Live Breaking News & Updates on Information wouldn t
Stay updated with breaking news from Information wouldn t. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
involving ukraine and china, both describing joe biden as the big guy with regard to payments on that. when you start with that, but then if highly credible source is partially verified or corroborated with the details they have provided, there is no excuse for why that investigation shouldn't have picked up speed instead of slowing down and what we know is that from sworn testimony of the whistleblowers, this information was never shared with the lead criminal investigators in the case. they testify four of those who agreed to felony charges backed off of that, and one having been apprised of this information wouldn't allow it to move forward and shut down any further inquiry to joe biden and the big guy, it is inexcusable. >> laura: as i document on the angle, democrats don't care, moderate republicans, never trumpers, they don't care.
he did not have any idea that the meeting was happening there but this for the first time is a suggestion that there was a meeting during the campaign. and erin, it's causing some concernation here at the white house because they thought they had turned the corner and they could focus on their agenda. that is not what is happening. again, these questions are dominating the white house. the question is, has anyone called for a full accounting of all of the meetings. sarah huckabee sanders said she did not know if anyone had asked for more meetings besides this one. >> jeff zeleny, thank you. it depends on what investigators know but everybody should have come forward and volunteered all of the meetings that they had or were a part of so this information wouldn't be coming via leaks to the press which could make it seem more sinister. "outfront," ron wyden, a member of the intelligence committee. senator, let me ask you, this meeting between donald trump jr., paul manafort and jared
they want to give victim impact statements. they want the defense's background. history all of that kind of thing. all that information wouldn't necessarily come out at the trial itself. and they can evaluate that coming up with the sentence. >> your point about being prepared? there was one trial that i lost, that i didn't verdict was against my client, that i did not anticipate. now i had to make arguments like guilty and judge goes, okay mr. aidala. why shouldn't i put your client right now? i'll tell you, martha, even though you're the big bad defense attorney you're emotionally drained. you're disappointed especially with it's not a verdict you're predicting and you know, i stumbled through it but i learned a lesson. every time no matter what i think the verdict is going to be, i'm prepared my client is going to be convicted. i have all my arguments why he should remain out on appeal and i wouldn't be surprised if people have prepared for this moment as well. >> especially since there isn't that opportunity to influence what the sentence is going to be
tampered with but yet preserves the safety issue. pilots don't like to have any box in the airplane that they can't turn off in case it's burning. maybe there's a way to have a satellite uplink for aircraft so you know where they are that has some kind of augmented fire protection mode in it that makes it impossible for somebody to defeat it who has a malicious intent in mind. that's key, if we knew where the plane was, that -- well we wouldn't be here on day 26, would we? >> hold on for a moment. we're going to get back to this mystery of flight 370 in a moment, but there's some breaking news that we're following right now out of ft. hood, texas. let's go to our pentagon correspondent barbara starr. what are you learning? >> wolf, at this hour, officials at ft. hood are telling cnn they have an active shooter on base. i've just gotten off the phone with a source who works there. this official telling me there is an active shooter right now
one, multiple times a day, briefings for the families, briefings for the media and you can completely discuss here's how we're going about this investigation even if you don't give up every single detail. >> what does it say to you, mark? you're a 777 pilot. about the focus of this investigation? >> to me it says that they're finally recognizes the fact that they believe it's now coming from the cockpit. maybe they have some more information that they haven't disvul jed as we've been told. if it's a criminal investigation, that information wouldn't be let out. we don't know who was in wbr-id="wbr6970"/> the cockpit, whether a crew member. >> why aren't they -- they're not -- they're also not ruling out mechanical failure. >> right. that's still on the table. but i will say this. when we heard from malaysian police they made it very clear that their area is the criminal side of things. they're police. they look at the criminal possibilities. however, it doesn't mean that
this weapon should have been arrested and he would have been arrested. now, the crime is carrying a weapon without a license in the district. and like i said, no one can do that. we take that very seriously in the city here. you know, we've had a lot of problems with people carrying weapons in the district of columbia, as you well know, steve, and that's something that i can tell you the d.c. police department would have been all over. i'm surprised if that information wouldn't have gotten to the police department because they definitely would look into that. >> you would imagine the reason they fired the guy who said hey, the boss' personal assist ability has got a glock, they wanted this to go away and didn't want their many donors to find out, wait a minute, media matters stands for one thing and yet they're breaking the law at the same time. is there a possibility given the fact that this news is out there right now. it sounds like media matters covered this up, that going forward the d.c. cops might have some sort of an investigation? >> you know, they could still do an investigation. the problem that you would have here, steve, is you would
Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - FOXNEWS - 20161217:17:07:00 vimarsana.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from vimarsana.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.