with 23 people killed and around 200 injured. israeli forces have repeatedly told palestinians to leave northern gaza for the south. the bbc�*s rushdi abualouf witnessed one of the air strikes while he was buying supplies for his children in the village of bani suhaila. four bombs fell around him in quick succession. he took these pictures, and says a block of about ten houses had been destroyed. rushdie told us he saw four dead bodies, and more than 100 injured people in that particular incident. it comes as hamas says the number killed in israel's bombing of gaza has now reached 11,180. it's also suspended talks on freeing the hostages seized during last month's attack on israel, saying this is because of israel's military action around gaza's largest hospital. israel says hamas has bases under the building. the us says it does not want to see firefights in hospitals in gaza. lucy williamson reports. the new map of gaza can't be trusted. safe places becoming empty spaces overnight. this was near khan younis this morning, in the south of gaza. our correspondent there heard people screaming for help under the rubble. israel has told people to move south to avoid the fighting in the north. but the search for shelter here is still a deadly gamble of daily life. samira fled south from the bombardment at the al—shifa hospital, in gaza city. translation: we thought the hospital was a safe place, but it wasn't. - if we'd stayed there another five minutes, we would've been killed. my son got injured, so i left him behind. doctors have been sending desperate messages, describing the constant bombardment and working without food, water or electricity. the hamas—run health ministry says three hospitals have shut down. in al—shifa, premature babies have been moved to a surgical unit after their incubators failed. yesterday, israel's army said it would help move them somewhere safer. we will help the babies in the paediatric department to get to a safer hospital. today, we exchanged messages with a doctor inside al—shifa, who said he was afraid all the babies in the unit would die. unfortunately today, we lost another baby yesterday in the icu — it doesn't look like an icu. it's one big open space for these babies. israel says hamas uses tunnels under hospitals like al—shifa to plan and launch attacks. but the clock is ticking louder on its military operation, as the toll on gaza's civilians grows, and negotiations continue over whether to pause the fighting to secure the release of hostages held by hamas. before the war, yael helped transport sick gazan children to hospitals in israel. her team has continued to ferry sick palestinians in from the west bank, despite growing calls here to pick a side. it's tricky because my sister's sons are there now, and my best friend's sons are there now, and i'm afraid of the soldiers — the soldiers like my kids, you know? so i'm praying for the soldiers to come back safe. and i'm praying for the gazan kids to be safe — and i think this war should stop as fast as it can. gaza is locked in a daily spiral. international concern over gazans' struggle to survive is turning irael�*s military campaign into a race against time. lucy williamson, bbc news, israel. i've been speaking to mark regev, senior adviser to the israeli prime minister and former israeli ambassador to the uk. he responded to allegations the al—shifa hospital, in gaza, is being directly targeted. you must remember that the head of the hospital was appointed by hamas, and if hamas is still controlling the hospitals, people are restricted in what they can say, they can only follow the hamas line, that's unfortunately the reality. i want clarity on that, you say you don't think so — is that a no, that hospital is not being directly targeted by israeli missiles? we don't directly target hospitals, we target hamas and hamas positions, that is our policy. but if they are operating, as you contend, from that hospital, then would you say you are directly targeting hamas within the hospital? i don't believe that's correct. i haven't been updated of exactly what's going on on the ground, but from what i've previously expensed, i know we don't target hospitals, we target hamas positions. now hamas has turned the area of the hospital into a war zone by establishing their military headquarters directly underneath the hospital — that's been proven, everyone in gaza knows that to be true... so how do you target hamas if they operate, as you say, from underneath that hospital? how do you target them directly without indirectly impacting other people, patients, doctors, medical staff in the hospital? you send in your grand forces and you're as surgical as you can be in a difficult combat situation. at the same time, there is an exit available to people who want to leave. israel has not surrounded the hospital in a way that nobody can leave, they can leave i believe through the east, and they have a safe corridor were there. and people who are patients — we've also said we're willing to take people in ambulances to help them to leave. it's a very difficult situation because, as you know, hamas has deliberately built its military infrastructure under the hospital, it's using the patients there and whole medical structure as a civilian shield, as a human shield for its military machine. so, as far as you know, have people been able to make use of that offer to leave that hospital safely, to be evacuated via ambulance that's put on by the israeli defence forces? correct, we've had people leave, and i think it was yesterday, we had 70,000 people — or 50,000 people, the day before was 70,000 people. what we've discovered is, as we are taking apart hamas's control of that part of the gaza strip, people who were kept there by force, who couldn't leave are now more than happy to leave, and they're moving out of our corridor. the civilian population, we've asked them to leave for over three weeks now, we've suggested that they leave. and most of them voted with their feet and left, they wanted to get out of the combat zone. and hamas had the opposite policy, they wanted to keep them there as human shields, forced at gunpoint to stay. and now, as their rule there is falling apart, people are free to move. tens of thousands of people have marched through central paris in a demonstration against anti—semitism. the speakers of the two houses of parliament called for a display of solidarity after a steep rise in anti—semitic actions following the october seven attacks by hamas and the israeli response. for the first time a march attended by representatives of the major parties also included the far—right�*s marine le pen. 0ur correspondent hugh schofield has the details. difficult to put a number on how many people have turned out here in central paris for this march against anti—semitism — let's just say that the big space is chockablock and they're moving off behind me now in the direction of the river, along to the senate building on the other side of town. i've spoken to many people here — it's a diverse mix, there are of course manyjews here, but many other people who are not jewish here who turned up the express their solidarity with thejewish community, and to make it clear that from their point of view, the kind of targeting ofjews as a people, as a religion in france is not something which they as good republicans can support. among jews you speak to here, there's a very sombre feeling, a feeling that things have changed in the last few weeks — a lot of people were saying to me that, yes, it's always been pretty bad, they've lived on their nerves at these moments of crisis in the middle east, but it's far worse now than it was in the past. you'll make a lot of people saying they've done things like removing their misuses from the front doors, wearing hats instead of campers when auoin to wearing hats instead of campers when going to shabbat. _ wearing hats instead of campers "1-01�*12�*1 going to shabbat. there's a real sense of anxiety among thejewish community here, and therefore a satisfaction that there's a big turnout here. another big topic here on everyone's minds is the presence of the far right here, the hard right, the nationalist right, marine le pen. all the dues i've spoken to today have set we've had problems with their party, but anyone who lends their voice to the fight against anti—tip lends their voice to the fight againstanti—tip —— lends their voice to the fight against anti—tip —— anti—semitism, as far as we're concerned, welcome. seven people have been charged by police in london following violence during protests on saturday, armistice day. we now know 145 people were arrested, the vast majority from, what the met police describe as right—wing groups. around 300,000 people also took part in a pro—palestinian march calling for a ceasefire in gaza. the home secretary, mrs braverman, has been accused of inflaming tensions before the march after she branded pro—palestinian protesters "hate marchers". in the last few hours she's tweeted about the protest... let's get more on this with bethany dawson, uk politics reporter at politico. welcome, good to have you on the programme. what do you make of this tweet from the home secretary and its content, given what she said on thursday in the newspaper in which she seemed to imply that the met was picking sides when it came to have it policed protests? so picking sides when it came to have it policed protests?— it policed protests? so this tweet and this statement _ it policed protests? so this tweet and this statement answers - it policed protests? so this tweet and this statement answers one | and this statement answers one of the really big questions at the moment, which was the relationship between the metropolitan police and rishi sunak and suella braverman in regards to this weekend. rishi sunak said he would hold the met police accountable for allowing this protest to go ahead. now sunak and bra for men, with the statement, have given their support to the police and given their thanks to the efforts of police, some of whom were injured over the weekend. but it doesn't answer the question many people are asking about the policing and management by politicians of these far right protesters — and these far right protesters — and these are the people that is described as being extremely violent and looking for confrontation during the marches. so whilst it might close one door, many questions are still going unanswered. the close one door, many questions are still going unanswered.— still going unanswered. the big . uestion still going unanswered. the big question is. — still going unanswered. the big question is, what _ still going unanswered. the big question is, what now - still going unanswered. the big question is, what now for - still going unanswered. the big question is, what now for the l still going unanswered. the big - question is, what now for the home secretary? questions raised over the past few days about whether or not she will hold onto herjob, given on thursday we also learned from downing street that they didn't authorise the article published, and asked for edits that didn't go in. yes, it's been an incredibly tumultuous week for sunak and braverman, both for different reasons. people were questioning whether the home secretary would be in post this weekend, of course she still is — again, that might be a question asked for tomorrow. but it doesn't seem like a question that's going away. she's continuing to make statements, and this of course is created a whole host of reactions notjust created a whole host of reactions not just from the created a whole host of reactions notjust from the opposition, but people within her own party, and we are seeing people saying — many members, conservative mps are really unhappy with the home secretary. and so the pressure that rishi sunak is facing right now doesn'tjust come from people that you may assume would be opposed to the home secretary for may be political reasons, but the calls are coming from inside the house now so he's got a really difficult issue on his hands. i5 got a really difficult issue on his hands. , . , ., got a really difficult issue on his hands. , ., ., ., hands. is it a case of damned if he does. damned _ hands. is it a case of damned if he does, damned if _ hands. is it a case of damned if he does, damned if he _ hands. is it a case of damned if he does, damned if he doesn't? - hands. is it a case of damned if he does, damned if he doesn't? its . does, damned if he doesn't? its issues over how weak he's looking over this issue? the issues over how weak he's looking over this issue ?_ over this issue? the conservative pa of over this issue? the conservative party of course — over this issue? the conservative party of course is _ over this issue? the conservative party of course is a _ over this issue? the conservative party of course is a broad - over this issue? the conservative party of course is a broad church | over this issue? the conservative i party of course is a broad church of political views, and suella braverman represents the more right wing of the party. and that's important for politicians, for conservative politicians that align themselves there, to have that representation on the front bench. so it's a difficult one for sunak, if he moves her away from that post — but also, if he keeps her in post, it's seen as sort of a confirmation that he approves of what she's doing, and that might not be something that pleases many people. so he's in a really difficult position, and tomorrow, as i said, may answer some questions, but we may answer some questions, but we may be here tomorrow night still asking questions of what's going on. bethany dawson, thank you. live now tojerusalem, and our correspondent paul adams. welcome to you, and you've been in a briefing in the last hour or so by the israeli military — what's the latest they've had to say? so the israeli military - what's the latest they've had to say? so they are sa in: latest they've had to say? so they are saying that — latest they've had to say? so they are saying that they've _ latest they've had to say? so they are saying that they've tried - latest they've had to say? so they are saying that they've tried to - are saying that they've tried to relieve the humanitarian situation in al shifa hospital, they tried to leave 300 l of fuel at a nearby road junction last night, they said that fuel was not collected and they believe hamas is getting in the way. hamas of course, they say are in control the hospital, and they have a main command centre underneath the hospital. so the israelis are clearly aware of a worsening humanitarian situation inside the hospital. we've all been hearing about the babies who've been taken out of incubators, people waiting to be evacuated, the israelis have said they will assist in the evacuation — it hasn't happened, again, the israelis are saying it's because hamas is meddling. there is a real battle of wills going on around al shifa hospital, and all the while you get a really mounting scent of international pressure on israel to try and do something to scale back the humanitarian, human consequences of its operation —— mounting sense. you got a desperately worded letter from the red cross talking about what it calls at unbearable human tragedy unfolding in gaza, with a completely... you have the eu security chief calling for longer humanitarian pauses, for much greater efforts to produce humanitarian aid, and also some comments of disquiet in washington about the way israel's campaign is going. we are reaching a critical moment where israel, still determined to press ahead with its goals, and al shifa hospital is definitely one of them because of what it thinks is underneath, now coming under pressure to try to stop soon. ., , coming under pressure to try to stop soon. . , , soon. paul, the reuters news agency is 'ust soon. paul, the reuters news agency is just reporting _ soon. paul, the reuters news agency isjust reporting that _ soon. paul, the reuters news agency isjust reporting that the _ soon. paul, the reuters news agency isjust reporting that the us - is just reporting that the us secretary of state, antony blinken, who is involved with all the diplomacy going on, has been speaking to qatar's prime minister to evacuate the wounded and increase the flow of humanitarian aid, and also discussing the hostage situation. tell us more about qatar's role in all this and how it could alleviate all three of those situations. ,, . ., , , could alleviate all three of those situations-— situations. qatar is trying very hard to emerge _ situations. qatar is trying very hard to emerge out _ situations. qatar is trying very hard to emerge out of- situations. qatar is trying very hard to emerge out of this - situations. qatar is trying very hard to emerge out of this as| situations. qatar is trying very l hard to emerge out of this as an honest broker. almost certainly because it's acutely conscious that it spent the last several years hosting senior members of hamas, providing money to hamas in gaza. someone at the request of the israeli government, but that's a whole other story. but it now feels the need to try and rehabilitate its image, and it sees itself as a conduit for conversations between people like the americans and others about aid and that crucial issue of hostages. because that's the other thing that's hanging over this whole situation, the fate of 239 hostages still being held somewhere in the gaza strip. the israeli government has argued all along that keeping up military pressure on hamas is the best way to secure the release of hostages, but that's an argument which i think many outside israel, andindeed which i think many outside israel, and indeed some israelis regard as questionable. and again, we are getting these calls for longer periods of calm, longer cease—fires to enable the negotiations which we keep hearing about, negotiations about hostages to bear fruit. because at the moment they just are not. i because at the moment they 'ust are not. ., ., because at the moment they 'ust are not. . ., . because at the moment they 'ust are not. ., ., ., i. ., because at the moment they 'ust are not. ., ., ., ., ., not. i want to ask you more about these claims _ not. i want to ask you more about these claims by — not. i want to ask you more about these claims by israel _ not. i want to ask you more about these claims by israel that - not. i want to ask you more about these claims by israel that hamas operates as its command centre underneath this al shifa hospital. is it even possible for us to know whether or not that is the case? it is not for the time being. it has been widely understood for probably a dozen years or so that hamas have some kind of facility or presence inside the hospital. i remember when i was there during the 2014 conflict, people were talking about it back then. and certainly the israelis let laid out their case in more detail than they'd ever done before a couple weeks ago, with graphics showing what they said were representations of the sorts of bunkers and commander controlled structures underneath al shifa hospital. and that is the reason the israeli military is outside. it's not because they want to kill the patients inside, destroy the hospital — they want to get at that hamas structure underneath. they regarded as one of the most important hamas structures, command—and—control centres, in the entire gaza strip. so they won't let it go. at some point, one assumes that this siege of the hospital will work at some point, the israelis will get in there. and we will find out whether they've been telling us the truth all along, or whether the