and yulia mandel, former press secretary to president zelenskyy and also an author of "the fight for our lives." david, extraordinarily well done column as everything you do, but you talk about putin and his
trespassers from your property. the democrat controlledure pass legislature just passed thated law effectively. >> they have legalized home invasion galized ho and there will likele be many more of those becausetyt starting next year, the safety act just passed in illinois will let violent felons out of n jail with no bail, actual violent felons, people who committed crimes like second degre murder e murder and arson and kidnapping. o what will happen then?ce well, i think we know because it's been tried in other placesn like new york city, where people are regularly sho arobbe beaten and robbed in public, people who could not be heldwase behind bars because democratsey decided that was mea're worried they're worried about the criminals and not worriedo about you . and once againrestate,, to restf you siloed hispanic voters into thisspecific one specific groupr concerns are totally different from everyone else's, you're missing the thread. that's not true. ns than e, that's nohispanic voters, lie other voter, every voter ofik every race, they don't like crime and violence, but it's everywhere. these groups are often the lastd
hearing what you've talked about on atheism darwinism and so forth, and i read your secular job. do you reject the idea that there is a supernatural? that there is a god? or how do you deal with that? >> do you reject that personally? god forbid i would reject that personally. there's a vast difference between being a believer and having a commitment and obeying a certain set of religious prescriptions. there's a vast terms between that and the fence fundamental rejection. no i don't reject it. i can't live with it, i admit that. >> and what is that mean. >> i'm like everyone else's, secular, individual. i like to think that i am better than i am. i like to think there are certain forms of conscience, certain impaired tenants that i
he's not thinking about the whole country. he's thinking about himself. >> it is not her job to be honest with the press. >> no, it is. that's why it was hard to watch. there was repeated falsehoods there. you can argue whether someone's rhetoric is inflammatory or tough. you can't argue about winning the vast majority of the votes in the country when you lost by three million. and, i mean, it was over and over again. that's one of the reasons why she doesn't go out very often. but this does come down to, i think, a very simple and understandable thing, which is the president always puts his own interest ahead of everyone else's, even if it's the country's. and we're going to watch this, and it is going to get worse over the next week because i think he sees this thing slipping away. >> it is interesting because you talk about that notion that the president puts his own interests first in the realm of this discussion about anti-semitism.
to the white house with obama that would like these guys are thugs they talk about gangsters and use the n word. i thought boy this is crazy. now they put their arms around kanye, obviously this is political expedience. it's not about substance. that's the key. i'm someone who does get beat up because i have my own opinion. they are what i think. i will tell you. i don't try to obey any orthodoxy. when it came to kanye, i don't know exactly what the agenda or substance was other than promoting kanye and talking about his ego and his desire to have trump as a father. >> all right. it felt to me like there was serious substance there. >> like what. name one thing. >> on family. [inaudible] hang on. absolutely he was. his own family, not to mention everyone else's, how much that has hurt him. it was deeply emotional. that's what we should be talking about in politics on welfare and business and entrepreneurship and crime. these are serious issues.
to the white house with obama that would like these guys are thugs they talk about gangsters and use the n word. i thought boy this is crazy. now they put their arms around kanye, obviously this is political expedience. it's not about substance. that's the key. i'm someone who does get beat up because i have my own opinion. they are what i think. i will tell you. i don't try to obey any orthodoxy. when it came to kanye, i don't know exactly what the agenda or substance was other than promoting kanye and talking about his ego and his desire to have trump as a father. >> all right. it felt to me like there was serious substance there. >> like what. name one thing. >> on family. [inaudible] hang on. absolutely he was. his own family, not to mention everyone else's, how much that has hurt him. it was deeply emotional. that's what we should be talking about in politics on welfare and business and entrepreneurship and crime. these are serious issues.
rick saccone, not a good candidate. >> and it's not that interesting, it's just going to be an emotional reaction or self-glorifying of the republican loser if he's a loser, but within the trump administration, is there anyone who will react to this as an adult? >> i think that remains to be seen. i think the president's voice is the one that sort of drowns out everyone else's, but the people within the white house should be reconcern very concerned by this wave. as difficult as it is for the president and the white house to get anything on its agenda done, now it's going to be that much worse with a split house if the democrats take back the house. it will be near impossible. it would ratch up talk of impeachment since it's the house that can bring articles of impeachment if it comes to that. it will be a much bigger headache than they have now, so they should be doing everything that they can to try to get a republican message, try to help
why i listen to him and millions of other people listen to him. he was right. do you think president trump is longing for his previous new york life? >> i do. the thing is i don't think he ever expected to be elected. i think he was running as a sort of a lark. it was a p.r. campaign. it was a carnival. and suddenly, much to his shock and everyone else's, he got elected. and now he's stuck. and i think that if i had to use one word to describe this first 100 days, it would be "chaos." probably the second word would be "incompetence." i think he's sort of been careening all over the place in his first 100 days, ricocheting off obstacles that he's created himself. and i think that this whole idea that he keeps saying, gosh, this is really hard. health care, this is really complicated. like who knew? i just don't think -- i don't think he had a clue. and i think one of the things that's interesting to me is how after the first 100 days and
i shot until the threat was stopped. that's why i discharged my gun eight times, hitting him five. it could have been this juror simply felt he couldn't do it based on the evidence. why? you might think it unreasonable. charles coleman may think it unreasonable. i might think it unreasonable. this juror, we also when we select jurors say, stick to your guns. in the event you have an opinion, it's different from everyone else's, you're the lone juror, i ask you on voir dire, if you're the lone juror and you have an opinion as to something, would you let someone change your mind? you're going to tell me no and i'll say, i want on you that jury. >> to your question about race, it is critically important to remember. this is a county that has a 28% african-american population and there was only one african-american juror on the jury. what that tells me is, quite frankly, folks have to show up to jury duty. that's something we can't ignore. yes, joey, you're absolutely right that that one holdout could have made a difference if it was ten african-americans and